Jose White11
Member
13 messages
joined Dec 2019
I spent some time scrolling through a couple of similar threads on two different forums, and it basically boils down to this:
Screw a paradise where my mom, my dad, my sister, my brother, my daughter, my son, my grandpa, my grandma, my best friend, my parrot, my lab, my favorite author, my favorite professor, and even the war buddy who saved my life... aren't there.
Given that—as we saw in that other thread about religion (THE PROBLEM OF EVIL)—the ratio of the saved to the damned is roughly 1 : 1,000,000 according to most Christian mystics and saints, it means it’s practically impossible for any family to enter paradise together in its full capacity (parents, kids, grandparents, grandkids), right?
When you bring that up, believers usually respond something like this:
"Hey, buddy, you've got it wrong. In paradise, we won't remember our earthly lives; we'll be something else entirely..."
My response:
If we're going to be something else entirely, then it won't even be us. In other words, it's a double screw-you to have a paradise where "we" don't even exist. Believers clearly don't realize what they're actually saying when they lean on that "argument" (the blessed forgetting)...
However, as Anthony Perez9 said (I haven't verified it myself, but I take his word for it), the Catholic Church teacher St. Thomas Aquinas goes way beyond just claiming that very few people will be saved; he actually suggests that the greatest joy of the saved in paradise will consist of finding satisfaction in the suffering of the damned...
Can anyone tell me that this kind of teaching isn't the most monstrous and immoral thing imaginable?