CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Why would anyone actually want to be a Reddit moderator?

Why would anyone actually want to be a Reddit moderator?

Started by Jeremy Davis7 · · 👁 9 views · 149 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jeremy Davis7Kevin Bailey2Rebecca Scott3Michael Reed45neondrifter17Bryan Alvarez15briskpuma23slymaker9fadedbear92Dennis Bailey2Matthew FisherLisa Hernandez3Jeffrey Sanchez7redmarlin3Austin Ross30Michelle Alvarez8silentpilot6Arthur Kim74stormyheron4Hannah White2Peter Phillips32driftingbear29slywolf45Ashley Phillips41 …
brightridge59 brightridge59 Active Member
85 messages
joined Jun 2011
#141 ·
Richard Perez3 said:There is.

It’s being able to run your subforum exactly how you want it to be.

😁

That’s why you aren't the boss. The boss is just sitting back enjoying life while we grind away for free, answering the same damn questions for the thirteenth time this year alone. 🙂

Get your hands off my husband. 🥳

😍

feraltrucker5 said:Well, you shouldn't have anyway—it was way more entertaining this way. 😁

Honestly, he really needed someone to break it to him that the moderators are basically lab-grown specimens, and only the absolute elite models get promoted to admin status. 😬

Personally, I spent quite a bit of time in an incubator myself, which is exactly how I managed to land this moderator gig. 😬

I genuinely find a lot of satisfaction in tidying up titles 😍 and keeping things moderated just so the whole layout looks cleaner, more polished, and generally higher quality. Of course, there is also a certain thrill in handing out warnings or banning someone when I feel they are being a total idiot—that kind of thing 😁

For a little while, I actually entertained the idea that I might find a husband right here on the forum, 😢 but I eventually realized that simply wasn't going to happen.

And yes, I’ll admit it, I definitely get a little kick out of those admin sanctions. 🥳
Hannah White2 Hannah White2 Active Member
135 messages
joined Oct 2011
#142 ·
brightridge59 said:😍

Personally, I spent quite a bit of time in an incubator myself, which is exactly how I managed to land this moderator gig. 😬

I genuinely find a lot of satisfaction in tidying up titles 😍 and keeping things moderated just so the whole layout looks cleaner, more polished, and generally higher quality. Of course, there is also a certain thrill in handing out warnings or banning someone when I feel they are being a total idiot—that kind of thing 😁

For a little while, I actually entertained the idea that I might find a husband right here on the forum, 😢 but I eventually realized that simply wasn't going to happen.

And yes, I’ll admit it, I definitely get a little kick out of those admin sanctions. 🥳

So what, you already went through all the moderators? Or are the admins just too busy running the show?
You gotta play by the casting rules if you want in.😁
brightridge59 brightridge59 Active Member
85 messages
joined Jun 2011
#143 ·
Pfft, I honestly can't believe anyone actually listens to those moderators anymore. ☕

That whole approach is so out of date. 😛
Brandon Castillo4 Brandon Castillo4 Regular
277 messages
joined Nov 2003
#144 ·
goldengull3 said:I am simply restoring order to the chaos.

image

🤣🤣🤣
Jeremy Davis7 Jeremy Davis7 Active MemberOP
55 messages
joined Oct 2007
#145 ·
brightridge59;
Look, I spent some time working in a startup incubator back in the day. That’s basically how I ended up being a moderator here. 😬

Care to elaborate? If it isn't too much trouble.

🙂
Nathan Perez5 Nathan Perez5 Member
17 messages
joined Sep 2009
#146 ·
Jeremy Davis7 said:Look, I don't want this to come off as a provocation.

I honestly think it's a valid question, and I’m genuinely curious about what drives someone to become a moderator for a commercial media outlet.

What am I talking about?

Reddit, for instance—it's just one tiny slice of a massive global forum ecosystem under a brand that pulls in millions of users.
It's a massive brand that operates right here in the US market.
It covers a huge range of topics, and for it to work as a product or service provider... to actually create that sense of "added value" for the user, it needs to be curated, managed... moderated.

Okay. That much is crystal clear.

But that's also where the dilemma starts eating at me.

We're talking about a commercial entity here.
The owners of the domain and the brand own everything associated with it, and they exploit that brand commercially.

How? By selling advertising space that plenty of advertisers are itching to buy, because this place clearly gathers a massive amount of potential consumers and interested parties... you know, all those ads and banners popping up on the edges of the page or screen...

The biggest value for the owners is the traffic they sell to advertisers.
And that traffic is fueled by high-quality threads and organized moderation—maintaining order and "hygiene" in discussions, which directly impacts the quality of the site.

To make that happen, they need to hire a small army of people to oversee and moderate all these topics (and I mean globally; America is just a tiny fraction of the whole picture).

The owner's motivation is perfectly obvious to me.
Making money from selling ad space.

What I truly can't wrap my head around is how they managed to recruit thousands (my best guess) of volunteers who diligently, passionately, almost fanatically, do this work for free. They're basically working for nothing.

He's built a fantastic business, he's making serious bank, and his overhead is minimal.
Most importantly: the moderation (watching over all the threads) that ensures his precious traffic costs him absolutely zero dollars.

So, what motivates people to enthusiastically work for free on a commercial platform whose sole purpose is to turn a profit!?

From what I can gather, there's an entire moderation hierarchy; authorities, team structures, departments, recruitment methods, oversight protocols... it's actual fucking management!!?
Literally.
And all of it "for free"!
Nobody sees a single cent, yet they pour in their time, their talent, they carry the responsibility, they have to follow organizational structures, and so on...

What's the draw? What do they get in return?

Is it a game? A sense of mission? Feeling important? A little bit of power? The need to feel "cool," a sense of belonging... whatever it is!?

I'm seriously asking.

PS.
Whoever designed this business model is a genius worthy of a Nobel Prize.
A master psychologist who clearly understands how humans function and knows exactly how to instrumentalize that without blinking.

Basically: "I'm using your labor for my personal... definitely not charitable... purposes, I'm paying you nothing, yet you remain motivated, you work hard, and you're even happy about it."

Top tier stuff!

🙂

My take is that people usually jump into these roles out of pure enthusiasm or just wanting to be helpful and find a productive way to kill some time...
But then you hit that stage where they start using their authority, and it becomes painfully obvious that some folks just aren't built to handle that kind of leverage.

What has baffled me since I first started scrolling through this Reddit thread is how much weight people give to that specific type of power—you know, the ability to just wipe away someone's post or maybe even nuking an entire account...
To me, that feels like a massive disconnect from real life, where someone gets so rattled by it that they struggle to move past it, feeling like the person who deleted their comment suddenly holds some sort of dominion over them or their actual existence...😲 (not that I don't get why it stings in the moment, obviously)
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 Regular
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#147 ·
Personally, I don’t mind if a moderator makes a mistake; we’re all human, after all.
What bothers me is when they refuse to own up to their errors, which usually points toward a massive superiority complex.
I should also mention that on the various subreddits I contribute to, there are far more competent moderators than bad ones. However, those who let their personal negativity drive their decisions tend to be incredibly intolerant and exclusionary.
I am not entirely sure what Slafko did, but I find myself facing the same restrictions regarding access to the local transit forums and the city planning boards.
Given my own situation, I highly doubt he actually did anything egregious.
Some mods take it incredibly personally when you point out a factual error.
It is a relief that they represent such a small minority, but it remains problematic when those individuals hold positions of authority...
goldengull3 goldengull3 Regular
260 messages
joined Nov 2007
#148 ·
Gary Lewis5 said:A question for those of you who aren't flying solo in your moderator roles:

Do you ever get that nagging sense of guilt—where you realize you’ve spent more than an hour glued to your screen instead of actually spending quality time with your partner? I wonder if, in the grand scheme of things, those lost hours end up taking a toll on the relationship itself. I'll apologize in advance if this feels a bit too personal; please feel free to answer in whatever way feels most comfortable to you. 😉

Well, my partner has her own PC and can do whatever she pleases, and we have AOL Instant Messenger to stay connected regardless. 🙂

In all seriousness, I frequent Reddit quite often to unwind, but my life isn't confined to just being at home. For instance, earlier today at the office, I had to produce six or seven pages of documentation—material that is fairly critical since others will be reviewing it. By the fourth page, I hit a wall, so I took a thirty-minute break to browse some lighter topics, grab a coffee, and reset. I would much rather linger at the office for an extra bit to take a breather than force myself through work that simply isn't flowing...

Furthermore, everyone specializes in a specific niche of the law in practice. The questions raised here on the legal boards can be quite demanding; they require genuine thought, digging through regulations, and diving into unfamiliar territory that I don't typically encounter in my daily routine. It can be quite challenging. In fact, certain threads have piqued my interest enough that I’ve looked into them seriously, even leading me to write something for a legal journal.
Thomas Carter80 Thomas Carter80 Newcomer
4 messages
joined May 2007
#149 ·
Jeremy Davis7 said:Look, I don't want this to come off as a provocation.

I honestly think it's a valid question, and I’m genuinely curious about what drives someone to become a moderator for a commercial media outlet.

What am I talking about?

Reddit, for instance—it's just one tiny slice of a massive global forum ecosystem under a brand that pulls in millions of users.
It's a massive brand that operates right here in the US market.
It covers a huge range of topics, and for it to work as a product or service provider... to actually create that sense of "added value" for the user, it needs to be curated, managed... moderated.

Okay. That much is crystal clear.

But that's also where the dilemma starts eating at me.

We're talking about a commercial entity here.
The owners of the domain and the brand own everything associated with it, and they exploit that brand commercially.

How? By selling advertising space that plenty of advertisers are itching to buy, because this place clearly gathers a massive amount of potential consumers and interested parties... you know, all those ads and banners popping up on the edges of the page or screen...

The biggest value for the owners is the traffic they sell to advertisers.
And that traffic is fueled by high-quality threads and organized moderation—maintaining order and "hygiene" in discussions, which directly impacts the quality of the site.

To make that happen, they need to hire a small army of people to oversee and moderate all these topics (and I mean globally; America is just a tiny fraction of the whole picture).

The owner's motivation is perfectly obvious to me.
Making money from selling ad space.

What I truly can't wrap my head around is how they managed to recruit thousands (my best guess) of volunteers who diligently, passionately, almost fanatically, do this work for free. They're basically working for nothing.

He's built a fantastic business, he's making serious bank, and his overhead is minimal.
Most importantly: the moderation (watching over all the threads) that ensures his precious traffic costs him absolutely zero dollars.

So, what motivates people to enthusiastically work for free on a commercial platform whose sole purpose is to turn a profit!?

From what I can gather, there's an entire moderation hierarchy; authorities, team structures, departments, recruitment methods, oversight protocols... it's actual fucking management!!?
Literally.
And all of it "for free"!
Nobody sees a single cent, yet they pour in their time, their talent, they carry the responsibility, they have to follow organizational structures, and so on...

What's the draw? What do they get in return?

Is it a game? A sense of mission? Feeling important? A little bit of power? The need to feel "cool," a sense of belonging... whatever it is!?

I'm seriously asking.

PS.
Whoever designed this business model is a genius worthy of a Nobel Prize.
A master psychologist who clearly understands how humans function and knows exactly how to instrumentalize that without blinking.

Basically: "I'm using your labor for my personal... definitely not charitable... purposes, I'm paying you nothing, yet you remain motivated, you work hard, and you're even happy about it."

Top tier stuff!

🙂

I honestly think you're way off base here.

Traffic and posting. High traffic means huge bandwidth costs (the sheer volume of data being moved around because of all the reading and writing). For instance, everything I'm typing right now represents "data" that the owner has to pay for in server space.

Advertisers. There are very few "real" advertisers (maybe some announcements for concerts, local events, or even humanitarian stuff). Most advertisers find a Reddit totally unappealing precisely because of how free people can write. Like, you can't expect someone like Walmart to want to advertise on a site where people might be tearing their business apart in the comments. So, big-name advertisers aren't really a thing here. Just look at Google Ads—you have to actually click the link just for the owner to scrape together a few cents.

Profit. When you crunch the numbers, after paying for servers and admins, the owner isn't walking away with a mountain of cash. In principle, they make way less than you'd think, maybe even just breaking even.

Moderators. I'm pretty sure most of them do it just to help people out. If you started paying them, the whole vibe of the platform would change; it would lose its sense of freedom, and everyone would feel it. And what's next? Paying users to post? 😉
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#150 ·
Thomas Carter80 said:I honestly think you're way off base here.

Traffic and posting. High traffic means huge bandwidth costs (the sheer volume of data being moved around because of all the reading and writing). For instance, everything I'm typing right now represents "data" that the owner has to pay for in server space.

Advertisers. There are very few "real" advertisers (maybe some announcements for concerts, local events, or even humanitarian stuff). Most advertisers find a Reddit totally unappealing precisely because of how free people can write. Like, you can't expect someone like Walmart to want to advertise on a site where people might be tearing their business apart in the comments. So, big-name advertisers aren't really a thing here. Just look at Google Ads—you have to actually click the link just for the owner to scrape together a few cents.

Profit. When you crunch the numbers, after paying for servers and admins, the owner isn't walking away with a mountain of cash. In principle, they make way less than you'd think, maybe even just breaking even.

Moderators. I'm pretty sure most of them do it just to help people out. If you started paying them, the whole vibe of the platform would change; it would lose its sense of freedom, and everyone would feel it. And what's next? Paying users to post? 😉

I wouldn't say the bandwidth is actually *that* huge.

Sure, the forum has thousands of users and a ton of posts going up every single day, but if you really look at it, it's all just plain text. And text? It barely touches bandwidth. The real bandwidth hogs are images, docs, and multimedia. Since we can't use attachments here, everyone just hotlinks to other sites for photos, and there isn't even any video content anyway. Plus, avatars are tiny and signature images are banned. It's pretty lean!

Still, wondering about how much bandwidth this forum burns through daily, monthly, or yearly is a fun thought. It would be cool to see some rough numbers, wouldn't it? Though, I wouldn't hold my breath.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads