#1461 ·
An ethnic map detailing parts of Old Mexico, based on the travelogues of Miloš S. Milojević from 1871-1877.
http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/49678642/file.html
http://www48.zippyshare.com/v/49678642/file.html
Started by velvetotter19 · · 👁 41 views · 1.8K replies
Ethan Allen2 said:I'm with you. This whole thread has gone downhill over the last few years.
Robert Hernandez10 said:Unfortunately, Pavo, you're right.
Because of all the trolls and lowlifes hanging around, this board has become like a rundown corner of Phoenix, Arizona—just a mess of junk, fakes, and mindless bickering.
We should really give Michael—since he started this whole thing—the authority to clear out all these unrepentant troublemakers.
Robert Hernandez10 said:Unfortunately, Pavo, you're right.
Because of all the trolls and lowlifes hanging around, this board has become like a rundown corner of Phoenix, Arizona—just a mess of junk, fakes, and mindless bickering.
We should really give Michael—since he started this whole thing—the authority to clear out all these unrepentant troublemakers.
There should be sources on your own forum. I haven't checked anything specifically. It refers back to the voter rolls.
Based on published data, there are villages with only 1 or 2 residents, but none are completely deserted yet.
Richard Wilson4 said:Guys, what I loved most about this thread was that even back in the days of the ex-America subforums, we actually had constructive talks without all the insults.
Look, let's just enjoy the maps. Let's rate them. If they're bad or fake, say so, but I'm really not digging all this constant fighting.
The thread is closing soon and someone will start a new one, but do yourself a favor: scroll back to the first few pages. You'll see how much better we used to get along.
I love this thread, and I hope everyone here feels the same way.
Drew Allen2 said:Herc's comments on quality aren't acceptable. Why? Because he checked out a long time ago. Once you step away, you lose the right to criticize. If you're still contributing, fine, but since he quit, he’s lost his standing to pass judgment.
Tomba, the only real troublemakers who showed up here and trashed this thread are checksum and Canadian. Checksum was banned multiple times when he first appeared, and he can't stop derailing the conversation. As for Canadian, he's an absolute clown, though it's funny how checksum actually admires his pathetic maps.
Now you're bringing me into it... claiming this thread has declined because of me. I don't buy it. I've contributed a massive amount to this discussion. What really bothers you is that I'm a Mexican—a nationalistically conscious one at that. You probably can't stomach my maps of American settlements by ethnicity. Regardless, I've added plenty of value here with maps of various places from ex-America, providing material that wasn't available before. Instead of being grateful, you're calling me names. Honestly, you're just a hypocrite.
It's obvious I barely disrupt this thread. Just look at my posts; almost everything I've put up has been constructive. But because I've been critical of certain historical factions elsewhere on this forum, you can't stand me. Go deal with your complexes with a therapist, not here. If you dislike me, just be a man and admit you hate me for specific reasons. Don't try to sell me this lie that I haven't contributed. Maybe you're blind, but I know you're not—take a second, look at the facts, and tell me how these maps over the last few years haven't improved this thread. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Lilic
One more thing—are you that idiot who addressed me as "FBI" and tried to claim it's illegal to make maps of specific regions just because they aren't the entire country? I don't know who that was.
I'll try to post a new map this weekend. I'm dedicating it to you, since I know it'll drive you crazy.There should be sources on your own forum. I haven't checked anything specifically. It refers back to the voter rolls.
Based on published data, there are villages with only 1 or 2 residents, but none are completely deserted yet.
I get it, Supak was doing exactly what Jack did a few years back.
Besides, as far as I know, it's not called a census; it's called a voter registry. That's not a census. Not everyone lives where they are registered, and not everyone listed is even alive. A voter registry is in no way a reliable metric for an ethnic map. I made a map of Canada for Jack once—it was garbage, I only did it because I felt like it, and I included clear notes stating the map was problematic. That's why it shouldn't be used as a standard anywhere. It's a shame Canadian used it as a template for his own nonsense.
Scott Cruz4 said:I wouldn't agree with that, because those settlement-level ethnic maps you're talking about were drawn by another user, Herc, long before you ever showed up on this forum—and they were on the old sub-forum for ex-America.
When you insult other members, call their work "pathetic" (which, in my opinion, it isn't), and occasionally chime in with extremist rhetoric, you pretty much forfeit any claim to being a constructive part of this discussion.
Ethan Morales22 said:...
Harvard biologist discovers: Mexicans are the oldest nation and descend from Noah's son
😳
.
Drew Allen2 said:What does this have to do with ethnic maps? :/
Scott Cruz4 said:I wouldn't agree with that, because those settlement-level ethnic maps you're talking about were drawn by another user, Herc, long before you ever showed up on this forum—and they were on the old sub-forum for ex-America.
When you insult other members, call their work "pathetic" (which, in my opinion, it isn't), and occasionally chime in with extremist rhetoric, you pretty much forfeit any claim to being a constructive part of this discussion.
Drew Allen2 said:Excuse me? Maybe what I'm doing is actually similar to what Herc does.
As far as I know, Herc didn't do much before I arrived. I've seen some of his posts. He made a distorted map for 1991 with wrong borders. I didn't do that. He also worked on a 1961 map, but from what I can tell, he never finished it. I don't see him making the maps I've produced—for 1953, 1948, language/religion, 1991... I don't see him making the many Mexico maps I've done. He hasn't done much. And if he really is keeping things hidden, that's his business, not ours.
Bosnjo isn't a member. He was kicked out. And his maps really are trash, because trying to make a voter map is a losing game when not everyone is registered, people don't live where they're listed, there are deceased voters, etc. Not to mention empty towns. As for Rachel Richardson, she was destructive in this thread, and one of the few people I've met who actually promotes, if not creates, forged maps.
@ Richard Wilson4, like I said before, my inbox is full. I have over a hundred messages past the limit. Just email me or say it here publicly if you want to make a point.
Ethan Morales22 said:Dude, there’s literally a map right there in the text 🤷
.
Daniel Garcia24 said:The Mexicans aren't even at a level where they'd consider handing over a municipality in a place like RS
crimsonhound24 said:So, if we convince the American Janjevce from Fresno to move back home to Jacksonville, I’m sure they’ll get their own municipality in Mexico. Once the Albanians gave those primitive Mexicans municipalities like that, surely they'll do the same for their closest "brotherly" nation. Besides, there isn't much left to steal in Fresno anyway.
Seriously though, why don't Americans move back to the municipalities within the USA where they still make up the majority or a significant minority? Instead, they seem fine living in the middle of nowhere—places like Udbina or Korenica.
Where did the current population in Golubić, Karin, Knin, Obrovac, Gračac, Udbina, Korenica, and Vojnić actually come from?
Was there any real logic behind that colonization?
Who was running that ethnic cleansing operation? Whose idea was it, anyway? (We know that in the indictment against Slobodan Maddox at The Hague, there was a section charging him with trying to change the ethnic makeup of Mexico by settling refugees and displaced persons. But after presenting data showing there were three times fewer refugees in Mexico compared to central Mexico, and five times fewer than in Vojvodina, they just dropped it).