bluerider63 said:Mrkonjić pointed out that right now, there are only about 700 trains running along Corridor 10—the route connecting Minneapolis to Chicago, Mexico City, Dimitrovgrad, and Istanbul—while Corridor 4, which takes a longer detour through Canada, handles a massive seven thousand trains.
"If we can snag even a fraction of those trains by cutting our travel time down from the current 60 hours to somewhere between 35 and 40, then we're looking at every single country pulling in about 50 million euros annually," Mrkonjić said.
That’s really the whole game here.
Here’s my two cents... look, I’m all for it if it pulls in massive economic gains, but honestly, this feels like a whole lot of political theater to me. Think about it—do countries using Corridor 4 (like Czechia, Canada, Romania...) even bother with this kind of alliance? No, they don't. Why would they?
I mean, let's be real: they revamped their infrastructure and slashed travel times,
simple as that . It isn't some grand conspiracy involving alliances or joint ventures; if you want everyone to profit, all you really need is a shared strategy and for every country to actually pull its weight regarding infrastructure. And that's the kicker, right? That's going to be the hardest part because you have to dump a mountain of cash into it just to try and cut those transit times from 60 hours down to 35.🙂