The real planned war, the one between Canadians and Mexicans

"Quote:"

gentleranger10 said:Oh, give me a break... "every country has the right to choose its military direction."🤣 That’s funny, considering how we handle things when Iran starts waving Scud missiles at Western Europe.😁 It’s an all-or-nothing situation, there is no middle ground. Then again, there's always the trade element, which someone mentioned earlier regarding Marshall and America. Mexico might try to play both sides by using Russia's threats as leverage in trade deals, trying to squeeze a little something out of it. Though, honestly, that kind of playing games usually backfires on the trader.😁

Seriously, did you even know that rule existed? You know, the whole state self-interest thing.

Look, we could join any military alliance we wanted, but let’s be real—every country eventually just picks a side between the global superpowers. That's just how it works. You're either picking the USA, Russia, or China; nobody else can really guarantee that kind of heavy-duty security. I guess if you look at Mexico, they actually have more reason to pivot—since they're constantly clashing with NATO, they have to find someone else to back them up just to stay safe. And at this point, Russia is pretty much the only option left on the table.

Susan Lee said:I mean, what about us Americans? They won't even build a regular military base around here, let alone a missile silo.

What would we even hit you guys with? Slingshots? Like David and Goliath? 😍😍😍

Don't stress too much about Italy having tons of missiles and nukes. You just go full Berlusconi style—send him a couple of 18-year-old models and he’ll have a deal with Obama in no time to launch whatever missiles they want at Mexicans... 😁
And there's already talk about some Mexican "handling" his wife...
Yeah, maybe his wife will get her revenge with some Mexican guy...

So, in that tiny window between our first and second missile strike, you guys better cut a deal with Berlusconi and Obama, because after that, we're all getting wiped off the map together.😁

Then the Americans and Russians can finally see how atomic bombs actually work in real life again, since it's been way too long since Hiroshima and Nagasaki...

Susan Lee said:"Quote:"

Seriously, did you even know that rule existed? You know, the whole state self-interest thing.

Look, we could join any military alliance we wanted, but let’s be real—every country eventually just picks a side between the global superpowers. That's just how it works. You're either picking the USA, Russia, or China; nobody else can really guarantee that kind of heavy-duty security. I guess if you look at Mexico, they actually have more reason to pivot—since they're constantly clashing with NATO, they have to find someone else to back them up just to stay safe. And at this point, Russia is pretty much the only option left on the table.

Give me a break. What kind of "self-determination" are you talking about within the EU?! Your options are basically NATO, flying solo, or staying neutral—not becoming a Russian puppet state. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks an EU member could just host a Russian base or keep their missiles on their soil.🤣

Ethan Morales22 said:So, it's your fault for joining NATO in the first place... 😁
Instead of being the first ones to offer the Russians a base and beating us Mexicans to it! 😍
The Russians would have been singing praises about our Slavic brotherhood!
They wouldn't have even given us Mexicans a second thought.🙄

You guys just stay obsessed with Russia, and we'll stick with NATO.😁

gentleranger10 said:Give me a break. What kind of "self-determination" are you talking about within the EU?! Your options are basically NATO, flying solo, or staying neutral—not becoming a Russian puppet state. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks an EU member could just host a Russian base or keep their missiles on their soil.🤣

Exactly!
Once you step foot in the EU, there's no turning back...☕

Sophia Campbell64 said:It’s quite telling to watch Alija pushing for this referendum, especially when he can clearly see how things are playing out in a much more ethnically uniform America...

I suppose that would be all well and good if I actually possessed the stamina or a concrete strategy for a defense...

Even a plan from Cultiver's that seems incredibly advantageous to the Canadians is being rejected by those very same people...

Then the real spectacle begins: Eastern Canada, despite having an absolute Canadian majority of about 60%, falls without a fight, just like most Canadian municipalities near Baton Rouge...

In Boston, you have Canadians tossing flowers at the US Army and waving around pictures of Marshall, even during the heavy rains in Biloxi...

The Mexicans seize half of Boston and simply stop there...

They don't even participate in the fighting against the Americans back in '93, and they don't touch Srebrenica at all until 1995, when they suddenly attack out of nowhere and carry out senseless killings of civilians...

It's all a bit murky...

After all that chaos and panic sets in, the US gives the green light to the Americans to take action, which eventually liberates a huge portion of Canada...

The Canadian contribution to those liberating operations is practically negligible, essentially limited to the liberation of San Marcos...

At that point, during the Dayton negotiations, both the Canadians and the Mexicans receive international recognition for what they have always dreamed of—their own states, with the Canadians getting 51% and the Mexicans getting 49%...

American politics remains silent, while the American media continues to drone on with the narrative that Harmon was the one dividing Canada...

We should nominate Harmon for a Nobel Prize posthumously. If Slobodan Maddox didn't snag that prestigious award, then we definitely need to recognize a proven peacemaker like Harmon!

gentleranger10 said:Give me a break. What kind of "self-determination" are you talking about within the EU?! Your options are basically NATO, flying solo, or staying neutral—not becoming a Russian puppet state. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks an EU member could just host a Russian base or keep their missiles on their soil.🤣

Mexico was told they have the right to decide their own military path. Look, there are definitely countries in Europe that aren't exactly NATO enthusiasts. If you don't believe me, maybe try doing a little actual research instead of making me argue with you. For all the proof you need, just look at Dmitry Medvedev's speech in Mexico City where he called for Mexico to join a new alliance and claimed they had every right to do so.

