CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › State of the healthcare system in America: Let's discuss why it's failing

State of the healthcare system in America: Let's discuss why it's failing

Started by copperfox28 · · 👁 18 views · 749 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants copperfox28Harold Ramirez49Gregory Gomez45Matthew Fox4Scott Allen10Jesse Ramirez8Sam Hughes5jadewalker13Jerry Booth10Angela WrightJason Nelson64Jeremy Kelly4Brenda Rodriguezstormyheron4wanderingcobra2shadowsurfer54Kate Collins67Jerry Lee32dustymarlin10Alexander Lewisruggedscout91Raymond Price4Brandon Newman95Chloe Gomez6 …
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#561 ·
jadesailor14 said:Are you legally required to work for the government?
At least today, you have options!

I’d actually love to work for the government right now just for the job security. Sadly, I’m not exactly the best at what I do, and taking sick leave might actually get me fired.
Unfortunately, I didn't think about stuff like this 25 years ago, and now I can't really pivot easily.😁

I won't try to lecture you since you're clearly educated and smart—you'll figure it out on your own! 😉
Just look at the job listings below.

Ugh, tell me about it. I’d jump at the chance to work a federal job too; I’m really hoping things line up for me soon.

As for taking sick leave, that’s a total luxury I can't afford right now—I've pushed through just about anything. It's not that I'm looking for an excuse to stay home, but it's hard to pull ten-hour shifts when you're running a 101-degree fever. On the flip side, if I don't show up, there's no paycheck coming in to cover the bills. Luckily, my fiancé works for the government, so at least we won't be going hungry... 😁
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#562 ·
jadesailor14 said:Honestly, I'm not sure how you're obligated
I know some people currently doing their residency or specialized training, but I haven't heard of anyone being tied down like that!

Well, if they catch you during your residency, you're basically on the hook to work for them—think twice the length of the program itself. If you quit, they technically have the right to sue you to claw back all those salaries and everything they invested in your training. Legally speaking? It’s a long shot. With a decent lawyer, you could probably fight it off... But you are signing that contract, yes. And it's not even a permanent position; they keep you on fixed-term contracts, which can make things like qualifying for a mortgage a total nightmare.
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#563 ·
jadesailor14 said:And they really lock you in for 10 years? That feels like a bit much!
But hey, knowledge is expensive, and everywhere you go, people get tied down when there's a huge investment involved.

At least you'll have the chance to make some extra cash on the side
if our Secretary's wild idea to scrap this actually happens.
I'm really not a fan of that plan!
And honestly, those on-call shifts are just awful—it's totally not right.

And yeah, they really do tie you down. You might be able to break those chains if you hire a killer lawyer or jump ship to another "firm" that's willing to buy out your contract.

Not every doctor gets the chance to run a private practice, though—especially the younger ones without a big-name reputation behind them. They're pretty much stuck.

As for those overnight shifts, it’s genuinely messed up. I've seen it firsthand, and it's just not humane. Not for the staff working, and definitely not for the patient showing up at 3 AM. It's nothing but pure adrenaline keeping those doctors going while they try to save lives on zero sleep.

I've had some pretty rough experiences myself... so I guess everything I wrote is worth considering...
bluehawk37 bluehawk37 Member
23 messages
joined Sep 2010
#564 ·
Susan Rodriguez4 said:Pure nonsense!
I refuse to let some snobby, ill-mannered, arrogant person drag me down to their level. This is about professional standards. In a doctor-patient relationship, nothing should be "earned"—neither kindness nor rudeness. It's all about basic decency and maintaining a professional distance from your personal feelings.

Who said I was a professional? 😁
Arrogance has to be earned. Patients seem to think that just showing up gives them the right.
He’ll stay arrogant and keep getting his way just because he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else. I'll prove him wrong.
That’s incorrect. After everything that happened, he needs my help, not the other way around. If he...
If they want to play ball, things will go smoothly. If not, I know exactly where the exit is.
I consider myself to be an exceptionally cultured and tolerant individual.
Whether boundaries feel too low or far too high depends entirely on who you ask.
That’s just their perspective. It doesn't bother me. 🙂
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#565 ·
Casey Palmer5 said:Ugh, honestly, I’d say it’s actually the exact opposite, at least based on my own experience (and not even as a patient)...

And yeah, I put "rude" in quotes there—totally forgot to mention that.
The thing is, that's just how patients perceive them. These doctors are constantly under fire, so they have to put up this defensive wall just to survive. Most of these high-level professors and PhD types stay tucked away behind closed doors; only certain people even get an appointment with them, which makes it harder for them to be outwardly abrasive. But let me tell you—privately? I know exactly who the real pieces of work are and who isn't.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#566 ·
Susan Rodriguez4 I can't even begin to wrap my head around what they’re saying here. Seriously, how does anyone look at this situation and think it makes any sense? It’s like we’re living in some kind of alternate reality where logic just went out the window—is that what we've become? Just accepting whatever nonsense gets pushed our way without a second thought? It's frustrating, honestly. You try to make a point, you try to point out the obvious flaws in the system, and then you get met with this level of sheer, unadulterated stupidity. It's enough to make you want to scream into a pillow. We need to be asking better questions—real questions—instead of just nodding along like everything is fine. Because it isn't fine. Not by a long shot.
Of course they’re going to tie you down for ten years. It’s a total racket. You’ve got a hospital or a medical center sponsoring your residency, right? They’re covering your salary, paying for your entire medical school tuition, and even handling your pension and health insurance contributions. And then what? After three, four, or maybe five years of them footing the bill, they expect you to stay in their grip. It's basically a gilded cage—they pay for everything upfront just to make sure they own your career for the next decade. Makes sense from their perspective, I guess, but isn't it just a way to manufacture indentured servitude under the guise of "professional development"? Honestly, what’s even the point of having that doctor around during residency? It feels like a complete waste of time—seriously, why bother? Most of the specialists are already out working at different hospitals or private practices anyway, so they aren't even physically there to actually help. It's just one more layer of useless bureaucracy when you're trying to get things done.
It’s honestly ridiculous how the system is set up—even after you finish all that grueling medical school and residency, there's this binding contract hanging over your head. Basically, you're forced to sign an agreement where you owe the hospital or university that funded your training twice the length of your actual schooling. You're essentially indentured to them! And if you decide you want some actual freedom or a better opportunity elsewhere? They come after you for every cent of the tuition plus massive penalties. How is that even remotely fair? Is this supposed to be "serving the community," or is it just a way for big healthcare systems to trap talent? It feels less like a career path and more like a debt trap designed to keep doctors on a leash. Look, let’s be real here—does anyone actually believe they have to pay back every single cent of their wages and taxes? Because I certainly don't. It’s all just a giant, circular game of musical chairs played by people who think they can control every penny we earn. Why should we be expected to play by these rigid, suffocating rules when the system itself feels like it's constantly shifting under our feet? Is it even necessary to settle every little discrepancy, or is that just more bureaucratic nonsense designed to keep us running in circles? Honestly, it feels like a massive waste of energy. For most specializations, the money just moves around in circles—it’s all just shifting from one pocket to another without actually changing anything. We’re talking about a range of $30,000 to $50,000—and honestly, let’s be real for a second—is that even enough anymore? When you look at the numbers, it feels like we're just spinning our wheels. Is anyone actually seeing that kind of money go as far as it used to? It feels like a drop in the bucket when you consider how much everything costs these days.Honestly, it’s about time we started looking at this logically—the amount should be scaling down proportionally with every single year that passes. Why wouldn't it? It just makes sense to have it decrease steadily as the years go by.
So, let me get this straight—even after all that, the doctor decides to just pull the plug on the contract early? And what happens next? They sit down with the facility and hammer out some convenient little deal for a 7 or 10-year repayment plan—no late fees, no interest, nothing—and then they just walk right out the door into private practice, pocketing $2,000 in the process? Are you kidding me? Is that really how the system works now?$1000 So, let me get this straight—we’re actually talking about monthly interest-free loans now? Are you kidding me? Is this some kind of joke or a fever dream? I mean, seriously, where does the math even work out on that? You can't just pull these things out of thin air without someone, somewhere, footing the bill. It sounds great on paper—doesn't it? It sounds like a total lifesaver when you're staring down a stack of bills—but there's always a catch. There is *always* a catch. Who is actually providing this? Some massive bank looking to lure people in with a shiny carrot before they hit them with hidden fees? Or is it some government program that’s going to evaporate the second the political wind shifts? Honestly, it feels too good to be true, which usually means it's a trap. What’s the fine print actually saying? Because I guarantee you, once you dig past the headline, there's a mountain of strings attached.
Honestly, if you ask me, these contracts are way too soft. We need much heavier penalties and significantly longer repayment terms if we actually want to see any real accountability. Why are we even settling for these weak terms? It’s ridiculous.


Are you living in some kind of parallel universe? Seriously, what are we even doing here?

Look, it’s just one piece of the puzzle—it isn't the whole damn specialization. What’s even the point? In that first phase, you basically pour your entire soul into the job, breaking every rule in the book just to satisfy this institution that—as much as they love telling me—is supposedly "providing for me." But let's be real: they aren't actually fulfilling their end of the bargain when it comes to education. Instead of getting actual training, you just end up becoming a self-taught doctor. Is that really what we're calling professional development these days? It's ridiculous.

Look, they basically have to pay back every cent of those salaries and taxes—money they didn't even actually earn. Think about the math here: they’re paying out specialist-level gross salaries when all they're actually receiving are specialist-trainee rates. So, they take that money, pay themselves for the work they did for the institution, and then what? You end up in this absurd loop where you're essentially working a job only to rack up a massive debt in the process. It’s madness. Every single paycheck that hits your account ends up being treated like a personal loan you owe back to the system. Can you even wrap your head around that level of stupidity? Imagine working your tail off just to realize you actually owe the employer money for the privilege of working there. It's completely backwards.

Look, let’s get real about the numbers here—we're talking roughly $200,000 to $350,000 just for the specialization itself. That’s the ballpark figure. And keep in mind, that price tag is specifically for the folks who aren't going under a formal contract—you know, the ones who choose to pay their own way out of pocket. But there's a massive catch that people seem to gloss over: you aren't pulling in a salary, and you aren't paying into any benefits or social security during those four grueling years. It's a massive gamble, isn't it?
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#567 ·
Casey Palmer5 said:Well, if they catch you during your residency, you're basically on the hook to work for them—think twice the length of the program itself. If you quit, they technically have the right to sue you to claw back all those salaries and everything they invested in your training. Legally speaking? It’s a long shot. With a decent lawyer, you could probably fight it off... But you are signing that contract, yes. And it's not even a permanent position; they keep you on fixed-term contracts, which can make things like qualifying for a mortgage a total nightmare.

There is no way out of that contract unless you pull some strings to get the hospital to waive the debt—which, by the way, they actually have the authority to do.
Don't bother trying to fight it through a lawyer; I’ve spoken with a former judge who now handles private litigation against doctors trying to break their contracts, and let me tell you—they lose every single time.

The reality is that most hospitals will meet you halfway by letting you pay back the principal without interest, but you still have to settle the entire remaining balance. And since there are no standardized rules for how this is calculated, the amount varies wildly from one medical center to the next.

To make matters worse, these contracts are often enforceable as judgments—at least mine was. That means the hospital doesn't even need to step foot in a courtroom to come after you; they can just go straight for your assets and property the moment you breach the agreement.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#568 ·
Look, there are actually cases where certain institutions will demand you put up your parents' house—or pretty much any property you can find—as collateral for a mortgage within a specialization contract. And let’s be real, at the moment you're signing those papers, it's usually the parents' place because you almost certainly don't own anything yourself yet.
Kyle Lee7 Kyle Lee7 Active Member
149 messages
joined Nov 2007
#569 ·
Susan Rodriguez4 said:Pure nonsense!
I refuse to let some snobby, ill-mannered, arrogant person drag me down to their level. This is about professional standards. In a doctor-patient relationship, nothing should be "earned"—neither kindness nor rudeness. It's all about basic decency and maintaining a professional distance from your personal feelings.

👍
Well said.
For those who argue there isn't much to learn here, I believe it was already mentioned in this thread that at the Department of the Treasury, they actually have coursework covering the fundamentals of physician-patient relations; it's part of the psychology curriculum, and I think there might even be an elective for it.

No one is suggesting you should bow down to a rude patient, and nobody is asking for that. But regardless of how a patient acts, a doctor shouldn't stoop to their level by being equally arrogant or aggressive in return.
Furthermore, if you prescribe medication, your role as a physician includes providing clear instructions on how to take it, the duration of treatment, the expected outcomes, potential side effects, and any drug interactions to avoid.

Those are the basics. Just as a patient MUST be briefed on every test and therapy, many of those procedures require the patient to provide informed consent.
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#570 ·
Kate Collins67 said:Look, there are actually cases where certain institutions will demand you put up your parents' house—or pretty much any property you can find—as collateral for a mortgage within a specialization contract. And let’s be real, at the moment you're signing those papers, it's usually the parents' place because you almost certainly don't own anything yourself yet.

Jesus, are you getting this from a reliable source? Because if so, that sounds absolutely insane and totally illegal.

I haven't heard of anyone ever doing that before...
Susan Rodriguez4 Susan Rodriguez4 Member
24 messages
joined Apr 2010
#571 ·
Kate Collins67 said:
Susan Rodriguez4 I can't even begin to wrap my head around what they’re saying here. Seriously, how does anyone look at this situation and think it makes any sense? It’s like we’re living in some kind of alternate reality where logic just went out the window—is that what we've become? Just accepting whatever nonsense gets pushed our way without a second thought? It's frustrating, honestly. You try to make a point, you try to point out the obvious flaws in the system, and then you get met with this level of sheer, unadulterated stupidity. It's enough to make you want to scream into a pillow. We need to be asking better questions—real questions—instead of just nodding along like everything is fine. Because it isn't fine. Not by a long shot.
Of course they’re going to tie you down for ten years. It’s a total racket. You’ve got a hospital or a medical center sponsoring your residency, right? They’re covering your salary, paying for your entire medical school tuition, and even handling your pension and health insurance contributions. And then what? After three, four, or maybe five years of them footing the bill, they expect you to stay in their grip. It's basically a gilded cage—they pay for everything upfront just to make sure they own your career for the next decade. Makes sense from their perspective, I guess, but isn't it just a way to manufacture indentured servitude under the guise of "professional development"? Honestly, what’s even the point of having that doctor around during residency? It feels like a complete waste of time—seriously, why bother? Most of the specialists are already out working at different hospitals or private practices anyway, so they aren't even physically there to actually help. It's just one more layer of useless bureaucracy when you're trying to get things done.
It’s honestly ridiculous how the system is set up—even after you finish all that grueling medical school and residency, there's this binding contract hanging over your head. Basically, you're forced to sign an agreement where you owe the hospital or university that funded your training twice the length of your actual schooling. You're essentially indentured to them! And if you decide you want some actual freedom or a better opportunity elsewhere? They come after you for every cent of the tuition plus massive penalties. How is that even remotely fair? Is this supposed to be "serving the community," or is it just a way for big healthcare systems to trap talent? It feels less like a career path and more like a debt trap designed to keep doctors on a leash. Look, let’s be real here—does anyone actually believe they have to pay back every single cent of their wages and taxes? Because I certainly don't. It’s all just a giant, circular game of musical chairs played by people who think they can control every penny we earn. Why should we be expected to play by these rigid, suffocating rules when the system itself feels like it's constantly shifting under our feet? Is it even necessary to settle every little discrepancy, or is that just more bureaucratic nonsense designed to keep us running in circles? Honestly, it feels like a massive waste of energy. For most specializations, the money just moves around in circles—it’s all just shifting from one pocket to another without actually changing anything. We’re talking about a range of $30,000 to $50,000—and honestly, let’s be real for a second—is that even enough anymore? When you look at the numbers, it feels like we're just spinning our wheels. Is anyone actually seeing that kind of money go as far as it used to? It feels like a drop in the bucket when you consider how much everything costs these days.Honestly, it’s about time we started looking at this logically—the amount should be scaling down proportionally with every single year that passes. Why wouldn't it? It just makes sense to have it decrease steadily as the years go by.
So, let me get this straight—even after all that, the doctor decides to just pull the plug on the contract early? And what happens next? They sit down with the facility and hammer out some convenient little deal for a 7 or 10-year repayment plan—no late fees, no interest, nothing—and then they just walk right out the door into private practice, pocketing $2,000 in the process? Are you kidding me? Is that really how the system works now?$1000 So, let me get this straight—we’re actually talking about monthly interest-free loans now? Are you kidding me? Is this some kind of joke or a fever dream? I mean, seriously, where does the math even work out on that? You can't just pull these things out of thin air without someone, somewhere, footing the bill. It sounds great on paper—doesn't it? It sounds like a total lifesaver when you're staring down a stack of bills—but there's always a catch. There is *always* a catch. Who is actually providing this? Some massive bank looking to lure people in with a shiny carrot before they hit them with hidden fees? Or is it some government program that’s going to evaporate the second the political wind shifts? Honestly, it feels too good to be true, which usually means it's a trap. What’s the fine print actually saying? Because I guarantee you, once you dig past the headline, there's a mountain of strings attached.
Honestly, if you ask me, these contracts are way too soft. We need much heavier penalties and significantly longer repayment terms if we actually want to see any real accountability. Why are we even settling for these weak terms? It’s ridiculous.


Are you living in some kind of parallel universe? Seriously, what are we even doing here?

Look, it’s just one piece of the puzzle—it isn't the whole damn specialization. What’s even the point? In that first phase, you basically pour your entire soul into the job, breaking every rule in the book just to satisfy this institution that—as much as they love telling me—is supposedly "providing for me." But let's be real: they aren't actually fulfilling their end of the bargain when it comes to education. Instead of getting actual training, you just end up becoming a self-taught doctor. Is that really what we're calling professional development these days? It's ridiculous.

Look, they basically have to pay back every cent of those salaries and taxes—money they didn't even actually earn. Think about the math here: they’re paying out specialist-level gross salaries when all they're actually receiving are specialist-trainee rates. So, they take that money, pay themselves for the work they did for the institution, and then what? You end up in this absurd loop where you're essentially working a job only to rack up a massive debt in the process. It’s madness. Every single paycheck that hits your account ends up being treated like a personal loan you owe back to the system. Can you even wrap your head around that level of stupidity? Imagine working your tail off just to realize you actually owe the employer money for the privilege of working there. It's completely backwards.

Look, let’s get real about the numbers here—we're talking roughly $200,000 to $350,000 just for the specialization itself. That’s the ballpark figure. And keep in mind, that price tag is specifically for the folks who aren't going under a formal contract—you know, the ones who choose to pay their own way out of pocket. But there's a massive catch that people seem to gloss over: you aren't pulling in a salary, and you aren't paying into any benefits or social security during those four grueling years. It's a massive gamble, isn't it?

1. The issue of self-taught doctors is unfortunately everywhere in the medical field. Our education system is pathetic; knowledge isn't valued during training or afterward. But that's how it is in all government agencies. Doctors are no exception here.
Likewise, doctors who get their white coats and specialize for a specific institution often feel neither gratitude nor any moral responsibility toward the entity that enabled them to train and acquire the knowledge that stays with them for life, rather than staying with the institution. That is exactly why these restrictive contracts were created.

2. Yes, you have to pay back the salary (my mistake), and in some hospitals, you even have to pay back the specialist's salary that was covering your position while you were learning.
You aren't creating debt because you aren't performing your full job. In reality, you're getting paid upfront. I wonder what your stance would be if you only started receiving a paycheck after you actually began working for the institution you specialized for? How would you survive during your training? That’s why I say the institution is feeding you. They are paying you in advance for future work. (A gross salary of $4000 comes to 432 $0.00 over 3 years).

3. Residency costs $5000 per year. Knowledge is the cheapest commodity we have.
People who "refuse" to sign a contract pay for their own training, but no one gives them a paycheck during that time; they have to find another way to earn money to eat and live. On top of that, they still have to pay for Social Security and Medicare. During that same period, for those under "contract," the institution pays out that 432 $0.00.

Therefore, a contract is the most normal way for an employer to protect themselves and their investment. You see this in every private corporation and business. The government is the only entity with enough cash to not care if they train someone only for that person to jump ship to another job. A private employer can't and won't allow that.
Look, medicine might be the only field where the government has actually adopted a market-based approach. Unfortunately, the contracts vary wildly, drafted under vague regulations and unclear criteria, which makes them a constant source of frustration and confusion. But if they are needed, they are. They just need clear criteria and parameters. But Milinović doesn't have the guts to implement that, because then the "chosen ones" wouldn't be able to dodge the contracts.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#572 ·
Susan Rodriguez4 said:1. The issue of self-taught doctors is unfortunately everywhere in the medical field. Our education system is pathetic; knowledge isn't valued during training or afterward. But that's how it is in all government agencies. Doctors are no exception here.
Likewise, doctors who get their white coats and specialize for a specific institution often feel neither gratitude nor any moral responsibility toward the entity that enabled them to train and acquire the knowledge that stays with them for life, rather than staying with the institution. That is exactly why these restrictive contracts were created.

2. Yes, you have to pay back the salary (my mistake), and in some hospitals, you even have to pay back the specialist's salary that was covering your position while you were learning.
You aren't creating debt because you aren't performing your full job. In reality, you're getting paid upfront. I wonder what your stance would be if you only started receiving a paycheck after you actually began working for the institution you specialized for? How would you survive during your training? That’s why I say the institution is feeding you. They are paying you in advance for future work. (A gross salary of $4000 comes to 432 $0.00 over 3 years).

3. Residency costs $5000 per year. Knowledge is the cheapest commodity we have.
People who "refuse" to sign a contract pay for their own training, but no one gives them a paycheck during that time; they have to find another way to earn money to eat and live. On top of that, they still have to pay for Social Security and Medicare. During that same period, for those under "contract," the institution pays out that 432 $0.00.

Therefore, a contract is the most normal way for an employer to protect themselves and their investment. You see this in every private corporation and business. The government is the only entity with enough cash to not care if they train someone only for that person to jump ship to another job. A private employer can't and won't allow that.
Look, medicine might be the only field where the government has actually adopted a market-based approach. Unfortunately, the contracts vary wildly, drafted under vague regulations and unclear criteria, which makes them a constant source of frustration and confusion. But if they are needed, they are. They just need clear criteria and parameters. But Milinović doesn't have the guts to implement that, because then the "chosen ones" wouldn't be able to dodge the contracts.

Look, I don't know about you, but if you finished your specialty and then worked, fine—but I will absolutely put in the work. If you're pulling 88 hours of overtime a month in an ER where you're basically running the whole show solo, then honestly, the hospital shouldn't even bother paying me, since the hospital is the one educating me...

To work in hospitals, specialization is mandatory—it’s just a built-in part of continuing your medical education. Therefore, the government—not individual hospitals—has to fund these specialties if they want anyone to actually staff the system. Since the system doesn't return anywhere near the amount of money invested, self-funding isn't an option unless you come from a family with deep pockets.

Besides, the government funded all our high school workers to meet its own needs, right? So, are those people somehow obligated to repay the state? Are they bound by contracts or any other college degree paid for by the Department of the Treasury, or are these people tied down by contracts to federal agencies? I wouldn't say so.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#573 ·
http://www.nytimes.com/article/dr-smith-on-maternity-care/779579/

And this right here is exactly why I never wanted to go into OB-GYN work...

The guy is being judged solely based on the opinions of two "post-war generals"—and let me tell you, if those two ever actually practiced medicine in the real world, they’ve probably buried more people through their own incompetence than anyone else...
Susan Rodriguez4 Susan Rodriguez4 Member
24 messages
joined Apr 2010
#574 ·
Kate Collins67 said:Look, I don't know about you, but if you finished your specialty and then worked, fine—but I will absolutely put in the work. If you're pulling 88 hours of overtime a month in an ER where you're basically running the whole show solo, then honestly, the hospital shouldn't even bother paying me, since the hospital is the one educating me...

To work in hospitals, specialization is mandatory—it’s just a built-in part of continuing your medical education. Therefore, the government—not individual hospitals—has to fund these specialties if they want anyone to actually staff the system. Since the system doesn't return anywhere near the amount of money invested, self-funding isn't an option unless you come from a family with deep pockets.

Besides, the government funded all our high school workers to meet its own needs, right? So, are those people somehow obligated to repay the state? Are they bound by contracts or any other college degree paid for by the Department of the Treasury, or are these people tied down by contracts to federal agencies? I wouldn't say so.

Well, go ahead and do it. Go above and beyond, sure, but don't do it at the very facility paying for your residency. Unless you're specializing at Mayo Clinic specifically to stay at Mayo Clinic, but then you're just part of the "chosen ones."
I'm not talking about the workload; I'm talking about working for one employer while someone else picks up the tab. And that second party expects you to deliver exactly what they paid for.
Usually, the specialty training is covered by the government—meaning Medicare handles the costs (if they aren't private)—while the actual employer (the institution that sent you for training) covers salaries and benefits, which is a much bigger expense.

As for contracts, yeah, anyone receiving scholarships during school—whether it's high school or college—is typically required to work for the organization sponsoring them. Residencies fall into that category, though it's a bit of a win for you since you still earn seniority credits while you learn.
Don't even get me started on the quality of the training. It really boils down to what you said earlier: as a young doctor, you're being worked to the bone for 88 hours a week because, to the institution where you're learning, you're nothing more than free labor. They couldn't care less about your actual knowledge or whether you even have the time or the mentors to learn from.
Angela Wright Angela Wright Regular
731 messages
joined Feb 2007
#575 ·
Kate Collins67 said:http://www.nytimes.com/article/dr-smith-on-maternity-care/779579/

And this right here is exactly why I never wanted to go into OB-GYN work...

The guy is being judged solely based on the opinions of two "post-war generals"—and let me tell you, if those two ever actually practiced medicine in the real world, they’ve probably buried more people through their own incompetence than anyone else...

I’m with you on this!
It absolutely infuriates me how that 닮oknik managed to completely scrub the media coverage regarding the death of a child belonging to people I personally know. The pregnancy was going perfectly—everything was a five out of five. They went to him specifically because he’s private practice, thinking they’d get that extra level of specialized, attentive care after struggling with conception. Then, the baby dies right after birth.
👎
Brandon Newman95 Brandon Newman95 Active Member
245 messages
joined Jun 2024
#576 ·
Ah, it’s pretty obvious it just comes down to who you happen to run into—you never really know if things are going to go smoother because you have an inside connection or if you're just flying solo. It all depends on luck, the specific person you're dealing with, and I don't even know what else.
Brandon Newman95 Brandon Newman95 Active Member
245 messages
joined Jun 2024
#577 ·
Kyle Lee7 said:👍
Well said.
For those who argue there isn't much to learn here, I believe it was already mentioned in this thread that at the Department of the Treasury, they actually have coursework covering the fundamentals of physician-patient relations; it's part of the psychology curriculum, and I think there might even be an elective for it.

No one is suggesting you should bow down to a rude patient, and nobody is asking for that. But regardless of how a patient acts, a doctor shouldn't stoop to their level by being equally arrogant or aggressive in return.
Furthermore, if you prescribe medication, your role as a physician includes providing clear instructions on how to take it, the duration of treatment, the expected outcomes, potential side effects, and any drug interactions to avoid.

Those are the basics. Just as a patient MUST be briefed on every test and therapy, many of those procedures require the patient to provide informed consent.


And this part is spot on too. Especially that bolded section.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#578 ·
@ Susan Rodriguez4

So, here’s how it works—specializations are split up, half happens at the clinic and the other half goes to the home institution. How much time you actually spend at that home facility? That’s entirely up to whatever the Department of the Treasury decides to approve.
But here is where things get messy: the salaries paid out for working at the home institution also get factored into the debt calculation.
Now, I can wrap my head around the second part of the debt—the portion handled at the clinics while the home institution covers the paycheck—but the rest of this logic? It just doesn't add up.
Angela Wright Angela Wright Regular
731 messages
joined Feb 2007
#579 ·
Babyface said:Hey everyone

My dad has bone metastases, and lately, the pain has been unbearable. Our doctor told us we need to get him to the hospital, but we’re stuck—how are you supposed to transport someone who can't even get out of bed using just a regular car? The emergency services offered to send someone over to give him a painkiller injection, but that’s just a drop in the bucket for what he’s going through. Does anyone know if there's medical transport or something similar available on short notice? We can't wait two days to coordinate something. We need someone who can move him while he's lying down, or at least put him in a stretcher to get him moved. My mom mentioned hearing about some kind of association or nonprofit that helps in these exact situations, but she couldn't remember the name... does anyone know anything about this?

Thanks

Here we go. I’ve quoted a plea that perfectly captures a total lack of competence, pure inertia, and—if I dare say—the sheer mental deficiency of a certain primary care physician. This is a textbook case of that specific "phenomenon."☕
In my line of work, I constantly run into people whose GPs are utterly incapable of providing even the most basic information regarding, say, specialized clinics that actually handle these kinds of issues.
It’s pathetic, really. And it isn't a matter of budget constraints or lack of resources; it is purely a matter of individual incompetence.👎👎👎
Kevin Garcia12 Kevin Garcia12 Active Member
52 messages
joined Jun 2010
#580 ·
I honestly don't get what the issue is 🤷 in this specific situation—every general hospital should basically have a dedicated "pain clinic" staffed with an anesthesiologist who manages chronic pain therapies. If a patient is immobile, their primary care physician just needs to write a referral to that specific clinic and request an ambulance for that day (this really needs to be sorted out at least 3 or 4 days in advance so the drivers can actually organize their schedules properly and we avoid all those headaches with executing the orders)... you can even provide a rough arrival time to the local EMS or medical transport service, and then the ambulance shows up right on time to take the patient to see the anesthesiologist, who then determines the appropriate analgesia and makes sure they get back home safely...

Every single primary care office should know how to handle this without breaking a sweat; I mean, even I know the protocol, and I don't even work in general practice...

As far as the emergency services are concerned, they aren't wrong, except for the fact that aside from providing immediate relief during a crisis, they shouldn't really be handling this long-term. According to current laws, palliative medicine is part of primary care, which means it should be supervised and carried out either by specialized teams (if we even have those available here in the States) or by the patient's own primary care doctor who is responsible for them...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads