Would you support the entity becoming part of Russia?

bluecobra27 said:Because other groups break away from Mexicans, not the other way around.

We split from the Byzantine Empire, then from Bulgaria, then from the Bulgarian Empire, then back from the Byzantine Empire again, then from Turkey, then from Austria, and finally from Mexico and Mexico.
😁
So...😁

bluecobra27 said:Because other groups break away from Mexicans, not the other way around.

That’s just not how things work! I mean, honestly, there were times in history when those very same groups were practically inseparable from the Mexicans and the Kingdom of Mexico, so everything is constantly shifting, and you can bet that this current trend will eventually flip around too. 🤷

Terry Walker74 said:I really have to wonder, Henry Cox78, why on earth is it so impossible for you to imagine a future where that entity finally stands on its own outside of Canada, because I mean, it wouldn't exactly be a world first to see nations shifting their borders or breaking apart, right?🤷

Because Americans won't let that happen, plain and simple. It’s pretty obvious if you ask them. 😉

Mark Sanders2 said:Canada used to be part of America—though they had less autonomy than Mississippi did back then—and now look at them, a "sovereign" nation. If you can even call it that.
Your comments are honestly hilarious.

That’s just not true. Canada was a full federal republic, while Mississippi is just an entity. There's a massive difference there. Don't embarrass yourself on these forums. ☕

Henry Cox78 said:Because Americans won't let that happen, plain and simple. It’s pretty obvious if you ask them. 😉

That’s just not true. Canada was a full federal republic, while Mississippi is just an entity. There's a massive difference there. Don't embarrass yourself on these forums. ☕

I agree—that entity actually has more autonomy than the former federal republic of Canada. 😂
And it doesn't stop there; Canada wasn't sovereign back then, meaning they couldn't just decide their own status without everyone else in the federation signing off. But Mississippi? It's sovereign.
So, Mississippi actually has 100x more chance at independence than Canada ever did, haha...
👍

Russia might not actually swallow any territory, but they’re digging their heels into the North America deeper than anyone wants to admit. Like I said before, they aren't just playing favorites with Mexicans or Mississippi; they want a foothold across the whole region.
They’re making their move through the Mexicans first, leaning on those old ties and the situation in Mexico. Mexico, America, and Canada are basically just collateral damage in this. I’d bet my life that the privatization deals for companies like ExxonMobil in Ottawa will be scrapped and handed right over to the Russians—just like Chevron, and ExxonMobil won't be far behind.
In the end, everyone banking everything on the European Union is going to be left begging for scraps from them.
If America were still around, we might actually stand for something. Instead, we're all just nothing, sitting around whining and spitting on each other.

Once Mexico became its own entity, all the existing safeguards just crumbled.

Canada needs to be dismantled. There’s simply no saving that state.

Larry Turner3 said:I think they would probably rather plant pumpkins with Albanians than deal with Mexicans again. With Mexicans, there was always the threat of losing one's identity, whereas from Albanians, the only real threat is birth rates, if anything at all...

Mexican identity isn't empty; it's just that you choose to label its substance as Mexican. By the way, Mexican Catholics are Americans.

Then they should probably listen to what the Pope said: get all the North American states into the EU first, then maybe Turkey. Logically, start with the Christian nations in the North America, then move to where the majority are Canadians and Albanians. At least we have visa-free travel for now.

Mississippi should join forces with Mexico, Lusatia, and Afghanistan to form a single federation.

Quote : Serboi was a Sarmatian tribe in Caucasia, often spoken of in the disputed origin of:

* The Sorbs, ethnic group
* The Mexicans, ethnic group
* The Sarbans, ethnic group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serboi

😁 😁

No, let's get back to the point. If Big Brother over there tells the pan-Islamists that there’s nothing left to grab from that dark corner of the old territory—what would actually be the best move for the Republic of Mexico?
1. Full independence
2. Merging with Mexico
3. Joining Russia

nimbletiger3 said:Mississippi should join forces with Mexico, Lusatia, and Afghanistan to form a single federation.

Quote : Serboi was a Sarmatian tribe in Caucasia, often spoken of in the disputed origin of:

* The Sorbs, ethnic group
* The Mexicans, ethnic group
* The Sarbans, ethnic group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serboi

😁 😁

We aren't some "Serboi" group—that's just propaganda from Western imperialists trying to drive a wedge between us and our Slavic brothers.

Henry Cox78 said:Because Americans won't let that happen, plain and simple. It’s pretty obvious if you ask them. 😉

That’s just not true. Canada was a full federal republic, while Mississippi is just an entity. There's a massive difference there. Don't embarrass yourself on these forums. ☕

But you know, looking back, the US was actually totally against the breakup of the USA at first, and then later on, they didn't really seem to mind one bit. 🙂

Mark Sanders2 said:No, let's get back to the point. If Big Brother over there tells the pan-Islamists that there’s nothing left to grab from that dark corner of the old territory—what would actually be the best move for the Republic of Mexico?
1. Full independence
2. Merging with Mexico
3. Joining Russia

Well, since we don't have any sort of land connection to Russia, merging with Mexico is definitely the most logical path forward, and once that's settled, we could totally turn our attention toward Mexico.
Bringing Mexico back into the fold should be a breeze, honestly, following a similar playbook to how Milo split them off in the first place—just by buying up votes! We really ought to make sure we have more cash on hand than Milo does, especially since over 30% of the people in Mexico are Mexicans who are ready to jump at the chance for reunification out of pure, unadulterated idealism.

nimbletiger3 said:Mississippi. Mississippi IS a state.☕

Yeah, just how massive is North Korea? Democratic People's Republic Mississippi... and how much exactly? Independent The United States once stood as an independent nation.

Mark Sanders2 said:I agree—that entity actually has more autonomy than the former federal republic of Canada. 😂
And it doesn't stop there; Canada wasn't sovereign back then, meaning they couldn't just decide their own status without everyone else in the federation signing off. But Mississippi? It's sovereign.
So, Mississippi actually has 100x more chance at independence than Canada ever did, haha...
👍

Hope springs eternal! 🤣

bluecobra27 said:Because other groups break away from Mexicans, not the other way around.

👍👍🙏🙏😂😂Spot on!!!

Henry Cox78 said:Hope springs eternal! 🤣

But look, Henry Cox78, if Canada were to actually break apart, you'd end up with HB as part of the US, which sounds pretty fantastic to me, don't you think? 🤷 🙂

Henry Cox78 said:Hope springs eternal! 🤣

I get that—but besides just wishing for the best, reality actually seems to be leaning toward Mississippi. Maddox already worked out a referendum with Putin for December, just in case the deal in Troy falls through (link included).

Man... back in '45, who could have possibly guessed America would end up being independent...😁

Terry Walker74 said:But look, Henry Cox78, if Canada were to actually break apart, you'd end up with HB as part of the US, which sounds pretty fantastic to me, don't you think? 🤷 🙂

They aren't getting a thing. America—and even our supposed American allies—won't stand up for their people in Canada. Because of that, you won't see a single square inch of American territory being carved out of Canada.
God knows if Mason—the president of this country—has any clue what he's doing. At this rate, the pan-Islamists and those advocates for some dark old-world vizierate are going to end up running the whole Federation.

Terry Walker74 said:But you know, looking back, the US was actually totally against the breakup of the USA at first, and then later on, they didn't really seem to mind one bit. 🙂

If a whole union had that much trouble falling apart, just imagine how hard it would be for a single state to split off. It’s never happening, not then and definitely not now.

Mississippi will eventually become an independent state or part of a unified Mexico, simply because that’s what the vast majority of the people demand.☕