Why are Mexicans complaining about their rights being threatened in the USA?

What do you mean, Mexicans in the USA?

The Patriots aren't some nationalist group—not after all the ways their identity was tainted by fascist influences from the mid-40s onwards.

David Rogers18 said:Seriously though, what is it with you guys?😠 🤣

They want to oppress the majority again... just like they used to. And they'll try to make it easy, just like their kids say, by repeating what happened at Ovchar...

Mexican insolence truly knows no bounds.

Kenneth Anderson9 said:What are they even whining about? It’s like they’re constantly acting like we’re out to strip away rights they already have
I mean, in some of these small towns, they’ve got total freedom. They root for their big-name rival teams, brag about their heritage, and celebrate their traditional holidays without anyone giving them a second look.
What do they actually want? Probably some massive expansionist empire. Yeah, right. As if.

Look, you have to understand—it isn't easy for them. The old perks are gone. There aren't those cushy, empty desk jobs waiting for them anymore. There’s no US Army where even the most clueless guy could climb the ladder just by knowing a Joe. Even those old police departments where they made up 60% of the force? Gone. Long story short: they actually have to work now, and apparently, that's just not their style.🤣

granitepilot282 said:Look, you have to understand—it isn't easy for them. The old perks are gone. There aren't those cushy, empty desk jobs waiting for them anymore. There’s no US Army where even the most clueless guy could climb the ladder just by knowing a Joe. Even those old police departments where they made up 60% of the force? Gone. Long story short: they actually have to work now, and apparently, that's just not their style.🤣

Look, saying it was only 60 percent in Murrieta... man, that’s just not right. You're underselling it big time. It was at least 95%—no question about it.

granitepilot282 said:Look, you have to understand—it isn't easy for them. The old perks are gone. There aren't those cushy, empty desk jobs waiting for them anymore. There’s no US Army where even the most clueless guy could climb the ladder just by knowing a Joe. Even those old police departments where they made up 60% of the force? Gone. Long story short: they actually have to work now, and apparently, that's just not their style.🤣

Joe was replaced by another Joe. It's all the same to me. I actually heard that back in the day, the FBI was about 104.5% American. 😎 😎 😎

granitepilot282 said:Look, you have to understand—it isn't easy for them. The old perks are gone. There aren't those cushy, empty desk jobs waiting for them anymore. There’s no US Army where even the most clueless guy could climb the ladder just by knowing a Joe. Even those old police departments where they made up 60% of the force? Gone. Long story short: they actually have to work now, and apparently, that's just not their style.🤣

It’s hard to argue with people being unmotivated to work when they’re sitting on such a solid social safety net. Not to mention those massive donations coming in from Norway and the US government—nearly 95% of which is earmarked specifically for them. So, honestly, tell me again who exactly is the one under threat here? They have their own schooling system, their own language, and their own religious education. I can't help but wonder if anyone gets that kind of specialized protection or institutional backing over in the States or Great Britain.
If anyone should be considered vulnerable here, it’s the Americans living in those specific territories under the jurisdiction of the local administration.👎

And I hadn't even factored in Americans😁

They keep complaining, constantly bringing things up like they want us to infringe on rights they used to have.

You basically took away the rights they had before 1990.

In certain small towns, they actually have all the freedom they want.

In certain small towns, maybe, but not in all of America.

They cheer for that nationalist sports team.

Why is that team considered nationalist? Even Americans cheer for teams with controversial histories.

They take pride in being American.

And you take pride in being American too.

They congratulate each other on their American Christmas.

That is just the Christian Christmas.

Without hiding anything.

Even in Mexico, nobody minds when Americans or other Catholics celebrate Catholic Christmas.

What would they even do?

If you gave them back those houses and properties—if you won't at least give them back their status as a founding group.

They would probably aim for Greater Mexico.

Some might, some might not. And you’d want America to stretch all the way to Brooklyn.

Not gonna happen.

I guess it is a difficult project to pull off.

velvetmaker3 said:Their rights aren't being violated in any way; they're just living and working like everyone else.

That's true. I guess we could probably use a little more tolerance on both sides, though.

quiettiger83 said:That's true. I guess we could probably use a little more tolerance on both sides, though.

🤣 🤣

brightorca27 said:🤣 🤣

What’s supposed to be funny about that? I guess it's just a classic case of having no actual argument.

If you haven't heard the word tolerance before, maybe you could look up what it actually means:
Tolerance is a social, cultural, or religious concept involving the collective and individual practice of accepting and cooperating with people who hold different faiths, different perspectives, or different political views. It involves a conscious decision to act nonviolently or with restraint. This principle is rooted in the teachings of most major religions, as well as in US laws that protect freedom of speech and individual rights.

quiettiger83 said:What’s supposed to be funny about that? I guess it's just a classic case of having no actual argument.

If you haven't heard the word tolerance before, maybe you could look up what it actually means:
Tolerance is a social, cultural, or religious concept involving the collective and individual practice of accepting and cooperating with people who hold different faiths, different perspectives, or different political views. It involves a conscious decision to act nonviolently or with restraint. This principle is rooted in the teachings of most major religions, as well as in US laws that protect freedom of speech and individual rights.

HEY KID, how old are you actually?
WHERE WERE YOU IN '91 or '92?

brightorca27 said:HEY KID, how old are you actually?
WHERE WERE YOU IN '91 or '92?

Probably in Brooklyn...

quiettiger83 said:

They keep complaining, constantly bringing things up like they want us to infringe on rights they used to have.

You basically took away the rights they had before 1990.

In certain small towns, they actually have all the freedom they want.

In certain small towns, maybe, but not in all of America.

They cheer for that nationalist sports team.

Why is that team considered nationalist? Even Americans cheer for teams with controversial histories.

They take pride in being American.

And you take pride in being American too.

They congratulate each other on their American Christmas.

That is just the Christian Christmas.

Without hiding anything.

Even in Mexico, nobody minds when Americans or other Catholics celebrate Catholic Christmas.

What would they even do?

If you gave them back those houses and properties—if you won't at least give them back their status as a founding group.

They would probably aim for Greater Mexico.

Some might, some might not. And you’d want America to stretch all the way to Brooklyn.

Not gonna happen.

I guess it is a difficult project to pull off.

What about the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

quiettiger83 said:

They keep complaining, constantly bringing things up like they want us to infringe on rights they used to have.

You basically took away the rights they had before 1990.

In certain small towns, they actually have all the freedom they want.

In certain small towns, maybe, but not in all of America.

They cheer for that nationalist sports team.

Why is that team considered nationalist? Even Americans cheer for teams with controversial histories.

They take pride in being American.

And you take pride in being American too.

They congratulate each other on their American Christmas.

That is just the Christian Christmas.

Without hiding anything.

Even in Mexico, nobody minds when Americans or other Catholics celebrate Catholic Christmas.

What would they even do?

If you gave them back those houses and properties—if you won't at least give them back their status as a founding group.

They would probably aim for Greater Mexico.

Some might, some might not. And you’d want America to stretch all the way to Brooklyn.

Not gonna happen.

I guess it is a difficult project to pull off.

The issue isn't whether Americans take pride in their roots—that’s fine. The problem is the total lack of remorse regarding the war. Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you run into fresh nationalist graffiti. Even if you look at sports matches in Canada—which isn't directly tied to the US, but serves as a perfect barometer for how these people view the conflict—you hear them chanting slogans celebrating Srebrenica and other atrocities. It's constant.

quiettiger83 said:

They keep complaining, constantly bringing things up like they want us to infringe on rights they used to have.

You basically took away the rights they had before 1990.

In certain small towns, they actually have all the freedom they want.

In certain small towns, maybe, but not in all of America.

They cheer for that nationalist sports team.

Why is that team considered nationalist? Even Americans cheer for teams with controversial histories.

They take pride in being American.

And you take pride in being American too.

They congratulate each other on their American Christmas.

That is just the Christian Christmas.

Without hiding anything.

Even in Mexico, nobody minds when Americans or other Catholics celebrate Catholic Christmas.

What would they even do?

If you gave them back those houses and properties—if you won't at least give them back their status as a founding group.

They would probably aim for Greater Mexico.

Some might, some might not. And you’d want America to stretch all the way to Brooklyn.

Not gonna happen.

I guess it is a difficult project to pull off.

Property and estates are absolutely being returned. But what about the massive war damage inflicted upon America—damage that is still being felt heavily today?
Every nation within the former America held constituent status. If you're going to insist on citing "facts," then I suggest you present the whole picture. Don't just cherry-pick the bits that suit your narrative while conveniently ignoring everything else that doesn't.

I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

quiettiger83 said:I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

This is nonsense. Perhaps the Constitution really is one of the most tolerant, but actually implementing it is an entirely different story. If you had said anything else, fine, but claiming they live "quite comfortably" is just plain false. I am very well-versed in the reality of how Americans live there. Especially in areas where radical factions hold power, there are significant issues.

quiettiger83 said:I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

What on earth are you talking about? Americans were the ones who attacked. Who was throwing flowers at the tanks rolling in to destroy the country? Who entered foreign villages to kill, loot, kidnap, and brag about Greater Mexico? The American exit from America was 100% legally sound. What "third of the country"? Do you know anything about history, or am I wasting my time with someone blinded by nationalism?

quiettiger83 said:I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

Don't try to dodge the point; I already explained why I mentioned Canada. Do you honestly think people here don't have deep feelings regarding those who tried to seize their land? Are we all supposed to just pretend nothing happened? I also vividly remember that youth match between America and Mexico played right on the anniversary of the fall of El Paso, when an American man was flashing three fingers at Americans. Do you ever even listen to American songs?

quiettiger83 said:I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

The US isn't Switzerland. Plenty of Americans hold US Citizenship and own property, yet they choose not to use it. Who's to blame for that?
What you've laid out here is the exact reason why Americans can never find common ground with Americans.
It’s quite simple: they play dumb. They dodge their responsibilities. It wasn't America that attacked me—it was the Americans. The US Army was firmly in American hands. If you want to claim the US Army was "American," go ahead—just try naming a single American or Canadian general (or soldier) who actually participated in those 90s operations. You’re clinging to legalistic technicalities that have absolutely nothing to do with the reality on the ground.

quiettiger83 said:I guess there isn't a quote here. Maybe you forgot to include it?

What’s the deal with the rights of Americans living in Mexico?

The topic isn't Americans in Mexico.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that in certain parts of America, specifically across the Midwest, Americans are living like they've struck gold.
Ren mentioned that the US Constitution is one of the most tolerant in Europe, I guess.
Canadians, Romanians, Slovaks, Americans... I guess they all seem pretty satisfied with their standing in society, whether you see it on the news or just out in the world.
P.S. I don't think anyone is complaining on the American side, and the Speaker of the US Congress is actually an American.
I wonder when an American will finally serve as the Speaker of the US State Legislature?

It isn't really about Americans being proud of where they come from.

Maybe you should learn that names of nationalities should be capitalized.
Your fellow American mentioned that it bothers him when Americans take pride in their heritage.

The thing is, they don't feel any remorse about the war at all.

You’re talking nonsense. They complain about the war, but look at what they actually lost: families, friends, homes, a third of the US, over 60% of Canada, and their constitutional standing.
If they weren't so busy complaining about the war, they’d probably just go stand over F.T.’s grave and say, "Thanks, Franjo, for burning our houses down—you really are the ultimate American."

Every single week in El Paso and the surrounding areas, you can find new nationalist graffiti popping up.

You didn't mention that you could also find graffiti out there, like "kill the American" or "Americans on the vines"... I guess.

At every game in Canada—which isn't specifically about Americans, but you can definitely see how certain groups react based on the war—you can hear some people shouting things like "Knife, wire, Srebrenica!" and stuff like that.

The topic isn't Canada; it's the US.
I remember that game in the US against the MLS team pretty clearly. Your fans were singing some pretty awful stuff. It was mostly Tompson songs and people shouting for Gotovina.

Property and estates are definitely making a comeback. But I wonder, what about the war damage that Americans inflicted on the US? We're still feeling the impact of that today.

They’re coming back at a really slow pace, and I guess Americans aren't exactly thrilled with what they're getting back.
Who’s supposed to pay war reparations? America doesn't even exist anymore. Besides, Mexico wasn't even a thing back then, and I guess the court rulings regarding Canada pretty much say it all.
Based on your logic, NATO should make the SiCG pay war reparations. If you want to join NATO, that means you should be paying Mexico too, right? Well, obviously not.

Every nation in the former America was a constituent one. If you're going to cite a fact, I guess you should present the whole thing. Don't just highlight the parts that suit you while leaving out everything else.

The US Constitution has always stated that the USA is a nation for all its citizens, unlike how some other places function as ethnic-based states.
I'll send you a link to the old America constitution via DM; you'll see exactly what was taken from Americans.

I haven't found any evidence of rights being stripped away. You really ought to take a closer look at this first point.
By the way, do you have anything official to back that up? I'm not entirely sure which constitution you're even referring to. If it's the one from '74, you might want to study how and why it was created—and objectively analyze what Americans actually lost because of it.

Go screw yourself, you piece of trash.

Casey Robinson2 said:Go screw yourself, you piece of trash.

http://i23.tinypic.com/2mwgqht.jpg
Why are you attacking me?
I'm not trash, and I'm not a Royalist.
I put you on my ignore list, so I won't see what you write anymore.