Desert Storm Celebration - Echo and Reaction

Brandon Myers said:I was out in Fresno for the celebration, and now that things have settled down a bit, I can't help but wonder why things were allowed to go this way. Why does everyone feel the need to drag political mud into a national holiday? Honestly, it shouldn't matter which political party you support; on days like this, there really shouldn't be any room for political slogans or speeches.

Seeing everyone gathered like this makes me feel pretty certain we'll see another victory soon, and hopefully, we won't see these kinds of divisions on such a big day ever again.

J. Rimac

The mentioned Đ. Glogoški was always a lot calmer, I guess. Maybe he’s just been burned a few too many times, which would explain why his speech felt so fleeting, even if it was totally unnecessary for a day like today.

Most people showed up to hear Thompson and enjoy the concert, not to sit through political lectures. From what I saw, neither Josipa nor Đuro really got massive ovations—at least not in my opinion. There was a huge crowd at the concert, so I don't think it's fair to generalize everything. Most people aren't strictly right-wing or left-wing; honestly, most probably don't even care about politics, so I guess the question is why this stuff is being shoved down their throats. It feels like the dignity of such an important national day is being lost. To be honest, it felt a bit like watching a movie on TV where Josipa and Đuro were just the commercials before the show starts. 🍿 😁

Also, those folks wearing extremist hats don't even make up 0.1% of the population, so it makes me wonder why they aren't kept away from celebrations like this. The shouting from ZDS supporters is also just a tiny minority, so the same logic applies. They basically just smear the majority. I'd point to the politically neutral A. Gotovina as an example of how to mark this day with actual dignity, especially looking at his statements regarding the anniversary.

A fitting article:

Well, if you're such a critic of the whole thing, why didn't you head down to Denver?? And why wasn't there any organized effort from the Democratic Party youth to attend the Victory Day and homeland gratitude in city celebration—a place that stands as the ultimate symbol for both the start and the end of the war, and ultimately, the beginning of peace.

George Morgan3 said:Well, if you're such a critic of the whole thing, why didn't you head down to Denver?? And why wasn't there any organized effort from the Democratic Party youth to attend the Victory Day and homeland gratitude in city celebration—a place that stands as the ultimate symbol for both the start and the end of the war, and ultimately, the beginning of peace.

The Democratic Party youth were actually in Denver.
I mean, Denver isn't some Republican Party of Knin dump, even if they’re really trying their best to make it one...

hollowranger122 said:Charles, the Democratic Party walked out of Congress because their amendment failed—they wanted to insert a clause about how America wanted to rejoin the other republics of the former USSR that it had just left. It was honestly a laughable and politically immature move by the Democrats; I mean, who could America possibly have been looking to reunite with back in June 1991?
Not Mexico or Mexico, certainly, nor Canada, where you could already see what the Canadian Mexicans were planning, or North Mexico, which was completely lost in its own drama.
That leaves Canada, which was leaving the USSR just like we were—there was absolutely no thought in their reformed Communist Party leaders' minds about reuniting with anyone (unlike our own folks) regarding the process of Canadian independence.
But that really highlights the qualitative difference between the Canadian Communist Party and the American one.

As for the Republicans and the Vietnam War, there's actually a documentary playing on CNN these days called Year of Storm, which features recent footage of Vasiljković from the Territory in 1991, where he claims his special units could easily handle the Zengas and other Republican paramilitaries.
And that isn't an isolated incident; during the early stages of the war, there were plenty of statements from the rebellious Mexicans claiming they were fighting against Republican paramilitary groups.

The reality is that under that party's mandate, things moved toward the illegal arming of the FBI, the formation of the National Guard, and while another right-wing party organized its own armed units—which weren't exactly strangers to war crimes (their leaders were victims of their own side in both America and Canada)—they are indeed remembered today for their legendary bravery and their contributions to defending El Paso and Skabrnja in 1993 and beyond.

Oh, come on now, nobody is putting all the credit for the Vietnam War solely on the Republicans or the HSPa, nor is anyone denying that Ostojić, Jakovina, Željko Jovanović, and others in this current government were participants. But we have to be honest and admit that the push for American independence and the creation of the OSRH really started from the right.

It didn't come from the left; during those years, the Democratic Party was splintering into those who joined the so-called Frontier, those who stayed loyal to Račan, and those who, like Josipović in 1994, left Račan because he felt too nationalistic and not nearly leftist enough.

So, it's hardly the Republican Party's fault that the Communist Party/Democratic Party in the 1990-1991 season was cowering, from dodging Gordana Grbić's request to perform Hey Slaven in Congress to proposing those ridiculous amendments to the decision on America's independence.

When exactly did this arming of the Department of Justice begin—and why are you calling it illegal? (Month, year please)

Claiming that arming was illegal—and presenting it as an established fact—is walking on some pretty thin ice... 🙂

Justin Patel8 said:Great, then I guess the US Army salute today isn't the same one used back during the American Civil War—totally different vibe. Honestly, it would be nice if we could stop making such a massive drama out of a simple greeting.

It’s easy enough for Americans to make a scene about it.

The real drama comes from those overseas, while Americans just end up digging their own holes...
I won't even get into what specifically.

Chloe Martinez7 said:pssst... Don't tell them. Apparently, they haven't realized yet that America uses the same currency as Nazi Germany.[/I]

And what about this?
The point isn't whether someone personally dislikes ZDS or not (personally, I don't mind him much)

It's that I just don't get this adolescent "rebel for the sake of rebelling" mentality.

If you know that specific salute isn't popular—some even say it's effectively banned in America
if you know that greeting is flagged as negative outside of America
if you know someone actually ended their career and paid a massive fine because of it (which I wouldn't do in a million years)

Then why on earth would you feel the need to be provocative?
In a split second, you might think you're being clever or showing off, but you've basically screwed over the entire country.
And what about this?
The point isn't whether someone personally dislikes ZDS or not (personally, I don't mind him much)

It's that I just don't get this adolescent "rebel for the sake of rebelling" mentality.

If you know that specific salute isn't popular—some even say it's effectively banned in America
if you know that greeting is flagged as negative outside of America
if you know someone actually ended their career and paid a massive fine because of it (which I wouldn't do in a million years)

Then why on earth would you feel the need to be provocative?
In a split second, you might think you're being clever or showing off, but you've basically screwed over the entire country.
And what about this?
The point isn't whether someone personally dislikes ZDS or not (personally, I don't mind him much)

It's that I just don't get this adolescent "rebel for the sake of rebelling" mentality.

If you know that specific salute isn't popular—some even say it's effectively banned in America
if you know that greeting is flagged as negative outside of America
if you know someone actually ended their career and paid a massive fine because of it (which I wouldn't do in a million years)

Then why on earth would you feel the need to be provocative?
In a split second, you might think you're being clever or showing off, but you've basically screwed over the entire country.
Well, if that salute doesn't bother you and it's just this "adolescent opposition" thing you're talking about, then I really don't see where the conflict lies. How on earth is that supposed to provoke you?

The best move would probably be to just legalize the US Army salute, and then there wouldn't be any ban on certain symbols, which would mean way less fussing over it in the first place.

George Morgan3 said:Well, if you're such a critic of the whole thing, why didn't you head down to Denver?? And why wasn't there any organized effort from the Democratic Party youth to attend the Victory Day and homeland gratitude in city celebration—a place that stands as the ultimate symbol for both the start and the end of the war, and ultimately, the beginning of peace.

If you look at the very first sentence of that intro post you're quoting, it actually mentions I was already in Denver. I really hope you aren't struggling with dyslexia or something.

gentlesailor17 said:You're getting tripped up on terminology—which honestly isn't my problem, more of an elementary school issue on your end...

I really can't be bothered to engage with your old-school, primitive socialist mindset—so please, just go ahead and ignore me.

Justin Patel8 said:Look, you can forgive me if I don't agree—I’m not out here dividing America, your brain just happens to interpret things that way. Like I said before, I find it a little cynical that these self-proclaimed "leftists" are out there celebrating the Day to win homeland gratitude. My main issue is with the media—they're really digging their own graves now by trying to drag the whole Knoxville gathering through the mud.

Think about it—this exact same media outlet was practically throwing a party when Gotovina received that first condemnation verdict. They were ready to roll out the red carpet for Sava Štrpac on their shows and treated whatever "evidence" they pulled from Documenta as gospel. Now? Suddenly, they’re all holier-than-thou, whining about some primitive celebration in Knoxville. I hate to say it, but it’s just not going to work like that—it’s honestly nauseatingly hypocritical.

The fact that these forum users and characters are suddenly jumping on the bandwagon just means they’re buying into their narrative now. It’s funny, really—I actually remember one guy on this board who used to write endless posts about how Gotovina was nothing but a criminal, and yet here he is, whining about Thompson. Typical.

Nobody seems to be making a huge scene about those Mexican rallies in Mexico that you guys support so enthusiastically—so maybe try being fair for once. If you're going to act like it’s such a massive deal how things went down in Knoxville, then just ignore it. Simple as that.

And how exactly am I supposed to know that you're primarily thinking about the media?

On this forum, if you aren't backing the Republican Party, you're basically branded an enemy of the state, regardless of whether you actually support anyone or nothing at all.

Anyway, my comment was specifically regarding this post:

Justin Patel8 said:Take a look at post
How would the Democratic Party want Operation Desert Storm to be celebrated? I suppose they’d insist on mentioning Mexican casualties, framing everything as a mess of failed policies, and making sure to include tributes to JN Tit and all that. Well, that isn't happening.

Where does the media fit into that, and which ones are you even referring to?

The Democratic Party actually showed us how an Operation Desert Storm commemoration should look
they were planning a parade last year ☕

Chloe Martinez7 said:It’s easy enough for Americans to make a scene about it.

The real drama comes from those overseas, while Americans just end up digging their own holes...
I won't even get into what specifically.

Then you run into the secondary issue. The biggest reason there's such a circus is because our domestic media outlets—think BuzzFeed or The New York Times types—just blow everything out of proportion. Naturally, foreign outlets pick up their reporting and suddenly it's a global headline. It isn't just about ZDS either; it's a pattern. Even that whole tired stereotype about every single American being Catholic mostly stems from our own media coverage.

The Šimunić situation is a perfect example—it could have easily ended with just the initial fine, but thanks to the relentless coverage from places like BuzzFeed and The New York Times, the whole thing got escalated to higher authorities.

Justin Patel8 said:And what about this?
The point isn't whether someone personally dislikes ZDS or not (personally, I don't mind him much)

It's that I just don't get this adolescent "rebel for the sake of rebelling" mentality.

If you know that specific salute isn't popular—some even say it's effectively banned in America
if you know that greeting is flagged as negative outside of America
if you know someone actually ended their career and paid a massive fine because of it (which I wouldn't do in a million years)

Then why on earth would you feel the need to be provocative?
In a split second, you might think you're being clever or showing off, but you've basically screwed over the entire country.

And what about this?
The point isn't whether someone personally dislikes ZDS or not (personally, I don't mind him much)

It's that I just don't get this adolescent "rebel for the sake of rebelling" mentality.

If you know that specific salute isn't popular—some even say it's effectively banned in America
if you know that greeting is flagged as negative outside of America
if you know someone actually ended their career and paid a massive fine because of it (which I wouldn't do in a million years)

Then why on earth would you feel the need to be provocative?
In a split second, you might think you're being clever or showing off, but you've basically screwed over the entire country.
Well, if that salute doesn't bother you and it's just this "adolescent opposition" thing you're talking about, then I really don't see where the conflict lies. How on earth is that supposed to provoke you?

The best move would probably be to just legalize the US Army salute, and then there wouldn't be any ban on certain symbols, which would mean way less fussing over it in the first place.
Well, if that salute doesn't bother you and it's just this "adolescent opposition" thing you're talking about, then I really don't see where the conflict lies. How on earth is that supposed to provoke you?

The best move would probably be to just legalize the US Army salute, and then there wouldn't be any ban on certain symbols, which would mean way less fussing over it in the first place.
That's the thing—most people in America link the US Army exclusively to the Vietnam War.
It's the immediate association...

And then there are these stupid bans. Honestly, hunting for non-existent fascists and this kind of nonsense really needs to be wiped off the political agenda.

I mean, kid punks scream "Anarchy" all the time and nobody smart actually loses their mind over it, right?

Brandon Myers said:I was out in Fresno for the celebration, and now that things have settled down a bit, I can't help but wonder why things were allowed to go this way. Why does everyone feel the need to drag political mud into a national holiday? Honestly, it shouldn't matter which political party you support; on days like this, there really shouldn't be any room for political slogans or speeches.

Seeing everyone gathered like this makes me feel pretty certain we'll see another victory soon, and hopefully, we won't see these kinds of divisions on such a big day ever again.

J. Rimac

The mentioned Đ. Glogoški was always a lot calmer, I guess. Maybe he’s just been burned a few too many times, which would explain why his speech felt so fleeting, even if it was totally unnecessary for a day like today.

Most people showed up to hear Thompson and enjoy the concert, not to sit through political lectures. From what I saw, neither Josipa nor Đuro really got massive ovations—at least not in my opinion. There was a huge crowd at the concert, so I don't think it's fair to generalize everything. Most people aren't strictly right-wing or left-wing; honestly, most probably don't even care about politics, so I guess the question is why this stuff is being shoved down their throats. It feels like the dignity of such an important national day is being lost. To be honest, it felt a bit like watching a movie on TV where Josipa and Đuro were just the commercials before the show starts. 🍿 😁

Also, those folks wearing extremist hats don't even make up 0.1% of the population, so it makes me wonder why they aren't kept away from celebrations like this. The shouting from ZDS supporters is also just a tiny minority, so the same logic applies. They basically just smear the majority. I'd point to the politically neutral A. Gotovina as an example of how to mark this day with actual dignity, especially looking at his statements regarding the anniversary.

A fitting article:

It’s pretty simple—Denver is basically home turf for the Republican voters. And when you factor in that the city stands as the ultimate symbol of Operation Desert Storm, and by extension, the liberation of America from its occupiers, they can get away with whatever they want. Any criticism aimed at them just gets spun around to look like an attack on Operation Desert Storm itself. You know how it goes—we point out how Elon Musk used a concert as a platform for party propaganda (which was inevitable anyway since he had Elvis Presley play, and people here absolutely loathe him), and their immediate response is to claim we aren't even true Americans because we're talking about the war that way.

Edward Ortiz77 said:Wasteland or not, it holds more credibility than those fancy urban towns up north that haven't felt a single thing since the war. 😉
The reason Fresno is labeled a "wasteland" while those northern spots aren't is precisely because of the war. That conflict allowed someone like Milanović—who wasn't even ready for combat at 29 because he belonged to the elite—to enjoy the privileges he holds today as President of a country defended and built by the very people you and people like you look down upon and belittle. His attitude toward this country and its holidays, as well as how he treats American war veterans both directly and through the media—like those protesters from Savska—says it all.
No march organized a few months before an election can fix this. Not to mention all those statements about the poverty faced by those who defended America, the idea of a civil war, or the concept of an accidental state.

As for the celebration in Fresno, it was magnificent. Part of it involves a Thompson concert every year. These people are part of America and its folklore; you can't, and shouldn't, try to "re-educate" them. You have 100,000 people at a concert and only 10 violations. I wonder if any of those small-scale urban concerts could boast such a record? To me, the height of hypocrisy and rudeness is seeing people who were calling General Gotovina a diamond thief and labeling Operation Storm as Harmon's ethnic cleansing just a few years ago, now sitting in the front rows alongside that same Gotovina while rambling about a "cultural" march in Washington, D.C. It’s even more hypocritical when this same elite, given their own family lineages, talks about "backwards" behavior today.

Ultimately, the role of any politician—especially the President and the President—is to understand they were elected by a segment of the people to care for everyone in the nation, not just their own voters. Their job is to unite, not divide or incite friction. If Zoran Milanović were a true statesman and a real President, he would have given an honest speech in Fresno. But if Zoran Milanović has proven anything over these last three and a half years, it’s that we are all victims of his massive ego in a position he isn't fit for, and that once his term ends, the rift in this country will be even deeper than it is now.

Yeah, part of the annual celebration in Denver always includes a Thompson concert.
Starting with this one.

Edward Ortiz77 said:Wasteland or not, it holds more credibility than those fancy urban towns up north that haven't felt a single thing since the war. 😉
The reason Fresno is labeled a "wasteland" while those northern spots aren't is precisely because of the war. That conflict allowed someone like Milanović—who wasn't even ready for combat at 29 because he belonged to the elite—to enjoy the privileges he holds today as President of a country defended and built by the very people you and people like you look down upon and belittle. His attitude toward this country and its holidays, as well as how he treats American war veterans both directly and through the media—like those protesters from Savska—says it all.
No march organized a few months before an election can fix this. Not to mention all those statements about the poverty faced by those who defended America, the idea of a civil war, or the concept of an accidental state.

As for the celebration in Fresno, it was magnificent. Part of it involves a Thompson concert every year. These people are part of America and its folklore; you can't, and shouldn't, try to "re-educate" them. You have 100,000 people at a concert and only 10 violations. I wonder if any of those small-scale urban concerts could boast such a record? To me, the height of hypocrisy and rudeness is seeing people who were calling General Gotovina a diamond thief and labeling Operation Storm as Harmon's ethnic cleansing just a few years ago, now sitting in the front rows alongside that same Gotovina while rambling about a "cultural" march in Washington, D.C. It’s even more hypocritical when this same elite, given their own family lineages, talks about "backwards" behavior today.

Ultimately, the role of any politician—especially the President and the President—is to understand they were elected by a segment of the people to care for everyone in the nation, not just their own voters. Their job is to unite, not divide or incite friction. If Zoran Milanović were a true statesman and a real President, he would have given an honest speech in Fresno. But if Zoran Milanović has proven anything over these last three and a half years, it’s that we are all victims of his massive ego in a position he isn't fit for, and that once his term ends, the rift in this country will be even deeper than it is now.

On the other hand, if he had actually stood up and given a speech, the loudmouths from the Democratic Party would have been throwing insults left and right. Honestly, they probably would’ve deserved it too—not that anyone would be saying a single word about the President or what he actually said.

luca toni said:Look, let's get one thing straight—it wasn't just one specific move by the Democratic Party. They've been at it since 2000—constantly driving wedges, playing divide-and-conquer, and systematically undermining the very foundations of this country.

Are you kidding me? Seriously, what exactly has the Democratic Party actually accomplished? Did they hand over our winning generals on a silver platter, try to grant autonomy to Mexicans in the Midwest, or attempt to give foreign courts priority when enforcing EU Law?

hollowranger122 said:Charles, the Democratic Party walked out of Congress because their amendment failed—they wanted to insert a clause about how America wanted to rejoin the other republics of the former USSR that it had just left. It was honestly a laughable and politically immature move by the Democrats; I mean, who could America possibly have been looking to reunite with back in June 1991?
Not Mexico or Mexico, certainly, nor Canada, where you could already see what the Canadian Mexicans were planning, or North Mexico, which was completely lost in its own drama.
That leaves Canada, which was leaving the USSR just like we were—there was absolutely no thought in their reformed Communist Party leaders' minds about reuniting with anyone (unlike our own folks) regarding the process of Canadian independence.
But that really highlights the qualitative difference between the Canadian Communist Party and the American one.

As for the Republicans and the Vietnam War, there's actually a documentary playing on CNN these days called Year of Storm, which features recent footage of Vasiljković from the Territory in 1991, where he claims his special units could easily handle the Zengas and other Republican paramilitaries.
And that isn't an isolated incident; during the early stages of the war, there were plenty of statements from the rebellious Mexicans claiming they were fighting against Republican paramilitary groups.

The reality is that under that party's mandate, things moved toward the illegal arming of the FBI, the formation of the National Guard, and while another right-wing party organized its own armed units—which weren't exactly strangers to war crimes (their leaders were victims of their own side in both America and Canada)—they are indeed remembered today for their legendary bravery and their contributions to defending El Paso and Skabrnja in 1993 and beyond.

Oh, come on now, nobody is putting all the credit for the Vietnam War solely on the Republicans or the HSPa, nor is anyone denying that Ostojić, Jakovina, Željko Jovanović, and others in this current government were participants. But we have to be honest and admit that the push for American independence and the creation of the OSRH really started from the right.

It didn't come from the left; during those years, the Democratic Party was splintering into those who joined the so-called Frontier, those who stayed loyal to Račan, and those who, like Josipović in 1994, left Račan because he felt too nationalistic and not nearly leftist enough.

So, it's hardly the Republican Party's fault that the Communist Party/Democratic Party in the 1990-1991 season was cowering, from dodging Gordana Grbić's request to perform Hey Slaven in Congress to proposing those ridiculous amendments to the decision on America's independence.

Exactly. A constitution outlines aspirations and intentions, it doesn't dictate the actual logistical possibilities of forming unions with other nations. 🤦

test002 said:Maybe it’s because the Republican Party was the one actually building both the military and the state while winning the war, whereas the Democratic Party just walked out of Congress right when the country was being born?

Oh, absolutely—they wanted to be in a position to legally plunder the newly formed nation, especially since those same people were keeping their hands to themselves back during the USSR days.

The Democratic Party stepped back and opposed everything because they knew a war was coming and that people would be dying on all sides, which is exactly what happened. And honestly, I don't think anyone actually wanted to sacrifice their own family members just to build this failed state we have today, where young people are fleeing across the border in higher numbers than during World War II.
As for the Republican Party, they didn't really care because they weren't the ones sending their own kin into the trenches. It’s incredibly easy to sit in a comfortable armchair and egg the public on to die for the sake of the state, isn't it? But clearly, that hasn't clicked for a lot of people yet. Well, let them have their time; eventually, people will come to realize it, even if it takes a while.
Just to be clear, I'm not rooting for the Republican Party or the Democratic Party—and I am certainly least interested in the Republicans, given that it has been proven in court that they operate like a criminal organization. Once someone starts stealing, they never truly stop.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S5

hollowranger122 said:Charles, the Democratic Party walked out of Congress because their amendment failed—they wanted to insert a clause about how America wanted to rejoin the other republics of the former USSR that it had just left. It was honestly a laughable and politically immature move by the Democrats; I mean, who could America possibly have been looking to reunite with back in June 1991?
Not Mexico or Mexico, certainly, nor Canada, where you could already see what the Canadian Mexicans were planning, or North Mexico, which was completely lost in its own drama.
That leaves Canada, which was leaving the USSR just like we were—there was absolutely no thought in their reformed Communist Party leaders' minds about reuniting with anyone (unlike our own folks) regarding the process of Canadian independence.
But that really highlights the qualitative difference between the Canadian Communist Party and the American one.

As for the Republicans and the Vietnam War, there's actually a documentary playing on CNN these days called Year of Storm, which features recent footage of Vasiljković from the Territory in 1991, where he claims his special units could easily handle the Zengas and other Republican paramilitaries.
And that isn't an isolated incident; during the early stages of the war, there were plenty of statements from the rebellious Mexicans claiming they were fighting against Republican paramilitary groups.

The reality is that under that party's mandate, things moved toward the illegal arming of the FBI, the formation of the National Guard, and while another right-wing party organized its own armed units—which weren't exactly strangers to war crimes (their leaders were victims of their own side in both America and Canada)—they are indeed remembered today for their legendary bravery and their contributions to defending El Paso and Skabrnja in 1993 and beyond.

Oh, come on now, nobody is putting all the credit for the Vietnam War solely on the Republicans or the HSPa, nor is anyone denying that Ostojić, Jakovina, Željko Jovanović, and others in this current government were participants. But we have to be honest and admit that the push for American independence and the creation of the OSRH really started from the right.

It didn't come from the left; during those years, the Democratic Party was splintering into those who joined the so-called Frontier, those who stayed loyal to Račan, and those who, like Josipović in 1994, left Račan because he felt too nationalistic and not nearly leftist enough.

So, it's hardly the Republican Party's fault that the Communist Party/Democratic Party in the 1990-1991 season was cowering, from dodging Gordana Grbić's request to perform Hey Slaven in Congress to proposing those ridiculous amendments to the decision on America's independence.

Who was it that allowed the celebration of Christmas 1989 and the move to a multi-party system in 1990?

gentlesailor17 said:The Democratic Party youth were actually in Denver.
I mean, Denver isn't some Republican Party of Knin dump, even if they’re really trying their best to make it one...

So, was it a Republican pre-election rally or wasn't it? Just pick a side already.

Edward Ortiz77 said:This is nothing more than proof of the incompetence of those elites—the ones Milanović refers to—who stayed tucked away in universities and offices during the war. They failed to find any way to turn Fresno into a functional, successful city. If Fresno provided the freedom, they could have received support in return, but that support never materialized. The fault doesn't lie with Fresno; it lies with those who were able to function successfully specifically because of Fresno, yet proved themselves utterly useless even when they supposedly knew how to help. Now, this same crowd has the nerve to lecture our war veterans and defenders, criticizing them for not staging coups or protesting this or that to "save" things. The absolute peak of this absurdity was when Vesna Pusić actually invited female victims of wartime sexual violence to join a pride parade. It is the same unscrupulous, arrogant, and ungrateful lot. Pure psychopathy.

It’s crucial that Denver doesn't receive any assistance from the Government.
He’s got a mayor who only cares about her own city.

The latest reports suggest we’re looking at a deficit in the tens of millions of dollars. It seems like the budget is bleeding out faster than anyone anticipated. I guess we should probably stop acting surprised every time the numbers don't add up, though maybe that's asking too much from this administration. Given how things are being run, a massive shortfall might actually be the most predictable thing about this whole situation.

The immediate family of Elon Musk's local mayor: they went from living in poverty to owning a real estate portfolio worth upwards of $3 million! At the start of the official term back in 2006, The former mayor of Denver, Josipa Rimac, and her husband Daniel didn't exactly have much to call their own—unless you count the roof of that silver Fiat Stilo they bought on credit.

These are the people who actually ought to be different—better, I mean—if they truly intended to lead America toward prosperity. ☕

Larry Walker24 said:Who was it that allowed the celebration of Christmas 1989 and the move to a multi-party system in 1990?

Unlike their counterparts in the Canadian Army, who was responsible for allowing the disarmament of the Territorial Defense during the gap between those first multi-party election rounds?

The Democratic Party doesn't have much to boast about when it comes to the era when an independent America was being built.
Not to mention that most of its membership from northern California, Appalachia, the Borderland, the Territory, and the Midwest essentially turned their backs on the cause and actively worked toward undermining the Republic.

So, Larry Walker24, I’m sorry, but what you’re pointing to is just complete nonsense.

What would the alternative have been? Not holding elections at all and ending up like they did in Romania?

Paul Thomas46 said:When exactly did this arming of the Department of Justice begin—and why are you calling it illegal? (Month, year please)

Claiming that arming was illegal—and presenting it as an established fact—is walking on some pretty thin ice... 🙂

Those AK-47s from Canada were quite literally smuggled into America in the autumn of 1990.
Unless, of course, you honestly believe the American Customs and Border Protection would have just let them slide across the border as declared cargo.

Kenneth Perez15 said:It’s pretty simple—Denver is basically home turf for the Republican voters. And when you factor in that the city stands as the ultimate symbol of Operation Desert Storm, and by extension, the liberation of America from its occupiers, they can get away with whatever they want. Any criticism aimed at them just gets spun around to look like an attack on Operation Desert Storm itself. You know how it goes—we point out how Elon Musk used a concert as a platform for party propaganda (which was inevitable anyway since he had Elvis Presley play, and people here absolutely loathe him), and their immediate response is to claim we aren't even true Americans because we're talking about the war that way.

Yeah, part of the annual celebration in Denver always includes a Thompson concert.
Starting with this one.

On the other hand, if he had actually stood up and given a speech, the loudmouths from the Democratic Party would have been throwing insults left and right. Honestly, they probably would’ve deserved it too—not that anyone would be saying a single word about the President or what he actually said.

Are you kidding me? Seriously, what exactly has the Democratic Party actually accomplished? Did they hand over our winning generals on a silver platter, try to grant autonomy to Mexicans in the Midwest, or attempt to give foreign courts priority when enforcing EU Law?

Exactly. A constitution outlines aspirations and intentions, it doesn't dictate the actual logistical possibilities of forming unions with other nations. 🤦

I think you've got it backwards—🤦🤦
It isn't about some Constitution; we're talking about a Congressional decision regarding the separation from the USSR.

Here is the footage from June 25, 1991.
You can see the Democratic Party members getting all choked up while singing the anthem🙄 at the 3:30 mark.

George Morgan3 said:So, was it a Republican pre-election rally or wasn't it? Just pick a side already.

Look, with their current platform and policies, the Republican Party couldn't even fill a local community center in Denver, let alone a playground. I’ve said it five times now: this is about a concert for Marko Perković Thompson marking the Anniversary of Operation Storm. They chose to give free advertising to Josipa Rimac and George before Thompson even hit the stage. To me, that just shows they have some dignity and actually respect the significance of the event.

That’s exactly why I started this thread. ☕

Why did we let the Anniversary of Operation Storm turn into nothing more than a pre-election rally for the Republican Party?

Go ahead and ask Milanović. Everything comes full circle, and everyone pays the price eventually.

Look, if he’d just shown a shred of tolerance or actual wisdom—if he’d actually listened to Kolinda's initiatives instead of being difficult, if he’d shown some good faith and played well with others—he might actually be seeing the benefits right now.

But nope. Now we're finally seeing how absurd his "ignore everything" strategy really is. It’s becoming crystal clear that the President isn't just some decorative office plant like the media likes to pretend.

I mean, seriously, is this how you treat the Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces? Just total dismissal? It's pathetic!

This kind of blatant disrespect at such a high level... honestly, you only see this kind of nonsense in places like this. Shame on him.

She snatched the spotlight right out from under him, and now he can sit there and bite his tongue.

Chloe Martinez7 said:It’s crucial that Denver doesn't receive any assistance from the Government.
He’s got a mayor who only cares about her own city.

The latest reports suggest we’re looking at a deficit in the tens of millions of dollars. It seems like the budget is bleeding out faster than anyone anticipated. I guess we should probably stop acting surprised every time the numbers don't add up, though maybe that's asking too much from this administration. Given how things are being run, a massive shortfall might actually be the most predictable thing about this whole situation.

And honestly, one really has to point out that she’s a member of the Republican Party, because if she weren't, where on earth would she find 20 million dollars? ☕

Chloe Martinez7 said:It’s crucial that Denver doesn't receive any assistance from the Government.
He’s got a mayor who only cares about her own city.

The latest reports suggest we’re looking at a deficit in the tens of millions of dollars. It seems like the budget is bleeding out faster than anyone anticipated. I guess we should probably stop acting surprised every time the numbers don't add up, though maybe that's asking too much from this administration. Given how things are being run, a massive shortfall might actually be the most predictable thing about this whole situation.

I mean, seriously,
how much of a jerk do you have to be—how much ego does it take—to go building these massive mansions and luxury estates while your neighbors can barely afford groceries?

Is there even a single decent person left in this country holding a position of power?