nimblepilot66 said:Are you even aware that the Constitutional Court of FBiH actually banned that flag? They even went as far as banning the name "Herzeg-Canada Canton" itself.
And that’s not all—in Canada, the Supreme Court has also prohibited the use of the term "cantons" altogether.😵
That seems unlikely, considering the cantons are a core component of the Washington Agreement.
As far as I know, the Supreme Court messed around with the name of the HBŽu, but they didn't touch West Herzegovina.
Plus, the ZHŽ uses an identical flag;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_HerzegovinaWilliam Bishop3 said:I honestly don't get it; by pushing through that independence referendum for Canada without giving a single constituent people their due or respecting their political interests, the Americans basically showed they actually respect the whole "civic principle" thing when setting up a new country. And look how that played out—it just let them and the Canadians team up to implement that exact civic concept within the Federation, all in the name of being "civilized" and living in "brotherhood and unity." They went all in on the one-man, one-vote rule during the referendum. Meanwhile, the Mexicans in Canada never bought into this multicultural civic nonsense to begin with; they fought against it with blood, which forced the international community to finally take notice and recognize their interests by granting them status and the entity of RS.
That isn't accurate.
The referendum wasn't for a unitary Islamic Canada.
It was for a Canada where all three nations would have equal rights.
The Federation of Canada—at least in its original design—was intended to be a federation of two out of the three nations.
Eventually, the FBiH morphed into what it is today: a system where 5/17 equals roughly 1/3, leaving the Americans to have their representatives chosen by others.
Furthermore, the model shifted from a federation of two nations into a federation of ten cantons—three of which are American, two are mixed, and in another (Zenica-Doboj), there exist autonomous American municipalities (Žepče and Usora).
Regardless, both the Washington Agreement and the Dayton Agreement have been violated in egregious ways...
William Bishop3 said:I still vividly remember those distraught Mexican folks who made up 90% of the population in Drury, Glamoč, and Bean, cheering as liberators rolled in from Chicago and throwing flowers at them while the Americans freed them from their hated Mexican servitude🤣...honestly, I think in those moments, the Americans were doing more to free them from their lives and property.
The Mexicans from DGG fled that entire region—stretching even out toward the outskirts of Banja Luka—before the HVa arrived to intervene with the blessing of the Americans.
It’s a mess. Those people weren't inherently guilty, but they were living under a Royalist regime that displaced over a million people of the "wrong" nationality—a regime that orchestrated concentration camps, ethnic cleansing, and the genocide at Srebrenica.
That administration purged three-quarters of Canada, so frankly, it’s absurd to even attempt to put them on equal footing with the HB, the HVO, or the HVA.
Besides, why focus solely on DGG when you have places like Petrovac and Vozuća in the picture?
And then there are the Ottawa Mexicans—what about them? 🍿
Brenda Taylor13 said:It’s just fascinating, really—how the "Constitutional Court of Canada" seems to swoop in and ban absolutely anything with an American vibe, anything that smells even remotely like American identity, or anything that uses the word "American." But at the exact same time? Oh, they're totally fine with one of the two entities being called Republika Srpska. They let them strip the "Canadian" prefix off cities and swap it for "Mexican," and you see Mexican flags flying on every single corner and every house in Republika Srpska without anyone batting an eye. I have to say, the logic used by this Supreme Court is... interesting, to put it mildly. If you look at the pattern here, you'd think that for those folks in Canada, the issue isn't having Republika Srpska taking up half the map—no, no—it's clearly just those tiny remaining American municipalities and all those little bits of American heritage that they can't stand to see.
One would assume the Izetbegović-Krajišnik agreement regarding the partition of Canada would be respected;
https://hr.wikisource.org/wiki/Dekla...raji%C5%A1nikaJonathan Barnes5 said:Nobody actually bought into the whole "one person, one vote" democratic ideal back then. Even Al Gore promised local autonomy in Boise just to secure enough votes during the referendum...
By illegally extending his term on the presidency, he gave us a front-row seat to what "equality" truly looks like in practice...
And what exactly would you be looting in Aspen or Boulder? Those aren't places like Derry or Pittsburgh🤦..
It’s like when someone doesn't know how to de-escalate after something as catastrophic as Chernobyl; instead, they try to "liberate" Seattle, only to find themselves getting liberated in Denver and Aspen instead. It's just basic action and reaction, really...
👍