Elvis Presley

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Why are you so obsessed with sponsoring Elvis Presley and all his nonsense? And please, spare me the "I'm just responding to provocations" excuse again. Honestly, more than half of your posts here are nothing but links to his videos without even a shred of actual substance. That’s not a discussion; it’s just straight-up advertising.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Taken out of context—which isn't exactly news when you're dealing with a site like creation.com.
First off, let's talk ethics here. I honestly think Dawkins was just poking the bear by trolling vegetarians who claim they won't eat meat because the animals "didn't consent" to being eaten. It’s such a reach. We're talking about hypothetical lab-grown meat here—stuff that was never even part of a living, breathing organism that could actually have an opinion or "refuse" to be consumed. It’s a total non-starter, and frankly, it's a weirdly circular argument to throw at vegetarians.
Then there's the science side of things: look, Dawkins is a biologist through and through. He’s well aware of the whole spectrum of health risks—like prion diseases—that kick in when any species starts snacking on meat from its own kind. Because he actually understands those biological red flags, he’d never seriously suggest something like that.
Look, I wasn't actually making a serious proposal here.

Daniel Chase13 said:I haven't the slightest clue.

Actually, I was wondering—has that specific crowd of atheists who follow Richard Dawkins finally taken his advice to start eating human flesh to break some social taboos, or are they still just sitting around waiting for the opportunity?
https://creation.com/why-does-richar...eat-human-meat

And what about those eco-warrior atheists or the neo-pagans—the ones convinced they're saving the planet—have they actually started snacking on babies to lower CO2 levels like they once suggested?

Look, you’re starting to sound desperate now. That woman in the video isn't some "concerned atheist neo-pagan" or whatever nonsense you're trying to spin. She’s actually a member of that right-wing, pro-Trump group called LaRouche PAC. They literally bragged about sending her there just to troll Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Do I even need to point out that the whole crowd is basically a collection of conspiracy theorists?

Alright, let's get back to this Flat Earther who’s out here bragging about drinking his own urine, washing his face with it, and pitching it as some kind of wellness hack because he supposedly "knows the human body better than anyone." He even went as far as writing a book on the subject. Now, Elvis Presley is out here praising him as some brilliant mastermind and a pioneer of the Flat Earth movement. Since you were the one pushing that video featuring both of them, I gotta ask: does that mean you’re actually backing David Murphy's medical "expertise"?

Charles Gonzalez19 said:Why are you so obsessed with sponsoring Elvis Presley and all his nonsense? And please, spare me the "I'm just responding to provocations" excuse again. Honestly, more than half of your posts here are nothing but links to his videos without even a shred of actual substance. That’s not a discussion; it’s just straight-up advertising.

Taken out of context—which isn't exactly news when you're dealing with a site like creation.com.
First off, let's talk ethics here. I honestly think Dawkins was just poking the bear by trolling vegetarians who claim they won't eat meat because the animals "didn't consent" to being eaten. It’s such a reach. We're talking about hypothetical lab-grown meat here—stuff that was never even part of a living, breathing organism that could actually have an opinion or "refuse" to be consumed. It’s a total non-starter, and frankly, it's a weirdly circular argument to throw at vegetarians.
Then there's the science side of things: look, Dawkins is a biologist through and through. He’s well aware of the whole spectrum of health risks—like prion diseases—that kick in when any species starts snacking on meat from its own kind. Because he actually understands those biological red flags, he’d never seriously suggest something like that.
Look, I wasn't actually making a serious proposal here.

Look, you’re starting to sound desperate now. That woman in the video isn't some "concerned atheist neo-pagan" or whatever nonsense you're trying to spin. She’s actually a member of that right-wing, pro-Trump group called LaRouche PAC. They literally bragged about sending her there just to troll Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Do I even need to point out that the whole crowd is basically a collection of conspiracy theorists?

