CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Physical Desires vs. Human Dignity and Unfulfilled Dreams...

Physical Desires vs. Human Dignity and Unfulfilled Dreams...

Started by Jose Miller3 · · 👁 8 views · 75 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jose Miller3Edward Greenblueheron62Zachary Collins2casualowl1ruggedjackal46Kyle Nelson2restlessridge36Chloe Smith11Donna Campbell6casualwolf12Brenda Cook4Lawrence Robinson5Brandon Castillo4silentridge543mistybisonrustymaker5Harold James9steelridge58mistyfox812Anthony Rivera17Rachel Bishopbrightridge59wiredmaker18
Anthony Rivera17 Anthony Rivera17 Active Member
62 messages
joined Dec 2007
#61 ·
Donna Campbell6 said:We all have that aggressive, destructive streak in us... and honestly, those aren't always bad things. Like, try picking up a girl without being a little bit assertive at some point, you know? If you're too careful about not stepping on her toes, you'll never make a move. Impossible.☕ You’re always, even just at first, pushing your way into someone's personal space... even if it's just a tiny bit. Plus, self-defense is basically built on aggressive instincts.
Still, I can't really get behind the second half of your post. I don't think we can just write everything off as "relative," otherwise any conversation about human nature just becomes totally pointless after a while...

🎉🎉🎉
Edward Green Edward Green Regular
335 messages
joined Sep 2008
#62 ·
casualowl1 said:But hey, she stood her ground. To me, that’s a choice. There could've been other ways it ended, but whatever.

As for that initial question, I'm not totally sure, but I feel like the answer might lie in the whole "martyrdom" aspect, especially since we're talking about a priest.

It’s about choosing whether to fight for yourself or not—it's not a choice between death and being raped!

pušimalboro said:Same goes for this girl's family. Someone needs to back them up and affirm that she wasn't just fighting for nothing, that she left with her dignity intact.

You can do that by talking to them privately. Not at a funeral, and definitely not by letting the news outlets broadcast it.
casualwolf12 casualwolf12 Member
32 messages
joined Jan 2008
#63 ·
^^
In my estimation, the far more pressing issue is the mere fact that cameras and recording devices were permitted at the funeral in the first place...
Rachel Bishop Rachel Bishop Active Member
80 messages
joined Jul 2003
#64 ·
Donna Campbell6 said:I really hope your friend doesn't end up going through what I suspect might happen later on.
But like you, I'm not religious, so I won't sit here and analyze her reaction or debate whether religion acts as some kind of sedative.
Still, just one thought: I think, in the long run, it’s probably better to just walk straight through the fire... look the horror right in the face, cry your eyes out, shake, and scream if you have to. But man, that's almost impossible. We just can't handle it. So we find ways to cope... and sometimes, that includes religion.

Even if you wanted to, you shouldn't question something you don't understand...
just as you don't realize that faith doesn't lessen the suffering...it just provides what suffering lacks without it...meaning, and the strength required to push through to the very end...to look terror in the eye...to cry until you're spent...to shake and scream toward the heavens...
essentially, enduring it is only truly possible through faith...
facing (senseless) pain and misery without (any) faith cuts off the flow of strength needed to actually process it all...
which is why those "various means" are used...to numb the experience...😢
brightridge59 brightridge59 Active Member
85 messages
joined Jun 2011
#65 ·
casualwolf12 said:I suspect many have fundamentally misconstrued the priest’s remark regarding her departing "with honor and dignity." It seems there is a widespread misunderstanding at play here. I don't believe he was referring to some external, third-party standard of dignity—as if she were somehow forfeiting her reputation or her perceived innocence in the eyes of her parents or the local community. Rather, I would argue his comment pertained entirely to her own internal perspective. Is it not more likely that the loss of dignity is a matter of self-perception? That is certainly my contention.
From my particular vantage point, if I were to find myself being brutally dispatched by a silverback gorilla and stuffed into a shipping crate, I suspect I would feel at least a marginal sense of lost dignity. Is there truly any individual among us who wouldn't experience a certain erosion of self-respect when forced into actions—or subjected to circumstances—against their own volition? One would assume that the preservation of agency is central to the human condition, wouldn't they? To be coerced, whether by nature or by force, seems inherently contrary to the maintenance of one's pride. 🤷

As for her father, perhaps he finds some small, hollow comfort in the fact that she wasn't assaulted before the murder occurred. Or perhaps that is merely a delusion? I suspect the reality hasn't truly sunk in yet, especially considering how visibly shaken he appeared when those reporters were badgering him for a statement.

What kind of innocence are we talking about here?
Are we discussing the purity of a divine being, or just the fact that nobody has managed to tear a hymen yet (which is something we can't possibly know)?

from my own perspective, if some massive brute tied me up and forced themselves on me, I think I’d feel at least a slight loss of dignity. Honestly, I don't think there's a soul alive who wouldn't feel their dignity stripped away by actions taken under duress, against their will... 🤷

Most people would likely feel that loss of dignity.
Personally, I would feel violated. But there is a profound difference between feeling violated because someone forced something upon you and feeling a loss of dignity because of something you brought upon yourself.

I can't help but wonder what kind of reaction a priest would have to the desecration of a corpse?
Specifically, regarding sexual acts involving one. Would that be considered desecration? Would the clergy and the Church actually be outraged by it, or would they simply argue that once the spirit leaving the body has occurred, the remains are just a body? 🙄 Yes, I realize we are drifting from the main topic... but I find it equally hypocritical.

I fail to see why an unfortunate girl should be hailed as a hero, even if it's "just" to provide comfort to her family.
This whole situation just proves that both the Church and society still view survivors of assault through the exact same lens. There is still this underlying layer of disgust and contempt, acting as if the victims themselves are somehow to blame. 🤮 You see it clearly in a case like this, where the victim wasn't even assaulted in the traditional sense.

It would honestly be better to die than to face such a violation. Jesus. 🙄
Donna Campbell6 Donna Campbell6 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jan 2007
#66 ·
Rachel Bishop said:Even if you wanted to, you shouldn't question something you don't understand...
just as you don't realize that faith doesn't lessen the suffering...it just provides what suffering lacks without it...meaning, and the strength required to push through to the very end...to look terror in the eye...to cry until you're spent...to shake and scream toward the heavens...
essentially, enduring it is only truly possible through faith...
facing (senseless) pain and misery without (any) faith cuts off the flow of strength needed to actually process it all...
which is why those "various means" are used...to numb the experience...😢

Does suffering even mean anything if you don't have faith? How can anyone actually know for sure... I mean, since you (I'm assuming) are a believer, you aren't exactly in a position to experience suffering without faith anyway, right?
Just because I don't believe, and yeah, it hurts, doesn't mean my suffering is pointless... It might just mean I'm not obsessed with proving I've found some grand purpose behind it all. And honestly? It definitely means I'm not about to let some half-baked priest with a fancy degree lecture me on the deepest, most fundamental questions of what it even means to be alive...
Basically, yeah... Believe......not really... thoughts....
If you're the type who lives by faith, then everything needs to be crystal clear...🙄 If you actually give a damn about thinking for yourself... you’re the only one who can really afford to admit when you don't know something...
Rachel Bishop Rachel Bishop Active Member
80 messages
joined Jul 2003
#67 ·
Donna Campbell6 said:Does suffering even mean anything if you don't have faith? How can anyone actually know for sure... I mean, since you (I'm assuming) are a believer, you aren't exactly in a position to experience suffering without faith anyway, right?
Just because I don't believe, and yeah, it hurts, doesn't mean my suffering is pointless... It might just mean I'm not obsessed with proving I've found some grand purpose behind it all. And honestly? It definitely means I'm not about to let some half-baked priest with a fancy degree lecture me on the deepest, most fundamental questions of what it even means to be alive...
Basically, yeah... Believe......not really... thoughts....
If you're the type who lives by faith, then everything needs to be crystal clear...🙄 If you actually give a damn about thinking for yourself... you’re the only one who can really afford to admit when you don't know something...


So... you believe in meaning even if you don't claim to have grasped it?😉
Convenient.🙂

Let's see what I actually said...
...I said that... even if you want to, you cannot question the experience of faith (if you haven't had it and don't possess it), nor the strength that comes from it... that's what I said... which isn't to say you need to listen to semi-educated priests...😉
Whether pain and suffering are meaningful or senseless to you or anyone else is a personal decision... I am merely stating what happens in the case of meaninglessness:

Facing (meaningless) pain and suffering without any faith cuts off the possibility of receiving the strength needed to endure it... so then people resort to those "various methods"... to numb the experience.


Don't put words in my mouth... I prefer candy.🙂
casualwolf12 casualwolf12 Member
32 messages
joined Jan 2008
#68 ·
brightridge59 said:What kind of innocence are we talking about here?
Are we discussing the purity of a divine being, or just the fact that nobody has managed to tear a hymen yet (which is something we can't possibly know)?

from my own perspective, if some massive brute tied me up and forced themselves on me, I think I’d feel at least a slight loss of dignity. Honestly, I don't think there's a soul alive who wouldn't feel their dignity stripped away by actions taken under duress, against their will... 🤷

Most people would likely feel that loss of dignity.
Personally, I would feel violated. But there is a profound difference between feeling violated because someone forced something upon you and feeling a loss of dignity because of something you brought upon yourself.

I can't help but wonder what kind of reaction a priest would have to the desecration of a corpse?
Specifically, regarding sexual acts involving one. Would that be considered desecration? Would the clergy and the Church actually be outraged by it, or would they simply argue that once the spirit leaving the body has occurred, the remains are just a body? 🙄 Yes, I realize we are drifting from the main topic... but I find it equally hypocritical.

I fail to see why an unfortunate girl should be hailed as a hero, even if it's "just" to provide comfort to her family.
This whole situation just proves that both the Church and society still view survivors of assault through the exact same lens. There is still this underlying layer of disgust and contempt, acting as if the victims themselves are somehow to blame. 🤮 You see it clearly in a case like this, where the victim wasn't even assaulted in the traditional sense.

It would honestly be better to die than to face such a violation. Jesus. 🙄

Regarding that second case... if my memory serves me correctly, they actually released those details to the public, specifically noting that the girl was a virgin.

brightridge59 said:Most people would likely feel a profound sense of lost dignity in such a situation.
Personally, I would feel violated. However, there is a fundamental distinction between feeling violated because someone forced an action upon you, and experiencing a loss of dignity because of a choice you made yourself.

Which sensation is more corrosive: the weight of being wrongfully accused, or the crushing realization that you’ve stripped away your own dignity through your own hand? One is an injustice inflicted upon you; the other is a self-inflicted wound. Which one truly leaves a deeper scar?

brightridge59 said:I find myself wondering: what exactly would a priest have to say regarding the desecration of a corpse? One can only imagine the theological gymnastics involved in such a grim scenario. Would he approach it from a lens of divine retribution, or perhaps focus on the profound disrespect shown to the sanctity of the departed? It is a heavy question, isn't it?
Regarding the matter of sexual obscenity involving an identical subject: would such an act be classified as profanity? Would one expect the clergy and the Church to react with indignation, or would it be argued that the spirit had left the body, leaving behind nothing more than mere flesh? 🙄 Yes, I am fully aware that this isn't the primary subject at hand... yet, isn't it equally hypocritical?

They would certainly find something to criticize, wouldn't they? If only they had the courage to actually step up to the plate.
I fail to grasp the precise objective you are attempting to achieve here. What exactly is your point? 🤷

brightridge59 said:I fail to see the logic in elevating some unfortunate girl to the status of a hero, even if her sole purpose is to serve as a mere balm for a grieving family's wounds.
This case serves as yet another grim reminder that both the Church and society at large continue to cast their gaze upon victims of sexual assault with an unyielding, unchanged perspective. There remains this pervasive, underlying sense of disgust and contempt—as if the women themselves were somehow responsible for the atrocities committed against them. Is it not remarkable how little we have actually progressed? 🤮 This becomes particularly evident in cases where there wasn't even a sexual assault involved.

