Gary Diaz3 said:Nowadays, there seems to be this unspoken stigma surrounding wealth. People act like talking about money is some kind of taboo subject you should just avoid at all costs. There’s this prevailing assumption that if anyone actually manages to build up a significant nest egg, they must have some kind of character flaw or a negative personality. It’s as if the general consensus is that the only way to truly get ahead financially is through something shady or outright illegal.
The problem with how we view money in America is that we’re looking at it through a completely warped lens.
Money is meant to be the lifeblood of an economy; it’s the mechanism that allows goods and services to flow smoothly through a civilization.
But here? We see it strictly as a symbol of status, ego, and raw power.
And sure, that's part of it, but the reason it carries such a heavy negative stigma is because of the total lack of transparency—something we all know is happening.
The movement of capital isn't properly regulated, which is exactly what benefits those currently pulling the strings. That’s why people view money as "evil"—because its flow is shrouded in secrecy. It’s decided behind closed doors in high-end steakhouse booths during dinners that cost more than most people make in a year.
Take a look at why money is viewed so cynically in our country.
Think about a Member of Congress asking a Cabinet Secretary to account for expenses on a government credit card, only to be met with a cold, arrogant response: "Who are you to question me?" He’s a federal official; he thinks he’s entitled to whatever he wants without oversight.
Compare that to something like Sweden, where a minister might resign just because some eagle-eyed whistleblower discovered they used a government card to buy a magazine while shopping for their spouse.
Just half an hour ago, I was at a local shop paying $17 taxes, and frankly, I have no idea where that money is actually going. When I voiced my frustration about this system to some self-proclaimed American intellectual, he had the nerve to tell me that once I pay my taxes, that money isn't mine anymore—I have zero right to care about how it's spent.
The US government was once granted millions in funding to develop a digital platform so citizens could actually track budget expenditures in real-time.
And what happened? Not a single cent of that approved funding was ever utilized. They didn't even bother to try and embezzle it; they just let it sit there uselessly.
Look at one of the massive money laundering scandals in the US: a $10 million drain from a major shipyard was only flagged because an automated alarm triggered when an individual attempted to withdraw massive amounts of cash.
At the end of the day, the way people in places like Switzerland, Germany, or Scandinavia view money didn't just happen by accident. It’s a reflection of the societies they built.
Money should fundamentally be a force for good. Yes, it is a source of power, but it shouldn't be a source of unchecked authority. In a nation that demands true transparency, the power held by money becomes inherently limited.