#601 ·
Edward Fisher86 said:He’s approving home healthcare, so he's likely more acquainted with how things work on the ground. That’s probably what they were aiming for, though we still run into issues since not everyone in need actually qualifies for coverage.
Broadly speaking, I have some serious issues with this residency requirement measure—especially this whole setup where every local Command Center just seems to do whatever they feel like at the moment...
You have tens of thousands of people in self-isolation, and now you're telling them they can't even retreat to a cabin in the woods because there are—admittedly, in small percentages—a few idiots out there breaking quarantine. I mean, do you really think an idiot is going to head out to some remote area just to mess around with their isolation protocols? It doesn't make sense.
On the other hand, I am genuinely curious about what "self-isolation" is supposed to look like in a typical American household with an average number of residents living in it.
Then there's the issue of police patrols stopping every single vehicle to harass people over paperwork; that is basically the literal definition of a super-spreader event.
I get the impression that, caught up in the hype regarding last Sunday's supposed exodus from Washington, D.C., they've made a decision that honestly carries far more downsides than upsides.