Kyle Nelson2 said:I think there are more than one, though...
I went through a psych evaluation once (over at Mayo Clinic), and the psychologist there put me through at least ten different sessions. We did all kinds of stuff—memory tests, spatial orientation, naming things, connecting concepts, all that. Out of those ten minimum tests, at least four of them were definitely measuring different types of intelligence (not counting the concentration or memory stuff, obviously)...
To be precise, she called them "cognitive abilities" in her report.
In your case, for example, they probably ran the LBG test for visual-motor coordination and perception, the Cornell test, the EPQ questionnaire, or a PIE emotional profile. But—and this is important—none of those tests actually measure an IQ score. Instead, they determine things like impulsivity, compulsiveness, general neuroticism, social introversion, whether you have psychosomatic reactions to stress, inadequacy, latent aggression, or even deep-seated mistrustness, and so on.
So, basically, most of those tests that people claim are meant to assess cognitive abilities are actually just unmasking your personality traits—basically looking for potential anomalies—but they aren't measuring intelligence at all.
Intelligence is simple; it’s just 1+1=2 and you're done. Yet nowadays, everyone tries to push these ideas of "sporting intelligence," where someone like Cristiano Ronaldo might be an incredibly talented athlete, but talent doesn't equate to intelligence.
It's the same thing with career criminals; a long-term offender can easily surprise you with their "emotional intelligence"—meaning, they might be as dim as a broken bulb 😁, but they are masters at reading people's behavior and act like expert psychologists (they have the talent, or perhaps they've just honed it over time).😛