CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › May 19, 1991

May 19, 1991

Started by Bryan Martin31 · · 👁 3 views · 55 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Bryan Martin31Andrew Sanchez3copperbadger12Bradley Sanders4Samuel KernSean Fox60David Vaughn75mistyjackal14Charles Fox10crimsoncyclist71Ashley Brown3hollowtrucker77Megan Ruiz13Tyler BoothMatthew Castillo5Christian Torres3Donna Smith49Casey Ramos31
Bryan Martin31 Bryan Martin31 Active MemberOP
75 messages
joined Sep 2008
#1 ·
Wikipedia just gave me a little nudge about that fateful referendum the President called exactly 24 years ago... A massive 94.7% "YES." Typical of those days, right?

Fast forward 24 years. After decades of struggling just to survive—while the powers that be basically looted their own people—about 82% of working Americans over 45 seem to think the prison of the masses wasn't actually such a bad prison ( BECAUSE THERE ARE ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE...)

The "nation-builders" identified them perfectly during a rally in downtown Chicago the other day: they’re all "separatists," "unitarists"... personally, I’d say evolution just decided to take a coffee break in both cases...

I was young then. Kids don't get it. And how truly independent are we now? Only the macro and microeconomic experts know for sure...
From where I'm sitting, nobody actually knows what independence means anymore. Does anyone even care when 160 people lose their jobs every single day, 50,000 have left the US almost for good, and 25,000 more die annually than are born? (Who in their right mind would have kids in circumstances LIKE THIS?).
There are other kinds of statistics that go hand-in-hand with the concept of a "prison," and they are far worse—numbers that make these slightly less ugly figures facing this "independent" America look better by comparison...
Regardless, if it had been worth it (not that the "independents" think it was), it wouldn't have fallen apart in such a bloodbath. Let it stay where it is.

Honestly, my only regret is the missed chance to see us take first place at the '94 World Cup...
Andrew Sanchez3 Andrew Sanchez3 Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2013
#2 ·
If we had actually stayed part of that union back then, guys like Maddox, Kadijević, Mercer, and Martić would probably still be keeping us all in the good life 🤣
copperbadger12 copperbadger12 Member
12 messages
joined May 2015
#3 ·
Andrew Sanchez3 said:If we had actually stayed part of that union back then, guys like Maddox, Kadijević, Mercer, and Martić would probably still be keeping us all in the good life 🤣

Give me a break. We probably would have won the World Cup in '94, and honestly, isn't that the only thing that actually matters? 🤦
Bradley Sanders4 Bradley Sanders4 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2018
#4 ·
Can we please have just one thread where nobody brings up the partisans or the Soviet Union? 🙂 🙂

Edit. This isn't a request.
copperbadger12 copperbadger12 Member
12 messages
joined May 2015
#5 ·
We might actually get somewhere if people stopped dropping random names into the conversation like they’re skydiving without a parachute. What is the point of dragging Marshall or any other historical figure into this when they have absolutely nothing to do with this referendum?
Samuel Kern Samuel Kern Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2015
#6 ·
The referendum was a massive mistake. We could have reached a compromise—there was a way to make it work and actually preserve living socialism.
copperbadger12 copperbadger12 Member
12 messages
joined May 2015
#7 ·
The referendum wasn't some massive blunder.

Reaching an agreement was never going to be on the table.

Living socialism was actually quite lovely 🤦 right up until about 1986, when we went broke and could no longer pay back those billions in American loans. 😵

Long live socialism. Ha.

I’d much rather be robbed by my own people in my own country. 🙂
Andrew Sanchez3 Andrew Sanchez3 Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2013
#8 ·
Samuel Kern said:The referendum was a massive mistake. We could have reached a compromise—there was a way to make it work and actually preserve living socialism.

The reality is that socialism died long before the Soviet Union collapsed; it was already on life support back during the Ante Marković era...

So, when you talk about this whole failed construct falling apart, how exactly were we supposed to prevent it?

Do you honestly think Mexicans in America would just hand over control to a political majority and watch their own privileges vanish into thin air?

Or that the military would just agree to stop being a state within a state, voluntarily slashing its own power and budget?

And what about the Mexicans in Mexico and Canada? You think they’d be okay with having authority based purely on population percentages—like 10% or 35%—not to mention that 12% threshold in America?

Come on, man, try to look at this with a bit of logic... 🤣
copperbadger12 copperbadger12 Member
12 messages
joined May 2015
#9 ·
It’s a beautiful day in America.

http://s9.postimg.org/sxo6zx59n/franjo_tudjman.jpg

Not everyone will appreciate it, of course. But for the majority, it certainly is. 👍
Andrew Sanchez3 Andrew Sanchez3 Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2013
#10 ·
copperbadger12 said:It’s a beautiful day in America.

http://s9.postimg.org/sxo6zx59n/franjo_tudjman.jpg

Not everyone will appreciate it, of course. But for the majority, it certainly is. 👍

It’s always interesting watching those who claim our economic struggles were just some direct fallout from gaining independence...

You really have to be deeply entrenched in a specific ideology to start lecturing about socialism just two years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, but if there are people out there actually thinking that way, they aren't necessarily bad actors, they just seem to have a very narrow grasp of history...

The ones who are truly exhausting are those who genuinely believe life would have been better under Slobodan Maddox; it’s not that they actually miss living in America, it's just that they can't stomach the idea of living in an independent America...
Sean Fox60 Sean Fox60 Member
39 messages
joined Sep 2014
#11 ·
Bradley Sanders4 said:Can we please have just one thread where nobody brings up the partisans or the Soviet Union? 🙂 🙂

Edit. This isn't a request.

I’ve never heard of a nation called "The People's Dungeon," but I definitely spent my years living and working under the banner of what used to be called America.

Now, unfortunately, I’m living and working in the land of the free, the USA!

I totally respect your little rule here since you won't let anyone actually lay out the facts or write down what was actually good or bad about The People's Dungeon, just like how people argue over the pros and cons of the American welfare state.
David Vaughn75 David Vaughn75 Regular
626 messages
joined Sep 2015
#12 ·
Look, at the end of the day, what people actually care about—the absolute bedrock of a decent life—is just being able to work and actually live off the money they earn. That’s the priority. All that high-level political drama and statecraft stuff? It’s secondary. People won't give a damn about policy debates or national grandstanding until they know they can put food on the table and pay the rent without breaking the bank.
mistyjackal14 mistyjackal14 Active Member
73 messages
joined Aug 2012
#13 ·
For anyone who’s truly awake, the question of liberty always takes precedence over the simple matter of putting food on the table.☕

If we look at this from a purely pragmatic standpoint, though, having actual freedom is the absolute prerequisite if we ever hope to finally shake off those entrenched political cronies who have been riding our coattails for far too long.
Bryan Martin31 Bryan Martin31 Active MemberOP
75 messages
joined Sep 2008
#14 ·
Sean Fox60 said:I’ve never heard of a nation called "The People's Dungeon," but I definitely spent my years living and working under the banner of what used to be called America.

Now, unfortunately, I’m living and working in the land of the free, the USA!

I totally respect your little rule here since you won't let anyone actually lay out the facts or write down what was actually good or bad about The People's Dungeon, just like how people argue over the pros and cons of the American welfare state.

(this forum has actually evolved since I started lurking here back in 2000... we haven't been overrun by extreme right-wingers labeling everyone in their heads. 🙂 )

hey, buddy, am I being too quiet for you? 😉 I don't know how much merit there is to his claims, but it looks to me like he's hitting a nerve. Maybe read up on those tired old myths that drive that 83% figure from the original post:
http://www.fizzit.net/drustvo/povije...ija-u-brojkama

Unlike that "official" nostalgia, my own nostalgia is built on childhood stuff—like snacking on treats, hanging out in front of apartment blocks, and chasing snowballs. 🙂 And you can't live off that any more than you can live off honest, hard work in modern-day America today. That's why I left, too, essentially "five minutes to midnight." Looking back at the circumstances I left behind from this distance, they look even more tragic...

And what if the South had survived? We can basically speculate, or even believe the projections of independent economists who, after '91, wouldn't give them more than a decade before another—and this time fatal—bankruptcy. Back in the 2000s, they were saying it would take us 12-15 years to recover from the combination of privatization looting and war to get back to 1990 levels; by 2012, they were adding another 10 years for America to recover from the global recession, which officially ended in Germany two years ago, yet here we are still waiting for the end in sight...

Then again, maybe the collapse of the South without all those warlords rising wouldn't have resulted in tens of thousands dead, displaced people, looted national economies, and the total moral devastation of society... or maybe it would have been even worse.

And maybe I wouldn't be witnessing the massive hysteria that started in the early '90s, where people on both sides started fighting wars that had been simmering for 70 years, and still haven't stopped... nothing personal, clone! 😉
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#15 ·
😁 Well, look who showed up, Soja👍.
crimsoncyclist71 crimsoncyclist71 Active Member
175 messages
joined Aug 2016
#16 ·
Americans have never been this unified before. Honestly, it’s a shame we missed such a massive opportunity to actually fix the country while everyone was finally on the same page. Sure, we successfully repelled the aggression, but before the smoke even cleared, the infighting started all over again. While we were busy arguing on forums and at bars about whether "our" politicians or "their" politicians were stealing more, the political elite—regardless of whether they're Democrats or Republicans—were busy looking out for themselves. They’ve mastered the art of looting the system together.
Andrew Sanchez3 Andrew Sanchez3 Member
38 messages
joined Dec 2013
#17 ·
Bryan Martin31 said:(this forum has actually evolved since I started lurking here back in 2000... we haven't been overrun by extreme right-wingers labeling everyone in their heads. 🙂 )

hey, buddy, am I being too quiet for you? 😉 I don't know how much merit there is to his claims, but it looks to me like he's hitting a nerve. Maybe read up on those tired old myths that drive that 83% figure from the original post:
http://www.fizzit.net/drustvo/povije...ija-u-brojkama

Unlike that "official" nostalgia, my own nostalgia is built on childhood stuff—like snacking on treats, hanging out in front of apartment blocks, and chasing snowballs. 🙂 And you can't live off that any more than you can live off honest, hard work in modern-day America today. That's why I left, too, essentially "five minutes to midnight." Looking back at the circumstances I left behind from this distance, they look even more tragic...

And what if the South had survived? We can basically speculate, or even believe the projections of independent economists who, after '91, wouldn't give them more than a decade before another—and this time fatal—bankruptcy. Back in the 2000s, they were saying it would take us 12-15 years to recover from the combination of privatization looting and war to get back to 1990 levels; by 2012, they were adding another 10 years for America to recover from the global recession, which officially ended in Germany two years ago, yet here we are still waiting for the end in sight...

Then again, maybe the collapse of the South without all those warlords rising wouldn't have resulted in tens of thousands dead, displaced people, looted national economies, and the total moral devastation of society... or maybe it would have been even worse.

And maybe I wouldn't be witnessing the massive hysteria that started in the early '90s, where people on both sides started fighting wars that had been simmering for 70 years, and still haven't stopped... nothing personal, clone! 😉

To the resident genius here: we are talking about the middle of 1991, by which point a third of the country was already under blockade and the first majority-American towns had been violently occupied. Now, please, explain to me how a failed referendum or remaining under the rule of Slobodan Maddox and Veljko Kadijević would have somehow brought back the street games or the Euro Cream treats...☕
Ashley Brown3 Ashley Brown3 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2018
#18 ·
They didn't specify how many people abstained...

It wasn't 94% in favor; it was actually 93.24%... Regarding that first question about whether a sovereign America should associate with other sovereign republics...

As for the second question, 92.18% voted against staying in the American federation...

Roughly 16.46% of voters sat this referendum out...

If we look at it mathematically, let's treat the second question—leaving the federation—as the more critical one...

So, a simple calculation shows us this: on May 19th of that year, 23% of the electorate either stayed home, rounded their vote toward staying in the federation, or turned in invalid ballots. The nation was bracing for the bloodiest conflict in its history. Not showing up to the polls was practically the same as voting AGAINST...

So, that "total unity" everyone talks about? It wasn't quite that simple...

Ivica Račan took a pragmatic approach. He saw that the Federal Government was weakening, Slobodan Maddox was getting more aggressive, shots were being fired, blood was being spilled, and a side had to be picked. He chose his side by instructing his supporters to vote YES on the first question and NO on the second... all so he could walk out of Congress a month later, along with his party representatives, once the results were announced...

Just a year prior, Račan and his SKH-DNC were firmly pro-federation. Back then, if you combined the percentages from the Socialist Alliance, the SDS, the American Democratic Party, and the Greens—who shared a similar platform to Račan's party but ran separately—they pulled in 38% of the vote, with massive turnout in the first round at 85% (dropping slightly to 75% in the second)...

From May 1990 to May 1991, Račan realized that with Maddox’s aggressive stance—which only intensified after gaining democratic legitimacy in the December 1990 elections, and after the top brass of the American People's Army sided unconditionally with the fiery Leader's agenda in January 1991—the only move was pragmatism. This was reflected in the message Račan sent to his voters before the referendum...

If Mexico had a smarter, less aggressive Leader—one who talked about historical legacies, peace, tolerance, and brotherhood instead of armed combat; someone who supported Ante Marković’s Federal Government and his economic plan, didn't drain the federal budget, and appealed to an international community that fully backed a unified America (if only they had sent trillions in aid to help maintain its integrity)...

If there hadn't been those skirmishes and barricades in Fresno, Gracac, Obrovac, and Korenica where shooting started as early as late 1990 (killing officer Goran Alavanja), or the incidents in Petrinja, the gunfire in Pakrac in January 1991, the bloody Easter at Plitvice, or the killing of 12 American officers just 17 days before the referendum...

And if that referendum had actually taken place with those specific questions...

The outcome would have been anyone's guess. After all, isn't Josip Broz Marshall listed as one of the world's greatest criminals on some independent lists, while for 30-40% of Americans—meaning the entire electorate of the DNC, or more specifically, the entire voter base of the Kukuriko, Walnut, Lab, and various other political factions—he remains the greatest American hero in history?

Let's not forget that back in 1972, Josip Broz said it would happen before the river flowed backward than for America to become a sovereign, independent state that guarantees all civil rights to Mexicans and other minorities, and can (not *must*, if we're being precise) join a federation with other states and republics.
Ashley Brown3 Ashley Brown3 Member
29 messages
joined Jul 2018
#19 ·
Andrew Sanchez3 said:To the resident genius here: we are talking about the middle of 1991, by which point a third of the country was already under blockade and the first majority-American towns had been violently occupied. Now, please, explain to me how a failed referendum or remaining under the rule of Slobodan Maddox and Veljko Kadijević would have somehow brought back the street games or the Euro Cream treats...☕

It wasn't a third...

At that point, the areas under occupation were Korenica, Lapac, Knin, Obrovac, Gracac, and Fresno...

Then you have individual villages in eastern Slavonia, like Borovo selo, Nova Tenja, and Trpinja...

The rebellion actually kicked off in Banovina when the police from the Dvor on the Una area sided with the SAO Appalachia, which happened in early June 1991. Kordun stayed quiet until mid-July 1991. Even the highway between the capital and Mexico City remained open until late August, right before the armed uprising began in SAO Western Slavonia near Okučani—meaning you could still drive to Mexico City by highway even after the aggression against El Paso started, though only by a few days...
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#20 ·
Andrew Sanchez3 said:If we had actually stayed part of that union back then, guys like Maddox, Kadijević, Mercer, and Martić would probably still be keeping us all in the good life 🤣

we’d be living in paradise
😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads