CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › What is power?

What is power?

Started by slymaker9 · · 👁 16 views · 210 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants slymaker9Zachary Cook2dustyskipper3Susan Price30Samuel Ortiz4Megan Nguyen22wearyhawk83wearyowl29Betty Patel172Gregory JacksonNathan Perez5velvetbear11jademarlin26brisktiger56silverraven7Brandon Kelly6Michelle Murphy61Timothy Green19Morgan King77Sam HayesAKeith Lee2Hannah DiazNathan Cook4 …
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#141 ·
brisktiger56 said:Exactly. If you can think for yourself and make independent choices, you have the agency to act.

Maybe a situation gets heavy enough that all my willpower and logic just fly out the window—mostly because I've never really practiced using them.

Spot on. There are plenty of people wired that way. Honestly, that sense of helplessness is tucked away inside all of us; it's entirely up to us to fix those mental glitches. But the real kicker is: how? How do you repair something that's been neglected for decades—or maybe even intentionally suppressed (in the case of someone who grew up in an abusive household)? A young person with shattered self-esteem doesn't feel powerful, nor do they even know how to reclaim that power. They might not even realize anything is missing, since they've never actually known what it feels like to be at peace with themselves.

Yeah, taking full ownership of that is basically the ultimate key to finally "growing up."

As for how? It definitely comes down to putting in the actual work and dedicating real time to it. Now, the big debate is whether we're strong enough to teach ourselves or if we need a guide to help us navigate through it. But look, having a guide is totally useless if we don't actually solve the core issue; otherwise, we'll just find ourselves right back where we started, unable to handle things on our own tomorrow.

That’s just my two cents, though, and I could probably go on forever about it. To me, a "guide" is just anyone who has a decent, objective grasp on this crazy game called life. Sure, a therapist is one way to go, but there are plenty of other people who pay close attention to the reality of life and the world around us from a perspective that gets them a little closer to the "truth."

If you're teaching yourself, then honestly, a "guide" can be anything—living or inanimate.

At the end of the day, the change has to come from within us, even if the motivation varies. And let's be real, sometimes there isn't any motivation at all because people are too comfortable staying stuck in their ways or just playing along with the image society forces on them, regardless of how messy or complex real life actually is.
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#142 ·
Anonymous said:The whole concept of "reason" is incredibly subjective.
I mean, in certain cultures, blood feuds are still considered perfectly rational.
Don't tell me they aren't, because to them, they are. And just like a blood feud makes sense to them, you and I have our own set of beliefs that feel totally logical to us, even if they seem crazy to someone else.
In other words, we build our entire "rational" world on such a fuzzy, undefined foundation.

So, what exactly stops me today from pausing, stepping back, and choosing to act exactly how I want—completely breaking free from the way my past experiences "shaped" me?

Nothing. The only real limit is how much you're actually capable of thinking, deciding, and acting outside the mental cage you built based on everything that's happened to you before.
But hey, I'm sure you'll bring up "reason" again.

Maybe a situation gets heavy enough that it overrides me. No amount of self-control or objective judgment could save me, since I've never really worked on those skills.

I'll give you that—practicing those things would definitely sharpen your ability.

That said, if I've put in at least a little work to develop those traits, then in 80% of cases, I'll definitely be acting out of true freedom.

The kind of freedom you think you know. The kind that lives entirely inside your own head.

And I don't need any supernatural powers for that—just an open mind, some consistency, practicing my self-control, and having a decent radar for what the actual, objective reality is.

I didn't see anyone here talking about "supernatural" powers.
An open mind—is that based on reason?
Self-control—that's probably the one area where we actually have some influence, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
As for the "objective" or "actual" state of things? From a human perspective, nothing is truly objective.

The context of "reason" in my post is crystal clear. I'm not even getting into those kinds of variations.

nothing. except the question is really about how much you can actually think, decide, and act outside the box you built based on everything that happened to you before.
And you're going to bring up "reason" again.

That's where my point about objectivity comes in. Achieving that is totally possible through different methods and constant self-reflection. It might be rare, but it definitely happens with certain people out there.

that freedom you know as freedom—it’s all contained within your own reason.

Exactly.

I didn't see anyone here mentioning "special" powers.
An open mind—is that based on reason?

I didn't say it was based on reason, but I could certainly go along with that.

Reason is a powerful tool, but just like a ship's heading is determined by how the sails are set rather than just the wind speed, we direct our reason not through math formulas, but by taking a high-quality, detailed look at what's right in front of us.

objective or actual state of things—nothing from a human perspective is truly objective.

When we're talking about human relationships and how people view the world, being "objective" means achieving the most optimal result, and that's exactly what we're discussing here.
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#143 ·
casualmaker13 said:Power is basically just the flip side of helplessness. That’s pretty much the whole definition right there.
It works just like anything else we talk about in terms of dualities—you know, positive versus negative, light against dark, yin and yang, all that stuff that keeps the world spinning.
I guess you could try throwing in other concepts like knowledge versus ignorance, possibility versus impossibility, or fear versus courage, but honestly? Adding more layers just muddies the water and drags the topic out further.
And it probably won't actually help us get any closer to figuring out what power really is...😉

Personally, I find that other definition of darkness—the one Einstein floated—to be way more logical and grounded: darkness is simply the absence of light. It follows the same pattern, really. Cold isn't some opposing force to heat; it's just the absence of heat. Even evil isn't a standalone thing; it's just the absence of good. Take electricity, for instance. We call them "plus" and "minus" poles, which makes it sound like this big dualistic struggle, but it's actually just electrons moving from where they are concentrated to where they aren't—it's all about equalizing potential. So, this whole "duality" thing... honestly, it's a stretch. Duality feels more like a convenient little construct our minds use to make sense of things.

