CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Partial Credit

Partial Credit

Started by Rachel Richardson · · 👁 6 views · 43 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel RichardsonAdam BarrettEthan Bailey18coastalwalker9Chris Jackson98lonetrucker4Maria Lopez5mistyhound94briskwalker10Keith Cox6Noah Fowler3Jacob AlvarezDaniel Kelly57Anthony Ward6wanderingmoose13Charles Bailey2casualcanyon3Drew Ross2Daniel Stewart7Lisa Patel4Chris Cruz942Sophia Thomas7Henry Evans10Donna Doyle2 …
Rachel Richardson Rachel Richardson RegularOP
662 messages
joined Jul 2017
#41 ·
Byron is a bad person. He hasn't lifted a finger to help anyone in his entire life. 😉
Since we’re getting into the weeds here...
Why can't you just accept that not everyone thinks like you do? Everyone is entitled to their own style and their own point of view.
Just mute me and stop reading my posts. Problem solved.
We aren't all cut from the same cloth.
I'm close with some people—I am not close with you.
It’s impossible to be everyone's cup of tea.

I regret that you hold such a low opinion of me, but I have never done anything to harm you—nor have I ever (as far as I can recall) gone looking for an argument with you.
I’ve wasted my own free time trying to decipher this situation.
I honestly don't understand what you expect from me.
You've been muted.
Lately, on the Reddit sub, I've only engaged with two specific threads—music and the general chat—and over on the main site, I've only touched four topics, always following the rules...

I also regret that you think I'm stealing focus from you (or anyone else), but there isn't any "focus" to steal in a group chat.
I truly try to avoid conflict; the only reason I'm even responding to you right now is because it seems to me you're biting the wrong people.
Why am I even important enough for you to care about?

Take a look at my recent activity.
During the week I received those partial results, I actually stepped back from the forums entirely—mostly due to a lack of sleep.
wanderingmoose13 wanderingmoose13 Member
20 messages
joined Jan 2019
#42 ·
Donna Doyle2 said:I honestly feel like everyone here realizes that Rachel Richardson isn't trying to be malicious at all!

The real issue is just that whenever she runs into a familiar face in a thread, she gets so excited to say hello that she ends up focusing entirely on that person instead of sticking to the actual topic at hand, don't you think?

I really don't believe it's fair to penalize someone just because of how their brain is wired, and shouldn't we be embracing these little personality quirks rather than judging them?

Henry Evans10 said:Look, Wikiceh isn't some troll who's out to insult people. Sure, I'll admit he can derail a thread now and then—but let's be real, we all do that sometimes when we get carried away. If you actually want to fix how he acts, you’d probably have more luck handing out short, frequent bans instead of just letting things slide or going nuclear. From where I'm sitting, he isn't looking for a fight and he isn't trying to start drama.

It shouldn't matter what Rachel Richardson does in his private life; if his family is cool with him hanging out on this forum, why shouldn't we be? That’s really none of our business.

A little side-chat happens to everyone from time to time. He loves chiming in, but honestly, that's exactly what makes the atmosphere here so much better—he connects people with those friendly comments and brings even the most quiet users into the fold. He's like a great host at a backyard BBQ. 🙂

I've actually noticed that the threads he used to participate in have been pretty quiet since he left. Instead of handing out long suspensions, maybe try the approach suggested by zvonezg: shorter, more frequent breaks to get him back on track. Save the heavy-duty bans for the real offenders—the ones who are actually being toxic or offensive to others.
Wiki really didn't deserve this.
Adam Barrett Adam Barrett Member
33 messages
joined Jul 2018
#43 ·
wanderingmoose13 said:It shouldn't matter what Rachel Richardson does in his private life; if his family is cool with him hanging out on this forum, why shouldn't we be? That’s really none of our business.

A little side-chat happens to everyone from time to time. He loves chiming in, but honestly, that's exactly what makes the atmosphere here so much better—he connects people with those friendly comments and brings even the most quiet users into the fold. He's like a great host at a backyard BBQ. 🙂

I've actually noticed that the threads he used to participate in have been pretty quiet since he left. Instead of handing out long suspensions, maybe try the approach suggested by zvonezg: shorter, more frequent breaks to get him back on track. Save the heavy-duty bans for the real offenders—the ones who are actually being toxic or offensive to others.
Wiki really didn't deserve this.

Facts. When I first stumbled onto the Game of Thrones threads a few hours ago, he was super chill and walked me through everything... most people would've just shut me down immediately. Most of his posts are actually legit and helpful.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#44 ·
The moderators have officially weighed in, and honestly, it looks like they’re sticking to their guns on this one. Given the mess we've all been dealing with, I can't say I blame them—it makes total sense from where they're sitting. 🙂Rachel Richardson, just a heads-up: you’ll be eligible to petition to have those partial bans lifted in about six months, but you really need to play it smart between now and then. They’re definitely going to be looking at how you conduct yourself in the meantime when they make their final call on whether to clear your record. Good luck!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads