CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Republican Party - General Discussion

Republican Party - General Discussion

Started by Larry Walker24 · · 👁 11 views · 2.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Larry Walker24mistyhawk17casualskipper6Jeremy Sanchez4Walter Baker2electricnomad8darkhawk30Nancy Gomez26Harold Davis6Alexander Reed7slysurfer14Kenneth Perez15Thomas Nelson25Robin Jones2urbanrider8Amy Nguyen18quietfox38Carol Newman2Ethan Clark3Paul Bishop3darkdriverrapidfox26Mark Hughes36hollowmason64 …
urbanrider8 urbanrider8 Active Member
81 messages
joined Feb 2020
#21 ·
Elvir Mesanovic
@Elvir_Mesanovic
·
7m
.
@GOP finally nailed down their official membership count, and it turns out the party is sitting at exactly 211,492 members #CNN
darkhawk30 darkhawk30 Active Member
161 messages
joined May 2023
#22 ·
Only 18 out of 49 representatives actually voted in favor of the IRS proposal. A solid 31 stood their ground against it.
Walter Baker2 Walter Baker2 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Feb 2020
#23 ·
darkhawk30 said:What makes you say "serious"?
They’re a massive party—the biggest one, actually. Even the old Democratic Party they grew out of was a powerhouse.
But calling them a "serious" party? That's a joke. 🙏
A serious party would actually put its resources, expertise, and influence toward improving the lives of its citizens.
From where I'm sitting, they're just showing us exactly what their only true priority is.

I meant "serious" in terms of raw power and their ability to seize control. Right now, it's clearly just two factions fighting for dominance—the Herzegovinian lobby versus the mainstream faction. Vaso, Kovač, Penava, and their whole crew will likely be purged from the Republican Party following this. Everything from here on out depends on how much sway that group holds within the Herzegovinian wing; we'll see if they pull out of the Republican Party entirely to start their own movement, or if fresh faces from that lobby simply step up to fill the void in the Republican Party. If you look at history, nothing really changed within the party after Ivića-Pašalić lost to Sanders.
Amy Nguyen18 Amy Nguyen18 Member
42 messages
joined Feb 2020
#24 ·
They’re going to kick Plenković out, not the other way around...
quietfox38 quietfox38 Member
30 messages
joined Mar 2023
#25 ·
THE END OF THE MODERATE REPUBLICAN PARTY: THE US IS SHIFTING RIGHT
Plenković has to face a bitter truth: he failed to reform the Republican Party


Andrej Plenković has to face a bitter reality. He didn't manage to change the Republican Party the way he intended. If ministers had been dropping like flies during an internal party purge, you could call it a cleanup. But that’s not what happened. He wasn't firing them because they were incompetent or lazy; he was doing it because the public outcry became too loud to ignore. He defended them as long as possible, letting them go with obvious reluctance. In the end, he just blamed the media for everything.

Now, Plenković is left with a tiny inner circle—leadership he basically hand-picked himself. The right wing of the party is already complaining that this leadership lacks actual support within the Republican Party. Honestly, he shouldn't even count on those publicly backing him, because many are already looking for an exit. More and more people are running for top positions without even checking with him first. Three years ago, this kind of thing would have been unthinkable. No leader of the Republican Party before Andrej Plenković has ever faced this much distrust. To a lot of people in the party, he's always felt like an outsider.
Carol Newman2 Carol Newman2 Regular
413 messages
joined Aug 2013
#26 ·
If Kovač actually takes over the reins at the Republican Party, we'd see the party headquartered in a place like Little Rock for the first time, with him stepping up as their prime candidate for leadership.

I’ve got my doubts about whether Kovač can actually pull enough votes to win. He’s just a shady, unlikable guy.
There's a real chance Bero could end up beating him.
We'll soon see which faction holds the real power within the Republican Party—whether it's the coastal and midwestern crowd or the folks from the South.
Ethan Clark3 Ethan Clark3 Member
10 messages
joined Nov 2022
#27 ·
I guess Kovač is originally from an Imotski native area.
Paul Bishop3 Paul Bishop3 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Dec 2011
#28 ·
Ethan Clark3 said:I guess Kovač is originally from an Imotski native area.

It’s not just garbage... the whole thing just went to hell.
darkdriver darkdriver Active Member
153 messages
joined Jun 2022
#29 ·
Amy Nguyen18 said:They’re going to kick Plenković out, not the other way around...

Coming from the guy who’s been claiming Škoro is going to take down Plenković in basically every single thread for years now.

I mean, look—you're not totally wrong. Plenković is definitely going to step down or lose his grip on the Republican Party at some point... that's a given, just like how the ocean is wet. But honestly? These timelines you keep throwing out there? It's nothing more than pure wishful thinking.
Amy Nguyen18 Amy Nguyen18 Member
42 messages
joined Feb 2020
#30 ·
darkdriver said:Coming from the guy who’s been claiming Škoro is going to take down Plenković in basically every single thread for years now.

I mean, look—you're not totally wrong. Plenković is definitely going to step down or lose his grip on the Republican Party at some point... that's a given, just like how the ocean is wet. But honestly? These timelines you keep throwing out there? It's nothing more than pure wishful thinking.

Whether I'm right or not is irrelevant. What matters is that once Plenković falls (which might take ten years if that makes you feel better), there needs to be a total internal purge of his inner circle. His people need to be politically sidelined and swept away completely. Only then can the party actually breathe again.
rapidfox26 rapidfox26 Member
15 messages
joined Oct 2017
#31 ·
Amy Nguyen18 said:Whether I'm right or not is irrelevant. What matters is that once Plenković falls (which might take ten years if that makes you feel better), there needs to be a total internal purge of his inner circle. His people need to be politically sidelined and swept away completely. Only then can the party actually breathe again.

With you, it really just comes down to which one you are:

A) One of those optimists who actually thinks the Republican Party can change...

Or

B) Someone just waiting for their turn to grab a piece of this dumpster fire of a country.
darkdriver darkdriver Active Member
153 messages
joined Jun 2022
#32 ·
Amy Nguyen18 said:Whether I'm right or not is irrelevant. What matters is that once Plenković falls (which might take ten years if that makes you feel better), there needs to be a total internal purge of his inner circle. His people need to be politically sidelined and swept away completely. Only then can the party actually breathe again.

Look, it’s definitely not in my interest for the Republican Party to thrive, let alone "breathe"—and if you ask me, it's in the best interest of the country, too.
That party is basically a nasty pathogen, like a virus that's woven itself into the very fabric of this nation. It isn't going anywhere until it kills the host, so it's in the country's absolute best interest to wipe out that pathogen before it causes immeasurable, irreversible damage—if it hasn't already.
You seem to think we should take things slow with these "ailments" (God knows why), almost suggesting they could even become beneficial if we just tweak them enough. I see it completely differently, and I guess that's the fundamental difference between us.
Amy Nguyen18 Amy Nguyen18 Member
42 messages
joined Feb 2020
#33 ·
darkdriver said:Look, it’s definitely not in my interest for the Republican Party to thrive, let alone "breathe"—and if you ask me, it's in the best interest of the country, too.
That party is basically a nasty pathogen, like a virus that's woven itself into the very fabric of this nation. It isn't going anywhere until it kills the host, so it's in the country's absolute best interest to wipe out that pathogen before it causes immeasurable, irreversible damage—if it hasn't already.
You seem to think we should take things slow with these "ailments" (God knows why), almost suggesting they could even become beneficial if we just tweak them enough. I see it completely differently, and I guess that's the fundamental difference between us.

Your opinion is certainly "modest," and you're spot on there. You've probably been voting for the Republican Party for the last 30 years.

The only thing that constitutes the American interest is the choice made by the American people. Not what you or I might want, but strictly what people decide at the ballot box. The public isn't some alien entity that just showed up out of nowhere to terrorize us for decades. It’s the people around us—maybe even ourselves—who support these specific options, these parties, these leaders, and these special interest groups.

And yes, your perspective is truly modest if you actually believe people don't want the exact kind of politicians they currently have.
darkdriver darkdriver Active Member
153 messages
joined Jun 2022
#34 ·
Amy Nguyen18 said:Your opinion is certainly "modest," and you're spot on there. You've probably been voting for the Republican Party for the last 30 years.

The only thing that constitutes the American interest is the choice made by the American people. Not what you or I might want, but strictly what people decide at the ballot box. The public isn't some alien entity that just showed up out of nowhere to terrorize us for decades. It’s the people around us—maybe even ourselves—who support these specific options, these parties, these leaders, and these special interest groups.

And yes, your perspective is truly modest if you actually believe people don't want the exact kind of politicians they currently have.

You totally called me out, major props 👍

And, yeah, my opinion is definitely modest—just mentioning it since you forgot to point that out for the third time.

Third time's a charm, as they say.
Mark Hughes36 Mark Hughes36 Active Member
109 messages
joined Feb 2023
#35 ·
rapidfox26 said:With you, it really just comes down to which one you are:

A) One of those optimists who actually thinks the Republican Party can change...

Or

B) Someone just waiting for their turn to grab a piece of this dumpster fire of a country.

It isn't just mess; the whole thing has gone to hell... 😉
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#36 ·
lezerni88 said:Man, what kind of irrational, delusional world are you living in? Seriously. 😁

Remember that one period back when Škoro finally stepped up and took over as president? 😁

Jeremy Sanchez4 said:Well, that’s just classic Plenković. Purely opportunistic. He spent the whole presidential campaign trashing Škoro, then basically vacuumed up all those Škoro votes after the first round. Now, out of nowhere, he’s acting all surprised that Škoro called him out, claiming he actually thinks nothing but good things about him.
Basically, both sides are just competing over who loves patriotism more, while both are already eyeing a coalition with the conservatives and Škoro. Plenković will pivot to being a hardcore right-winger if it means being even more extreme than Škoro's crowd. Bottom line? They're essentially the same thing. It doesn't matter who wins... except Plenković is way more hypocritical, shifty, and calculated. He'll blow whichever way the wind shifts just to cling to power.
The whole thing is disgusting.

It feels just like when they were dragging the Bridge through the mud back during Karamarko's era. Honestly, where's the difference?
The Republican Party is nothing more than a criminal enterprise. It’s just a collection of corrupt thugs and crooks who only care about holding onto power so they can line their own pockets—it doesn't even matter who they have to screw over to do it.
They honestly don't have an ounce of shame, any sense of decency, or even a shred of character left.

Amy Nguyen18 said:Your opinion is certainly "modest," and you're spot on there. You've probably been voting for the Republican Party for the last 30 years.

The only thing that constitutes the American interest is the choice made by the American people. Not what you or I might want, but strictly what people decide at the ballot box. The public isn't some alien entity that just showed up out of nowhere to terrorize us for decades. It’s the people around us—maybe even ourselves—who support these specific options, these parties, these leaders, and these special interest groups.

And yes, your perspective is truly modest if you actually believe people don't want the exact kind of politicians they currently have.

So, what, the entire interest of the American people is just to see if the Republican Party can catch its breath?
So, what does it actually mean when people say the "Republican Party is breathing again"? It’s one of those phrases you hear tossed around in political circles, usually implying there's a sudden surge of energy or a second wind after things have been looking pretty stagnant. It’s like watching a tired athlete finally catch their breath and find that extra gear right when everyone thought they were done. I was chatting with a friend about this the other day while we were grabbing coffee, and we were both trying to wrap our heads around whether it's genuine momentum or just a temporary spike in activity. It’s a bit vague, isn't it? It could mean anything from a shift in leadership to just a renewed sense of purpose within the party ranks.
Carol Newman2 Carol Newman2 Regular
413 messages
joined Aug 2013
#37 ·
PENAVA ACCUSES REPUBLICAN PARTY LEADERSHIP OF EXERTING PRESSURE: 'Gathering signatures is becoming impossible. This is pure repression and an assault on democracy—we need to move past this.'

-------
At this rate, these Republicans are going to end up tearing each other apart before the internal party elections even get underway.
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active Member
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#38 ·
Carol Newman2 said:PENAVA ACCUSES REPUBLICAN PARTY LEADERSHIP OF EXERTING PRESSURE: 'Gathering signatures is becoming impossible. This is pure repression and an assault on democracy—we need to move past this.'

-------
At this rate, these Republicans are going to end up tearing each other apart before the internal party elections even get underway.

Joe Biden is still basically the big boss for every politician in the States. The only guy who could actually stand toe-to-toe with him ended up running for President.

Chuck Schumer can only run his errands, and Kovacs might as well be polishing his shoes.
Until we find someone better—go Plenković and Penava 🙂

And if Penava doesn't land that Vice President spot, he’s out of here—he can just go hang out with Hasanbegović then ☕
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#39 ·
silentsurfer3 said:Joe Biden is still basically the big boss for every politician in the States. The only guy who could actually stand toe-to-toe with him ended up running for President.

Chuck Schumer can only run his errands, and Kovacs might as well be polishing his shoes.
Until we find someone better—go Plenković and Penava 🙂

And if Penava doesn't land that Vice President spot, he’s out of here—he can just go hang out with Hasanbegović then ☕

So, if all the candidates who lose are anti-Plenky, does that mean they all join the coalition or is it just Penava??
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active Member
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#40 ·
Charles Fox10 said:So, if all the candidates who lose are anti-Plenky, does that mean they all join the coalition or is it just Penava??

If you're asking me? Everyone. 😁
Those chrome-plated idiots still don't get that the Republican Party isn't some organized movement—it's more like a giant catch-all bucket where you can cram anyone from the moderate center all the way down to the far right.

Besides, I honestly can't remember the last time the Republican Party was actually a "right-wing" or "far-right" party instead of just being your standard center-right outfit.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads