Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Elizabeth Mendoza said:They’d probably cause way more of a stir if they just went after Allah instead.

🤣

It is absolutely hilarious watching liberals and feminists defend a culture that stands in total opposition to everything they claim to fight for. This is where their hypocrisy really hits its peak.

Elizabeth Mendoza said:They’d probably cause way more of a stir if they just went after Allah instead.

🤣

Paul Martinez73 said:If you were to set fire to Josephine, Joseph, and Jesus right in front of the local NFL stadium, people would call it some avant-garde performance art in the spirit of Mardi Gras. But when you do that to two men and a child, it’s just straight-up prison time.
Oh sure, because the kids saw it 🤣 that’s the ultimate trump card...

When and where did this actually happen for the first time? 🤷

bluebison47 said:When and where did this actually happen for the first time? 🤷

He isn't burned out—but seriously, what kind of twisted vision did Frljić have, portraying Jesus raping a Muslim woman?
The coverage was handled with genuine enthusiasm—presented in a way that felt both cutting-edge and incredibly engaging. Why settle for anything less? ☕

Rachel Cooper3 said:He isn't burned out—but seriously, what kind of twisted vision did Frljić have, portraying Jesus raping a Muslim woman?
The coverage was handled with genuine enthusiasm—presented in a way that felt both cutting-edge and incredibly engaging. Why settle for anything less? ☕

I hadn't heard about that, but honestly, even as an atheist, I find the whole thing just... revolting. It feels offensive to everyone involved, I guess.

Rachel Cooper3 said:He isn't burned out—but seriously, what kind of twisted vision did Frljić have, portraying Jesus raping a Muslim woman?
The coverage was handled with genuine enthusiasm—presented in a way that felt both cutting-edge and incredibly engaging. Why settle for anything less? ☕

Well, you obviously watched it, so you can testify to what actually happened.
And naturally, you don't see anything problematic about portraying the burning of homosexuals—or even an adopted child—as something positive and funny.

bluebison47 said:I hadn't heard about that, but honestly, even as an atheist, I find the whole thing just... revolting. It feels offensive to everyone involved, I guess.

Honestly, neither side really bothers me—it’s just the blatant double standards that get under my skin. Why is one thing treated as perfectly normal while the other causes a massive uproar? Especially among those who seem to live for Frljić's antics.
Bauk is filing criminal charges. 🙏
Look—it’s all because of some performance at a carnival, during that time of year when people lose their minds and dress up like superheroes or animals. Honestly, what is wrong with everyone?

Matthew Young35 said:Well, you obviously watched it, so you can testify to what actually happened.
And naturally, you don't see anything problematic about portraying the burning of homosexuals—or even an adopted child—as something positive and funny.

Matthew Young35 right back at the front of the line—as per usual. ☕

I’ve officially lost my mind—so I guess I'll be watching Frljić's play. 🤣
The act itself is designed to provoke a reaction from a specific crowd—how or why that matters is secondary.

How exactly are we supposed to take this whole "burning gay couples" thing—seriously, though?
A warning to all gay and lesbian couples out there—stay inside if you know what's good for you. You're just asking for trouble out in public. 🙄

And here is a perfect example of what I’m talking about—Matthew Young35 really missed the mark on that one.

You didn't watch the play—so, quite frankly, you missed the point. The narrative runs much deeper than that, and it requires actual comprehension; the fact that he’s messing around with certain elements is completely irrelevant.
On the other hand—
This burning is serious business—it’s not some joke—and it does nothing but damage our kids and our global reputation..

I’m just going to tell you one thing—you didn't exactly nail that carnival performance. ☕

Rachel Cooper3 said:Honestly, neither side really bothers me—it’s just the blatant double standards that get under my skin. Why is one thing treated as perfectly normal while the other causes a massive uproar? Especially among those who seem to live for Frljić's antics.
Bauk is filing criminal charges. 🙏
Look—it’s all because of some performance at a carnival, during that time of year when people lose their minds and dress up like superheroes or animals. Honestly, what is wrong with everyone?

Matthew Young35 right back at the front of the line—as per usual. ☕

I’ve officially lost my mind—so I guess I'll be watching Frljić's play. 🤣
The act itself is designed to provoke a reaction from a specific crowd—how or why that matters is secondary.

How exactly are we supposed to take this whole "burning gay couples" thing—seriously, though?
A warning to all gay and lesbian couples out there—stay inside if you know what's good for you. You're just asking for trouble out in public. 🙄

And here is a perfect example of what I’m talking about—Matthew Young35 really missed the mark on that one.

You didn't watch the play—so, quite frankly, you missed the point. The narrative runs much deeper than that, and it requires actual comprehension; the fact that he’s messing around with certain elements is completely irrelevant.
On the other hand—
This burning is serious business—it’s not some joke—and it does nothing but damage our kids and our global reputation..

I’m just going to tell you one thing—you didn't exactly nail that carnival performance. ☕

Exactly.
You caught my drift perfectly.

Burning homosexuals is pure idiocy—honestly, it’s probably criminal, and people ought to be freaking out about it.

Maybe burning Jesus and Mary would be considered idiocy and a crime too, and we should probably be raising hell over that as well.

The same goes for Allah. And for Black people.

One doesn't cancel out the other. It's all just stupidity, and it's all deserving of heavy condemnation.

Honestly, I'm pretty much over this whole Coronavirus panic. Did it really have to hit Italy first just for us to be riding this wave now? Over in Istria, people are buying up those masks like crazy 🙄

Noah Roberts46 said:🤣

It is absolutely hilarious watching liberals and feminists defend a culture that stands in total opposition to everything they claim to fight for. This is where their hypocrisy really hits its peak.

So, can you actually point to a single feminist defending a culture that treats women like second-class citizens? You can't. You're guessing, right? Nowhere. It's the exact opposite. What actually happens is they call out corporations and countries that play nice with problematic places like Saudi Arabia while putting on a big show for the public about fighting for human rights. Stop talking nonsense. Liberals aren't out here defending Muslim culture either; they're defending freedom of religion—as long as people follow the laws of the country they live in. So, in this whole little drama, you're the only joke here. ☕

P.S. If it weren't for liberalism and human rights, you'd be the first one sent to Treblinka. Pretty obvious, isn't it?

Paul Martinez73 said:If you were to set fire to Josephine, Joseph, and Jesus right in front of the local NFL stadium, people would call it some avant-garde performance art in the spirit of Mardi Gras. But when you do that to two men and a child, it’s just straight-up prison time.
Oh sure, because the kids saw it 🤣 that’s the ultimate trump card...

Please. Kids have seen everything already—probably more than they should, like seeing a priest's junk. You can't shield them from every little thing. I'm with you on this one.

Matthew Young35 said:Exactly.
You caught my drift perfectly.

Politicians—both dead and living, from Bozanić to whoever else—have been getting burned for years, yet suddenly there's this massive panic? Interesting.

They completely missed the whole point of Mardi Gras—the whole pagan tradition of chasing away evil spirits and signaling the arrival of spring, rebirth, and abundance. Historically, people used it as a way to poke fun at the government without getting arrested. The authorities actually allowed it because it was easier to just identify who the troublemakers were.

Burning a gay couple with a child isn't mocking the government, nor is it driving out bad spirits. They could have used Zoran, Kolinda, or any other politician, which is how it’s actually done. This mess happens when people who don't understand the tradition try to take the lead.

I think in places like Santa Barbara, they just burn the same old "Mardi Gras" figure every year—a totally neutral character that’s been around for a century. That’s because those folks were always too afraid to actually rebel against the establishment (they’ve always been pretty much sycophants). So, they just burn the same poor soul under a different name every hundred years.

Rachel Cooper3 said:Politicians—both dead and living, from Bozanić to whoever else—have been getting burned for years, yet suddenly there's this massive panic? Interesting.

That’s because this isn't about politicians.
It’s about a minority that doesn't threaten the majority.
Politicians are the ones who actually threaten the majority.

Just imagine if you were an American in St. Louis and people were publicly burning an effigy of an American. How would that sit with you?
What kind of emotions do you think a gay person feels when they see something like this? Wouldn't they want to flee while they still have the chance?
Or consider how a child growing up in a same-sex household feels watching this unfold?

urbanhawk17 said:Honestly, I'm pretty much over this whole Coronavirus panic. Did it really have to hit Italy first just for us to be riding this wave now? Over in Istria, people are buying up those masks like crazy 🙄

Look, you have to be careful—you or I might just breeze through it and feel nothing, but if you pass it to someone elderly or sick, you could easily end up being their death sentence.🤷

Matthew Young35 said:That’s because this isn't about politicians.
It’s about a minority that doesn't threaten the majority.
Politicians are the ones who actually threaten the majority.

Just imagine if you were an American in St. Louis and people were publicly burning an effigy of an American. How would that sit with you?
What kind of emotions do you think a gay person feels when they see something like this? Wouldn't they want to flee while they still have the chance?
Or consider how a child growing up in a same-sex household feels watching this unfold?

And what about the family of the politician being burned? How should they feel?
Will that politician's kid end up being the target of bullying at school?
Plenty of questions—hardly any answers.

A gay person is a living being, just like any politician.
If something is deemed "accepted" or "normal" in this wasteland, we need to apply the same standard to everyone. You can't label one thing as normal and then criticize the other—that's nothing but hypocrisy.

Rachel Cooper3 said:And what about the family of the politician being burned? How should they feel?
Will that politician's kid end up being the target of bullying at school?
Plenty of questions—hardly any answers.

A gay person is a living being, just like any politician.
If something is deemed "accepted" or "normal" in this wasteland, we need to apply the same standard to everyone. You can't label one thing as normal and then criticize the other—that's nothing but hypocrisy.

Look, the guy chose to get into politics; nobody forced his hand. Besides, this is basically a ritualistic burning of someone representing "power," meant to show them they aren't invincible. A gay person didn't choose their orientation—they can't just quit being gay... etc.

wiredfalcon2 said:Look, the guy chose to get into politics; nobody forced his hand. Besides, this is basically a ritualistic burning of someone representing "power," meant to show them they aren't invincible. A gay person didn't choose their orientation—they can't just quit being gay... etc.

I can already see the wave of gay people getting burned all over America following that art performance in Imotski. Next thing you know, people will be dressing up like Native Americans at a wine festival and howling around bonfires. 😁

Anthony Jackson2 said:Look, you have to be careful—you or I might just breeze through it and feel nothing, but if you pass it to someone elderly or sick, you could easily end up being their death sentence.🤷

The elderly and people with underlying conditions need to watch out for the flu, too. I don't think there's a massive difference here.