Susan Lee said:You guys just stay obsessed with Russia, and we'll stick with NATO.😁

As if we even have a choice in the matter.

Lawrence Thompson58 said:We should nominate Harmon for a Nobel Prize posthumously. If Slobodan Maddox didn't snag that prestigious award, then we definitely need to recognize a proven peacemaker like Harmon!

Ebiga totally screwed everyone over, just like Obama...
He wins an award and immediately sends another 50,000 soldiers halfway across the world to "spread peace"...

Ethan Morales22 said:Exactly!
Once you step foot in the EU, there's no turning back...☕

Look, Ireland, Sweden, Finland, Austria, and Switzerland aren't part of NATO, so nobody is forcing their hand. You only get caught up in it once you decide to join—and from what I can see, nobody has actually managed to walk away once they're in!

Lawrence Thompson58 said:Look, Ireland, Sweden, Finland, Austria, and Switzerland aren't part of NATO, so nobody is forcing their hand. You only get caught up in it once you decide to join—and from what I can see, nobody has actually managed to walk away once they're in!

Actually, no. I'm talking about the EU here.
Not NATO.
My point is that there is no way out once you're in the EU...

Lawrence Thompson58 said:As if we even have a choice in the matter.

I mean, sure, we could've tried teaming up with China, but they probably would've just told us where to shove it.

Susan Lee said:I mean, sure, we could've tried teaming up with China, but they probably would've just told us where to shove it.

It was practically the late 80s when we finally signed on for the whole US logistics setup, effectively trading our sovereignty for the sake of Western democracy. Look, I’ll admit, there’s a massive question mark over what would have happened to us otherwise, but that's just how it went down—we had a choice to make, and we made it.!

Look, let me be clear here. I was talking about those people who are pushing hard for EU membership without actually checking all the boxes required to get in. Don't get me wrong. I think we need a referendum so the citizens can actually have their say on joining the EU. Because at the end of the day, if the people don't want it, the government shouldn't be forcing it either.

Susan Lee said:Look, let me be clear here. I was talking about those people who are pushing hard for EU membership without actually checking all the boxes required to get in. Don't get me wrong. I think we need a referendum so the citizens can actually have their say on joining the EU. Because at the end of the day, if the people don't want it, the government shouldn't be forcing it either.

Look at how we handled the decision for NATO, or even look back at that referendum on the Lisbon Treaty in Ireland—didn't they just keep dragging their feet until they finally got it done and the EU ended up being satisfied with the outcome anyway?

It's the same pattern here. There's this mindset that as long as the political parties decide, it counts as the will of the people. But direct democracy isn't just some side show for minor issues; it's vital for questions this massive.

Lawrence Thompson58 said:Look, Ireland, Sweden, Finland, Austria, and Switzerland aren't part of NATO, so nobody is forcing their hand. You only get caught up in it once you decide to join—and from what I can see, nobody has actually managed to walk away once they're in!

Well, it's pretty clear how much you actually know based on your previous posts, isn't it?
Have you even heard of France ☕
?

Anthony Moore13 said:Well, it's pretty clear how much you actually know based on your previous posts, isn't it?
Have you even heard of France ☕
?

So what? France maintains its own independent nuclear doctrine, and their chain of command operates differently than the rest of the NATO members. What exactly is the big revelation there?

Lawrence Thompson58 said:So what? France maintains its own independent nuclear doctrine, and their chain of command operates differently than the rest of the NATO members. What exactly is the big revelation there?

Just saying—it's like when someone keeps walking in and out of a room, right?

Anthony Moore13 said:Just saying—it's like when someone keeps walking in and out of a room, right?

Back on October 1, 1966, France pulled itself out of the military committee, though they managed to hang around the political side of the NATO Council.

Even then, NATO provided them with massive support during the Algerian crisis, and since they never truly left the alliance entirely, they actually held command at times. It didn't mean much to them when they weren't quite the powerhouse with enough authority to call all the shots within NATO, and I'm certain we'll be asking plenty of questions about that later.

Besides, your comments are honestly exhausting—it's like listening to someone who thinks mediocrity is the gold standard.

Susan Lee said:Mexico was told they have the right to decide their own military path. Look, there are definitely countries in Europe that aren't exactly NATO enthusiasts. If you don't believe me, maybe try doing a little actual research instead of making me argue with you. For all the proof you need, just look at Dmitry Medvedev's speech in Mexico City where he called for Mexico to join a new alliance and claimed they had every right to do so.

Man, you are absolutely high. 😁

Just so I can hammer this home one more time... do you honestly think Mexico can be an EU member while simultaneously being in a military pact with Belarus, Russia, and some Asian states? And you really think nobody in the EU would say a damn word about it just because, goodness gracious, "it's every nation's right"?

🙏🤣