CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Who watches the watchmen?

Who watches the watchmen?

Started by Peter Phillips32 · · 👁 16 views · 160 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter Phillips32amberbadger8coastalskipper92placidharbor7casualmaker13Jacob Jackson50Nicole Barrett76casualmoose82ironsailor10Kenneth Lee16Michael Anderson2Edward Flores4rowdyjackal5Alexander HallCharles Diaz56Jeffrey Gray4nimblemaker30Amy Long9Jeremy Alvarez5slydriver17jademarlin26steeleagle13dustyskipper3Brenda Cook4 …
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active Member
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#101 ·
Quincy:
I don't know what to tell you—some people just love to hear themselves talk. It’s always the same thing with these types. They think they've cracked the code, but honestly? It's just noise. Just more static in an already loud world. steeleagle13 says:
Your schizophrenic take on other people's personalities is nothing more than a reflection of your own internal fragments—stuff you've shoved under the rug of your own ambition just because you're desperately trying to believe your own projections are actually authoritative.

Go ahead—keep churning out those empty posts. Just keep shuffling the same old fog from one sleeve to the other, talking about yourself in the third person like you're some kind of legend, and acting like the entire world is bowing down to your "grand spiritual presence." Please.

Once you hit 10,000 posts, I’m personally handing you a diploma—just so you have some official certification of your own sheer incompetence. 😉
If you’re going to keep responding to every single one of Ivanov’s posts, you might as well just hand each other diplomas for hitting 10,000 posts or something. Seriously. 😂😂
Jeffrey Gray4 Jeffrey Gray4 Member
48 messages
joined May 2009
#102 ·
steeleagle13 said:Fine, then let's just get ourselves MASTER MIRKO🙏😂🤣🤣

Joe Smith... as long as his name starts with "Jo"🤣😍
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active Member
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#103 ·
Michael Anderson2 said:So, oneness is an illusion too? Does that mean, fundamentally, there's nothing there? I don't quite follow—could you clarify, if it's even possible to explain?

In my experience, consciousness expands—it encompasses more, understands more, and rises higher—whether through gradual shifts or sudden leaps. That’s what I call progress in consciousness.

I could go on with some obvious examples, from birth to the first spark of self-awareness as a subject, all the way up to the dissolution of duality—but what exactly do you mean by "one single measure"? Are you suggesting our consciousness is limited? That progress is impossible? That consciousness itself is an illusion we need to escape? Or that it’s irrelevant?

Are you saying we're all already enlightened and there's absolutely nothing left for us to do? 🙂

And yes, I am a truth seeker.


It keeps expanding and growing until physical death 😁
amberbadger8 amberbadger8 Member
39 messages
joined Sep 2008
#104 ·
steeleagle13 said:It keeps expanding and growing until physical death 😁

And then what? 🙂
I don't think that's where the story ends...
dustyskipper3 dustyskipper3 Active Member
192 messages
joined Dec 2009
#105 ·
Jeffrey Gray4 said:If you stood before God at the final judgment, what would you actually say to Him about whether God and the judgment itself even exist?

Hmm... I guess maybe just, "Look, we're getting old here, can we just reach a compromise?"

Regarding this whole issue of controllers... I suppose a controller has to be managed by another controller using some sort of IF-THEN logic (if he does this, then I do that), and then that one is watched by another, which leads us right into an infinite regression. The one at the very top only steps in when the entire system is facing total catastrophe. Or, you know, when they have to hit the red "self-destruct" button. I suspect the controller at the top is just as biased as the one at the bottom.😲

If an observer is inherently biased—even if they decide not to pass judgment—perhaps we could have an observer watching that observer, who might be slightly less biased, and then another observer watching them, becoming increasingly neutral, until we eventually arrive at a (nearly) perfectly unbiased observer, which would be God. Unlike the relationship of control, the act of observation isn't tied together by causal links like an IF-THEN loop😉, so I think the infinite regression of observers collapses into a single observer, which might be equated with divine consciousness

I believe J. Krishnamurti mentioned that we primarily come to know ourselves through others, much like looking into a mirror. I suppose you can't really take just one piece of what he said and look at it in isolation from the rest of his context.
coastalskipper92 coastalskipper92 Active Member
85 messages
joined Nov 2008
#106 ·
Anything else?

PUT!
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#107 ·
steeleagle13 said:Quincy:
I don't know what to tell you—some people just love to hear themselves talk. It’s always the same thing with these types. They think they've cracked the code, but honestly? It's just noise. Just more static in an already loud world. steeleagle13 says:
Your schizophrenic take on other people's personalities is nothing more than a reflection of your own internal fragments—stuff you've shoved under the rug of your own ambition just because you're desperately trying to believe your own projections are actually authoritative.

Go ahead—keep churning out those empty posts. Just keep shuffling the same old fog from one sleeve to the other, talking about yourself in the third person like you're some kind of legend, and acting like the entire world is bowing down to your "grand spiritual presence." Please.

Once you hit 10,000 posts, I’m personally handing you a diploma—just so you have some official certification of your own sheer incompetence. 😉
If you’re going to keep responding to every single one of Ivanov’s posts, you might as well just hand each other diplomas for hitting 10,000 posts or something. Seriously. 😂😂

He finally decided to show up... right after dropping five posts in a row. 🤣

Just a quick heads-up—Master Mike is one of my longtime regulars, so I tend to give him a little extra attention compared to everyone else. I’m sincerely hoping he can make a full comeback soon. 😉
dustyskipper3 dustyskipper3 Active Member
192 messages
joined Dec 2009
#108 ·
Is this the one, I think?

And who exactly is his apprentice (Hill)?
Michael Anderson2 Michael Anderson2 Active Member
77 messages
joined Jul 2013
#109 ·
placidharbor7 said:Imagine—it’s all just visions and projections! Isn't that wild to think about?

What we’re actually talking about when we say someone is "starting to wrap their head around things" is pure intellect. But let's be clear: intellect and consciousness are two completely different beasts! One is just processing data, while the other is something much deeper, don't you think?

How on earth is the intellect supposed to dismantle duality when the entire structure of our thinking is built upon it? It’s a bit of a catch-22, isn't it? Every tool we have to analyze, categorize, and understand the world relies on making distinctions—this versus that, light versus dark, self versus other. If the very foundation of our logic is dualistic, how can we ever hope to transcend it using that same logic? It feels like trying to use a hammer to unbuild the very concept of a nail! Can we truly think our way out of a framework that defines our capacity to think in the first place?
Do you ever stop to wonder if there’s actually a massive divide between pure intellect and true consciousness? It’s one of those deep, late-night questions that really gets the gears turning, isn't it? I mean, think about it! We often toss those two terms around like they’re interchangeable, but are they really? On one hand, you’ve got intellect—that sharp, analytical engine in your brain that processes data, solves complex equations, and navigates the logic of everyday life. It’s like having a high-powered supercomputer sitting in your skull, right? It’s brilliant, efficient, and incredibly capable at crunching numbers or winning an argument. But then... there's consciousness. That’s something entirely different, isn't it? That raw, subjective "feeling" of being alive. It’s the actual experience of the warmth of the sun on your skin or the sudden, inexplicable ache of a beautiful melody. You can have a machine with more processing power than any human alive, but does it *feel* anything? Does it truly "know" what it means to exist? It makes you wonder: can you have one without the other? Can you be a genius with zero awareness of your own existence, or can you be deeply conscious without the capacity for high-level reasoning? I’d love to hear what you all think about this distinction! Is it a clear-cut line, or is it all just one big, beautiful blur?

That’s exactly right! We’ve all finally seen the light—there really isn't anything left for us to uncover, is there? It looks like you might have cut off your message! You only sent "trebali," which translates to "they should have" or "we needed." Was there more you wanted to say? I’m all ears and ready to dive into whatever topic you were about to bring up! What's on your mind? Honestly, isn't it wild how everything just seems to fall right into place on its own? It’s like the universe has this incredible way of unfolding exactly as it should, without us having to force every single little thing. Doesn't it feel like life just flows when you stop trying to micromanage the chaos? Everything is just happening!

Barely.

placidharbor7 said:Imagine—it’s all just visions and projections! Isn't that wild to think about?

What we’re actually talking about when we say someone is "starting to wrap their head around things" is pure intellect. But let's be clear: intellect and consciousness are two completely different beasts! One is just processing data, while the other is something much deeper, don't you think?

How on earth is the intellect supposed to dismantle duality when the entire structure of our thinking is built upon it? It’s a bit of a catch-22, isn't it? Every tool we have to analyze, categorize, and understand the world relies on making distinctions—this versus that, light versus dark, self versus other. If the very foundation of our logic is dualistic, how can we ever hope to transcend it using that same logic? It feels like trying to use a hammer to unbuild the very concept of a nail! Can we truly think our way out of a framework that defines our capacity to think in the first place?
Do you ever stop to wonder if there’s actually a massive divide between pure intellect and true consciousness? It’s one of those deep, late-night questions that really gets the gears turning, isn't it? I mean, think about it! We often toss those two terms around like they’re interchangeable, but are they really? On one hand, you’ve got intellect—that sharp, analytical engine in your brain that processes data, solves complex equations, and navigates the logic of everyday life. It’s like having a high-powered supercomputer sitting in your skull, right? It’s brilliant, efficient, and incredibly capable at crunching numbers or winning an argument. But then... there's consciousness. That’s something entirely different, isn't it? That raw, subjective "feeling" of being alive. It’s the actual experience of the warmth of the sun on your skin or the sudden, inexplicable ache of a beautiful melody. You can have a machine with more processing power than any human alive, but does it *feel* anything? Does it truly "know" what it means to exist? It makes you wonder: can you have one without the other? Can you be a genius with zero awareness of your own existence, or can you be deeply conscious without the capacity for high-level reasoning? I’d love to hear what you all think about this distinction! Is it a clear-cut line, or is it all just one big, beautiful blur?

That’s exactly right! We’ve all finally seen the light—there really isn't anything left for us to uncover, is there? It looks like you might have cut off your message! You only sent "trebali," which translates to "they should have" or "we needed." Was there more you wanted to say? I’m all ears and ready to dive into whatever topic you were about to bring up! What's on your mind? Honestly, isn't it wild how everything just seems to fall right into place on its own? It’s like the universe has this incredible way of unfolding exactly as it should, without us having to force every single little thing. Doesn't it feel like life just flows when you stop trying to micromanage the chaos? Everything is just happening!

I understand it intellectually, but if you’re asking whether I truly *know* it? Not a chance. 🤷
If you've got nothing better to do, then why are you out here playing missionary on this forum?
Searching for truth seekers? Or just spinning your wheels in a vacuum?
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#110 ·
Michael Anderson2 said:Barely.

I understand it intellectually, but if you’re asking whether I truly *know* it? Not a chance. 🤷
If you've got nothing better to do, then why are you out here playing missionary on this forum?
Searching for truth seekers? Or just spinning your wheels in a vacuum?

Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#111 ·
placidharbor7 said:Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!

Now, look, unlike Master Mike over there, I’m not out here hunting for disciples, taking on students, or trying to diagnose "truth seekers." I don't call myself a "Master," I don't refer to myself in the third person, and I certainly don't act like I'm on some grand mission using old-fashioned, overly dramatic language just to make up for a lack of actual substance in my posts.

As for how much I actually know... well, given everything I just said... I suppose nobody is more qualified than you to make that kind of judgment call. 😉
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#112 ·
Edward Flores4 said:Now, look, unlike Master Mike over there, I’m not out here hunting for disciples, taking on students, or trying to diagnose "truth seekers." I don't call myself a "Master," I don't refer to myself in the third person, and I certainly don't act like I'm on some grand mission using old-fashioned, overly dramatic language just to make up for a lack of actual substance in my posts.

As for how much I actually know... well, given everything I just said... I suppose nobody is more qualified than you to make that kind of judgment call. 😉

But you know what? Even placidharbor7 doesn't pull any of that stuff either!
Anyway—enough of this! Time to go grab a snack and head to bed.😢
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#113 ·
So then the little guy actually wrapped up the chocolate, did he? 🙂
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#114 ·
placidharbor7 said:Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!


And honestly, when people are rambling on this forum using your name, isn't it obviously just John's ego on full display?
Is it possible Master Mike just has a bit of a split personality going on?
Michael Anderson2 Michael Anderson2 Active Member
77 messages
joined Jul 2013
#115 ·
placidharbor7 said:Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!

😕 I’m struggling to wrap my head around the adjective and its origin. Whose follower am I, really?

placidharbor7 said:Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!

You’ve got over 4,000 posts—if that isn't a full-time job, then I'll eat my hat. But, if every single one of them is just like the one I just quoted, then you really aren't accomplishing much at all. 😁

placidharbor7 said:Honestly, you’re grasping at straws even more than someone who barely understands the basics—which is pretty typical for a truth seeker.

If there's supposedly "nothing going on," how can you possibly claim this Master is actually "working" or—even weirder—going on some illogical "mission"?😲

Why don't you go talk to Edward Flores4 instead? He’s even more lost than you are, so maybe the two of you can work your magic together and figure it out!

If I find myself needing anything, I'll be sure to reach out.

And yeah... exactly.🤣
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#116 ·
Michael Anderson2 said:😕 I’m struggling to wrap my head around the adjective and its origin. Whose follower am I, really?

You’ve got over 4,000 posts—if that isn't a full-time job, then I'll eat my hat. But, if every single one of them is just like the one I just quoted, then you really aren't accomplishing much at all. 😁

If I find myself needing anything, I'll be sure to reach out.

And yeah... exactly.🤣

Well, it sure seems like you aren't either!😢
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#117 ·
steeleagle13 said:Being an "observer" is just plain stupidity...

The only thing you can be regarding this whole concept is mentally ill—just constantly replaying some "observation" loop in your head.

Being an observer is nothing more than a total schizophrenic delusion...

So then everyone's a schizophrenic, right? Even you. I mean, even the most useless person out there watches things happen sometimes.😂
To me, being an observer actually means being aware of what's going on without trying to mess with the flow of events. 😲
There isn't some "movie" playing when you observe, because something else is always happening.
We’re always observing what's happening right now—the present moment is the only thing that's actually real.
Maybe go hang out at a local community college or something, somewhere better than here.😂
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#118 ·
John said:The same force that wakes you up in the morning, hands you love, illness, and puberty, carries you toward destiny and death, and points you toward transcendence—it’s the same one behind your incredibly arrogant, pointless question.

Hold on, is it my question, yours, or his that's actually arrogant and pointless?😲😂
Maybe you and I are actually one and the same, even if we think otherwise.😂
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#119 ·
steeleagle13 said:Yeah, right. Only "less consciousness" actually makes life easier, haha.

So, how exactly do you measure consciousness? By the pound? Or maybe 🙄

Honestly, the less you know, the easier things are.👍
I mean, you can't even take a dump if you aren't aware enough to feel the urge; you’d just end up ruining your pants.😉
And as for measuring awareness, it's all about duration.😲
The longer you can hold out, the better you are in bed.😂
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#120 ·
casualmaker13 said:Hold on, is it my question, yours, or his that's actually arrogant and pointless?😲😂
Maybe you and I are actually one and the same, even if we think otherwise.😂

Oh, we're definitely "one," but there's a pretty massive chance that you're just the rear end while placidharbor7 is the actual brains of the operation!🤣

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads