CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Started by Charles Ross3 · · 👁 51 views · 9.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Ross3rowdytiger13electrichawk94nimblemoose2Noah Ward2George Robinson43Larry Wilson25Larry Walker24Amanda Allen4Noah Sanchez2Paul Thomas46Jessica Peterson2Nancy Gomez26Nathan Evans78William Anderson5electricsurfer47gentlestag15wiredseal7Thomas Nelson25Donna Harris11Nicholas WatsonJack Kelly5Carol Johnson21Kate Cook27 …
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#9001 ·
gentlemoose57 said:Fantastic—now, instead of the Ukrainians just halting right at the border with Russia once they liberate territory, I really think they should push even further.

What is the point of pushing past the border? Why should Ukrainians bother "liberating" Russians from Putin’s tyranny when those same Russians are busy fleeing their own country to avoid mobilization? Let them deal with Putin; if he serves them well, fine. He is quite possibly the greatest punishment they could face—simply because they once held a somewhat benevolent attitude toward their elections. (We are currently enduring our own version of that punishment here in the States).
Putin will eventually face his reckoning; everyone meets their judgment sooner or later.
Terry Green3 Terry Green3 Active Member
149 messages
joined Jun 2022
#9002 ·
John Ramos45 said:Ukraine has officially submitted its application to join NATO.


Ishitren move. Zelenskyy is a great animator, but a poor politician. Personally, I thought they should have just stayed the course since things were moving in the right direction.
I’m worried about whether they'll actually get the green light from the rest of the NATO alliance. We were all unified in supporting Ukraine, but this request might just create unnecessary friction within the alliance.
nimbleviper3 nimbleviper3 Active Member
84 messages
joined Feb 2020
#9003 ·
Midzet claims we’re going to end up hungry, stinking, and broke.
Until yesterday, he wouldn't even listen to the idea of negotiations, but apparently, his tune has changed today:
"I am calling on Ukraine to enter negotiations, but I also emphasize that the citizens of Lugansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson made their 'choice,' and that is no longer up for discussion," stated the Russian leader.

I suspect he'll find himself backed into a corner very soon....
loneskipper3 loneskipper3 Member
36 messages
joined Feb 2023
#9004 ·
He’s bringing up South Korea again—claiming they're under occupation. 😁 I wonder why he doesn't bother asking the South Koreans themselves which version of Korea they actually want? You know, the one fashioned by the USSR and China, or the one built by the Americans.
Elizabeth Wells2 Elizabeth Wells2 Member
22 messages
joined May 2023
#9005 ·
Gregory Ramos3 said:The bummer is, that would probably mean giving up those territories, since they can't really get into NATO until they have full control over everything within their internationally recognized borders.

But hey, we're living in such a wild era where precedents just keep getting tossed out the window, so who actually knows what might happen ☕

True.

It would be quite something if NATO made an exception and fast-tracked Ukraine's membership. Then they could simply declare that if Russia doesn't back off within a few days, Article 5 is triggered.

Let's see how Russia reacts to that.
gentlestag15 gentlestag15 Regular
280 messages
joined May 2024
#9006 ·
Elizabeth Wells2 said:True.

It would be quite something if NATO made an exception and fast-tracked Ukraine's membership. Then they could simply declare that if Russia doesn't back off within a few days, Article 5 is triggered.

Let's see how Russia reacts to that.

There's zero chance they get in with Canada and Turkey sitting right there.
Those two haven't even greenlit Finland and Sweden yet, let alone bringing Ukraine into the fold.
George Robinson43 George Robinson43 Regular
472 messages
joined Oct 2017
#9007 ·
loneskipper3 said:He’s bringing up South Korea again—claiming they're under occupation. 😁 I wonder why he doesn't bother asking the South Koreans themselves which version of Korea they actually want? You know, the one fashioned by the USSR and China, or the one built by the Americans.

If anyone had any lingering doubts about whether The Kremlin has simply polished up those old-school USSR communists in a total Brezhnev style...
Terry Green3 Terry Green3 Active Member
149 messages
joined Jun 2022
#9008 ·
Sandra Harris2 said:

I think it’s time for me to start looking for a new job.
All that nonsense fits perfectly with his carefully branded role as the guardian of "traditional" values.
Dugin is thriving.

A twilight of the mind.

Besides... why does he even care about the West? Is he afraid that despite all that supposed "corruption and decadence," it's still more attractive than his regime?
I think it’s time for me to start looking for a new job.
All that nonsense fits perfectly with his carefully branded role as the guardian of "traditional" values.
Dugin is thriving.

A twilight of the mind.

Besides... why does he even care about the West? Is he afraid that despite all that supposed "corruption and decadence," it's still more attractive than his regime?
After this speech from Putin, I have zero doubts left. They blew up that pipeline because it fit the narrative of his speech beautifully.

The man is aiming straight for European conservatives and, most lethally, American Trump supporters. Honestly, I’m starting to believe Trump is a Russian asset. The Russians really played them—planting seeds of division within the US like nothing we've seen since the Civil War.
And now, Putin presents himself as the savior. Meanwhile, on the other side, Americans are led by a senile old man and a Vice President who can't even tell North Korea from South Korea.
stormybear25 stormybear25 Active Member
62 messages
joined Sep 2022
#9009 ·
President Biden on Russia's attempts to annex Ukrainian territory: "Make no mistake: those actions have zero legitimacy."

"In response to Russia's false claims regarding annexation, the United States, alongside our allies and partners, is announcing new sanctions today."

View on twitter
steelheron25 steelheron25 Active Member
61 messages
joined Mar 2022
#9010 ·
Terry Green3 said:Ishitren move. Zelenskyy is a great animator, but a poor politician. Personally, I thought they should have just stayed the course since things were moving in the right direction.
I’m worried about whether they'll actually get the green light from the rest of the NATO alliance. We were all unified in supporting Ukraine, but this request might just create unnecessary friction within the alliance.