Alright, let's get back to this Flat Earther who’s out here bragging about drinking his own urine, washing his face with it, and pitching it as some kind of wellness hack because he supposedly "knows the human body better than anyone." He even went as far as writing a book on the subject. Now, Elvis Presley is out here praising him as some brilliant mastermind and a pioneer of the Flat Earth movement. Since you were the one pushing that video featuring both of them, I gotta ask: does that mean you’re actually backing David Murphy's medical "expertise"?

🤣

Oh, absolutely not.

And honestly, how many times have we seen this? It’s the same old pattern where they try to dig Dawkins out of another embarrassing situation—which isn't surprising given his followers—right after he's gone and revealed his own morbid side (his views on mild pedophilia, his support for aborting unborn children with Down syndrome, and so on...).

On a related note, this Swedish scientist who claims to be an "expert" on saving the planet and the human race recently suggested eating the flesh of deceased humans—he even mentioned he was personally open to trying human meat himself. https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scient...rce=NYPTwitter

They're being exposed more and more frequently these days.

Charles Gonzalez19 said:Why are you so obsessed with sponsoring Elvis Presley and all his nonsense? And please, spare me the "I'm just responding to provocations" excuse again. Honestly, more than half of your posts here are nothing but links to his videos without even a shred of actual substance. That’s not a discussion; it’s just straight-up advertising.

Taken out of context—which isn't exactly news when you're dealing with a site like creation.com.
First off, let's talk ethics here. I honestly think Dawkins was just poking the bear by trolling vegetarians who claim they won't eat meat because the animals "didn't consent" to being eaten. It’s such a reach. We're talking about hypothetical lab-grown meat here—stuff that was never even part of a living, breathing organism that could actually have an opinion or "refuse" to be consumed. It’s a total non-starter, and frankly, it's a weirdly circular argument to throw at vegetarians.
Then there's the science side of things: look, Dawkins is a biologist through and through. He’s well aware of the whole spectrum of health risks—like prion diseases—that kick in when any species starts snacking on meat from its own kind. Because he actually understands those biological red flags, he’d never seriously suggest something like that.
Look, I wasn't actually making a serious proposal here.

Look, you’re starting to sound desperate now. That woman in the video isn't some "concerned atheist neo-pagan" or whatever nonsense you're trying to spin. She’s actually a member of that right-wing, pro-Trump group called LaRouche PAC. They literally bragged about sending her there just to troll Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Do I even need to point out that the whole crowd is basically a collection of conspiracy theorists?

Alright, let's get back to this Flat Earther who’s out here bragging about drinking his own urine, washing his face with it, and pitching it as some kind of wellness hack because he supposedly "knows the human body better than anyone." He even went as far as writing a book on the subject. Now, Elvis Presley is out here praising him as some brilliant mastermind and a pioneer of the Flat Earth movement. Since you were the one pushing that video featuring both of them, I gotta ask: does that mean you’re actually backing David Murphy's medical "expertise"?

Of course not.

It’s a bit like saying I hope you aren't backing Richard Dawkins's supposed desire to snack on human flesh or his little crusade against the taboo of cannibalism—unless, of course, you're a fan of that particular brand of "expertise" from Dawkins?

Daniel Chase13 said:Of course not.

It’s a bit like saying I hope you aren't backing Richard Dawkins's supposed desire to snack on human flesh or his little crusade against the taboo of cannibalism—unless, of course, you're a fan of that particular brand of "expertise" from Dawkins?

This post is screaming neurodivergence.

Hannah Alvarez2 said:This post is screaming neurodivergence.

🤣

The way this was written—it’s almost as if the autism itself is shouting right out of the text.

Daniel Chase13 said:🤣

Oh, absolutely not.

And honestly, how many times have we seen this? It’s the same old pattern where they try to dig Dawkins out of another embarrassing situation—which isn't surprising given his followers—right after he's gone and revealed his own morbid side (his views on mild pedophilia, his support for aborting unborn children with Down syndrome, and so on...).

On a related note, this Swedish scientist who claims to be an "expert" on saving the planet and the human race recently suggested eating the flesh of deceased humans—he even mentioned he was personally open to trying human meat himself. https://nypost.com/2019/09/09/scient...rce=NYPTwitter

They're being exposed more and more frequently these days.

What kind of planet-saving expert? Magnus Soderlund is just pushing marketing! Get real.

And you still haven't told me why you're so obsessed with promoting Elvis Presley, a guy who's a proven liar.

Hannah Alvarez2 said:This post is screaming neurodivergence.

Pure cognitive dissonance right there. People who are blinded like him just don't give a damn about actual evidence.

Daniel Chase13 is actually Elvis Presley.
The guy just really loves himself!

wearyowl29 said:Daniel Chase13 is actually Elvis Presley.
The guy just really loves himself!

🤦

Not quite.

I've already had to address this kind of surface-level assumption before—I'm not Elvis Presley, nor am I some flat-earther.

Charles Gonzalez19 said:What kind of planet-saving expert? Magnus Soderlund is just pushing marketing! Get real.

And you still haven't told me why you're so obsessed with promoting Elvis Presley, a guy who's a proven liar.

🤦

Look, just take a breath. There's no need to be so tense about this.

When I called him a "planet conservation expert," I was being sarcastic—poking fun at his supposed "concern" for the world's future and that bizarre notion about humans eating the deceased for the greater good of humanity.

I wasn't the one who started this thread about Elvis.

Since the topic is already out there, I'm just adding his latest clips and statements to the mix—that way, everyone can make up their own minds.

Daniel Chase13 said:Of course not.

It’s a bit like saying I hope you aren't backing Richard Dawkins's supposed desire to snack on human flesh or his little crusade against the taboo of cannibalism—unless, of course, you're a fan of that particular brand of "expertise" from Dawkins?

Reading from the Holy Gospel according to John: Whoever eats my body and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day. My body is true food, and my blood is true drink.

It is honestly mind-blowing how someone from Krscan—basically a Krscan-cannibal at this point—is the one throwing accusations of cannibalism at others!
A normal, rational person would never even entertain the idea of "eating human flesh and drinking blood."
But for a follower of Krscan, this isn't just an idea—it's been ingrained in them; it’s actually a core part of their identity and their entire belief system.

Bryan King3 said:Reading from the Holy Gospel according to John: Whoever eats my body and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day. My body is true food, and my blood is true drink.

It is honestly mind-blowing how someone from Krscan—basically a Krscan-cannibal at this point—is the one throwing accusations of cannibalism at others!
A normal, rational person would never even entertain the idea of "eating human flesh and drinking blood."
But for a follower of Krscan, this isn't just an idea—it's been ingrained in them; it’s actually a core part of their identity and their entire belief system.

🤣

Don't act like you don't see what's happening. Stop playing dumb.

It’s pretty obvious who holds those dark, morbid convictions about consuming human flesh—whether we're talking about infants or the deceased.

There's a certain group of people who seem to share the same mindset as Richard Dawkins—they're obsessed with breaking every taboo and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable regarding cannibalism.

Daniel Chase13 said:🤣

Don't act like you don't see what's happening. Stop playing dumb.

It’s pretty obvious who holds those dark, morbid convictions about consuming human flesh—whether we're talking about infants or the deceased.

There's a certain group of people who seem to share the same mindset as Richard Dawkins—they're obsessed with breaking every taboo and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable regarding cannibalism.

Look at this guy, he's a total clown. You actually believe that when an altar boy rings that bell and the priest lifts up a tiny piece of unleavened bread, that little bit of bread suddenly becomes THE FLESH OF JESUS! 😲😲😲
Isn't that literally the definition of transmutation? 🙂
And then you just sit there staring at it, licking your lips, thinking, "Man, I love this so much I could just eat it all up, yum yum."🤦
That’s probably why they don't let you bite the host—so you don't hear your teeth cracking, right?😂
But here you are, lecturing me about Dawkins and some "morbid obsession with eating people."
Buddy, if you're a good Catholic, you're basically doing that once a week!🐔

Hannah Alvarez2 said:Look at this guy, he's a total clown. You actually believe that when an altar boy rings that bell and the priest lifts up a tiny piece of unleavened bread, that little bit of bread suddenly becomes THE FLESH OF JESUS! 😲😲😲
Isn't that literally the definition of transmutation? 🙂
And then you just sit there staring at it, licking your lips, thinking, "Man, I love this so much I could just eat it all up, yum yum."🤦
That’s probably why they don't let you bite the host—so you don't hear your teeth cracking, right?😂
But here you are, lecturing me about Dawkins and some "morbid obsession with eating people."
Buddy, if you're a good Catholic, you're basically doing that once a week!🐔

So, let me ask you—do you actually find the ideas some modern atheists have about cannibalism—even involving children or the deceased—to be appealing?

Daniel Chase13 said:🤦

Not quite.

I've already had to address this kind of surface-level assumption before—I'm not Elvis Presley, nor am I some flat-earther.

Man, you must be head over heels for him...

Daniel Chase13 said:🤣

Don't act like you don't see what's happening. Stop playing dumb.

It’s pretty obvious who holds those dark, morbid convictions about consuming human flesh—whether we're talking about infants or the deceased.

There's a certain group of people who seem to share the same mindset as Richard Dawkins—they're obsessed with breaking every taboo and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable regarding cannibalism.

Seriously, even if you already realized all this was just fake news from some trashy tabloid or a bunch of Trump fanatics (or both), are you really still playing dumb?
And let's not forget how hypocritically you dodge any mention of the Eucharist. By definition, that’s actual cannibalism, but I guess as a Catholic, you're too embarrassed to admit that's a core part of your faith. Where does this, to quote you, insane urge to spread lies about other people come from? Is it just a way to distract everyone from your own massive shortcomings?

You spent all that time hyping up your idol Elvis Presley and his buddy Dave Murphy, who literally drinks and washes in his own urine. Now you're just being a coward, hiding behind fake stories about everyone else.

wearyowl29 said:Man, you must be head over heels for him...

🤣

That kind of statement is really just a product of a biased imagination.

Let me try saying this one more time—since it seems to be such a struggle to grasp and accept:

I didn't start the thread about Dawkins, nor did it ever cross my mind to do so.

Since the discussion about Dawkins is already underway, I'm simply adding his latest material and public appearances to the mix—leaving it up to everyone else to form their own opinions.

Charles Gonzalez19 said:Seriously, even if you already realized all this was just fake news from some trashy tabloid or a bunch of Trump fanatics (or both), are you really still playing dumb?
And let's not forget how hypocritically you dodge any mention of the Eucharist. By definition, that’s actual cannibalism, but I guess as a Catholic, you're too embarrassed to admit that's a core part of your faith. Where does this, to quote you, insane urge to spread lies about other people come from? Is it just a way to distract everyone from your own massive shortcomings?

You spent all that time hyping up your idol Elvis Presley and his buddy Dave Murphy, who literally drinks and washes in his own urine. Now you're just being a coward, hiding behind fake stories about everyone else.

It isn't my fault that certain modern-day atheists shamelessly push this twisted ideology regarding the consumption of human flesh—including children and the deceased.

To be fair, people who actually know Dawkins personally—since they grew up in his neighborhood—voted him into the local city council during the last elections.
It’s possible that, on a private level, Dawkins is someone people truly trust, which might explain why his neighbors backed him at the polls.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/local-election-coverage-highlights-90271/

https://www.nytimes.com/news/article/local-government-updates-20130701

Daniel Chase13 said:It isn't my fault that certain modern-day atheists shamelessly push this twisted ideology regarding the consumption of human flesh—including children and the deceased.

Look, it's not your fault. You aren't responsible for your constant stream of "unsubstantiated, brainless, biased, and straight-up sadistic rants" on the subject, even when people throw actual facts in your face.

Honestly, my conscience won't let me pin this on "unstable, deeply miserable people who need this kind of outlet just to get a momentary mental break."

Seriously, go see a therapist. And regardless of what Elvis Presley and those other Flat Earthers tell you, do not go drinking urine. Flat Earth health advice is dangerous as hell—it can literally kill you.