slypuma17 said:And how exactly would anyone have known earlier if he didn't tell a soul? Honestly, shame on you for assuming that.
🤷
If we rule out mental illness, then we’re left with the implication that his actions were a calculated, rational choice.
Do you truly believe it's possible for such an act to be the result of a perfectly sound decision?
Is that the kind of thing people with impaired judgment actually pull off? 😁
You have a point; war alone doesn't justify an action like this, especially during peacetime.
It would certainly be enlightening to get a look at his private journals or transcripts. 🤷
I am not entirely convinced that war alone isn't enough. I believe that being placed in a location and a time where all human dignity and moral rules cease to exist—where you witness horrors like mass killings for extended periods—fundamentally alters one's perception of life. It is something very few psychotherapies can actually resolve. This isn't just an individual question of a "mental disorder"; it’s about having been there and witnessing absolute chaos, seeing someone brutally tortured simply because of an ethnic label attached to their name. You were present when a person was massacred just to steal a gold bracelet.
And then, from that mental state, you are expected to reintegrate into the moral order of a peaceful society? Good luck with that.
In my view, certain consequences remain for life, whether one is formally diagnosed with PTSD or not.
It is entirely possible for one's entire value system to be completely dismantled. Your sense of identity might shatter, likely reaching a point where you can no longer distinguish yourself from your surroundings... add to that the poor social support for veterans here in the US, the lack of understanding from the general public, and the situation has the potential to end exactly how it ends every five days in our national news; yes, frustrated by long-term societal neglect, a man picks up a gun and delivers judgment upon himself and "his own."
Since we aren't talking about a domestic dispute here, and he killed children as well—I don't believe he did this out of pure malice, but rather out of a distorted sense of possessiveness. In a moment of ultimate fury toward the world, he probably can no longer distinguish his own existence from theirs; if he is leaving "this hellish world," then "his people won't stay either"—that is likely the logic at play. Beyond the fact that he is reacting impulsively in the moment, the moral categories that would normally signal that his planned actions are wrong were likely shattered during the war long ago; the question is whether he even possesses them in the way a "normal" person does.
What I fail to understand is why this country does nothing regarding this issue.
It is one thing when such a tragedy occurs once or twice—that is an individual problem. But when similar headlines appear every five days, it becomes a systemic social crisis. Why on earth don't they sit down and establish a social support system for these individuals, along with a social work framework designed to provide regular monitoring...