#581 ·
Paul Peterson4 said:Basically, we’re looking at a massive red flag here—the actual amount of money backed by real-world value is shrinking compared to this mountain of speculative cash, interest on top of interest, and those general paper bubbles that have absolutely zero foundation in reality.
When you look at where the West is dumping its resources lately—dealing with scams like Meta or basically sawing off the very branch they're sitting on—it’s pretty hard to see any kind of bright future in this mess.
But regarding PM, the real question I'm asking is: who actually wins and who loses when we introduce PM as the new backing for currency? It’s obvious the collectors win, but let’s be real, the collectors aren't the ones calling the shots. The people making the decisions are the ones running the political show right now. They love the current fiat setup; all they need is a minor "adjustment" to win back some semblance of trust.
Or maybe it'll be one big theatrical production. Are we going to go to war, say against Iran? But honestly, we already sold that script in Iraq and Afghanistan, and it didn't do much for anyone except line the pockets of a few people with massive profits.
At the end of the day, today's currencies—regardless of whether you're looking at M1, M2, or any other metric—possess zero intrinsic value and zero backing.
brightviper48 said:And what, exactly, is the actual utility of gold? What can one truly accomplish with it? You cannot eat it—certainly not—you cannot use it to warm your home, you cannot grow crops upon it, nor can you live inside it... it serves no practical purpose in any meaningful sense.
Gold, much like any other currency, possesses value only insofar as the rest of society agrees that it does...
Beyond that, it simply fails to generate any tangible value—on a farm, you can plant crops to sell; in the woods, you can harvest timber for profit; but with gold, you’re left doing nothing but waiting for some sucker willing to pay an even higher price...
It sounds like you don't quite grasp the fundamental nature of money. 🤷
Gold and silver function as money because of their inherent physical properties—traits no other commodity possesses—not simply because of a collective whim. Humanity has understood this logic for thousands of years, yet it only took a single stroke of Nixon's pen to make us forget such a straightforward, logical truth.
Fiat currencies rely entirely on the leap of faith required to believe that a scrap of paper and some ink is worth, say, a printed $100 bill, when in reality, it's barely worth a fraction of a cent.