CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Coronavirus › Curfew restrictions: Is it legal to leave your house?

Curfew restrictions: Is it legal to leave your house?

Started by rustywalker42 · · 👁 86 views · 2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants rustywalker42electricbadger89Joseph Taylor11Jonathan Smith12Drew Johnson2Henry Lopez10lonefalconrestlessmason54darkotter35Patrick Cookmellowseal1Rebecca Peterson94Matthew Jackson2nimbleharbor10Susan Martin4Jose Scott3Brian Anderson8wearypilot34Anthony Jackson2David Vaughn75velvetstag5Roger Gray27Keith Cox6Jack Cook7 …
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#601 ·
Edward Fisher86 said:He’s approving home healthcare, so he's likely more acquainted with how things work on the ground. That’s probably what they were aiming for, though we still run into issues since not everyone in need actually qualifies for coverage.

Broadly speaking, I have some serious issues with this residency requirement measure—especially this whole setup where every local Command Center just seems to do whatever they feel like at the moment...

You have tens of thousands of people in self-isolation, and now you're telling them they can't even retreat to a cabin in the woods because there are—admittedly, in small percentages—a few idiots out there breaking quarantine. I mean, do you really think an idiot is going to head out to some remote area just to mess around with their isolation protocols? It doesn't make sense.

On the other hand, I am genuinely curious about what "self-isolation" is supposed to look like in a typical American household with an average number of residents living in it.

Then there's the issue of police patrols stopping every single vehicle to harass people over paperwork; that is basically the literal definition of a super-spreader event.

I get the impression that, caught up in the hype regarding last Sunday's supposed exodus from Washington, D.C., they've made a decision that honestly carries far more downsides than upsides.
Dana Robinson4 Dana Robinson4 Active Member
181 messages
joined Jul 2010
#602 ·
James Phillips92 said:It’s simple: when people get hungry. Once the supplies run dry and these clowns in the Government realize they might be facing some serious backlash, that’s when this whole circus will finally wrap up.

Word is it all started down in Southern Italy...
Better grab the crew and make a run for Walmart
Source: Sky News
darktinker4 darktinker4 Active Member
79 messages
joined May 2019
#603 ·
Dana Robinson4 said:Word is it all started down in Southern Italy...
Better grab the crew and make a run for Walmart
Source: Sky News

🤣😂😂🙂
electricbadger89 electricbadger89 Regular
423 messages
joined May 2019
#604 ·
I’m trying to figure out how things work with separated parents. If neither parent is sick or under quarantine, can the other parent pick up their child and then bring them back later?
I mean, who exactly is going to stop me from seeing my kid when we have a 50/50 custody agreement with their dad?
vividranger8 vividranger8 Active Member
96 messages
joined Aug 2011
#605 ·
Benjamin Barnes2 said:A few days ago, the NSCZ was practically begging everyone to just stay put and not leave their homes.
Now, the Department of Justice is out there slapping fines on anyone who ignores those requests.
I actually witnessed this firsthand tonight—a DOJ vehicle was at a checkpoint, pulling cars over and checking addresses just to write up $150 tickets.

I haven't personally seen a hundred-dollar fine handed out yet, but I definitely saw what was happening...

Honestly, you can take a fine like that and throw it straight in the trash. There’s absolutely zero legal basis for punishing people just because they "ignored a request."
wiredseal7 wiredseal7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2009
#606 ·
Benjamin Barnes2 said:A few days ago, the NSCZ was practically begging everyone to just stay put and not leave their homes.
Now, the Department of Justice is out there slapping fines on anyone who ignores those requests.
I actually witnessed this firsthand tonight—a DOJ vehicle was at a checkpoint, pulling cars over and checking addresses just to write up $150 tickets.

I haven't personally seen a hundred-dollar fine handed out yet, but I definitely saw what was happening...

It’s chaos—though, honestly, I wonder how many of those will actually hold up in court. Regardless, I don't see much point in heading out tonight anyway. I guess that's why they cut the hours at the local grocery stores.

It’s almost funny how every single country in the European Union has cooked up its own weird version of these rules. Store hours, public transit, freedom of movement, fine amounts, quarantine protocols, cell phone tracking, airport status... it's just total madness.
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#607 ·
electricbadger89 said:I’m trying to figure out how things work with separated parents. If neither parent is sick or under quarantine, can the other parent pick up their child and then bring them back later?
I mean, who exactly is going to stop me from seeing my kid when we have a 50/50 custody agreement with their dad?

First off—and I say this with all due respect to the legal realities here—in extreme circumstances, a judge could strip away far more than just visitation rights. That whole "let's see who can stop me..." attitude you're taking? It's misguided, frankly.

But, since we aren't dealing with an emergency situation right now, you should theoretically be able to get your court order without much trouble. However—and this is the part people tend to overlook—how much red tape you run into depends entirely on how much of a headache the local clerk or caseworker decides to make you. Depending on how much they decide to nitpick, you might find yourself drowning in endless paperwork, affidavits, and notarized stamps just to satisfy some bureaucrat's mood.
electrichound22 electrichound22 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2020
#608 ·
The decision was made specifically to avoid forcing everyone
to flee to the rural towns and islands all at once.
If they did, local doctors wouldn't stand a chance against that kind of sudden surge in patients.
Still, I can’t wait for this restriction to be scrapped
so we can finally get back to normal traffic flow and have the borders fully reopened.
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#609 ·
electrichound22 said:The decision was made specifically to avoid forcing everyone
to flee to the rural towns and islands all at once.
If they did, local doctors wouldn't stand a chance against that kind of sudden surge in patients.
Still, I can’t wait for this restriction to be scrapped
so we can finally get back to normal traffic flow and have the borders fully reopened.

Look, if someone chooses to self-isolate, a local doctor isn't going to have anything to do with that. Besides, even then, we'd still be looking at far fewer people than what we see during the peak summer tourist season.

The crux of the matter is that this decision was made under the assumption that people are heading to their vacation homes just because they feel like it—not because staying home is practically impossible for them.
Keith Barrett2 Keith Barrett2 Active Member
57 messages
joined Nov 2021
#610 ·
Man, they seriously screwed up here in my city and basically created a perfect storm for spreading this damn virus.

So, get this—there are two main ways you can even enter town now. Instead of having checkpoints at both of those entrances, they decided to put the cops at one single spot about 2-1.9 miles miles deep inside the city limits. Now everyone is just stuck in these massive lines of cars waiting to be checked.

And here’s the kicker: like 90% of the people driving through there actually live right there in those 2-1.9 miles outskirts neighborhoods. Under the current rules, they're totally allowed to head into town for groceries and stuff, so they have to pass through.

Every single resident passing through ends up in close contact with an officer because they have to hand over their ID. Then the cop grabs your ID with his hands—after he's already been touching hundreds of other IDs while wearing those gloves—and then hands it right back to you. It’s just common sense, right? Total madness.🙂
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#611 ·
But... But... But, they’re actually wearing gloves!

😬
Bryan Taylor6 Bryan Taylor6 Active Member
179 messages
joined Oct 2017
#612 ·
electrichound22 said:The decision was made specifically to avoid forcing everyone
to flee to the rural towns and islands all at once.
If they did, local doctors wouldn't stand a chance against that kind of sudden surge in patients.
Still, I can’t wait for this restriction to be scrapped
so we can finally get back to normal traffic flow and have the borders fully reopened.

The decision came way too late. It happened right after 300,000 people from NYC already cleared out of the city.
Bryan Taylor6 Bryan Taylor6 Active Member
179 messages
joined Oct 2017
#613 ·
Bryan Taylor6 said:Start an initiative to dissolve the local township and merge with the next big city over. You’d cut the total amount of red tape in half.

Man, I’d love to see that happen 😁

The idea isn't actually bad...
electrichound22 electrichound22 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2020
#614 ·
Once these initial 30 days wrap up,
is there any actual plan to extend this decision through May and June?
nimblescout50 nimblescout50 Active Member
88 messages
joined May 2012
#615 ·
Yeah, honestly, it’d be better if we just had those 300,000 people right here in town—just enough to clog up the streets and give everyone something to gossip about.
wiredseal7 wiredseal7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2009
#616 ·
Keith Barrett2 said:Man, they seriously screwed up here in my city and basically created a perfect storm for spreading this damn virus.

So, get this—there are two main ways you can even enter town now. Instead of having checkpoints at both of those entrances, they decided to put the cops at one single spot about 2-1.9 miles miles deep inside the city limits. Now everyone is just stuck in these massive lines of cars waiting to be checked.

And here’s the kicker: like 90% of the people driving through there actually live right there in those 2-1.9 miles outskirts neighborhoods. Under the current rules, they're totally allowed to head into town for groceries and stuff, so they have to pass through.

Every single resident passing through ends up in close contact with an officer because they have to hand over their ID. Then the cop grabs your ID with his hands—after he's already been touching hundreds of other IDs while wearing those gloves—and then hands it right back to you. It’s just common sense, right? Total madness.🙂

They should be monitoring from a distance—which is actually what they do where I live (not in the US).

Even at my local bakery, the woman puts bread into bags using the same gloves she used to handle cash or credit cards from previous customers. Seriously, haven't they heard of tongs? I actually had to crank up the oven and bake my bread for another 10 minutes just to feel safe.

But hey, what can you do? I guess the best bet is just flooding the government with complaints about these little details that actually drive the infection rates up.
Joshua Gray75 Joshua Gray75 Active Member
92 messages
joined Oct 2013
#617 ·
vividranger8 said:Honestly, you can take a fine like that and throw it straight in the trash. There’s absolutely zero legal basis for punishing people just because they "ignored a request."

" checking an address would result in fines of $100"

Is it just me, or does that sentence sound completely nonsensical... or maybe there's something wrong with my head?🤔

I've been scouring the web trying to find where they actually specify the fine amounts for people attempting to cross into another county or city without a permit... but I'm coming up empty... 🤔

Does anyone have a link?
boldotter2 boldotter2 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2020
#618 ·
electrichound22 said:The decision was made specifically to avoid forcing everyone
to flee to the rural towns and islands all at once.
If they did, local doctors wouldn't stand a chance against that kind of sudden surge in patients.
Still, I can’t wait for this restriction to be scrapped
so we can finally get back to normal traffic flow and have the borders fully reopened.

Honestly, this whole decision feels like it was made in a panic just to stop a panic, and it's only happening in Washington, D.C. That’s where the real absurdity lies. It seems like the government is actually panicking more than the actual people are!
As for the rest of America, especially the rural areas, this rule really shouldn't have anything to do with them.

And I guess the islands should have handled their own quarantine stuff much earlier if they needed to. I mean, isn't the whole point of a quarantine to keep the disease from getting in, rather than keeping sick people from leaving?
Plus, they really need to keep an eye on the summer tourist season. The chance of things spreading and the strain on the system will be way higher then than it is right now.

It'll be pretty interesting to see how the islands and other vacation spots behave this summer—things might calm down by then, but the problem won't be solved by a long shot. If it took Chinese people a month to sort things out after the peak, it'll probably take Italians at least three, and they haven't even hit the peak yet.
It would be super hypocritical if they start letting in tourists with big spenders later on while blocking Americans from going to their own homes right now.
Keith Barrett2 Keith Barrett2 Active Member
57 messages
joined Nov 2021
#619 ·
wiredseal7 said:They should be monitoring from a distance—which is actually what they do where I live (not in the US).

Even at my local bakery, the woman puts bread into bags using the same gloves she used to handle cash or credit cards from previous customers. Seriously, haven't they heard of tongs? I actually had to crank up the oven and bake my bread for another 10 minutes just to feel safe.

But hey, what can you do? I guess the best bet is just flooding the government with complaints about these little details that actually drive the infection rates up.

Man, either your people have superhuman eyesight or you guys are carrying around giant ID cards.😂

So, wait—is it the same deal for you? Like, do they set up checkpoints a few miles inside the city instead of just at the borders?
Joshua Gray75 Joshua Gray75 Active Member
92 messages
joined Oct 2013
#620 ·
electrichound22 said:Once these initial 30 days wrap up,
is there any actual plan to extend this decision through May and June?

A thirty-day restriction on leaving one's residence—or is it something else entirely?...
(meaning from March 23rd to April 22nd?🤔)

If anyone could provide a direct link to the official notice, I’d certainly appreciate it... ☕

🙄

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads