Kimberly King said:First off, my apologies to the Lioness for kicking off a brand-new thread. I actually sent over a private message explaining myself, and I’m really hoping this one stays open—I’d love to avoid a repeat of last time where things got shut down without much cause, especially since there’s still plenty of ground to cover here.
The deal is, I fired off an email to Bank of America following those specific instructions, but the response I got back was pretty murky at best. If anyone here can make sense of the corporate jargon and tell me what they're actually implying, I’d truly appreciate the help.
Here is the actual email from SC:

Thanks in advance for any insight, and fingers crossed we don't get locked out of this discussion too soon...
Not to quote the whole thing...
If the income stayed the same, the deficit would stay the same too. If a bonus or some holiday pay gets logged as regular salary, it bumps up the average income. Then, after a few months once those extra payments stop hitting the average, the deficit drops back down...
They used to have a cap of $1,300 on how much they'd cover for an overdraft, but apparently that's gone now. For example, if your pay dropped from $20,000 down to $5,000, they'd shave off $1,300—so first it hits $18,700, then $17,400... now it happens gradually, but it could be more than $1,300 at a time.
Clients without a steady paycheck don't even get the overdraft protection. They used to have a minimum limit there too...
That bit about them getting rid of the deficit limits entirely should probably be double-checked. I think it might just be a misunderstanding, but it would be huge if it's true. Maybe check back with whoever gave you that info?