I would truly rather face death than endure such an assault. Jesus. 🙄

It seems to me that a significant number of people suffer from this persistent delusion where they view the Church and its clergy as the primary antagonists of the nation. They seem to seize upon every single opportunity to interpret every word uttered by religious figures in the most vitriolic light possible. It is quite telling, really. As soon as those statements from the priest and the father were released to the public, the conversation underwent an immediate and predictable shift. Suddenly, the focus pivoted from "look at what happened to this poor girl" to "look at what these backward priests have said." Is it not fascinating how quickly the collective attention shifts from the victim to the perceived transgressors?
To be perfectly honest, I don't see what else they could have expected from him. When a person is navigating the immediate aftermath of a funeral, can we truly expect them to provide any semblance of rational commentary? It’s almost an absurdity to demand logic in such a moment. From my perspective, those remarks were nothing more than the most basic, reflexive attempts to find some silver lining—the typical "it could have been worse" sentiment that people cling to when they are reeling.

If I may draw a parallel to yet another recent tragedy where the participants were immediately branded as heroes... I find it quite fascinating how all the self-appointed moral guardians were absolutely revolted by the media's lack of decency when they released those images of charred firefighters and the statements from families devastated by the catastrophe. Yet, in this particular instance, everyone seems equally outraged by the remarks made by the priest and the father, while the ethics and sensitivity of the media go entirely unexamined—even though they were just as eager to solicit statements during what was, for the family, an incredibly harrowing moment.
Donna Campbell6 Donna Campbell6 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jan 2007
#69 ·
Rachel Bishop said:So... you believe in meaning even if you don't claim to have grasped it?😉
Convenient.🙂

Let's see what I actually said...
...I said that... even if you want to, you cannot question the experience of faith (if you haven't had it and don't possess it), nor the strength that comes from it... that's what I said... which isn't to say you need to listen to semi-educated priests...😉
Whether pain and suffering are meaningful or senseless to you or anyone else is a personal decision... I am merely stating what happens in the case of meaninglessness:

Facing (meaningless) pain and suffering without any faith cuts off the possibility of receiving the strength needed to endure it... so then people resort to those "various methods"... to numb the experience.


Don't put words in my mouth... I prefer candy.🙂

Honestly, it’s none of my business...
You just managed to cram total nonsense and a complete lack of faith into one single sentence... "to face..." Just totally pointless... It’s just all about the pain and the struggle... honestly... Just without any of that religious stuff......and that’s basically what I was rambling about in my other posts. Look, I’m not trying to tell you how to think or put words in your mouth. Honestly, I actually dig that you prefer using your own words... keeps things real...👍
And honestly... I’m just not a candy person either...😲 What can I even do...😢
Donna Campbell6 Donna Campbell6 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jan 2007
#70 ·
casualwolf12 said:Regarding that second case... if my memory serves me correctly, they actually released those details to the public, specifically noting that the girl was a virgin.

Which sensation is more corrosive: the weight of being wrongfully accused, or the crushing realization that you’ve stripped away your own dignity through your own hand? One is an injustice inflicted upon you; the other is a self-inflicted wound. Which one truly leaves a deeper scar?

They would certainly find something to criticize, wouldn't they? If only they had the courage to actually step up to the plate.
I fail to grasp the precise objective you are attempting to achieve here. What exactly is your point? 🤷

It seems to me that a significant number of people suffer from this persistent delusion where they view the Church and its clergy as the primary antagonists of the nation. They seem to seize upon every single opportunity to interpret every word uttered by religious figures in the most vitriolic light possible. It is quite telling, really. As soon as those statements from the priest and the father were released to the public, the conversation underwent an immediate and predictable shift. Suddenly, the focus pivoted from "look at what happened to this poor girl" to "look at what these backward priests have said." Is it not fascinating how quickly the collective attention shifts from the victim to the perceived transgressors?
To be perfectly honest, I don't see what else they could have expected from him. When a person is navigating the immediate aftermath of a funeral, can we truly expect them to provide any semblance of rational commentary? It’s almost an absurdity to demand logic in such a moment. From my perspective, those remarks were nothing more than the most basic, reflexive attempts to find some silver lining—the typical "it could have been worse" sentiment that people cling to when they are reeling.

If I may draw a parallel to yet another recent tragedy where the participants were immediately branded as heroes... I find it quite fascinating how all the self-appointed moral guardians were absolutely revolted by the media's lack of decency when they released those images of charred firefighters and the statements from families devastated by the catastrophe. Yet, in this particular instance, everyone seems equally outraged by the remarks made by the priest and the father, while the ethics and sensitivity of the media go entirely unexamined—even though they were just as eager to solicit statements during what was, for the family, an incredibly harrowing moment.

...so maybe just remember that old saying about silence being golden...😁
casualwolf12 casualwolf12 Member
32 messages
joined Jan 2008
#71 ·
^^
It would arguably be more prudent if we simply avoided placing him in any position where he is compelled to offer a statement in the first place...
Donna Campbell6 Donna Campbell6 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jan 2007
#72 ·
casualwolf12 said:^^
It would arguably be more prudent if we simply avoided placing him in any position where he is compelled to offer a statement in the first place...

Heh... man, I am loving this...👍 Now, look, I might be a little bit of a troublemaker, but if I were the priest, I’d probably take that whole idea, dial it back a notch, then crank it right back up—say, maybe on a 24/7 schedule...😁
Alright, alright, I'll chill out, I won't go any further😳....besides, that's not even what this thread is about.
Edward Green Edward Green Regular
335 messages
joined Sep 2008
#73 ·
casualwolf12 said:Regarding that second case... if my memory serves me correctly, they actually released those details to the public, specifically noting that the girl was a virgin.

Which sensation is more corrosive: the weight of being wrongfully accused, or the crushing realization that you’ve stripped away your own dignity through your own hand? One is an injustice inflicted upon you; the other is a self-inflicted wound. Which one truly leaves a deeper scar?

They would certainly find something to criticize, wouldn't they? If only they had the courage to actually step up to the plate.
I fail to grasp the precise objective you are attempting to achieve here. What exactly is your point? 🤷

It seems to me that a significant number of people suffer from this persistent delusion where they view the Church and its clergy as the primary antagonists of the nation. They seem to seize upon every single opportunity to interpret every word uttered by religious figures in the most vitriolic light possible. It is quite telling, really. As soon as those statements from the priest and the father were released to the public, the conversation underwent an immediate and predictable shift. Suddenly, the focus pivoted from "look at what happened to this poor girl" to "look at what these backward priests have said." Is it not fascinating how quickly the collective attention shifts from the victim to the perceived transgressors?
To be perfectly honest, I don't see what else they could have expected from him. When a person is navigating the immediate aftermath of a funeral, can we truly expect them to provide any semblance of rational commentary? It’s almost an absurdity to demand logic in such a moment. From my perspective, those remarks were nothing more than the most basic, reflexive attempts to find some silver lining—the typical "it could have been worse" sentiment that people cling to when they are reeling.

If I may draw a parallel to yet another recent tragedy where the participants were immediately branded as heroes... I find it quite fascinating how all the self-appointed moral guardians were absolutely revolted by the media's lack of decency when they released those images of charred firefighters and the statements from families devastated by the catastrophe. Yet, in this particular instance, everyone seems equally outraged by the remarks made by the priest and the father, while the ethics and sensitivity of the media go entirely unexamined—even though they were just as eager to solicit statements during what was, for the family, an incredibly harrowing moment.

Honestly, dragging family members down for a comment right after they find out someone died? That's just disgusting. Period.

But we're talking about a priest's statement here. Nobody chased him down for a quote—he spoke up on his own initiative at the funeral.
Anthony Rivera17 Anthony Rivera17 Active Member
62 messages
joined Dec 2007
#74 ·
Donna Campbell6 said:Does suffering even mean anything if you don't have faith? How can anyone actually know for sure... I mean, since you (I'm assuming) are a believer, you aren't exactly in a position to experience suffering without faith anyway, right?
Just because I don't believe, and yeah, it hurts, doesn't mean my suffering is pointless... It might just mean I'm not obsessed with proving I've found some grand purpose behind it all. And honestly? It definitely means I'm not about to let some half-baked priest with a fancy degree lecture me on the deepest, most fundamental questions of what it even means to be alive...
Basically, yeah... Believe......not really... thoughts....
If you're the type who lives by faith, then everything needs to be crystal clear...🙄 If you actually give a damn about thinking for yourself... you’re the only one who can really afford to admit when you don't know something...

Good 👍
wiredmaker18 wiredmaker18 Member
41 messages
joined Jan 2008
#75 ·
I could probably write a whole novel about my take on priests and organized religion in general, but I won't start a war or spit venom right now since it's not really the topic, though let it be known... To address the question of whether this girl was a hero: people love throwing around big words way too easily. Suddenly everyone is a hero, from pro athletes😕 to fallen firefighters who probably had to burn alive just to be celebrated as martyrs (again, stripping away the emotion, the reality is they were just doing their jobs and likely died because someone cut corners on their gear just to line their own pockets), so now some football player running around on grass is somehow on the same level as a person who died burning up while trying to save lives and nature from a disaster😕. This girl is simply a victim. Removing the sentimentality, it's just a web of tragic circumstances. I'm not even sure how much her family and friends care about the fact that she maintained her dignity, purity, honesty, and righteousness—and maybe saved some whales in the process—according to what the priest said. Of course the priest had to say something, but calling her a great woman, a hero, Joan of Arc... give me a break. She’s just a victim. Do you honestly think she was thinking about anything other than pure instinct, doing whatever it took to stay alive in those moments? For God's sake. When you're in that situation, you don't know which way is up. You have no clue what you're doing or what you should be doing. Thinking about preserving her "purity" in the way the church defines it, or fighting for "sacred" ideals, is somewhere around the 1,776th priority, somewhere between wondering what's for dinner and checking the New York Stock Exchange. You fight for survival. You react on instinct. You don't have time to think about anything at all. People just can't accept that some things in life are just senseless shit that hits you every once in a while. There's no grand reason for her death. A tragic accident. A life wasted. A victim. That's it.
Anthony Rivera17 Anthony Rivera17 Active Member
62 messages
joined Dec 2007
#76 ·
wiredmaker18 said:I could probably write a whole novel about my take on priests and organized religion in general, but I won't start a war or spit venom right now since it's not really the topic, though let it be known... To address the question of whether this girl was a hero: people love throwing around big words way too easily. Suddenly everyone is a hero, from pro athletes😕 to fallen firefighters who probably had to burn alive just to be celebrated as martyrs (again, stripping away the emotion, the reality is they were just doing their jobs and likely died because someone cut corners on their gear just to line their own pockets), so now some football player running around on grass is somehow on the same level as a person who died burning up while trying to save lives and nature from a disaster😕. This girl is simply a victim. Removing the sentimentality, it's just a web of tragic circumstances. I'm not even sure how much her family and friends care about the fact that she maintained her dignity, purity, honesty, and righteousness—and maybe saved some whales in the process—according to what the priest said. Of course the priest had to say something, but calling her a great woman, a hero, Joan of Arc... give me a break. She’s just a victim. Do you honestly think she was thinking about anything other than pure instinct, doing whatever it took to stay alive in those moments? For God's sake. When you're in that situation, you don't know which way is up. You have no clue what you're doing or what you should be doing. Thinking about preserving her "purity" in the way the church defines it, or fighting for "sacred" ideals, is somewhere around the 1,776th priority, somewhere between wondering what's for dinner and checking the New York Stock Exchange. You fight for survival. You react on instinct. You don't have time to think about anything at all. People just can't accept that some things in life are just senseless shit that hits you every once in a while. There's no grand reason for her death. A tragic accident. A life wasted. A victim. That's it.

This whole obsession with "heroes" is something we imported from overseas, much like most of the nonsense that is currently
being shoved down our throats by local media outlets... For someone to actually earn the title of "hero," they supposedly have to perform some extraordinary feat that
the average person simply cannot, as if merely existing isn't enough to hold value... This mindset just creates
yet another inferiority complex, subtly telling people that being themselves isn't sufficient because, without these labels, they are essentially nobodies... a truly wonderful way to run a society...
😲

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads