#181 ·
gentlerider7 said:When people pitch these utopian ideas, they're basically banking on the assumption that most folks just want more of the exact same stuff we already have. They act like there are these set-in-stone, objective benchmarks for what actually counts as "good."
If that were true, we wouldn't need architects or planners at all; we’d just vote on stuff and call it a day. Most people don't want the same things because we aren't clones, and there is no such thing as an objective metric for "good"—that's entirely subjective. We manage by making compromises, however messy they might be, and that's basically how society functions.