#81 ·
swiftotter9 said:Honestly, I have to admit that at the social services office they didn't even ask why I was withdrawing cash or what I was spending it on, but I was acting pretty pissed off, so maybe they just didn't want to deal with me.😁
And I’ll never understand how this protects my kid's interests. It just sounds like another half-baked idea from some out-of-touch politician.🙏
As for whose money it actually is... sorry wearytrucker22, but it’s mine. My kid, my responsibility, my assets. This isn't some untouchable trust fund or a housing savings plan, and it's definitely not an "emergency fund" because life is hard enough as it is right now. It’s just basic savings for a child that gets topped up by child support a few times a year—it's entirely my call whether I save those amounts or use them.
It isn't just your kid, and it definitely isn't just your business.
To put it bluntly, every child is essentially future state property. They are a person that the government starts investing in almost immediately after birth via maternity benefits, then they provide free schooling and healthcare. But here’s the kicker: for everything that person consumes from the moment of conception, the government takes its cut. Roughly speaking, about 30% of everything that goes into a person's mouth goes straight to the state, and 30% of everything that comes out goes back to the state—only this time, it's not in goods, it's cold hard cash. That individual basically dresses the state in 30% of their life.
Once that person actually lands a job, the government doesn't just take 30% anymore; at that point, it's a fifty-fifty split.
And if you ever get a little heated and lay a hand on that kid, you'll quickly realize exactly who that child belongs to once the sirens of the police cars start wailing outside.
The state will slap you down and tell you, "No, no, no, you can't mistreat our future taxpayer." They're the only ones allowed to mess with them—not physically, sure, but psychologically.