#101 ·
This president of Ukraine doesn't actually represent the Ukrainian people.
Why isn't anyone even talking about this?
Why isn't anyone even talking about this?
Started by Matthew Rodriguez9 · · 👁 36 views · 2K replies
Matthew Rodriguez9 said:urbanotter, it’s honestly kind of hilarious watching the West try to numb the public with all these big-name sanctions, acting like they're some kind of checkmate against Vladimir Putin.
So, during a press conference today, Jens Stoltenberg was asked by a reporter if NATO was actually planning on stepping up with air and ground support for Ukraine.
He just sort of mumbled his way through it—you know the drill, basically saying we’re helping constantly but we're totally powerless to offer anything more significant.
Honestly, enough is enough.
"Allies intend to continue providing support"
Stoltenberg also mentioned that several of the 30 member nations have announced the specific types of weaponry they will be delivering to Ukraine.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated today that the military alliance is deploying additional units to Eastern Europe and will maintain its shipments of weaponry to Ukraine, including air defense systems.
gentlecrane8 said:What if Ukraine just followed the Chechnya playbook and cut some sweet deals with Russia to secure its own economic standing and aid? They could ditch NATO entirely and play it smart by cooperating with both the East and the West without all this constant warfare. Imagine them actually focusing on real economic growth instead of just living off empty promises and being pushed into endless conflicts. So far, besides a bunch of weapons—which we all know will come with a massive bill one day—they haven't seen any serious cash from either the European Union or the USA. Honestly, they should just work with anyone willing to actually invest and do business in Ukraine. Why not try to have your cake and eat it too?☕
Gritty said:Instead of just attacking world leaders, you might want to actually use some logic.
Take NATO, for example.
It’s a military alliance—essentially a coalition of the most powerful nations on Earth—that was originally established to counter the Soviet Union. That was a long time ago. Since then, the Soviet Union collapsed, communism disappeared, and instead of dissolving, NATO has expanded right up to Russia's doorstep, threatening infiltration into Ukraine, and now there's talk about other countries too.
NATO is an anti-Russian military alliance, and Russia views it as a direct threat to its very survival. In that context, their reaction makes sense.
Julius Caesar said:You're basically calling for genocide here.
Not surprising coming from a Putin supporter.
hollowdriver13 said:The logic here is just incredible. Truly mind-blowing stuff...🤦
"They fund every single evil thing on Earth"
"But how can you be sure about that?"
"I just know, and you're just too clueless to see it." 🙏
Jason Roberts2 said:This president of Ukraine doesn't actually represent the Ukrainian people.
Why isn't anyone even talking about this?
Matthew Rodriguez9 said:Honestly, this whole mess was stirred up by even bigger monsters...
If you want to find the people who actually built this disaster, go look in Silicon Valley.
electrichawk94 said:Where exactly are you seeing Ukraine fall?
Brenda Taylor13 said:What happened to this place? It’s like everyone turned into mindless sports fans cheering at a stadium mid-game.
Look, if you don't actually have anything smart to contribute—like some actual news or a useful bit of info—then honestly, just keep it to yourself.
Betty Murphy3 said:That is precisely my point—I say it constantly. What difference does it make if nuclear assets are in Ukraine or Alaska? Does it matter if they are positioned in the Baltics or in Germany and France? Putin is a madman; far from being intelligent, he's completely lost his mind.
If he had any sense, he’d realize he could launch a nuke at Moscow from basically anywhere, and those submarines hitting the Baltic would take out ten of them without breaking a sweat. How does he think he can maintain control? Does he honestly believe the entire world will stop spinning just because of Russia? The fact that he hasn't managed to win over anyone in his own neighborhood speaks volumes about him and the Russians. They are losers—for the last hundred years, they've only succeeded in harming themselves and everyone else, and no one is ever going to change that reality.
Sure, the West has its own idiocies and its own rot, but it possesses an economy that everyone wants to be a part of. Meanwhile, Putin has weapons and half a country living in poverty. It’s baffling that Ukraine wouldn't want to be a Russian province—so according to certain logic on this forum, it's somehow "legal" to rip them apart just to prevent them from joining the West. They claim it's to avoid becoming a threat to Russia or to prevent an invasion via the USA and NATO—what infantile, hollow nonsense from Putin and his circle of sycophants. It’s unbelievable that Russians are fighting for this sick individual; if anything, it proves they aren't any braver than he is. Honestly, I wish the same fate upon them as he gets—straight to Siberia.
Andrew Martinez8 said:You can't really offend Putin. He's a tough guy.🙂
Look, Russia shouldn't complain if other countries decide they want to join NATO. They ought to ask themselves why they aren't being embraced by Europe.
If they were acting normally, they'd have a great standing. But they aren't.
Will they ever change? I doubt it.
Jason Fox2 said:I mean, how exactly did Chechnya prosper once Kadyrov (and then his son) started sucking up to Putin? Sure, the elites are doing fine, but we're talking about the average person here. Seriously, those Kadyrov types just do whatever suits them, even when it's against their own people. They're just savages who happened to get modern weapons.
Douglas Davis4 said:The way the world is treating Russia right now... they're being kicked out of everything everywhere
Even the local symphony orchestra refused to perform works by any Russian composers
Everyone can slap sanctions on them for as long as they want, and once this war finally ends
They’ll be facing massive demands for reparations to help rebuild Ukraine
gentleharbor3 said:An interview worth checking out from Robert Barić over at the International Politics and Security section (FPZ)
...First off, you don't just start general mobilization once the war has already kicked off and the enemy has stepped onto your soil—by then, it’s basically too late. Zelenskyy didn't pull the trigger on that early enough, and honestly, he couldn't have anyway because Ukraine just doesn't have the economic backbone to sustain a long-term defense on its own. He was clearly hoping—much like a lot of folks in the West—that he could somehow appease Putin with tiny, little concessions, but that obviously didn't work. And when you look at organizing combat units, I mean, how is Ukraine supposed to pull that together without outside help? It’s really this American concept where they essentially said, "Let's just arm Ukraine the way we did in Afghanistan."
But, there’s a massive difference between Ukraine and Afghanistan. For one, Ukraine sits right against the Russian border, which gives it huge strategic and resource value for Russia. Second, if the USA actually goes through with fully arming Ukraine, we really have to ask ourselves what the Russian response is going to be. Are we looking at a broad attack on American infrastructure? That's exactly what people in Washington, D.C. are starting to debate, and it looks like it would be a damn controversial move right now. This American move might make sense if it were part of some broader, long-term Western strategy against Russia—and by long-term, I mean talking twenty or thirty years down the line. You can't just hand Ukraine two million AKs and say, "Alright, go get 'em." It doesn't work like that...
Keith Williams3 said:Ukraine has been fighting in Donbas since 2014, much like how Mexico acted in Mexico trying to stop separatism. It's the exact same thing.
And yeah, NATO was formed because of the Soviet Union. Russia had every right to expect that once the USSR collapsed, NATO would dissolve too. Or at least stop expanding toward their borders.
It’s just unacceptable.
sedmica77 said:Just wondering how old that photo is. I don't get why you'd bother moving a missile that already has enough range to hit the West Coast anyway. Makes zero sense.
Quote : Sunny Ways said:That tank and those two vehicles are all part of the same unit... they were just posing as Ukrainians after crossing the line. They realized who they actually were pretty fast once they got caught, and then they got absolutely crushed.
And that’s really all there is to it.