CheckEmoji Community Β· the emoji forum
🏠 Home πŸ†• What's new ❓ Unanswered πŸ”₯ Popular πŸ“‘ RSS Members πŸ‘₯ 0 online log in Β· register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Suggestion: Can we make avatars larger?

Suggestion: Can we make avatars larger?

Started by Rachel Reed2 · · πŸ‘ 6 views · 98 replies

πŸ“‘ Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel Reed2Larry Walker24Anthony Jackson2Taylor Gonzalez79Kate James21Jesse Sanchez4neonfalcon16Matthew Fox4Michelle Palmer6Austin Baker86northernpilot2Henry Edwards33mellowlynx68swiftcrane96redcrane22casualwolf12Walter Kelly4Edward Murphy4wiredmarlin33coppersailor28cosmiclynx57Carl Cox3swiftbison2Alex Cook …
Alex Cook Alex Cook Active Member
157 messages
joined May 2009
#41 ·
Taylor Gonzalez79 said:50X50=2500
75X75=5625

It was under 3125 pixels before.

So, are we feeling pro-pixel-peepers here, or what? Are you guys for it or against it? β˜•
Taylor Gonzalez79 Taylor Gonzalez79 Active Member
78 messages
joined May 2008
#42 ·
Alex Cook said:So, are we feeling pro-pixel-peepers here, or what? Are you guys for it or against it? β˜•

I used to be all for it, but since nothing ever actually happens, now I'm against it. At the end of the day, it's more important to just be right, yawn... β˜•
Rachel Reed2 Rachel Reed2 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Oct 2012
#43 ·
Taylor Gonzalez79 said:50X50=2500
75X75=5625

It was under 3125 pixels before.

Well, you've officially buried him... 🀣

That 3125 figure is a negligible percentage compared to a modest 1280x1024 screen resolution of 1,310,720 pixels.
3125 is just 0.23%.
What a massive difference. If we include five posts per screen, we hit a staggering 1.15%.😲

Your math is annoying.😁
Taylor Gonzalez79 Taylor Gonzalez79 Active Member
78 messages
joined May 2008
#44 ·
Rachel Reed2 said:Well, you've officially buried him... 🀣

That 3125 figure is a negligible percentage compared to a modest 1280x1024 screen resolution of 1,310,720 pixels.
3125 is just 0.23%.
What a massive difference. If we include five posts per screen, we hit a staggering 1.15%.😲

Your math is annoying.😁

That’s my signature move. β˜•

Those 3,125 are a tiny fraction compared to the measly 1280x1024 resolutionβ€”which is only 1,310,720 pixels.
3,125 is just 0.23%.
Pff, what a massive difference. If we say there are about 5 posts per screen, we're looking at a whopping 1.15%... 😲

Numbers are such a pain in the neck. 😁

There's too much of that 0.23% going on. To actually make that work, they'd have to resort to some pretty painful cuts. And I don't think anyone's interested in that right nowβ€”especially not with the elections coming up.
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#45 ·
I guess I’ll throw my support behind this too, since I’d personally love to have an avatar that isn't so tiny. There's plenty of room for larger ones (even up to 100x100), and I doubt it would mess up the Reddit layout all that much. β˜•

Vote for bigger avatars! 😳
mellowraven22 mellowraven22 Active Member
105 messages
joined Jan 2007
#46 ·
Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.
mistypanther mistypanther Member
45 messages
joined Nov 2003
#47 ·
mellowraven22 said:Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.

Can we just bundle the signature rules into the same agreement as the avatar specs?
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#48 ·
mellowraven22 said:Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.

Nice. Now that John Doe has cleared out and headed for the hills...β˜•
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#49 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:Nice. Now that John Doe has cleared out and headed for the hills...β˜•

What does John Doe even have to do with this? I guess. Maybe. 🀷
I guess one should probably ask who actually owns all of this. πŸ™‚
Rachel Reed2 Rachel Reed2 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Oct 2012
#50 ·
mellowraven22 said:Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.

Fine. I'll hold onto the figures until we reach a decision. πŸ‘
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#51 ·
mellowraven22 said:Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.

Awesome! John Doe! You seriously just made my night, and hey, I really hope your colleagues are on the same page too!πŸ‘
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#52 ·
@Tyndal

I honestly thought you and Maria Barnes had those massive avatars, but I just took another look and it still looks like mine is stuck at a tiny 50x50 pixels to me 🀷

Are you guys actually testing out the bigger ones and they just haven't gone live yet, or what's the deal?
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#53 ·
cosmiclynx57 said:@Tyndal

I honestly thought you and Maria Barnes had those massive avatars, but I just took another look and it still looks like mine is stuck at a tiny 50x50 pixels to me 🀷

Are you guys actually testing out the bigger ones and they just haven't gone live yet, or what's the deal?

mellowraven22 has a 60x60, so maybe they're running some kind of test. 🀷
swiftcrane96 swiftcrane96 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2012
#54 ·
Takeshi Kitano is 75x75 β˜•

It doesn't mess up the look of the Reddit layout at all, and honestly, I think it’d be pretty nice if the rest of us could get that option too. πŸ™‚
Christian Taylor3 Christian Taylor3 Active Member
213 messages
joined Jul 2010
#55 ·
I guess nobody’s realized yet that all the mods and admins get bigger avatars by defaultβ€”you know, as a little perk for the jobs they actually do.

swiftcrane96 said:Takeshi Kitano is 75x75 β˜•

It doesn't mess up the look of the Reddit layout at all, and honestly, I think it’d be pretty nice if the rest of us could get that option too. πŸ™‚

http://www.reddit.com/profile.php?do=editavatar

Note: The maximum size of your custom image is 50 by 50 pixels or 9.8 KB (whichever is smaller).

Really? 😁

Look, in my very humble capacity as the self-appointed tiny defender of Reddit, I am officially declaring this a case of user discrimination and politely begging the admin team to let regular users have larger avatars too. Besides, even users on European forums aren't stuck with this 50x50 limit anymoreβ€”it's just an American thing. If my requests are ignored, the office of the tiny Reddit defender will be forced to contact Jon Stewart. 😬

All jokes aside...

mellowraven22 said:Honestly, I don't really care if we go with avatars at 75x75 or 100x100. Just gotta see where everyone else stands on it first.

Didn't signatures cause enough trouble for the server back in the day? You really think bigger avatars won't cause the exact same headaches? In other words, we're basically promising ourselves a headache. The priority should be keeping the forum functional; we don't want a repeat of those constant server crashes just to accommodate these concessions. If that happens, we're truly screwed.
Maria Barnes Maria Barnes Active Member
105 messages
joined Dec 2005
#56 ·
cosmiclynx57 said:@Tyndal

I honestly thought you and Maria Barnes had those massive avatars, but I just took another look and it still looks like mine is stuck at a tiny 50x50 pixels to me 🀷

Are you guys actually testing out the bigger ones and they just haven't gone live yet, or what's the deal?

Testing.

The problem with bigger avatars is simple: if most people pick ugly ones, the whole Reddit site just gets uglier.

Ha, you like my new avatar?😁 You want something like this? 75x75.

Sure, but only if you promise not to upload hideous stuff. And you better pressure anyone with an ugly avatar to fix it.😁
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#57 ·
Seriously, we can't let some random street corner run this forumβ€”who would even allow that? πŸ™‚

avatars stay 50x50. Thereβ€”you finally got what you wanted. β˜•
mistyhound94 mistyhound94 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jun 2012
#58 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:Seriously, we can't let some random street corner run this forumβ€”who would even allow that? πŸ™‚

avatars stay 50x50. Thereβ€”you finally got what you wanted. β˜•

Says the guy without an avatar. 🀣

@Maria Barnesβ€”are you actually joking about how hideous these avatars are? Please tell me you're kidding. 🀣
swiftcrane96 swiftcrane96 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2012
#59 ·
My avatar looks pretty decent πŸ™‚

I think Gilmour would actually look better if the size was set to 75x75 πŸ™‚

🀣 🀣
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#60 ·
mistyhound94 said:Says the guy without an avatar. 🀣

@Maria Barnesβ€”are you actually joking about how hideous these avatars are? Please tell me you're kidding. 🀣

Seriously though, does that avatar look like some kind of prank to you? 😎

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

πŸ”— Similar threads