Do you honestly believe this was some spontaneous, independent decision made in a vacuum? Isn't it far more likely they received a quiet signal from NATO leadership beforehand to pull this exact lever?
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#9011 ·
wearyheron5 said:Just when you think you've heard every possible nonsense under the sun, here comes someone spinning a psychotic web involving war, hygiene, Satanism, and gender reassignment surgery.

That's a diagnosis right there. Harsh.

The rhetoric is merely a symptom of massive pressure on the ground. The situation for Russia grows more dire by the hour. It seems Putin has finally realized the absolute mess he’s made of his country, and these delusions are just desperate attempts to justify his catastrophic miscalculations to the public. He knows he’s responsible, so now he resorts to sheer nonsense. It’s like a child caught in a small lie—once the parents push back with a few questions, the kid starts doubling down, spinning increasingly elaborate fabrications like a snowball gaining momentum down a hill. The difference is, this particular fool holds the levers of power and decides who lives and who dies.
Anthony Perez9 Anthony Perez9 Regular
311 messages
joined Apr 2019
#9012 ·
Terry Green3 said:Ishitren move. Zelenskyy is a great animator, but a poor politician. Personally, I thought they should have just stayed the course since things were moving in the right direction.
I’m worried about whether they'll actually get the green light from the rest of the NATO alliance. We were all unified in supporting Ukraine, but this request might just create unnecessary friction within the alliance.

A brilliant, coordinated strategic play. A total slap to Putin during his attempt at an Anschluss.

Zelenskyy is a great motivator but a pretty lousy politician. Personally, I think they should have kept going this way since it was actually working.

And they will.

I'm worried they won't get enough support from the various NATO allies to join.

It doesn't matter if they aren't in NATO right away. Just having it on the table is enough. It’s just another nail in Putin's coffin.

We were all united for Ukraine, but now this request might cause rifts within the alliance.

There won't be any rifts. If anything, it'll just tighten the alliance against that little brat.
Bryan Booth82 Bryan Booth82 Regular
483 messages
joined Feb 2024
#9013 ·
gentlestag15 said:There's zero chance they get in with Canada and Turkey sitting right there.
Those two haven't even greenlit Finland and Sweden yet, let alone bringing Ukraine into the fold.

Of course there isn't a chance! Even Zelenskyy knows that's a non-starter.
What they actually ought to be doing is fast-tracking their entry into the European Union through an expedited process.
If the Hun start throwing fits about it, then we should just use that exact same lightning-fast process to kick them out!

Sure, I realize we can't fix everything overnight, but wouldn't that sound great?

lp
dustyowl29 dustyowl29 Regular
258 messages
joined Dec 2007
#9014 ·
Elizabeth Wells2 said:True.

It would be quite something if NATO made an exception and fast-tracked Ukraine's membership. Then they could simply declare that if Russia doesn't back off within a few days, Article 5 is triggered.

Let's see how Russia reacts to that.

Right? That would be classic Russian style—basically saying, "Here, have some chaos for free."
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson Regular
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#9015 ·
It feels like a lost war—likely just a pretext for establishing a dictatorship here at home.
Kate Cook27 Kate Cook27 Regular
557 messages
joined Jun 2022
#9016 ·
Gregory Ramos3 said:The bummer is, that would probably mean giving up those territories, since they can't really get into NATO until they have full control over everything within their internationally recognized borders.

But hey, we're living in such a wild era where precedents just keep getting tossed out the window, so who actually knows what might happen ☕

It feels more like a performance for the public—and a message to the White House. Ukraine isn't joining NATO tomorrow.

Plus, there's the NATO address tonight.
crimsonorca42 crimsonorca42 Active Member
59 messages
joined Nov 2014
#9017 ·
gentlestag15 said:There's zero chance they get in with Canada and Turkey sitting right there.
Those two haven't even greenlit Finland and Sweden yet, let alone bringing Ukraine into the fold.

I suppose Biden will pull the necessary strings if he really has to.

It shouldn't be too hard to lean on the Canadians; after all, the USA isn't some indecisive entity like the EU is. As for the Turks, they probably realize they might be one of the next targets for Russia.
Russia has always had its eyes on Constantinople and access to warm waters. ☕
Michael Davis9 Michael Davis9 Active Member
64 messages
joined Aug 2012
#9018 ·
Zelenskyy is playing this perfectly—every single time Russia tries to escalate, it just triggers a fresh Ukrainian countermove. It’s almost funny watching them try to step up, only to find themselves digging their own graves instead...
Elizabeth Wells2 Elizabeth Wells2 Member
22 messages
joined May 2023
#9019 ·
gentlestag15 said:There's zero chance they get in with Canada and Turkey sitting right there.
Those two haven't even greenlit Finland and Sweden yet, let alone bringing Ukraine into the fold.

I'm aware. It was purely hypothetical; I was simply curious about how Russia might react to such a move by NATO.

😁
John Ramos45 John Ramos45 Active Member
73 messages
joined Apr 2023
#9020 ·
Terry Green3 said:Ishitren move. Zelenskyy is a great animator, but a poor politician. Personally, I thought they should have just stayed the course since things were moving in the right direction.
I’m worried about whether they'll actually get the green light from the rest of the NATO alliance. We were all unified in supporting Ukraine, but this request might just create unnecessary friction within the alliance.


I suspect Zelenskyy isn't acting as a lone wolf here. If Ukraine joins NATO, it implies the USA is planning to push Russia out of the territory much like how Saddam Hussein was forced out of Kuwait during Desert Storm. In a head-to-head conventional conflict, the Russians simply don't stand a chance against the modern machinery of NATO.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads