#541 ·
Duspara: He’s just a populist mouthpiece, an ideological tool for ultra-conservatism backed by heretics—that pretty much sums up how authentic the Catholicism of these local bigwigs really is. 😍
Started by Keith Martinez77 · · 👁 46 views · 831 replies
Daniel Chase13 said:But let's be real, they've been booking Presley for media appearances since back in 2010 or 2011.
That's definitely stretching that "five-minute" rule a bit thin, don't you think? ☕
Just look at how much those atheist fundamentalists were whining back in early 2011. They were absolutely livid after NBC aired a segment leaning toward creationist and anti-evolution views, largely sparked by Presley's own interviews. 👍
Daniel Chase13 said:It went from Duspara's initial pitch—which grew to $83 the point where he was basically offering the one thing that would provide undeniable, unquestionable scientific proof of macro-evolution—to running as an actual commercial on NBC, even during prime Sunday slots right before Stankovićev's show.
For over six months, Duspara kept ramping up his offer, and yet, not a single student or professor specializing in evolution from Harvard University, nor anyone from the Ruđer Institute, or any other evolutionary biologist out there, could produce actual evidence to support their stance.
Honestly, it was hilarious—people were practically laughing until they cried reading the whining, the grumbling, and the angry outbursts from evolutionists in letters and messages sent to the newsroom, all because they couldn't provide that definitive proof of macro-evolution.
There were even some desperate evolutionists who almost sounded like they were begging, writing things like, "I want that money!" or "I need that money!"
And then, of course, there were the honest ones—the evolutionists who openly admitted that absolutely no one in the world can provide indisputable, unquestionable proof of macro-evolution.
Daniel Chase13 said:It went from Duspara's initial pitch—which grew to $83 the point where he was basically offering the one thing that would provide undeniable, unquestionable scientific proof of macro-evolution—to running as an actual commercial on NBC, even during prime Sunday slots right before Stankovićev's show.
For over six months, Duspara kept ramping up his offer, and yet, not a single student or professor specializing in evolution from Harvard University, nor anyone from the Ruđer Institute, or any other evolutionary biologist out there, could produce actual evidence to support their stance.
Honestly, it was hilarious—people were practically laughing until they cried reading the whining, the grumbling, and the angry outbursts from evolutionists in letters and messages sent to the newsroom, all because they couldn't provide that definitive proof of macro-evolution.
There were even some desperate evolutionists who almost sounded like they were begging, writing things like, "I want that money!" or "I need that money!"
And then, of course, there were the honest ones—the evolutionists who openly admitted that absolutely no one in the world can provide indisputable, unquestionable proof of macro-evolution.
Daniel Chase13 said:It went from Duspara's initial pitch—which grew to $83 the point where he was basically offering the one thing that would provide undeniable, unquestionable scientific proof of macro-evolution—to running as an actual commercial on NBC, even during prime Sunday slots right before Stankovićev's show.
For over six months, Duspara kept ramping up his offer, and yet, not a single student or professor specializing in evolution from Harvard University, nor anyone from the Ruđer Institute, or any other evolutionary biologist out there, could produce actual evidence to support their stance.
Honestly, it was hilarious—people were practically laughing until they cried reading the whining, the grumbling, and the angry outbursts from evolutionists in letters and messages sent to the newsroom, all because they couldn't provide that definitive proof of macro-evolution.
There were even some desperate evolutionists who almost sounded like they were begging, writing things like, "I want that money!" or "I need that money!"
And then, of course, there were the honest ones—the evolutionists who openly admitted that absolutely no one in the world can provide indisputable, unquestionable proof of macro-evolution.
electricdriver33 said:That news is from back in 2011... 🤷
Maybe someone should offer Duspara 250 $0.00 if they can prove God created the world in six 24-hour days and rested on the seventh, just like it says in the Bible... 🙂
coppersailor28 said:🤷Well, what do you expect; nothing else was ever expected from evolutionists (evolutionary biologists, I assume)...
electricdriver33 said:That news is from back in 2011... 🤷
Maybe someone should offer Duspara 250 $0.00 if they can prove God created the world in six 24-hour days and rested on the seventh, just like it says in the Bible... 🙂
Daniel Chase13 said:None of those atheist fundamentalists or evolutionist believers have the guts—or the cash—to make a public offer like that.
The reality is that, unlike those atheist and evolutionist zealots, Duspara was openly offering money through commercials on CBS for over six months—well before the show Good Morning, America aired, and even before Stankovićev's program, among other slots. He was essentially putting up a bounty for undeniable proof of macro-evolution, at least until $83 finally made a public move. After that, they all just started desperately whining and moaning, clearly eyeing the money they could never actually earn while clinging to their evolutionary beliefs. Honestly, it was a total riot to read through—I still get a chuckle just thinking about 🤣😂
My thanks go out to all the evolutionists from Harvard University and the local science institutes, along with everyone else who was complaining back then. Wherever they are now, thanks for the laughs and the entertainment.
Charles Gonzalez19 said:Until now, I honestly thought you were just obsessing over Elvis Presley's videos. I admit it, I was wrong.
You're actually just obsessing over your own posts.
Daniel Chase13 said:🤦
Auuuuu, good grief...
It seems like once again, someone has suddenly decided to bring up some incredibly bizarre sexual fixations—the kind of stuff that wouldn't even cross anyone else's mind, let alone make sense in a normal conversation.
And this is on a topic that has absolutely nothing to do with all of that.
So, how on earth is that even possible?
Daniel Chase13 said:🤦
Auuuuu, good grief...
It seems like once again, someone has suddenly decided to bring up some incredibly bizarre sexual fixations—the kind of stuff that wouldn't even cross anyone else's mind, let alone make sense in a normal conversation.
And this is on a topic that has absolutely nothing to do with all of that.
So, how on earth is that even possible?
Daniel Chase13 said:🤦
Auuuuu, good grief...
It seems like once again, someone has suddenly decided to bring up some incredibly bizarre sexual fixations—the kind of stuff that wouldn't even cross anyone else's mind, let alone make sense in a normal conversation.
And this is on a topic that has absolutely nothing to do with all of that.
So, how on earth is that even possible?
Charles Gonzalez19 said:So, after you went ahead and labeled love as some kind of sexual perversion, you’ve basically proven that you have absolutely no business deciding what counts as "perverted" in the first place.
Secondly, you’re still totally obsessed with sex. Honestly, just looking at the way you word things makes that pretty damn obvious.
I actually went out and consulted two licensed psychologists, and honestly? They both reached the exact same conclusion about you:
obsessed with sex
Honestly? I’m my own biggest sexual fantasy. There, I said it. It sounds a little crazy when you say it out loud, but hear me out—I’ve finally reached that level of self-confidence where I actually think I’m a catch.
If you want to go with some old-school, colloquial slang for that, you’d just call him a jerk.
Honestly, just look at your posts—the sheer volume and the exact same stuff you keep churning out. It’s pretty obvious to me. Your repetitive content on this forum is basically just a mirror image of those mindless, repetitive hand movements you keep making.
It absolutely matters.
Ever since this subforum first went live, you’ve basically treated the entire thread like your own personal playground. Seriously, half the posts here are yours, and it’s always the same old routine—just constant insults, tearing people down, and making fun of everyone else. That post you dropped last night? It was just the cherry on top of a massive, bitter cake of hostility (though knowing you, it might be more like the icing on a disaster, but hey, let's hope for the best).
Charles Gonzalez19 said:So, after you went ahead and labeled love as some kind of sexual perversion, you’ve basically proven that you have absolutely no business deciding what counts as "perverted" in the first place.
Secondly, you’re still totally obsessed with sex. Honestly, just looking at the way you word things makes that pretty damn obvious.
I actually went out and consulted two licensed psychologists, and honestly? They both reached the exact same conclusion about you:
obsessed with sex
Honestly? I’m my own biggest sexual fantasy. There, I said it. It sounds a little crazy when you say it out loud, but hear me out—I’ve finally reached that level of self-confidence where I actually think I’m a catch.
If you want to go with some old-school, colloquial slang for that, you’d just call him a jerk.
Honestly, just look at your posts—the sheer volume and the exact same stuff you keep churning out. It’s pretty obvious to me. Your repetitive content on this forum is basically just a mirror image of those mindless, repetitive hand movements you keep making.
It absolutely matters.
Ever since this subforum first went live, you’ve basically treated the entire thread like your own personal playground. Seriously, half the posts here are yours, and it’s always the same old routine—just constant insults, tearing people down, and making fun of everyone else. That post you dropped last night? It was just the cherry on top of a massive, bitter cake of hostility (though knowing you, it might be more like the icing on a disaster, but hey, let's hope for the best).
Daniel Chase13 said:Elvis Presley is staying busy, as always. Here’s his latest video https://www.facebook.com/duspara.elv...00005063086780
Amy Brown8 said:What is this guy actually doing, and what's even the point??? Look, buddy, maybe it's time to get a grip? If you aren't Elvis [as you say], how can you be so obsessed with that whole line of thought? Seriously, write back—let's talk. Maybe I can help you out, or maybe you can help me?! You down?
Daniel Chase13 said:Hi there,
I really appreciate the kindness and concern you're showing—especially at 4:26 in the morning while everyone else is fast asleep.
That kind of thoughtfulness is honestly pretty rare these days.
It's genuinely nice to see that there are still such considerate people out there.
That said, if you find yourself needing a hand, you might want to reach out to some of the other folks here who share your perspective.
They're probably more on your wavelength, so they might be able to offer the specific kind of support you're looking for much better than I could.
goldenjackal6 said:What a stellar example of Christian "I won't help you because you aren't part of my tribe" humanity right there.
Daniel Chase13 said:Actually, it isn't about that—it's more that I have an immense amount of respect for your expertise. Because this situation is so specific, I truly believe you're in a much better position to help our colleague than I am.
Given your particular talents and professional skill set—things I simply can't compete with—you'll handle this far more effectively.
As someone who's really just an amateur here, there isn't much I could contribute. But considering your life experience, your professional background, how closely you align with the colleague's perspective, and, above all, your sheer competence, you're the one who can play a decisive role here.