CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Republican Party - General Discussion

Republican Party - General Discussion

Started by Larry Walker24 · · 👁 23 views · 2.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Larry Walker24mistyhawk17casualskipper6Jeremy Sanchez4Walter Baker2electricnomad8darkhawk30Nancy Gomez26Harold Davis6Alexander Reed7slysurfer14Kenneth Perez15Thomas Nelson25Robin Jones2urbanrider8Amy Nguyen18quietfox38Carol Newman2Ethan Clark3Paul Bishop3darkdriverrapidfox26Mark Hughes36hollowmason64 …
Alex Moore3 Alex Moore3 Active Member
54 messages
joined May 2024
#1961 ·
Are the typos just because you're stressed? What's got you so worked up?
A week before the vote, they didn't even have 76 votes in the chamber, so the bill didn't pass.
Which opposition was Andrej Plenković talking about? The group that actually helped pass that law, or the ones who were against it or abstained?
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active Member
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1962 ·
hollowmason64 said:Wait, "a little tougher"???
Seriously, please tell me how passing a law becomes just "a little tougher" when you already have the 76 votes you need to make it happen?
I am dying of curiosity here, please, I really need to hear an explanation for that logic. 🙂

Quincy:
So, are you saying the Democratic Party and the Progressives voted for a disastrously bad law, but they aren't responsible for it???
Of course not. How can you be held accountable for managing something when you don't have a single lever at your disposal—not even a tiny bit of influence over any of them?

Your logic is a bit shaky 😵 — on one hand, you're arguing that if the opposition hadn't supported the law, citizens would notice, but now that nothing is getting built, citizens don't seem to care?
Are you saying back then it would have been obvious the law was bad because the opposition rejected it, but now nobody knows who to blame for the lack of progress?
You're being a little contradictory here.

Where did I ever say citizens aren't asking questions now?
They voted for a disastrously bad law, effectively handing Joe Biden and that genius Smith an excuse to use the classic Republican tactic: shifting all the blame onto the opposition.

What really gets to me is seeing these constant Republican-style excuses for the other side's screw-ups on this forum. They voted, but it doesn't matter. They lied, but it doesn't matter.
It feels like reading an epic poem written by two opposing machines stuck in a loop. 🙂

And yeah, sure, I voted for Eric Adams in the local elections just to kick out Al Capone, Dilbert, and their whole crew. That doesn't mean I'm going to blindly defend every blatant mistake they make.
Chloe Martinez7 Chloe Martinez7 Active Member
144 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1963 ·
The timing of the law—whether it was a week before or after—and how many hands were actually involved in the process...
they’re completely losing the plot by ignoring the fact that

Even under that "flawed" legislation, they could have renovated a good portion of the properties.
But they haven't renovated a single building.
In all this time
everything that has actually been fixed was done on a volunteer basis.

They haven't even touched the facilities owned by the government.


Arguing over specific dates and technicalities isn't going to fix a single property,
and neither is cluttering up this forum to defend the administration.
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#1964 ·
Alex Moore3 said:They couldn't pass that law a week before.
On the second attempt, they actually put in some effort and passed a controversial, poorly designed, and unworkable law, and they even had help from the Democratic Party and the Greens.
Satisfied with that answer?

The only thing that ruins your little lie about the law not being voted on a week prior is the fact that it was actually passed after a two-week special session of US Congress.
Next time you decide to stretch the truth, maybe try inventing something that isn't so easily debunked by checking the official US Congress website.
And yes, I am very satisfied with the answer.

steelfox98 said:Where did I ever say citizens aren't asking questions now?
They voted for a disastrously bad law, effectively handing Joe Biden and that genius Smith an excuse to use the classic Republican tactic: shifting all the blame onto the opposition.

What really gets to me is seeing these constant Republican-style excuses for the other side's screw-ups on this forum. They voted, but it doesn't matter. They lied, but it doesn't matter.
It feels like reading an epic poem written by two opposing machines stuck in a loop. 🙂

And yeah, sure, I voted for Eric Adams in the local elections just to kick out Al Capone, Dilbert, and their whole crew. That doesn't mean I'm going to blindly defend every blatant mistake they make.

What are you talking about when you say they don't care?
Looking at the rest of your post... man, do you even realize what you're writing?
Are you saying that voting for the law gave Plenković and Horvat the ammunition to play it off and point fingers elsewhere?
Is it really that hard for people who actually think for themselves to see that this is just standard Republican nonsense?
If you see it, you see it. If you don't... well, the Republicans could have stayed home on election day and we'd still be stuck with people believing Plenković.
On the flip side, if they hadn't voted for it, Plenković would just be accusing them of not giving a damn about people sitting without roofs over their heads, claiming the reconstruction would only be halfway done if everyone hadn't supported the law—it's all just a bunch of garbage...
..which brings us back to the main point: Republicans will always find a way to blame someone else for their own screw-ups. It's the same deal whether you recognize who is responsible or not.
Anything else is just silly spinning and twisting things in a way that only serves to make you look foolish.

Quincy:
What bothers me is how often I see these Republican-style excuses popping up on this forum from Možemo and their mistakes. They voted, but it doesn't matter. They lied, but it doesn't matter.
It feels like reading an epic poem written by two opposing machines.🙂
Sure, they voted for that law. They were out there protesting in front of US Congress all night right before the dissolution and elections because they wanted that law passed first.
The whole point was to get that damn law on the books so the reconstruction could finally start.
The idea was to pass it, then tweak and adjust it as problems popped up on the ground—but the priority was just to get moving.
I can say this with total confidence: even the harshest critics of the Republican Party—and I count myself among them—never thought they would sit on their hands for over a year while these people didn't give a single damn about the fact that another winter was coming.
steelfox98 steelfox98 Active Member
128 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1965 ·
Don't hold your breath. I've seen enough disappointment in this life to know better. steelfox98 says:
Where exactly did you say they don't bother to ask?
Look at this thread... honestly, are you even aware of what you're posting?
The vote on that bill just gave Andrej Plenković and Horvat all the leverage they need to brush this under the rug and point the finger at everyone else. Typical. I remember when things actually meant something in DC, before this constant deflection became the norm. It’s exhausting.
Is it really that hard to see? For anyone with half a brain cell left, this is just more typical Republican-style bullshit. I've seen this circus before, back when I was working those long shifts in Chicago. It never changes.

I suppose so, but if that's how you want to play it, you clearly aren't interested in actually communicating.
They voted for that desperate Republican law out of pure populism, too afraid to touch the one issue that actually triggers their voters. And then, predictably, those criminals have the nerve to claim, "Even the opposition supported our bill!" Typical.

If you see it, you see it. If you don't, you don't. Honestly, those Republicans should have just stayed home that day—not just skipping the vote, but staying out of the country entirely. People like that would still be out there blindly trusting Andrej Plenković regardless.

It’s obvious to everyone now. If the opposition had actually pulled themselves together back then—even with that one unconventional move on such a sensitive issue—they could have pivoted the focus toward yet another Republican disaster. If they had, Andrej Plenković wouldn't be standing there today talking about "opposition support." Not a chance.
We all knew that any legislation birthed by the Republican Party was bound to be a disaster, but I didn't realize just how catastrophic it would actually be. Did you? Would you have paid more attention if every single opposition member had voted against that reconstruction bill? I certainly would have.

"Quote:"
Look, if they hadn't voted for it, Andrej Plenković would just be pointing fingers anyway. He’d claim they didn't give a damn about people sitting out there without a roof over their heads. He’d argue that reconstruction would only be halfway done if they hadn't backed that law. It's all just a load of nonsense.
He’d love to call them out, but he'd end up swallowing his own pride just to cover for another one of those Republican Party stunts. Typical.
They broke his quorum, so we just sat there laughing at his pathetic whining. It’s the same old story. Right after the election, every single opposition leader refused to even grab a coffee with him. They knew better. With Andrej Plenković, you don't get a conversation—you only get a knife in the back.
Look at what happened last week. Everyone was fixated on Wolfgang Schäuble and that predictable mess over at NBC. It was all a distraction. We saw how the opposition used their blockade to push a visibly rattled Andrej Plenković into cutting the live broadcast of the session. Typical.

"Quote:"
It always comes back to this. The Republicans will find some way to pin their own mess on someone else. It's predictable. Those who actually want to hold them accountable will see it, and those who don't... well, they won't. Same old story.
Everything else is just mindless spin. It’s a desperate attempt to twist the truth so hard you end up biting your own tongue. I've seen this dance before.
Was that aimed at me?
Let’s be real: that disastrous Republican law gave them all the cover they needed. Like you said, everything else is just pure spin. To me, this is nothing more than classic Republican-style damage control to justify their own screw-ups.

"Quote:"
Yeah, they voted for that bill. Just like they spent the entire night protesting outside the US Congress before everything was dissolved for elections, all because they were desperate to push that specific legislation through first.
The whole point was to get that damn law passed so reconstruction could actually kick off.
The plan was to just tweak and amend things on the fly as problems popped up on the ground—as long as they got moving.
I can say this with total confidence: even the harshest critics and haters of the Republican Party—and I proudly count myself among them—never imagined these people would sit on their hands for over a year, completely indifferent while we head into another winter.
The Republican Party would have pushed that law through even without any opposition, but hey—some of them actually did vote for it. That’s despite the fact that the Republican Party rejected every single meaningful amendment meant to fix it. Don't quote me on the specifics, but I think they conceded on a few trivial ones.

I absolutely agree with that last part, but that’s my whole point. If the opposition had actually united back then, they would have realized something smelled way worse than usual. Like that whole situation with Wolfgang Schäuble.
Robin Jones2 Robin Jones2 Active Member
199 messages
joined Nov 2012
#1966 ·
People are wasting breath arguing over who voted for or against this legislation.

It’s a complete distraction from the actual issue at hand.

The reality is that the Republican Party Administration hasn't managed to build or even repair a single house or building in eighteen months.

There is no logical reason why this law should prevent the Administration from repairing or constructing homes where the ownership titles are perfectly clear.
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#1967 ·
Alex Moore3 said:Quincy

Mr. Analyst, do I really need to prove you wrong again? Fine.
Nobody was questioning who is responsible for the (lack of) enforcement of this law, but since you asked, yes, the Republican Party is responsible for that, and Smith is a Republican minister. Satisfied?
But just in case you didn't catch it, let me repeat: the Republican Party is responsible for both passing this bad law and its implementation, while the Democrats and the Greens share responsibility for voting it through. This is the opposition that you, our "expert" analyst 😁, labeled as the "real" opposition while calling the others "fake," so I'm showing you exactly how much nonsense you're talking. You're getting ahead of yourself.☕

On a more serious note. The opposition needs to unite at least regarding the elections to take power back from a corrupt administration. They should set aside ideological differences until those issues actually hit the agenda. What you and the other former Democrats are doing is counterproductive. By pushing these foolish and untrue claims, you're creating division within the opposition before the election even happens. You don't even realize you're just helping the corrupt party.
Back when the Democrats were in power, you tried to shut down legitimate criticism of bad moves—moves that ultimately led to the Republicans returning to power. Instead of criticizing those mistakes yourselves, you deflected and insisted everyone else was to blame rather than your own party.
Now, after the split in the Democratic Party and their path toward becoming a marginal group, you've jumped ship to join the Greens and are making the exact same mistakes. You haven't learned anything, and you could easily end up with the same result.
Of course, that is unless you change your approach.
It is necessary to criticize the bad actions of your own favorites so they can improve and correct their course in time.
If you've understood anything at all, you won't be angry at this critique; if you haven't, just keep going until Adams eventually asks you to defend him.😁

Thanks a lot, party loyalist. That was all you were asked to do. The rest of your rambling is completely useless.
Alex Moore3 Alex Moore3 Active Member
54 messages
joined May 2024
#1968 ·
Christian Torres3 said:Thanks a lot, party loyalist. That was all you were asked to do. The rest of your rambling is completely useless.


To the analyst trying to play judge on which opposition side is right or wrong...
Why did you cut out the part where it explains how your party and the Progressives are actually responsible for passing that terrible law that's stalling all the reconstruction efforts?
Do you really think people will forget just because you cherry-picked the comments?
Plenty of people know how your party operates, especially when they back criminal legislation. It's a pattern—your party always jumps in to bail out its own wing whenever it suits them.☕
Anyway, Mr. Aspiring Analyst, 😁 do you honestly still think you're the right person to be grading the opposition after getting slapped down by the facts like this?😁
Alex Moore3 Alex Moore3 Active Member
54 messages
joined May 2024
#1969 ·
hollowmason64 said:The only thing that ruins your little lie about the law not being voted on a week prior is the fact that it was actually passed after a two-week special session of US Congress.
Next time you decide to stretch the truth, maybe try inventing something that isn't so easily debunked by checking the official US Congress website.
And yes, I am very satisfied with the answer.

What are you talking about when you say they don't care?
Looking at the rest of your post... man, do you even realize what you're writing?
Are you saying that voting for the law gave Plenković and Horvat the ammunition to play it off and point fingers elsewhere?
Is it really that hard for people who actually think for themselves to see that this is just standard Republican nonsense?
If you see it, you see it. If you don't... well, the Republicans could have stayed home on election day and we'd still be stuck with people believing Plenković.
On the flip side, if they hadn't voted for it, Plenković would just be accusing them of not giving a damn about people sitting without roofs over their heads, claiming the reconstruction would only be halfway done if everyone hadn't supported the law—it's all just a bunch of garbage...
..which brings us back to the main point: Republicans will always find a way to blame someone else for their own screw-ups. It's the same deal whether you recognize who is responsible or not.
Anything else is just silly spinning and twisting things in a way that only serves to make you look foolish.

Quincy:
What bothers me is how often I see these Republican-style excuses popping up on this forum from Možemo and their mistakes. They voted, but it doesn't matter. They lied, but it doesn't matter.
It feels like reading an epic poem written by two opposing machines.🙂
Sure, they voted for that law. They were out there protesting in front of US Congress all night right before the dissolution and elections because they wanted that law passed first.
The whole point was to get that damn law on the books so the reconstruction could finally start.
The idea was to pass it, then tweak and adjust it as problems popped up on the ground—but the priority was just to get moving.
I can say this with total confidence: even the harshest critics of the Republican Party—and I count myself among them—never thought they would sit on their hands for over a year while these people didn't give a single damn about the fact that another winter was coming.


What lie are you talking about???
Maybe this one?
https://www.telegram.com/politics-news-on-reconstruction/amp/

Look, I'm actually feeling a little embarrassed for you right now. 😁
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#1970 ·
Alex Moore3 said:To the analyst trying to play judge on which opposition side is right or wrong...
Why did you cut out the part where it explains how your party and the Progressives are actually responsible for passing that terrible law that's stalling all the reconstruction efforts?
Do you really think people will forget just because you cherry-picked the comments?
Plenty of people know how your party operates, especially when they back criminal legislation. It's a pattern—your party always jumps in to bail out its own wing whenever it suits them.☕
Anyway, Mr. Aspiring Analyst, 😁 do you honestly still think you're the right person to be grading the opposition after getting slapped down by the facts like this?😁

🤔 are responsible, and that's why nothing is being rebuilt???

Good God, what a bad joke. From what I can gather, if a law is garbage and the Republican Party didn't pass it, heaven forbid the Republican Party ever tries to fix it.
It's like the opposition thinks once they pass something, it's etched in stone and there's no God who could change it.🤦
Harold Davis6 Harold Davis6 Active Member
56 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1971 ·
Who exactly is responsible for enforcing the law under the Constitution of the United States?
You know the drill: the whole three branches of government nonsense.
And look, from what I can gather, there isn't a single line in the current disaster relief laws saying we aren't allowed to rebuild certain things. I’m positive there are plenty of damaged buildings out there that qualify for reconstruction, but let’s be real—the sheer incompetence of the folks in Washington can't just nullify even the best law in the book.
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#1972 ·
steelfox98 said:
Don't hold your breath. I've seen enough disappointment in this life to know better. steelfox98 says:
Where exactly did you say they don't bother to ask?
Look at this thread... honestly, are you even aware of what you're posting?
The vote on that bill just gave Andrej Plenković and Horvat all the leverage they need to brush this under the rug and point the finger at everyone else. Typical. I remember when things actually meant something in DC, before this constant deflection became the norm. It’s exhausting.
Is it really that hard to see? For anyone with half a brain cell left, this is just more typical Republican-style bullshit. I've seen this circus before, back when I was working those long shifts in Chicago. It never changes.

I suppose so, but if that's how you want to play it, you clearly aren't interested in actually communicating.
They voted for that desperate Republican law out of pure populism, too afraid to touch the one issue that actually triggers their voters. And then, predictably, those criminals have the nerve to claim, "Even the opposition supported our bill!" Typical.

If you see it, you see it. If you don't, you don't. Honestly, those Republicans should have just stayed home that day—not just skipping the vote, but staying out of the country entirely. People like that would still be out there blindly trusting Andrej Plenković regardless.

It’s obvious to everyone now. If the opposition had actually pulled themselves together back then—even with that one unconventional move on such a sensitive issue—they could have pivoted the focus toward yet another Republican disaster. If they had, Andrej Plenković wouldn't be standing there today talking about "opposition support." Not a chance.
We all knew that any legislation birthed by the Republican Party was bound to be a disaster, but I didn't realize just how catastrophic it would actually be. Did you? Would you have paid more attention if every single opposition member had voted against that reconstruction bill? I certainly would have.

"Quote:"
Look, if they hadn't voted for it, Andrej Plenković would just be pointing fingers anyway. He’d claim they didn't give a damn about people sitting out there without a roof over their heads. He’d argue that reconstruction would only be halfway done if they hadn't backed that law. It's all just a load of nonsense.
He’d love to call them out, but he'd end up swallowing his own pride just to cover for another one of those Republican Party stunts. Typical.
They broke his quorum, so we just sat there laughing at his pathetic whining. It’s the same old story. Right after the election, every single opposition leader refused to even grab a coffee with him. They knew better. With Andrej Plenković, you don't get a conversation—you only get a knife in the back.
Look at what happened last week. Everyone was fixated on Wolfgang Schäuble and that predictable mess over at NBC. It was all a distraction. We saw how the opposition used their blockade to push a visibly rattled Andrej Plenković into cutting the live broadcast of the session. Typical.

"Quote:"
It always comes back to this. The Republicans will find some way to pin their own mess on someone else. It's predictable. Those who actually want to hold them accountable will see it, and those who don't... well, they won't. Same old story.
Everything else is just mindless spin. It’s a desperate attempt to twist the truth so hard you end up biting your own tongue. I've seen this dance before.
Was that aimed at me?
Let’s be real: that disastrous Republican law gave them all the cover they needed. Like you said, everything else is just pure spin. To me, this is nothing more than classic Republican-style damage control to justify their own screw-ups.

"Quote:"
Yeah, they voted for that bill. Just like they spent the entire night protesting outside the US Congress before everything was dissolved for elections, all because they were desperate to push that specific legislation through first.
The whole point was to get that damn law passed so reconstruction could actually kick off.
The plan was to just tweak and amend things on the fly as problems popped up on the ground—as long as they got moving.
I can say this with total confidence: even the harshest critics and haters of the Republican Party—and I proudly count myself among them—never imagined these people would sit on their hands for over a year, completely indifferent while we head into another winter.
The Republican Party would have pushed that law through even without any opposition, but hey—some of them actually did vote for it. That’s despite the fact that the Republican Party rejected every single meaningful amendment meant to fix it. Don't quote me on the specifics, but I think they conceded on a few trivial ones.

I absolutely agree with that last part, but that’s my whole point. If the opposition had actually united back then, they would have realized something smelled way worse than usual. Like that whole situation with Wolfgang Schäuble.

The reason they voted for it was just to get some kind of legislation on the books, because even a flawed law like that was supposed to kickstart the rebuilding process. Or at least, that was the idea. Because there was constant whining about how work couldn't actually begin until the law was passed.
And honestly, I totally get that logic. When you've spent six months without a roof over your head, you just want things to move—you think, "Let's just get started and fix the details as we go," since realistically, nobody could have predicted every single little problem upfront.

Then, once they realized they'd been screwed over, they lost the quorum during the amendments a few months later—check out the link this genius posted as proof of an event from several months prior 😁
It’s just like when the whole COVID mess started and everyone gave them their full support, only to blow them off when they saw how they were being played, like that coffee meeting you mentioned.

Now it's finally clear to the citizens...

So now it's suddenly obvious that the Republicans are solely responsible for the rebuilding—or rather, the lack thereof? Well, they can go jump in a lake if they're only realizing that now.

The Republican Party would have passed that law that day regardless of the opposition

And that’s exactly the point of the whole argument. It's like trying to blame the opposition for not caring that rebuilding can't start without legislation while people are left homeless.
We both know the Republicans would find a way to shift the blame in any scenario, simply because they're shameless, immoral pieces of work.

Alex Moore3 said:What lie are you talking about???
Maybe this one?
https://www.telegram.com/politics-news-on-reconstruction/amp/

Look, I'm actually feeling a little embarrassed for you right now. 😁

Do you even read past the headline, or do you just Google stuff to find a title that supports whatever nonsense you're trying to pass off as truth? 🤣🤣🤣

So, you're basically blaming the Democratic Party and the Progressives for passing that reconstruction law, claiming they were just looking for any excuse to break quorum like they did last week. Then you drop a link where Plenki kukati complains about how the opposition blocked them from voting on the amendments to the reconstruction law 🙏instead of actually fixing things.

Honestly, you should be embarrassed.
Though, seeing as you’ve typed out so much nonsense, I doubt you even know what shame feels like. It requires a bit of self-reflection, and based on what you've written here, it looks like you're completely immune to that.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#1973 ·
Republican Party sees rating bump following corruption verdict

Quavo:
NBC just released the latest Nielsen data regarding political party popularity. This particular poll was conducted between October 16th and 19th, using a sample size of 1,400 respondents. Interestingly, the survey follows the final court ruling against the Republican Party concerning the massive Ogilvy scandal involving the misappropriation of funds from state agencies and corporations.

Republican Party 27.3%
Can Do 16.1%
Democratic Party 15.9%
Bridge 6.8%
DP 4.1%.
dustymarlin10 dustymarlin10 Active Member
238 messages
joined Nov 2015
#1974 ·
Great.

I bet someone's gonna chime in and say we don't deserve them.

Kid.

We get exactly the kind of leadership we deserve, right?
Nothing more, nothing less.
Emily Smith6 Emily Smith6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2023
#1975 ·
Melania, a minister whose party was just convicted of corruption: 'The Republican Party has made a clear commitment to fighting corruption!'
The Cabinet, according to the minister, is demonstrating its 'readiness and dedication to the fight' by introducing this new anti-corruption package.
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#1976 ·
Honestly, I don't even know whether to laugh or cry at this one... goodbye, common sense 🤦
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#1977 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Melania, a minister whose party was just convicted of corruption: 'The Republican Party has made a clear commitment to fighting corruption!'
The Cabinet, according to the minister, is demonstrating its 'readiness and dedication to the fight' by introducing this new anti-corruption package.

What's wrong with what he said? Just pay off the people you bribed before they catch you... though at this rate, catching you will be the least of your worries.
brightheron64 brightheron64 Regular
408 messages
joined Apr 2016
#1978 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Republican Party sees rating bump following corruption verdict

Quavo:
NBC just released the latest Nielsen data regarding political party popularity. This particular poll was conducted between October 16th and 19th, using a sample size of 1,400 respondents. Interestingly, the survey follows the final court ruling against the Republican Party concerning the massive Ogilvy scandal involving the misappropriation of funds from state agencies and corporations.

Republican Party 27.3%
Can Do 16.1%
Democratic Party 15.9%
Bridge 6.8%
DP 4.1%.

The Republican Party figured out the formula a long time ago: you basically have to screw over the voters just to keep them coming back for more... 😵
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#1979 ·
A Republican Party supporter on tampon taxes: Women haven't even had periods since the era of the Republican Party and Andrej Plenković.
fadedgull6 fadedgull6 Member
18 messages
joined Jul 2025
#1980 ·
Emily Smith6 said:Republican Party sees rating bump following corruption verdict

Quavo:
NBC just released the latest Nielsen data regarding political party popularity. This particular poll was conducted between October 16th and 19th, using a sample size of 1,400 respondents. Interestingly, the survey follows the final court ruling against the Republican Party concerning the massive Ogilvy scandal involving the misappropriation of funds from state agencies and corporations.

Republican Party 27.3%
Can Do 16.1%
Democratic Party 15.9%
Bridge 6.8%
DP 4.1%.

The Supreme Court actually upheld the county court's decision. It's not like the Republican Party was convicted this week.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads