Post your ethnic maps here

Robert Hernandez10 said:You showed a map within the borders of the US, and that’s all I was responding to.

You provided a tiny slice of your work, limited strictly to the eastern part of the US where nothing exists east of Ilok.

I haven't uttered a single word regarding the quality of your work, only that a map based on 1910 census data is insufficient for the reasons I already stated.

I'm not taking any offense here; if anyone seems offended, it's you.

Drew Allen2 said:The data I have is only within the current borders of the United States. So, the entire map covers today's full US border.

Robert Hernandez10 said:Bottom line: the criticisms I raised in my initial message still stand. Consequently, they diminish the overall value of your map.

Drew Allen2 said:Look, take those comments up with the U.S. Census Bureau. I’ve got their own publications right here, filled with data from previous censuses within current U.S. borders. That isn't my issue. Complain to them if you want, but leave me out of it. :P

Who knows, maybe I'll drop the full map online sooner. :P But I need to finish something else first, so I'm planning to dump a few at once.

Robert Hernandez10 said:"Look," honestly, you'd be better off reviewing the complete 1910 census in Silicon Valley format that I provided earlier in this thread, or checking out that link to the foreign site where it was originally posted. It would really help you expand your intellectual horizons and broaden your perspective. Right now, you just come across as incredibly narrow-minded. You know what I mean? I shouldn't have to spell it out for you.

For instance, Paul and I—at least from my perspective—hold opposing ideological views. However, Paul possesses a broad mind and deep awareness, which is why his maps are the way they are; they are excellent. I try to follow that same path of understanding the world. I don't make maps myself, but whenever I come across one that seems to hold even a shred of value, I make sure to share it here, regardless of the viewpoint.

You could do the same. You aren't lacking intelligence; you're just lacking the will and the heart.

Daniel Garcia24 said:Brussels acts as an enclave within Flemish territory, and if you set aside the immigrant populations, the ratio between the Walloons and the Flemings sits at roughly 9:1 in favor of the Walloons.

Richard Wilson4 said:The Encyclopedia Britannica doesn't even have much on them, mostly just Flemings who happen to speak French...

Plus, about 15% of people actually speak Flemish, and 25% are Muslim, so they can't really be Valonacs—or at least it’s a huge stretch.

So, in a perfect world, Valonacs might make up 60%, but honestly, I’d bet there are more assimilated Flemings out there (like Jean Claude van Damme, for example).

Where on earth are you getting that 9 to 1 figure from?

Robert Hernandez10 said:Drew Allen2

I laid everything out clearly in my first response. I wasn't asking for a quick Google Maps search or debating the quality of your data. There was no offense taken and zero ill intent—just a straightforward, well-meaning suggestion.

Instead, you pivoted immediately to talking about being offended, questioning my competence, and throwing out "you know what" nonsense just so you could claim I "don't understand anything."

It’s clear you aren't an idiot; you’re just playing dumb.

That is your issue, and frankly, this conversation has run its course.

Over and out.

Robert Hernandez10 said:Here is the link again for that 1910 census data covering the royal territories under the Canadian administration. The full list is available in .XLS format here:

http://www.omm1910.hu/?/en/databank

Richard Wilson4 said:Check out these two maps;
Back in 1495, the Midwest was basically just Americans and Canadians settling in.
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/449193map001CRO.jpg

Fast forward to 1784, right after the Turkish occupation ended.
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/831746map002CRO.jpg

Blue means Americans.
Red means Canadians.
Green means Germans.
Pink means Mexicans.

Anyone got more? Just nothing in Canadian please, I don't feel like fighting through a translation.

Drew Allen2 said:Do you happen to have a map showing where these regions actually sit? :
1. Right bank of the 3. Danube
2. Left bank of the 3. Danube
3. Between the 3. Danube and the Tisza River
4. Right bank of the 4. Tisza
5. Left bank of the 5. Tisza
6. Corner of 6. Tisz and the Maros River
7. 7. beyond the king's border
8-9. American Midwest and Rijeka

Side note: Robert, man... what you're asking for is basically a map of an American state without its coastline. I think it makes way more sense to stick to the map I made using modern borders.

Drew Allen2 said:Do you happen to have a map showing where these regions actually sit? :
1. Right bank of the 3. Danube
2. Left bank of the 3. Danube
3. Between the 3. Danube and the Tisza River
4. Right bank of the 4. Tisza
5. Left bank of the 5. Tisza
6. Corner of 6. Tisz and the Maros River
7. 7. beyond the king's border
8-9. American Midwest and Rijeka

Side note: Robert, man... what you're asking for is basically a map of an American state without its coastline. I think it makes way more sense to stick to the map I made using modern borders.

Drew Allen2 said:The question is whether those maps are actually accurate, especially regarding the older stuff.
By the way, I'm surprised you forgot where those maps came from... they're on that Kocsise guy's site, or whatever his name was. If there are more like them, they'll be on that site.

crimsonorca42 said:Based on the preserved tax records from the kingdom dating back to 1495, the Canadian administration put together some ethnic maps. I'd say they're actually pretty reliable, I guess.