#181 ·
Wait, can't you just make a one-time lump sum payment for the whole thing? I think someone mentioned that earlier. 🤷
Started by Nicole James · · 👁 15 views · 231 replies
wiredtinker11 said:Here’s a solid little deep dive into what’s actually happening over at Citigroup and their current roadmap for a potential sale:
http://north America.aljazeera.net/video/a...iness-14092013
Timothy Kim9 said:"So, I guess you think people's savings are safe?"
If you don't care about the possibility of getting your money back years later—with zero interest, mind you—
then yeah, they're perfectly safe.
I suppose we should have learned by now:
The Federal Reserve first puts out these incredibly soothing statements about how stable everything is, and then they go and drive
Credit Suisse and the Central Bank straight into bankruptcy.
Timothy Kim9 said:1) Just waiting for the hammer to drop.
Basically, the US has about five major TBTF banks—if you ask me—including Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Hypo Bank.
Customer deposits at Hypo Bank alone are sitting near $15 billion.
If ANY one of these five big players trips up, the federal budget isn't going to have roughly $2.7 billion ready for Hypo
to pay out everyone's cash all at once.
Instead, they’ll pivot to this: you get maybe $50 a month. That could drag on for at least
a year before most savers are cleared out. Then they might bump the limit to $100.
And yeah, obviously, there's zero interest during that wait.
2) Hypo is the only bank in the US that actually set up its own "bad bank."
3) Their parent bank back in Austria is in a pretty rough spot.
4) Hypo in the US is desperately trying to wash its hands of the real estate business.
5) Hypo Bank in the US has been tangled up in just about every scandal imaginable—stuff that'll eventually
end up in court (just Google Hypo + Sanders, Hypo + Zagorec, or Hypo + Haider).
If you want to keep your savings in a place like that, be my guest. You can always choose to trust those
comforting reports from the Federal Reserve if that makes you feel better...
Timothy Kim9 said:The question was whether bank savings are actually safe here in the States.
At least, that’s how I took it. So I laid out a worst-case scenario—the kind of thing that
has actually happened before during those old currency crises back in the day.
Honestly, it surprises me that the Austrians haven't jumped all over the European Union yet, using the excuse:
"It's just not right that the branches get to live large while Austria picks up the tab."🙂
Sam Ruiz60 said:unless this was actually setting the stage for this:
If I were in their shoes, I'd be looking for the nearest exit... liquidating my CDs and getting out of town.
wiredtinker11 said:The thieves will end up behind bars, the bank will be sold off, and that'll be that. But hey, I guess some people just live to spread panic—whatever.
Sam Ruiz60 said:But really, who would want to deal with a European Union branch that has such a murky history? These kinds of investigations and the resulting bad press certainly don't help their case.
| Charles Ramos7 As requested: When you look at bank acquisitions, it isn’t really about chasing ghosts from the past. Why dwell on what happened years ago? It's all about the present reality—securing immediate access to a new market or instantly expanding a client base. That is where the true value lies.☕ |
wiredtinker11 said:Well, there you have it—read it and weep. They’ve pushed the deadline for the sale out to mid-2015, so all this mass panic is honestly a bit much.