What do you think about those Einsteinian ideas? They clearly don't fit into that lazy, broad-stroke dualism people love to apply to everything, but most of us tend to oversimplify things—stuffing everything into extreme categories—just because we lack the patience to sit back and actually sense the nuances.

If we follow that logic, powerlessness would just be a state where power is missing. People who are powerless usually end up looking for help 😉, essentially searching for what they don't have.
Brian Foster3 Brian Foster3 Active Member
116 messages
joined Aug 2007
#144 ·
brisktiger56 said:Look, we didn't get a vote on our parents, our looks, or our basic temperament—that was all decided before we even had a say in the matter. But friends? We actually have some agency there, both back then and still today. There are things we can steer, and things that are just out of our hands—or were, at least, a long time ago.

Whether it’s all just random cosmic noise or some grand, pre-written destiny—well, that’s really down to your own philosophy. But when you start following a specific thread, an energy, or a particular idea... you're bound to run into similarities more often. You find what fits you best, and in those moments, it feels pretty easy to conclude that everything was meant to be.

Personally, I don't think much is set in stone on a day-to-day basis. Within those 86,400 seconds we get every single day, we make choices. We choose what’s good for us, we try to pivot toward something better, or we attempt to squeeze some kind of meaning out of a messy situation.

Having that sense of agency is huge—it's basically the only way to steer your life in the direction you actually want to go. If we don't even realize we have the power to choose, then everything feels pretty hopeless. But if you grew up learning, say, how to stand up to bullies in middle school or how to dodge a bad crowd, then you've hit the jackpot. Of course, it’s never too late to tap into the potential sitting inside you—that power belongs to us. Whether we’re actually aware of it, or whether we're brave enough to actually use it... well, that's a whole different story.

It’s simple: we gravitate toward people who mirror our own traits. The more someone acts like me, the more I want them around, and the more different they are, the faster I'm running the other way! It's just that spiritual law where like attracts like.

Is everything just a massive coincidence or is it all predestined? Honestly, it depends on how you look at it, but when you start following a specific path or vibe, you inevitably run into more similarities and things that fit your mold—so it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking everything was scripted from the start.

That's not about "personal viewpoints." Those views are totally arbitrary and subjective; they don't show you what's actually happening, they just show you a version of reality filtered through your own selfish desires and quirks. Spiritual paradoxes exist perfectly fine without needing your opinion, and you only get the real truth once you stop looking through that lens.

I really feel like very little is set in stone. In every single one of those 86,400 seconds we get each day, we're making choices—trying to do good, aiming for improvement, or squeezing the best out of a bad situation.

That's just the ego playing its game. You think "very little is set in stone" because reality is incredibly complex, but honestly, the whole system is rigged to create this illusion of free will and random chance. In the spiritual realm, space and time aren't even real things.
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#145 ·
Anonymous said:Isn't that just a circular definition, though? If you claim power is just the opposite of being helpless, I still don't actually know what "power" means until I understand what "helplessness" is.

I guess we’ve all been in those spots where we could actually get things done, or maybe we couldn't—basically, moments where you feel your own agency or total lack thereof depending on the circumstances.
That lived experience is what really teaches us what power and weakness look like, rather than some textbook definition. Maybe the only way to truly grasp it is through a whole string of different life events that show it from every angle.
Power can take on different names depending on how you tie it to something else—like the power to think or hold an opinion, the power to speak up, or even just the power to move, whether that's walking, crawling, or driving a car...

And hey, power might even be something more like magic or just pure sleight of hand...😲😁
Brian Foster3 Brian Foster3 Active Member
116 messages
joined Aug 2007
#146 ·
wearyhawk83 said:For someone who doesn't know how to actually use their brain, I'd say that's a pretty spot-on take. Basically, saying we're no different from animals.

So, tell me: what's stopping me today from pausing, thinking things through, and deciding to act exactly how I want to—completely defying the way my past circumstances "built" me?

Sure, maybe a massive crisis could knock me off course, and if I've never bothered to work on self-control or objective reasoning, then yeah, I'd be stuck.

But if I've actually put in the work to develop those qualities, then 80% of the time, I am absolutely going to act out of true freedom.

And I'm not talking about some fake, subjective nonsense either. I mean real, genuine freedom. It's the greatest gift we've got.

We don't need superpowers for this; we just need an open mind, some discipline, regular practice with our self-control, and a decent radar for seeing things exactly as they actually are.

Fine, let's break it down. First off, logic is really just an extension of our impulses—basically, it's just a tool used to chase pleasure. Or if you want to get all poetic about it, the mind is just a servant to the heart. The heart wants something, and then the brain starts sweating, trying to figure out how to make it happen. The stronger the craving, the more frantic the brain gets trying to find a way to satisfy it.

The only real thing separating us from animals is one single factor: animals can't choose to endure some immediate pain now if they think it'll lead to a bigger payoff later, but we can. That's the whole game. Animals just react to whatever gives them pleasure or causes them pain right this second. We, however, can decide to suck it up for a while if we believe that suffering will eventually lead to a massive reward.

It's totally normal to either follow or rebel against what you've been conditioned to do; it's just two sides of the same coin. At the end of the day, the deciding factor is always just how much anticipated pleasure is on the line. Even in high school, kids rebel against authority because of biological drives, not because they've suddenly mastered free will. It's the same thing later in life.

I highlighted the main point here: our desires dictate our actions. And we don't even choose those desires; they're just hardwired inside us, ruling our lives while we delude ourselves into thinking they're "ours."

Maybe a situation gets heavy enough that it overrides any self-control or objective reasoning, especially since I've never really focused on training myself that way.

But if I actually put in the work during my life to develop those qualities, then in 80% of cases, I’ll definitely be acting out of true freedom.

And I'm not talking about some fake, subjective version of freedom, but the real deal. The greatest gift we actually have.

You don't need superpowers for this; you just need an open mind, some discipline, practice with self-control, and a decent radar for seeing things as they actually are.

What's the point of all that? It's precisely so you can better calculate the situation to maximize your pleasure or minimize your pain. So, yeah—it's still just programming. Sure, it might be sophisticated programming, but it's still programming.
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#147 ·
Brian Foster3 said:It’s simple: we gravitate toward people who mirror our own traits. The more someone acts like me, the more I want them around, and the more different they are, the faster I'm running the other way! It's just that spiritual law where like attracts like.

Is everything just a massive coincidence or is it all predestined? Honestly, it depends on how you look at it, but when you start following a specific path or vibe, you inevitably run into more similarities and things that fit your mold—so it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking everything was scripted from the start.

That's not about "personal viewpoints." Those views are totally arbitrary and subjective; they don't show you what's actually happening, they just show you a version of reality filtered through your own selfish desires and quirks. Spiritual paradoxes exist perfectly fine without needing your opinion, and you only get the real truth once you stop looking through that lens.

I really feel like very little is set in stone. In every single one of those 86,400 seconds we get each day, we're making choices—trying to do good, aiming for improvement, or squeezing the best out of a bad situation.

That's just the ego playing its game. You think "very little is set in stone" because reality is incredibly complex, but honestly, the whole system is rigged to create this illusion of free will and random chance. In the spiritual realm, space and time aren't even real things.

By shunning anything that feels "different," a person really just ends up robbing themselves of new perspectives—perspectives that might actually be useful. Honestly, rejecting diversity is just a fast track to intolerance...
It isn't about having a personal opinion. These things are arbitrary and subjective; they don't reflect the actual state of reality, but rather a version of reality filtered through a person's specific desires and personality. Spiritual paradoxes exist without any issues—in fact, they work perfectly. It's only when you experience them directly that you get "true knowledge" of how things are.

There are as many spiritual models on this planet as there are people. Spirituality is an individual thing, right? Paradoxes only exist within someone's spirituality if that person perceives and accepts them as such. My take is that spirituality isn't some homogeneous, universal construct that's identical for everyone. If you think I'm wrong, feel free to try and convince me otherwise.
That's all just the ego's programming at work. You might feel like "too little is mapped out" because reality is incredibly complex, but it's actually designed that way—to create this illusion of free will and randomness. In the spiritual realm, for instance, space and time don't even exist.

The ego likely manufactured "spirituality" as a way to balance out the material world and those raw, physical interactions. In the spiritual sphere, you can claim pretty much anything and prove nothing, so space and time effectively vanish. And if real space and time didn't exist, spirituality would be... well, where would it even be? People wouldn't even be able to mention it, because people wouldn't exist either...

People have the power to organize their life and their worldview however they see fit. I've set mine up my way, and you've set yours up yours. We both just used the power we had.
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#148 ·
brisktiger56 said:Personally, I find that other definition of darkness—the one Einstein floated—to be way more logical and grounded: darkness is simply the absence of light. It follows the same pattern, really. Cold isn't some opposing force to heat; it's just the absence of heat. Even evil isn't a standalone thing; it's just the absence of good. Take electricity, for instance. We call them "plus" and "minus" poles, which makes it sound like this big dualistic struggle, but it's actually just electrons moving from where they are concentrated to where they aren't—it's all about equalizing potential. So, this whole "duality" thing... honestly, it's a stretch. Duality feels more like a convenient little construct our minds use to make sense of things.

What do you think about those Einsteinian ideas? They clearly don't fit into that lazy, broad-stroke dualism people love to apply to everything, but most of us tend to oversimplify things—stuffing everything into extreme categories—just because we lack the patience to sit back and actually sense the nuances.

If we follow that logic, powerlessness would just be a state where power is missing. People who are powerless usually end up looking for help 😉, essentially searching for what they don't have.


What you’ve laid out here is basically just a specific philosophy you've picked because it fits your worldview.😲
Actually, you're saying the exact same thing I am.
By that logic, we could just as easily say light is the absence of darkness, or heat is the absence of cold—it ends up being the same argument.
That’s just how we see nature, right? This constant cycle of night and day, light and dark, birth and death. These are just opposites sitting on the same spectrum. Having versus not having, plus versus minus, positive versus negative.
It would be pretty silly to claim one can't exist without the other, just like it would be silly to argue that light is somehow "stronger" than darkness.😁

The other thing is, you seem to be rejecting this other side entirely, but maybe that's just because you're afraid of death, and that fear pulls everything else down with it.😉
Brian Foster3 Brian Foster3 Active Member
116 messages
joined Aug 2007
#149 ·
Anonymous said:I don't agree with your first point, at least not at first glance. I saw very clearly why I ended up being born into my specific circumstances and why I turned out the way I did... obviously, that decision is part of a much larger picture where you could ask whether I (well, who am I actually talking about here?) truly have any control.
I do agree there's a part where we have control and a part where we don't. Actually, saying it that way isn't even quite right. You can't simplify it into a single sentence like that.
Here's a question: if I completely surrender to God's will/fate/(whatever you want to call it), do I still have control over that choice or not?
I'll read the text, but probably tomorrow, and then I'll get back to you.

So, what you're saying is that your choices might just be tiny threads in a much larger tapestry that you can't fully wrap your head around. And honestly? You're right. 🙂

I agree there's a part where we're in the driver's seat and a part where we're just along for the ride. Actually, even that isn't quite right. You can't really boil it down to a single sentence like that.

Sure you can, provided you actually know exactly where your agency ends and where fate takes over. If you don't know, then no, you can't. 🙂

Question: if I completely surrender to God's will, fate, or whatever you want to call it, do I still have control or not?

No. You’d only ever do that if you saw some kind of personal benefit in it, which means it’s not true freedom—it's just more programming. There are tons of people like that. It's exhausting for them to actually think for themselves and face the world, so they just hand the reins over to destiny and live day-to-day following whatever convenient little paradigm they've picked up. But hey, I'm not blaming them. They were just built that way. In the end, they aren't any less important than the people fighting against it.

I'll read the text, probably tomorrow, and then I'll comment.

Great. Looking forward to seeing what you think. 🙂
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#150 ·
Brian Foster3 said:Fine, let's break it down. First off, logic is really just an extension of our impulses—basically, it's just a tool used to chase pleasure. Or if you want to get all poetic about it, the mind is just a servant to the heart. The heart wants something, and then the brain starts sweating, trying to figure out how to make it happen. The stronger the craving, the more frantic the brain gets trying to find a way to satisfy it.

The only real thing separating us from animals is one single factor: animals can't choose to endure some immediate pain now if they think it'll lead to a bigger payoff later, but we can. That's the whole game. Animals just react to whatever gives them pleasure or causes them pain right this second. We, however, can decide to suck it up for a while if we believe that suffering will eventually lead to a massive reward.

It's totally normal to either follow or rebel against what you've been conditioned to do; it's just two sides of the same coin. At the end of the day, the deciding factor is always just how much anticipated pleasure is on the line. Even in high school, kids rebel against authority because of biological drives, not because they've suddenly mastered free will. It's the same thing later in life.

I highlighted the main point here: our desires dictate our actions. And we don't even choose those desires; they're just hardwired inside us, ruling our lives while we delude ourselves into thinking they're "ours."

Maybe a situation gets heavy enough that it overrides any self-control or objective reasoning, especially since I've never really focused on training myself that way.

But if I actually put in the work during my life to develop those qualities, then in 80% of cases, I’ll definitely be acting out of true freedom.

And I'm not talking about some fake, subjective version of freedom, but the real deal. The greatest gift we actually have.

You don't need superpowers for this; you just need an open mind, some discipline, practice with self-control, and a decent radar for seeing things as they actually are.

What's the point of all that? It's precisely so you can better calculate the situation to maximize your pleasure or minimize your pain. So, yeah—it's still just programming. Sure, it might be sophisticated programming, but it's still programming.

I’d go as far as to say you're looking at this through way too narrow a lens. Unless I decide to adopt your specific worldview where everything just boils down to pleasure and pain, we're stuck. Look, it's not a bad take—I totally get where you're coming from—but it’s just not deep enough for this conversation. We were actually digging into all sorts of different relationships here, not just the whole pleasure versus suffering thing!

So, I’m gonna jump back in here because, honestly, I still don't think you actually addressed my point from earlier. Your response just didn't quite hit the mark or defend my position nearly as well as it should have!

I’m still standing by my word on this: people absolutely have the power to reshape their own future, no matter how much their past tries to hold them back. Honestly, the more capable you are at breaking away from that old conditioning, the more powerful you truly become.

I hope that finally clears up my little "sketch"—even if I ended up using a bit too much ink this time!

Quincy:
It’s totally normal to see people reacting either exactly how they were taught or doing the complete opposite. Honestly, those are just two sides of the same coin. At the end of the day, the real deciding factor is always just how much anticipated pleasure someone expects to get out of it. Take teenagers, for example—they rebel against authority because it's basically hardwired into their nature, not because they actually have the freedom to choose otherwise! And that’s exactly how things play out later in life!.
I totally disagree. Once someone actually builds a solid identity and finds some real self-awareness, they aren't going to be swayed by every little thing happening around them like they were back in their teenage years. It’s just different once you grow up!

Go ahead and react—honestly, you totally should! You can try to lump it all together in one bucket if you want, but let’s be real: you and I both know that's a completely different way of looking at things.

Look, you might find one person like that in a hundred, which totally blows your rule out of the water! And honestly, that's a massive deal because when you're dealing with those kinds of relationships, the rules just don't apply anyway.

Quincy:
I think I just hit the nail on the head here. Our desires are what drive everything we do, but get this—we don't actually choose those desires ourselves. They're already baked into us, running the show from the inside, and we just fall for the illusion that they're "ours."
What part of what I said did you miss? I clearly stated that humans are capable of choosing all sorts of things—including their own desires! We’ve got the power to pick our own motivations and our own will too (I mean, obviously not in every single area of life, but you get the point)!

Maybe I’m just fighting against my own "weakness" by putting this out there, but I honestly think I'm hitting the nail on the head. Like I said before, even if I am light-years ahead of what was actually said!

Quincy:
What’s the point of all that? It's strictly so you can read the room better and figure out how to squeeze every last drop of pleasure out of a situation—or, you know, dodge the misery altogether. It’s basically programming. Super sophisticated, sure, but it's still just programming.
Look, obviously pleasure is the end goal here. But everyone’s got their own way of getting there, and different tools for the job. That’s exactly what I’m talking about!

If you're trying to argue that someone isn't "in control" just because they're wired to chase pleasure that doesn't prove anything about their freedom—it's literally just how they're built.

Look, if seeking pleasure or even experiencing "struggle" is just part of my nature, that's not some kind of "shackles." It's just a fact, like having ten fingers on my hands, and I'm totally fine with that.

The whole idea of being "trapped" only works if you look at things from a perspective I have zero interest in pursuing. First off, life is way too short for that nonsense, and second, everything happens in its own time—including progress.

Honestly, I embraced my "role" a long time ago, so I don't feel controlled, powerless, or programmed in the slightest.

If we're going to debate this constantly, then there was no point in me even speaking up. There’s no sense in overanalyzing obvious stuff, if you know what I mean. What I was actually trying to do was offer a different take on the situation.

At the end of the day, maybe you just phrased things a little clunkily, and I ended up getting hung up on your specific wording.
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#151 ·
casualmaker13 said:What you’ve laid out here is basically just a specific philosophy you've picked because it fits your worldview.😲
Actually, you're saying the exact same thing I am.
By that logic, we could just as easily say light is the absence of darkness, or heat is the absence of cold—it ends up being the same argument.
That’s just how we see nature, right? This constant cycle of night and day, light and dark, birth and death. These are just opposites sitting on the same spectrum. Having versus not having, plus versus minus, positive versus negative.
It would be pretty silly to claim one can't exist without the other, just like it would be silly to argue that light is somehow "stronger" than darkness.😁

The other thing is, you seem to be rejecting this other side entirely, but maybe that's just because you're afraid of death, and that fear pulls everything else down with it.😉

So, let me get this straight—first I write whatever fits my mood, and then somehow, by some stroke of cosmic luck, it turns out I actually said what you were saying all along?! Pick a lane here. 😉

I actually dig that logic, though—it highlights the actual direction of change.

First off, you’ve got darkness and coldness (specifically out in deep space), and then you’ve got a sun that, due to the fundamental forces of nature, lights up and warms a tiny little corner of the cosmos. It’s pretty easy to see how light and life emerged from that state of void and stagnation. It’s a fascinating shift toward something better. Is it technically correct to say that life is the absence of nothingness—or rather, stillness—or that the opposite of life is stillness? We could debate that forever, but it's a bit of a circular argument... long, long ago, before there was any life on Earth, how could life even have an "opposite"?

Basically, your starting point is looking at things and their opposites in the present moment, whereas I’m taking a wider view. When I look back into the distant past, I see the total absence of life, light, goodness, and power.

Powerlessness isn't the opposite of power. Powerlessness is just the state caused by the absence of power. That condition we call "powerlessness" is what existed long before power ever showed up. And once power finally arrived, it triggered a shift with a very clear direction, and again—that’s the part of the Einsteinian perspective I really like.

p.s. It’s kind of funny how day and night don't actually exist from the perspective of the sun! That whole concept is just a byproduct of our limited human perception, where we interpret everything through opposites—day being the absence of night, night being the absence of day. Whatever. There aren't really "opposites" there; it’s just a result of the Earth's rotation making it impossible for sunlight to hit the entire surface at once.
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#152 ·
It’s obvious how light and life emerged from pure darkness and stagnation. It’s a pretty incredible transformation for the better.

For whom? God, the Absolute, the Universe, eternity... it doesn't really matter.
If we only look at these concepts through a strictly human lens, we’re never going to grasp the deeper levels. Just try to imagine a reality where "good" and "evil" don't even exist. Try looking at the world through that perspective for a second.

So, a day is just the absence of night, just as night is the absence of day.

The technical definition would be more like: daytime is when a specific part of the planet is exposed to the sun's light...
Circular definitions like that don't actually explain anything, nor do they help anyone truly understand what's happening.
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#153 ·
Anonymous said:
It’s obvious how light and life emerged from pure darkness and stagnation. It’s a pretty incredible transformation for the better.

For whom? God, the Absolute, the Universe, eternity... it doesn't really matter.
If we only look at these concepts through a strictly human lens, we’re never going to grasp the deeper levels. Just try to imagine a reality where "good" and "evil" don't even exist. Try looking at the world through that perspective for a second.

So, a day is just the absence of night, just as night is the absence of day.

The technical definition would be more like: daytime is when a specific part of the planet is exposed to the sun's light...
Circular definitions like that don't actually explain anything, nor do they help anyone truly understand what's happening.

Once you step outside the human perspective—you know, in the context of the cosmos or "eternity"—talking about power becomes kind of ridiculous. When a comet slams into a planet, that planet doesn't sit there feeling helpless, mostly because it doesn't have the hardware to feel anything at all. It's the same with the sun; the sun doesn't "feel" its own power. It just exists. We're the ones slapping labels and values onto it. At the end of the day, we're people—this forum exists for us, not for some random cloud of dust in quadrant 5x. We're discussing power here in a very specific, human sense. Day and night have nothing to do with it. I was just using those examples to show that helplessness isn't some opposite force to power; it's simply the absence of it.
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#154 ·
brisktiger56 said:So, let me get this straight—first I write whatever fits my mood, and then somehow, by some stroke of cosmic luck, it turns out I actually said what you were saying all along?! Pick a lane here. 😉

I actually dig that logic, though—it highlights the actual direction of change.

First off, you’ve got darkness and coldness (specifically out in deep space), and then you’ve got a sun that, due to the fundamental forces of nature, lights up and warms a tiny little corner of the cosmos. It’s pretty easy to see how light and life emerged from that state of void and stagnation. It’s a fascinating shift toward something better. Is it technically correct to say that life is the absence of nothingness—or rather, stillness—or that the opposite of life is stillness? We could debate that forever, but it's a bit of a circular argument... long, long ago, before there was any life on Earth, how could life even have an "opposite"?

Basically, your starting point is looking at things and their opposites in the present moment, whereas I’m taking a wider view. When I look back into the distant past, I see the total absence of life, light, goodness, and power.

Powerlessness isn't the opposite of power. Powerlessness is just the state caused by the absence of power. That condition we call "powerlessness" is what existed long before power ever showed up. And once power finally arrived, it triggered a shift with a very clear direction, and again—that’s the part of the Einsteinian perspective I really like.

p.s. It’s kind of funny how day and night don't actually exist from the perspective of the sun! That whole concept is just a byproduct of our limited human perception, where we interpret everything through opposites—day being the absence of night, night being the absence of day. Whatever. There aren't really "opposites" there; it’s just a result of the Earth's rotation making it impossible for sunlight to hit the entire surface at once.

That’s a nice little fantasy you've got going there, but honestly, you might want to open your eyes for a second. Look around. There's day and there's night on this planet where you're currently standing. When it's night, there isn't any light—at least none coming from the sun. Unless, I guess, you actually bother to flip a switch and turn on a lightbulb.😁
Maybe in some other galaxy, it’s just constant night, or maybe it's perpetual daylight, or who knows—something else entirely. But honestly, you can only really sit there and daydream about it. You have absolutely no clue what it's actually like out there.😲

P.S. Good grief, when you really think about it, day and night aren't even real things. It’s just light and dark. The sun is basically just pure light, and then there's all this darkness surrounding it. I guess that's just how it works.
The sun can only light up such a tiny little corner of this universe, which is mostly just darkness and nothingness, I guess.😉
Brian Foster3 Brian Foster3 Active Member
116 messages
joined Aug 2007
#155 ·
wearyhawk83 said:I’d go as far as to say you're looking at this through way too narrow a lens. Unless I decide to adopt your specific worldview where everything just boils down to pleasure and pain, we're stuck. Look, it's not a bad take—I totally get where you're coming from—but it’s just not deep enough for this conversation. We were actually digging into all sorts of different relationships here, not just the whole pleasure versus suffering thing!

So, I’m gonna jump back in here because, honestly, I still don't think you actually addressed my point from earlier. Your response just didn't quite hit the mark or defend my position nearly as well as it should have!

I’m still standing by my word on this: people absolutely have the power to reshape their own future, no matter how much their past tries to hold them back. Honestly, the more capable you are at breaking away from that old conditioning, the more powerful you truly become.

I hope that finally clears up my little "sketch"—even if I ended up using a bit too much ink this time!

Quincy:
It’s totally normal to see people reacting either exactly how they were taught or doing the complete opposite. Honestly, those are just two sides of the same coin. At the end of the day, the real deciding factor is always just how much anticipated pleasure someone expects to get out of it. Take teenagers, for example—they rebel against authority because it's basically hardwired into their nature, not because they actually have the freedom to choose otherwise! And that’s exactly how things play out later in life!.
I totally disagree. Once someone actually builds a solid identity and finds some real self-awareness, they aren't going to be swayed by every little thing happening around them like they were back in their teenage years. It’s just different once you grow up!

Go ahead and react—honestly, you totally should! You can try to lump it all together in one bucket if you want, but let’s be real: you and I both know that's a completely different way of looking at things.

Look, you might find one person like that in a hundred, which totally blows your rule out of the water! And honestly, that's a massive deal because when you're dealing with those kinds of relationships, the rules just don't apply anyway.

Quincy:
I think I just hit the nail on the head here. Our desires are what drive everything we do, but get this—we don't actually choose those desires ourselves. They're already baked into us, running the show from the inside, and we just fall for the illusion that they're "ours."
What part of what I said did you miss? I clearly stated that humans are capable of choosing all sorts of things—including their own desires! We’ve got the power to pick our own motivations and our own will too (I mean, obviously not in every single area of life, but you get the point)!

Maybe I’m just fighting against my own "weakness" by putting this out there, but I honestly think I'm hitting the nail on the head. Like I said before, even if I am light-years ahead of what was actually said!

Quincy:
What’s the point of all that? It's strictly so you can read the room better and figure out how to squeeze every last drop of pleasure out of a situation—or, you know, dodge the misery altogether. It’s basically programming. Super sophisticated, sure, but it's still just programming.
Look, obviously pleasure is the end goal here. But everyone’s got their own way of getting there, and different tools for the job. That’s exactly what I’m talking about!

If you're trying to argue that someone isn't "in control" just because they're wired to chase pleasure that doesn't prove anything about their freedom—it's literally just how they're built.

Look, if seeking pleasure or even experiencing "struggle" is just part of my nature, that's not some kind of "shackles." It's just a fact, like having ten fingers on my hands, and I'm totally fine with that.

The whole idea of being "trapped" only works if you look at things from a perspective I have zero interest in pursuing. First off, life is way too short for that nonsense, and second, everything happens in its own time—including progress.

Honestly, I embraced my "role" a long time ago, so I don't feel controlled, powerless, or programmed in the slightest.

If we're going to debate this constantly, then there was no point in me even speaking up. There’s no sense in overanalyzing obvious stuff, if you know what I mean. What I was actually trying to do was offer a different take on the situation.

At the end of the day, maybe you just phrased things a little clunkily, and I ended up getting hung up on your specific wording.

And honestly, isn't "power" just another word for being able to grab pleasure and run away from misery?

So, following up on that, I’m basically building on my previous comment regarding your post, which, if you ask me, still hasn't been even remotely "defended" properly by the words you've actually put down.

I still firmly believe that a person has the capacity to reshape their own future, regardless of how much their past tries to dictate it. Basically, the more capable someone is of doing that, the more "powerful" they truly are.

Hopefully, that fleshes out my "sketch" with a bit more actual ink this time.

It does. I agree. I wasn't emphasizing it on purpose; I was keeping it on the back burner. Why? Because the people who actually know where and how they can make a choice are incredibly rare. What most of humanity calls "free will"? Yeah, that's a total myth. 😉

I disagree. Once a person develops a solid identity and a decent amount of self-awareness, they aren't going to react to external pressures and social influences the same way they did when they were teenagers.

They’ll react correctly—meaning, they'll act freely. Now, you could try to lump that into the same category as before, but we both know we're talking about two completely different approaches here.

Even if there's only one such person out of a hundred, it completely breaks your rule, and that's a massive point because rules don't exist in these kinds of relationships.

There are definitely rules. Spiritual laws are absolute, and everything happens according to them. As for the "grown-ups," they just choose their pleasures and avoid their pains with more precision than a teenager would. But the underlying principle remains exactly the same; they're just playing the game on a higher level.

Which part of what I said makes you miss the fact that a human being is capable of choosing many things, including their own desires? Their motives and their will? (Not in every single area, obviously.)

Maybe I'm just fighting against my own "impotence" through these words, but I still think I'm making sense. Like I said, even if I am lightyears behind what's being discussed personally.

Among the Kabbalists, the rule goes: what cannot be attained, cannot be named.
Basically, if you haven't achieved something, you can't talk about it accurately, because you don't actually *know* it. You haven't experienced it firsthand.

Look, obviously pleasure is the goal. But there are a million different ways to get there and a thousand different tools to use, and that’s exactly what I’m getting at here.

Nobody is out here claiming that everyone experiences pleasure or pain in the exact same way, okay? But those individual differences don't change the core narrative. The fundamental story is the bedrock of all those variations and it stays constant, so understanding that foundation is way more important than obsessing over every little subjective nuance people want to throw at you.

Quincy:
If your argument is that a person isn't "in control" of themselves—that they're just conditioned or programmed because they're chasing pleasure then that doesn't prove they aren't "in control," it just proves that's how they're wired.

If seeking pleasure or feeling "pain" is just baked into my nature, that doesn't mean I'm wearing some kind of "shackles"; it's just a fact of existence, like the fact that I have ten fingers on my hands, and I'm totally fine with that.
Whether you're a happy slave or a miserable one, the reality remains the same: you're still a slave.😉

Quincy:
The idea of "shackles" only exists if you look at it from an impossible perspective that I have zero interest in pursuing, because first off, life is far too short for this nonsense, and second, everything happens when it happens, which will eventually lead to progress.

The truth is, I accepted my "role" a long time ago, so I don't feel manipulated, powerless, or programmed in the slightest.
Of course not. 🙂 But you haven't looked deep enough. We all love to sugarcoat things about ourselves just so we can feel better about our situation.😉

Quincy:
If we had to talk about it constantly, I wouldn't bother bringing it up, because there's no point dwelling on obvious stuff, if you catch my drift; what I was actually trying to say was just a different way of looking at the whole situation.

In the end, maybe you just phrased things poorly and I ended up nitpicking your specific wording.
Honestly, it might not even matter. What matters is the intention behind this whole discussion we're having. If our intentions are right, the laws of the universe will take care of us both (and maybe some others) in the best way possible, but if our intentions are garbage, then both you and I—and whoever else gets caught in it—are going to suffer.🙂

Stay golden! 😍
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#156 ·
casualmaker13 said:That’s a nice little fantasy you've got going there, but honestly, you might want to open your eyes for a second. Look around. There's day and there's night on this planet where you're currently standing. When it's night, there isn't any light—at least none coming from the sun. Unless, I guess, you actually bother to flip a switch and turn on a lightbulb.😁
Maybe in some other galaxy, it’s just constant night, or maybe it's perpetual daylight, or who knows—something else entirely. But honestly, you can only really sit there and daydream about it. You have absolutely no clue what it's actually like out there.😲

P.S. Good grief, when you really think about it, day and night aren't even real things. It’s just light and dark. The sun is basically just pure light, and then there's all this darkness surrounding it. I guess that's just how it works.
The sun can only light up such a tiny little corner of this universe, which is mostly just darkness and nothingness, I guess.😉

🙂I left you some room to think, and wow, you really got emotionally invested there. So, according to you, day and night don't exist for the sun, but there's this darkness surrounding it? Well, yeah. Darkness was already sitting there long before the sun ever showed up to brighten things up. Light had to be missing for the situation to change in the first place. It's kind of like that riddle in the movie Life Is Beautiful: Say my name and I am gone! Who am I?

Silence!

The moment you say the word "silence," you aren't actually experiencing silence anymore—you've just created a phenomenon that shifts things in a very clear direction > much like those situations Einstein talks about.

Anyway, let's get back to talking about power, or at least try to stay a little on topic.
briskeagle3 briskeagle3 Active Member
59 messages
joined Dec 2012
#157 ·
Here’s how I’d define true power:

It’s when you have the ability to act, but you choose not to—not because you lack the capacity, but simply because you can afford to stay still.
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#158 ·
briskeagle3 said:Here’s how I’d define true power:

It’s when you have the ability to act, but you choose not to—not because you lack the capacity, but simply because you can afford to stay still.

That sounds more like a description of a mature, enlightened mind... rather than power itself.

Real power is having 500 horsepower under the hood of a Mercedes-Benz, but actual wisdom is being the driver who doesn't floor it past an elementary school just to prove a point and risk everyone's safety.

What you’re actually getting at is: my power is evident in the fact that I don't feel the need to show it off, because I already know it's there. Sure, fine. But that's really about mental maturity—having a sense of self that doesn't require constant demonstrations of force to feel fulfilled.

But before all that philosophical stuff kicks in, you actually have to possess the power to act in the first place. Our topic here is defining that specific value—that raw, unbridled capacity that exists without any inherent direction or moral compass...
slymaker9 slymaker9 Active MemberOP
164 messages
joined Apr 2010
#159 ·
Based on what’s been said, I believe the best responses are:

dustyskipper3 said:True power is essentially 'inner peace,' having self-control, or perhaps just the ability to master one's own selfishness and those more primitive, animalistic impulses we all carry within us.

Winning against other people makes you strong; however, the one who conquers themselves is what I would call truly powerful. (Lao-tzu)🧐

It’s similar to what Zachary Cook2 mentioned regarding spiritual 'black magic' being a way to 'conquer' others, whereas spiritual 'white magic' is about mastering oneself—it's how you defeat those who lash out at others simply because they lack the capacity to control their own negativity and ego.

Nathan Perez5 said:👍...but real power is actually having the ability to act on that whenever possible, because that inner voice telling us what's right in any given moment is always screaming inside us, provided we actually have enough strength to silence all the other noise and distractions just so we can finally hear it...

brisktiger56 said:👍

Power is a lot like money—you can use it for good, or you can absolutely wreck things with it if you aren't careful...

Nathan Cook4 said:Spiritual strength is essentially freedom—the refusal to let anything possess you. No matter what life throws your way, you maintain your power simply by remaining true to your authentic self.
The difficulty, of course, lies in the fact that none of us are without our flaws.

Quincy:
brisktiger56 As specified by brisktiger56:
Power plays a decisive role here, because it is only through power that we can direct our lives exactly where we want them to go. If we lack the capacity to make our own choices, then everything is hopeless. However, if from a young age we are taught how to stand up against insults at school or how to effectively steer clear of the wrong crowd, then we are truly fortunate. Of course, It is never too late to uncover the untapped potential within us; that power resides entirely inside our own being. Whether we actually recognize it, or possess the courage to wield it, is a much more complicated question altogether.

Riding the wind, I continue my dance😍
brisktiger56 brisktiger56 Active Member
148 messages
joined Mar 2010
#160 ·
Your whole collection of thoughts actually gave me an idea for a new way to define 😉—maybe something that captures the raw, uninhibited capacity to act, whether mentally or physically, toward someone or something...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads