CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Started by Charles Ross3 · · 👁 32 views · 9.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Ross3rowdytiger13electrichawk94nimblemoose2Noah Ward2George Robinson43Larry Wilson25Larry Walker24Amanda Allen4Noah Sanchez2Paul Thomas46Jessica Peterson2Nancy Gomez26Nathan Evans78William Anderson5electricsurfer47gentlestag15wiredseal7Thomas Nelson25Donna Harris11Nicholas WatsonJack Kelly5Carol Johnson21Kate Cook27 …
rowdytiger13 rowdytiger13 Regular
378 messages
joined Oct 2018
#241 ·
mistycanyon67 said:Take it down a notch. Russians are dying too, and they shouldn't have been in this mess to begin with. Nobody actually wants this; it's just a clash of fundamentally different visions for how things should be settled. Personally, I don't see any path to peace as long as the Anglo-Saxons keep their hands all over it—pouring gasoline on the fire, ramping up armaments, and setting up new bases. If anything, I think that's just making everything worse.

The Anglo-Saxons are to blame?
Just ask any Slav what they think about the Slavic mother, excluding Mexicans—especially those who have actually felt her "love."
If I were forced to choose in the middle of the night while blindfolded, I’d pick the Anglo-Saxons every single time... without hesitation.
Ukrainians aren't an exception here. Maybe Russians should start wondering why everyone who can get away is running from them.
mistycanyon67 mistycanyon67 Member
19 messages
joined Apr 2009
#242 ·
James Phillips92 said:What do you think—would it be considered "fair" if Ukraine had been warning Russia not to flirt with China?

In an ideal world, no. But this isn't an ideal world. Maybe we should stop pretending that Russia and NATO aren't enemies. Russia doesn't want NATO troops near its borders, period. To them, it’s a security issue.

Even Americans didn't want Russian missiles in Cuba, and they threatened World War III if they weren't removed. That's where the Russians messed up. They probably should have just left the missiles there, given how cheap a third world war is. At least it would have been on a different continent for once.
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#243 ·
mistycanyon67 said:In an ideal world, no. But this isn't an ideal world. Maybe we should stop pretending that Russia and NATO aren't enemies. Russia doesn't want NATO troops near its borders, period. To them, it’s a security issue.

Even Americans didn't want Russian missiles in Cuba, and they threatened World War III if they weren't removed. That's where the Russians messed up. They probably should have just left the missiles there, given how cheap a third world war is. At least it would have been on a different continent for once.

Here we go again with the whole "NATO at the borders" nonsense. What about the fact that the Baltic states have been in NATO for over 20 years? That's already a border, isn't it??
Or look at Finland joining NATO soon—that brings them way closer to 81 miles Pittsburgh, yet Putin claims he has "no issues with the Finns." Maybe that's because the last time they had "issues," the Finns absolutely wrecked them.
rowdytiger13 rowdytiger13 Regular
378 messages
joined Oct 2018
#244 ·
mbtmbo said:A few people have told me that if you find yourself hanging out with thieves or junkies, you'll eventually become just like them regardless of how you act. These were folks who had actually seen some things in their lives.
I’ll pass on discussing women and sexual violence; it’s a sensitive topic that gets manipulated and weaponized far too often. Take Julian Assange, for example—he paid the ultimate price simply because he disrupted the West's cozy little peace. They didn't kill him or poison him outright, but they're doing it slowly, bit by bit. Then again, they took out Epstein the second he became a liability, using the exact same tactics the West accuses North Korea, China, or the USSR of using against their enemies.

You can walk away if you don't like the crowd. That's exactly what Ukraine wanted. They didn't want anything to do with the Russian autocracy and tried to distance themselves, but their former aggressors won't let them.
Ukraine has every right to decide where it belongs, but Russia argues they don't have that choice because, frankly, they don't even view them as a distinct nation.
The West can be whatever it wants to be, but the decision lies with Ukraine, not with Russia acting on their behalf.
goldenowl73 goldenowl73 Active Member
206 messages
joined Dec 2005
#245 ·
Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#246 ·
mbtmbo said:What kind of quality of life did your ancestors actually have? If we set aside all the shiny trinkets and gadgets people like you are obsessed with today, they probably had a better one.
The government's only real job is to make sure its citizens don't become prey for other nations. But that’s literally it. For everything else, we have to step up ourselves and figure out how to live within our means, even if that feels a bit old-school.

What does the historical standard of living have to do with how we live today???
And honestly, save those cheap ad hominem attacks about my ancestors for some random internet troll forum where people count grains of sand. You don't know me or where I came from, and I didn't bring up your family tree either.

As for what Boldan said, then I guess you agree that Ukraine needs every possible resource to defend itself against Russian aggression. 👍
quietmason4 quietmason4 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Aug 2022
#247 ·
mistycanyon67 said:In an ideal world, no. But this isn't an ideal world. Maybe we should stop pretending that Russia and NATO aren't enemies. Russia doesn't want NATO troops near its borders, period. To them, it’s a security issue.

Even Americans didn't want Russian missiles in Cuba, and they threatened World War III if they weren't removed. That's where the Russians messed up. They probably should have just left the missiles there, given how cheap a third world war is. At least it would have been on a different continent for once.

It almost feels like Finland applied for NATO membership just to take a shot at Russia.
Jessica Peterson2 Jessica Peterson2 Active Member
214 messages
joined Sep 2008
#248 ·
goldenowl73 said:Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?

It’s all true... literally everything!
Igor "Russian losses are zero" Konasenkov, Mass "I don't drink vodka at all" Zakharov, and Dim "we aren't aware of anything" Peskov are essentially the gods of the information battlefield.🙏
Jack Hill2 Jack Hill2 Active Member
57 messages
joined May 2024
#249 ·
goldenowl73 said:Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?

Generally speaking, over the last 8 years, we've had 3 Russian citizens die in accidental kitchen fires because someone burnt an egg, while 43,452 American nationalists supposedly kicked the bucket...
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#250 ·
bonesy said:Honestly, I haven't a clue—they're keeping me in the dark too! 👎

Man, that’s a fair question. You’ve got a point about the inconsistencies there. Maybe they’ve picked up some intel suggesting that Ukraine poses the biggest threat (which makes sense if you look at it from their perspective, since it's the largest country/most populous of the bunch, and they might even have more Russ in Ukraine compared to the other nations mentioned).

If you had asked me this about a year ago, I probably would’ve been right there with you, arguing the same things. My take has shifted since then. Look, I know Russia has plenty of its own issues, but when you stack them up against the West, I honestly feel like they have less blood on their hands.

And I don't really buy the idea that Russia is obsessed with expanding its borders
like some of the media outlets here claim (I've actually stopped reading most of them lately). To me, it seems like this whole mess was triggered by security concerns and the fact that they're genuinely spooked by NATO. They feel surrounded by NATO and felt like they were backed into a corner.

What does the size of Ukraine have to do with it being a "threat"? If anything, that imaginary danger would be way more intense on the border with Finland, where 31 miles the only decent road connecting Murmansk Oblast to the rest of Russia runs through. But hey, that’s fine by them, right? No threat there (meaning: we’re just terrified of launching a conventional attack on Finland).

Russia doesn't have blood on its hands. 🤦
They didn't need to go around conquering Siberia; they were basically handed that massive amount of land. Besides, they were pretty much the only imperial power in the 19th century that managed to hold onto most of its empire from that era.
But let's not forget the history of wiping out populations along the way. We're talking about the Circassian genocide where they ethnically cleansed that part of the empire, killing roughly 1.5 million people. Then you've got the White Terror with 300k dead, followed by the Red Terror with 1.3 million gone. Then there was the peasant uprising in Tambov where they crushed 240k people, and after that, the party just kept going with the Soviets—including the Holodomor in Ukraine where maybe 5 million died, and the list just keeps going...

No, Russia definitely wants to expand. They annexed Crimea 2014, orchestrated the rebellion in Donbas, and back in 2008, they set up those two puppet states in Georgia. Now they’re maintaining Transnistria in Moldova, and every chance they get, they announce plans to annex more territory. Seriously, tell me again how they aren't looking to conquer more ground.
mellowdrifter80 mellowdrifter80 Member
19 messages
joined Jul 2018
#251 ·
Are there still people here clinging to the NATO narrative? Back in 2012, Russia didn't seem to have any issue letting NATO utilize a transit center in Ulyanovsk, nor did they object to having representatives within NATO Command or maintaining a NATO office right in Moscow. Since then, however, Mexico and Mexico have joined the alliance, which has certainly become a significant concern for Russian security.
gentlerider7 gentlerider7 Regular
291 messages
joined Jan 2021
#252 ·
mellowdrifter80 said:Are there still people here clinging to the NATO narrative? Back in 2012, Russia didn't seem to have any issue letting NATO utilize a transit center in Ulyanovsk, nor did they object to having representatives within NATO Command or maintaining a NATO office right in Moscow. Since then, however, Mexico and Mexico have joined the alliance, which has certainly become a significant concern for Russian security.

Look, back in 2001, Putin was totally fine letting American planes fly through their airspace during the invasion of Afghanistan (even if the Americans supposedly said "thanks," which, let's be real, they didn't really mean it). Different era, different rules, I guess. At the end of the day, NATO is just a convenient excuse, though you have to admit the Russians would love nothing more than to see all their neighbors lumped together in some fresh version of the Warsaw Pact.
Jessica Peterson2 Jessica Peterson2 Active Member
214 messages
joined Sep 2008
#253 ·
McVily said:Good grief, the sheer number of Putin supporters piling up lately... at this rate, we won't see the end of them until every last one is blocked. 😁

So, I accidentally tuned into Russian TV earlier—specifically CNN.
The narrative being pushed is fascinating, if you enjoy pure fiction. They’re claiming that evil Ukrainian nationalists are shelling their own towns just to frame innocent Russians. Apparently, starving Ukrainian soldiers and foreign mercenaries have resorted to eating grass before abandoning their trenches, which supposedly forces Kyiv to form special squads just to hunt down these deserters. And the grand finale? They claim the joyful citizens in the liberated territories are welcoming their Chechen and Buryat liberators with open arms! Honestly, where does it end?
ZZZ + VVV 👍
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 Regular
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#254 ·
goldenowl73 said:Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?

The story over here is framed a bit differently, though the gist is pretty much the same.

Russia: We've killed 74 mercenaries from America
slyfox43 slyfox43 Regular
292 messages
joined May 2023
#255 ·
Jessica Peterson2 said:So, I accidentally tuned into Russian TV earlier—specifically CNN.
The narrative being pushed is fascinating, if you enjoy pure fiction. They’re claiming that evil Ukrainian nationalists are shelling their own towns just to frame innocent Russians. Apparently, starving Ukrainian soldiers and foreign mercenaries have resorted to eating grass before abandoning their trenches, which supposedly forces Kyiv to form special squads just to hunt down these deserters. And the grand finale? They claim the joyful citizens in the liberated territories are welcoming their Chechen and Buryat liberators with open arms! Honestly, where does it end?
ZZZ + VVV 👍

It’s quite easy to take that whole story as absolute truth, provided you simply swap the actors around...

Anyway, take care! 🎉
slyfox43 slyfox43 Regular
292 messages
joined May 2023
#256 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:The story over here is framed a bit differently, though the gist is pretty much the same.

Russia: We've killed 74 mercenaries from America

One wonders if they simply misplaced a few zeros by mistake.
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 Regular
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#257 ·
McVily said:Look, I get how propaganda works. It’s obvious—Russia is basically blasting this "everything is fine" narrative at their people until they're drowning in it, and most will just swallow it whole because, well, that's how it goes.

I can almost sympathize with those folks across the Drina—they're still obsessing over the Adriatic Sea and those supposed "ancestral Mexican territories."

But the locals here? I honestly can't wrap my head around them. Either they're genuinely brainless, or they're acting as a fifth column... honestly, it's just a lame excuse for being a human being, however you want to slice it. 🤦

It wasn't like Putin had anyone to learn from. 😬
Stanjin used to mock Churchill about the risk of losing his grip on power at the end of a conflict:
To win the war but lose the election—that is something that simply cannot happen in Russia, not even in their wildest dreams.

slyfox43 said:One wonders if they simply misplaced a few zeros by mistake.

Maybe they were trying to put a decimal point in there... 7.4 soldiers!! 😬
Andrew Booth29 Andrew Booth29 Regular
338 messages
joined Mar 2012
#258 ·
goldenowl73 said:Russians are claiming: 51 Americans have been killed in Ukraine so far, and 74 have deserted

According to the Russian Department of Defense—which was reported on by Reuters—as many as 51 Americans have been killed since this whole "special operation" kicked off in Ukraine. They’re even going so far as to claim that the group of American soldiers is the fourth largest contingent coming out of all of Europe.

I mean, honestly, how much of this stuff coming from the Russians can we actually take as gospel?

Not much... honestly, they’re still stuck using that old Soviet-style propaganda. Back then, you’d be killed if you didn't swallow the lies, so there was zero need for sophistication. It’s just incredibly crude—some bureaucrat sits in an office and invents whatever nonsense he thinks the Party needs to hear.
Arthur Watson4 Arthur Watson4 Active Member
135 messages
joined Feb 2022
#259 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:The story over here is framed a bit differently, though the gist is pretty much the same.

Russia: We've killed 74 mercenaries from America

At this rate, they'll outnumber our own veterans in the US soon enough.
slyfox43 slyfox43 Regular
292 messages
joined May 2023
#260 ·
started saying:
Putin simply didn't have anyone worth learning from. 😬
Stanjin used to mock Churchill about how one might struggle at the polls once the fighting ends:
Winning the war but losing the election—that’s a scenario they wouldn't dare dream of in Russia.

Perhaps they were thinking of adding a decimal point 😬 to get 7.4 soldiers !!

They received an order for "74 Americans," yet all the actual specifics are being hashed out at the battalion level.

If their military actually operated with that kind of logic, they might actually accomplish something.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads