Austin Garcia said:I’m honestly not following your persistence here; perhaps you don't care which authority sends kids home, but I never said I didn't care, nor did I suggest a janitor was making these calls...
I simply pointed out that while the school follows the protocol you described, my child was only kept home based on my own word...
To reiterate, they told us a rapid test would be sufficient for their purposes, so there is absolutely nothing recorded in the official state database since I performed the test at home myself...
Furthermore, I still wanted a PCR test, so I went ahead and got one...
But even then, there is no record of the initial symptoms in the system because, as I have mentioned three times now, nobody called us to ask about symptoms or to mandate isolation. Yet, you keep insisting that this information is already filed away...
Given how inconsistent recent testing results have been, it was entirely possible for a PCR to come back negative. If that had happened, what reason would be listed in the system for the children's isolation? We couldn't exactly tell them, "Haha, sorry your kids had to stay home for five days for no reason"...
If I haven't made it clear enough why this doesn't add up, I'm really not sure how else to explain it to you...
No need to get worked up. You already said how it went down, and that’s just not how things work—either there are actual rules, or it's just total chaos.
We had this ridiculous paradox the other day. A kid wakes up with a fever on Monday before school starts. Mom calls the principal to say he's staying home, and the principal decides the whole school needs to shut down—even though, by the book, contacts from Friday don't even count.
Because officially, you only count contacts with someone positive within that 48-hour window before symptoms pop up or before an asymptomatic test comes back.
Sure, we can sit here and guess the kid caught it at school, but if nobody else in the class reported being positive, you can't trigger isolation based on Friday's contacts because that was way more than 48 hours ago. End of story.
I don't care about the principal's "gut feeling" or whatever.
And I'm certainly not burning through my sick days or PTO just because someone has a hunch.
It's black and white according to the CDC guidelines, so that's what we follow.
Then again, a few months back, a brother and sister both got sick at school—lower grades. One doctor sent the entire class home, while another doctor looked at a second-grade class in the exact same situation and only sent three kids home. Nobody was wearing masks anyway.
Samuel Barrett33 said:I honestly can't wrap my head around why some people are being told to isolate the second they feel even a tiny bit off, while others are basically living their lives until that PCR test actually comes back positive. Is there some kind of logic there, or is it just random? I'm wondering if those folks who only start isolating after the lab results come in are just getting a pass because they aren't showing any symptoms at all.
For someone showing symptoms, day zero is the day the symptoms start, and the clock begins tomorrow.
For someone without symptoms, day zero is when the test comes back positive.
How else are you supposed to pin down when an asymptomatic person actually turned positive if not by the test itself?
The time since exposure is just the incubation period, which lasts about 10 days. Someone might get sick or test positive on day 3, or they might be waiting until day 10.