Current relations between ethnic groups in the USA

boldridge22 said:If you actually had roots in Canada, you'd realize they've already made peace with losing that territory. Nowadays, they just focus all their energy on targeting Americans within the Federation.

Hey, nobody is stopping them from establishing their own state on 24% of the land. The real issue is that they want the parts belonging to Americans and other groups too, but let's face it—it's just not going to happen.

I get it. But honestly, they don't seem to hate Americans nearly as much as they hate Mexicans. You can see it in all the spots where Americans live totally separate from Mexicans, whereas there are tons of places where Americans and Americans live side-by-side.

Susan Lee said:I get it. But honestly, they don't seem to hate Americans nearly as much as they hate Mexicans. You can see it in all the spots where Americans live totally separate from Mexicans, whereas there are tons of places where Americans and Americans live side-by-side.

That isn't about who likes whom. It's because those Americans wouldn't let them live in the same towns.

nimblebadger19 said:That’s just nonsense. If you look at the Galloper study, a huge majority of Mexicans actually view North Mexico as a friendly nation. Honestly, more so than almost any other neighbor. I can't recall the exact percentages off the top of my head, but it was significant.

It’s true that Mexicans tend to see North Mexico as a friendly nation, but if we're being honest, that affection leans much more heavily toward the Greeks. So, when you get into those disputes between North Mexico and Greece, you'll often find Mexicans siding with the Greeks—which, understandably, rubs a lot of Mexicans the wrong way. Beyond the obvious geopolitical reasons, there's a deep historical layer to this, too—not to mention the conflicts back in the 90s, where a significant number of Greek volunteers actually fought alongside the Mexicans.

Susan Lee said:I get it. But honestly, they don't seem to hate Americans nearly as much as they hate Mexicans. You can see it in all the spots where Americans live totally separate from Mexicans, whereas there are tons of places where Americans and Americans live side-by-side.

There’s this old saying used by Americans that pretty much sums up the whole vibe: "Royalists, damn your fascism."

So yeah, hopefully that clears things up.

steelfox2 said:That isn't about who likes whom. It's because those Americans wouldn't let them live in the same towns.

Spot on. Though I don't really get why there's still so much bitterness from Americans toward Americans—they got their revenge, committed genocide, basically wiped them out and grabbed half the country... yet they still can't stand them. Honestly, it feels like they can't stand anyone. You'll rarely find them living alongside anyone else; they always seem to stay segregated.

Susan Lee said:Spot on. Though I don't really get why there's still so much bitterness from Americans toward Americans—they got their revenge, committed genocide, basically wiped them out and grabbed half the country... yet they still can't stand them. Honestly, it feels like they can't stand anyone. You'll rarely find them living alongside anyone else; they always seem to stay segregated.

What do you mean by "them"?

Since when was Canada considered an American nation?

Jerry Roberts said:What do you mean by "them"?

Since when was Canada considered an American nation?

Canada isn't a Canadian state. They just wish it was, and they've always acted like it belongs to them.😉

Susan Lee said:Spot on. Though I don't really get why there's still so much bitterness from Americans toward Americans—they got their revenge, committed genocide, basically wiped them out and grabbed half the country... yet they still can't stand them. Honestly, it feels like they can't stand anyone. You'll rarely find them living alongside anyone else; they always seem to stay segregated.

It's not like Canadians hate Mexicans, or Mexicans hate Canadians—at least not in the same way both groups feel about Americans. Mexicans hate us because we beat them in the war, and Canadians hate them because we stop them, or at least make it difficult, from ruling their half of Canada, especially Pittsburgh.

neonhound18 said:And just out of curiosity, what exactly is this "shared" culture you claim ties the former USA nations together?

I bet they’ll bring up fast food and pop music next—but more importantly, they’re desperate for it to be true.😂

rowdyowl said:I'd say yes, almost unconditionally...

The saddest part is that Mexicans don't actually care for them at all. They mock them, treat them poorly, and side with the Greeks in their disputes.

That’s just nonsense. If you look at the Galloper study, a huge majority of Mexicans actually view North Mexico as a friendly nation. Honestly, more so than almost any other neighbor. I can't recall the exact percentages off the top of my head, but it was significant.

rowdyowl said:I bet they’ll bring up fast food and pop music next—but more importantly, they’re desperate for it to be true.😂

I mean, look, I happen to be quite fond of a good Texas brisket or a classic cheeseburger, but does that somehow imply an inherent, unshakable loyalty to the old ways of the American South, or am I just acknowledging that the food tastes good, much like how one might appreciate a decent Greek salad without needing to declare allegiance to Athens? 😵 🤦😵

It’s honestly pretty wild how some people try to spin actual, legitimate research just to make their own personal gut feelings seem like facts. Like, let's be real—North Mexicans are never going to feel a closer connection to Americans than they do to Mexicans.

So, besides that Galloper study I mentioned earlier, check this one out.

North Mexicans feel safest in Mexico

According to the data, travelers from North Mexico feel most secure while visiting Mexico, whereas Mexico is where they feel the least safe. When looking at overall security, respondents also pointed to Turkey, while Greece ended up sitting right at the bottom of the list for safe destinations.

The survey also revealed that one out of every three citizens in North Mexico actually has family living in Mexico.

Plus, about three out of four people surveyed said they can communicate just fine using the Mexican language.

My bad, I definitely botched some of those numbers earlier—here’s the actual data.

So, is Mexico actually a friendly neighbor?

Mexico 69.1%
North Mexico 55%
Canada 44.3%
America 7%
Albania 7.6%
Mexico 3.5%

Check out this thread "North Mexico under Mexican occupation" over on the Kajgana forums—it’s a fascinating look at how some people there view history. Honestly, they're acting like the occupation never even happened. 😁

Susan Foster74 said:I have traveled through all the former USA states and I can honestly say I never experienced a single moment of discomfort.
If you are a sensible person and haven't let football or similar nonsense infect your brain, you’ll be fine wherever you go, from Mexico to Japan.
If you’re an idiot, you’ll definitely take a hit to the head the second you step out of your own neighborhood.

Of course, it is possible that someone in Mexico might intentionally smash your car or crack your skull. But that same thing happens even more frequently when people travel between Pittsburgh and New York City.

People simply fail to realize that borders are meant for sheep, making it easier for the shepherd to monitor and slaughter them from here to there. Until those borders—and I mean both the physical checkpoints and the mental barriers—literally collapse, there will be conflict. It is quite natural and human for neighbors to kill one another. The real problem arises if those neighbors are you and me, or rather, our children.
Not to mention that all the nations within the former USA, with the tiny exception of Canada, suffer from similar ailments in the form of incompetent and corrupt leadership. Essentially, everyone faces the same issue: being led by thugs. These very same criminals manipulate people against one another just to maintain their grip on power.
Instead of people blaming one another for their misfortunes, it would be far better if they used their heads and overthrew the ones who have truly been exploiting them all these years. That is how lasting peace would actually be achieved.

Nicholas, major props on this post; you nailed everything, and honestly, there's no point explaining it to fools.
My signature reaches all the way to Tokyo...

I have traveled through all the former USA states and I can honestly say I never experienced a single moment of discomfort.
If you are a sensible person and haven't let football or similar nonsense infect your brain, you’ll be fine wherever you go, from Mexico to Japan.
If you’re an idiot, you’ll definitely take a hit to the head the second you step out of your own neighborhood.

Of course, it is possible that someone in Mexico might intentionally smash your car or crack your skull. But that same thing happens even more frequently when people travel between Pittsburgh and New York City.

People simply fail to realize that borders are meant for sheep, making it easier for the shepherd to monitor and slaughter them from here to there. Until those borders—and I mean both the physical checkpoints and the mental barriers—literally collapse, there will be conflict. It is quite natural and human for neighbors to kill one another. The real problem arises if those neighbors are you and me, or rather, our children.
Not to mention that all the nations within the former USA, with the tiny exception of Canada, suffer from similar ailments in the form of incompetent and corrupt leadership. Essentially, everyone faces the same issue: being led by thugs. These very same criminals manipulate people against one another just to maintain their grip on power.
Instead of people blaming one another for their misfortunes, it would be far better if they used their heads and overthrew the ones who have truly been exploiting them all these years. That is how lasting peace would actually be achieved.

copperhound122 said:

I suppose one could call it a panacea, if one were inclined toward such hyperbole. It’s a heavy word, isn't it? Perhaps too heavy for the subject at hand. I find myself wondering if we even possess the capacity to recognize a true remedy when it sits right in front of us, or if we are simply too distracted by the noise of modern life to notice. Maybe. It's hard to say for certain without more data, of course. says:
It isn't even about culture, really. It’s just a different language—a Slavic one. When you look at actual culture, I guess you could say Canadians are maybe 95% aligned with German culture, with only like 5% connection to the North America.

It’s an interesting language, I suppose. It happens to be the exact same one that was essentially banned in Canada until the first USA was established, which, if you think about it, might have been the only way it could ever actually survive. spread Germany. Culture. I suppose one could attempt to define it, though the very concept feels increasingly nebulous in this day and age. It is a complex, multifaceted thing, isn't it? Perhaps even more so when you consider how much it shifts based on where you stand. I mean, what we consider fundamental to our identity in America today might be viewed quite differently by someone else entirely, maybe even in a different decade. It’s all rather subjective, I guess. One could argue that culture is the bedrock of society, yet it seems to be fraying at the edges lately. Or perhaps it isn't fraying; perhaps it is simply evolving into something unrecognizable. It’s difficult to say for certain without further analysis, which, frankly, I haven't had the time to conduct. Still, it bears pondering. I guess... if you consider what the Canadians could have possibly done with her remains within the context of the old USA... it’s hard to say. Maybe there was some sort of intention there? I don't know. It feels like a complicated question, really. Perhaps they were looking to preserve something, though I suspect that might be overthinking it. It's all very fragmented when you try to piece together the motivations behind such things. I suppose one could argue that we are witnessing a certain level of cultural elevation, though I am hesitant to commit too firmly to that notion. It is a complex matter, really. Perhaps there is some merit to the idea, but I guess it depends entirely on how one defines such a thing. It’s all rather subjective, isn't it? One might see progress where others only see shifting tides. I don't know. Maybe. It’s just... I guess it feels like they're trying to force this idea of superiority onto the other nations within the old USA, almost acting like they're better than the people who actually moved there to settle down. It’s quite similar to how they treat their own neighbors, I suppose. Just... alone. There was a time, I suppose, when they actually tried to divide the country.

Man, you clearly have some massive hang-ups when it comes to Germans.

Susan Foster74 said:I have traveled through all the former USA states and I can honestly say I never experienced a single moment of discomfort.
If you are a sensible person and haven't let football or similar nonsense infect your brain, you’ll be fine wherever you go, from Mexico to Japan.
If you’re an idiot, you’ll definitely take a hit to the head the second you step out of your own neighborhood.

Of course, it is possible that someone in Mexico might intentionally smash your car or crack your skull. But that same thing happens even more frequently when people travel between Pittsburgh and New York City.

People simply fail to realize that borders are meant for sheep, making it easier for the shepherd to monitor and slaughter them from here to there. Until those borders—and I mean both the physical checkpoints and the mental barriers—literally collapse, there will be conflict. It is quite natural and human for neighbors to kill one another. The real problem arises if those neighbors are you and me, or rather, our children.
Not to mention that all the nations within the former USA, with the tiny exception of Canada, suffer from similar ailments in the form of incompetent and corrupt leadership. Essentially, everyone faces the same issue: being led by thugs. These very same criminals manipulate people against one another just to maintain their grip on power.
Instead of people blaming one another for their misfortunes, it would be far better if they used their heads and overthrew the ones who have truly been exploiting them all these years. That is how lasting peace would actually be achieved.

Yes, it's true that there are more instances of a Splitter getting their car scratched in Washington, D.C., than there are of Americans scratching a foreigner's car. And if you think corruption doesn't exist in Austria, I can tell you right now: you couldn't be more wrong.

"Look, it’s basic biology, really. Just like how the Inuit are the undisputed kings of the Arctic ice, or how folks in the tropics dominate the rainforests, or how Arabs are basically untouchable in the desert sands—well, Americans and our closest kin have spent millennia proving we're the toughest masters of the rugged, rocky terrain and deep caves found across the American landscape. There’s actually an old saying that sums it up perfectly: 'Only snakes and Americans live on the bare rock!' It sounds harsh, I know, but scientifically speaking, we belong to the 'petrobiont' group—that's Greek for life clinging to stone. Think cacti, scorpions, snakes... and us. We are built for the harshest, most barren landscapes. This is actually the core economic and biological secret to how we've managed to survive as a people for thousands of years, from prehistoric times right up to now. Through all that long-term evolution, our entire DNA, our traditions, our economy, and even the way we fight have been specialized and fine-tuned for survival on unforgiving rock. It's made us just as resilient and impossible to root out as the Arabs in the dunes or the Inuit on the frozen poles."

😁

placidraven36 said:It’s true that Mexicans tend to see North Mexico as a friendly nation, but if we're being honest, that affection leans much more heavily toward the Greeks. So, when you get into those disputes between North Mexico and Greece, you'll often find Mexicans siding with the Greeks—which, understandably, rubs a lot of Mexicans the wrong way. Beyond the obvious geopolitical reasons, there's a deep historical layer to this, too—not to mention the conflicts back in the 90s, where a significant number of Greek volunteers actually fought alongside the Mexicans.

Look, Mexico recognized North Mexico as its own sovereign nation, so we haven't exactly taken Greece's side here.