CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › High IQ and Narcissism: Fact or Fiction?

High IQ and Narcissism: Fact or Fiction?

Started by Lawrence Wells · · 👁 12 views · 186 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Lawrence WellsMorgan Bishop4George Jackson5brighteagle39rowdycyclist7crimsonhound80Taylor Phillips4Joseph Bailey41David Nelson74Joshua ClarkBrian Parker6Charles Evansgentlepanther8William Gonzalez3Gerald Rivera60Asteelridge58shadowsurfer11wearybadger672Anthony BaileyKeith Lee2neonmarlin56Kyle Nelson2hiddentrucker16 …
William Williams27 William Williams27 Member
21 messages
joined Oct 2006
#61 ·
gentlepanther8 said:Honestly, finding anyone with a high IQ on this forum is like searching for a needle in a haystack.
It’s just me and maybe a couple of others.

☕

Hehe... just sitting here waiting for the inevitable backlash. 😬

I don't know why this stuck in my head, but if you're looking for a challenge, shouldn't you actually call it one??
silentgull16 silentgull16 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Oct 2007
#62 ·
Lawrence Wells said:Come on, people—let's hear it! Speak up!


the truth is

you wretches 😈
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#63 ·
Laura Mendoza said:Yet another ridiculous study...😠

Since I have a high IQ, I possess all the typical traits—except for narcissism and everything else that usually comes with it. In my view, those personality quirks depend on the individual rather than being a direct byproduct of intelligence...

🙄 🙄
'I have a high IQ, and I don't have any flaws; I'm just incredibly smart and perfect, but I'm not narcissistic.'

So, I guess we have a textbook example here of someone who—supposedly—is highly intelligent, yet instead of avoiding narcissism, they've fallen right into its center.
It almost seems like there might be some truth to the idea that highly intelligent people tend to lean toward being a narcis.
Paul Jones4 Paul Jones4 Newcomer
8 messages
joined May 2007
#64 ·
What exactly constitutes an IQ?
Gerald Rivera60 Gerald Rivera60 Active Member
129 messages
joined Feb 2007
#65 ·
brighteagle39 said:What exactly are you trying to convey with this post? Are you arguing that animals are intelligent creatures? That they possess a capacity for reason similar to our own?
Your opening sentence seems completely disconnected from the rest of your argument, mostly because I highly doubt the latter portion is your own original thought. If you are pulling excerpts from a textbook or a specific author, please at least have the courtesy to cite them.

And you. You know. It’s as if they lack basic reason and the ability to think.
A man claims to possess reason... but where exactly is it? Show me.
They are nothing more than concepts—mere fabrications we use to make sense of the world and ourselves.
What exactly defines reason? Is it just another word for consciousness? I struggle to understand how we can definitively claim animals lack it. They possess brains structurally similar to our own, so why wouldn't they possess "consciousness" or "reason"—whatever those terms actually imply? Perhaps their capacity is less developed, but that doesn't mean it isn't there.

brighteagle39 said:What exactly are you trying to convey with this post? Are you arguing that animals are intelligent creatures? That they possess a capacity for reason similar to our own?
Your opening sentence seems completely disconnected from the rest of your argument, mostly because I highly doubt the latter portion is your own original thought. If you are pulling excerpts from a textbook or a specific author, please at least have the courtesy to cite them.

I can't give you a direct quote because I didn't sit here transcribing anything. That kind of knowledge isn't handed to you; you pick it up through your college years, deep dives into literature, and just moving through life.
Searching through the EBSCO database doesn't yield much regarding the link between intelligence and narcis disorder, aside from that one specific paper I mentioned earlier—and I already provided the source for that one.
Gerald Rivera60 Gerald Rivera60 Active Member
129 messages
joined Feb 2007
#66 ·
Paul Jones4 said:What exactly constitutes an IQ?

It’s a fiction—a hypothetical construct designed to explain and describe certain phenomena.
Don't fall into the trap of flawed reasoning.
Just because something is invented doesn't mean it possesses objective reality. That doesn't mean the "fiction" isn't useful, but we shouldn't grant it more status than it deserves.
IQ was created for practical utility, and that's where it ends.
hiddentrucker16 hiddentrucker16 Active Member
123 messages
joined Oct 2006
#67 ·
James Allen6 said:😂

well, you made me laugh again with that part about throwing up 😛
I guess I celebrated too early. The day was actually pleasant, but not for long..... I seem to be so sensitive lately that I can't believe how much things can hurt me on a daily basis.... it feels like stress is just waiting around the corner for me...... and then the depression grabs hold, then the nausea hits, and then that feeling that I'm going to 🤮 well, I just let it all out now 😂 I wonder what else I am supposed to learn from you.....😘

Actually, it's quite alright—as long as we're talking about dwarves and burping, I can already feel myself cracking a smile... though, I suppose we have both gone a little bit off the deep end 😂... you really do provide such a boost of positive energy, and I truly, deeply thank you for that
.
brighteagle39 brighteagle39 Active Member
80 messages
joined Feb 2007
#68 ·
Gerald Rivera60;8454135 said:You know they lack any semblance of reason and don't bother to think at all.

Of course I know, though I find it quite a mystery how you could be unaware, especially considering you're a student—or at least were one—which implies you possess a solid academic background.
Matthew Evans2 Matthew Evans2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined May 2007
#69 ·
Heh... just laugh at it all, I guess.

Narcissists are narcissists, period. It really doesn't matter how high their IQ is or how many degrees they have hanging on the wall... it's completely irrelevant.

In my humble opinion—and I might be wrong here, but I'm probably not—you'd think people with higher intelligence would actually be more rational, rather than being such a total narcis...
Matthew Evans2 Matthew Evans2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined May 2007
#70 ·
Gerald Rivera60 said:It’s a fiction—a hypothetical construct designed to explain and describe certain phenomena.
Don't fall into the trap of flawed reasoning.
Just because something is invented doesn't mean it possesses objective reality. That doesn't mean the "fiction" isn't useful, but we shouldn't grant it more status than it deserves.
IQ was created for practical utility, and that's where it ends.

So, what, are you just trying to sell us a load of smoke now? 😬
mistymoose57 mistymoose57 Member
37 messages
joined Sep 2006
#71 ·
I suspect they’re veering toward depression just because their eyes are finally open... Not that anyone ever sang about how great it is to be clueless.
Matthew Evans2 Matthew Evans2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined May 2007
#72 ·
mistymoose57 said:I suspect they’re veering toward depression just because their eyes are finally open... Not that anyone ever sang about how great it is to be clueless.

I mean, this feels more like a matter of character to me... some people just "give up on everything" sooner rather than later, while others—well, I know for a fact I won't be doing that 😬...
Keith Lee2 Keith Lee2 Active Member
117 messages
joined Dec 2006
#73 ·
Gerald Rivera60 said:It’s a fiction—a hypothetical construct designed to explain and describe certain phenomena.
Don't fall into the trap of flawed reasoning.
Just because something is invented doesn't mean it possesses objective reality. That doesn't mean the "fiction" isn't useful, but we shouldn't grant it more status than it deserves.
IQ was created for practical utility, and that's where it ends.

I think IQ exists so we don't have to guess if someone's smart—we can just measure it and clear up any doubt.
Honestly, you usually get a sense of how someone's thinking just by talking to them.
But that vibe is always relative, since we're just comparing people to ourselves.
It’s like, if we knew for a fact someone was 6'7", we wouldn't keep trying to pass them off as a point guard
(using basketball terms here, haha)
So, look, tell me your IQ score and I'll know exactly how much weight your arguments carry.
But since bragging about your IQ is seen as being a total narcis,
I guess we'll just keep struggling to understand each other.😬
Gerald Rivera60 Gerald Rivera60 Active Member
129 messages
joined Feb 2007
#74 ·
Keith Lee2 said:I think IQ exists so we don't have to guess if someone's smart—we can just measure it and clear up any doubt.
Honestly, you usually get a sense of how someone's thinking just by talking to them.
But that vibe is always relative, since we're just comparing people to ourselves.
It’s like, if we knew for a fact someone was 6'7", we wouldn't keep trying to pass them off as a point guard
(using basketball terms here, haha)
So, look, tell me your IQ score and I'll know exactly how much weight your arguments carry.
But since bragging about your IQ is seen as being a total narcis,
I guess we'll just keep struggling to understand each other.😬

Look, if someone I know acts stupidly, there isn't a single test on earth that will convince me they aren't dim-witted. The reverse holds true as well.
In practical terms, that is actually the true measure of intelligence.
An IQ test is just a shortcut. We use it because, for practical reasons, we can't throw people into real-world situations and wait to see how they react just to gather data.
IQ doesn't validate intelligence; behavior in real situations does.
Someone isn't intelligent because they have a high IQ; they have a high IQ because they are intelligent.
IQ is merely an instrument...
Imagine you are driving. Your car is flying down the highway, passing everyone else, and the speedometer reads 25 miles mph. What would you assume? That the speedometer is broken, that you are actually going 25 miles mph, or that the other cars are incredibly slow?

The issue is that, unlike intelligence, the concept of speed is clearly defined and universally accepted. Furthermore, the technical design of a speedometer is far more sophisticated than any intelligence test.

Keith Lee2 said:I think IQ exists so we don't have to guess if someone's smart—we can just measure it and clear up any doubt.
Honestly, you usually get a sense of how someone's thinking just by talking to them.
But that vibe is always relative, since we're just comparing people to ourselves.
It’s like, if we knew for a fact someone was 6'7", we wouldn't keep trying to pass them off as a point guard
(using basketball terms here, haha)
So, look, tell me your IQ score and I'll know exactly how much weight your arguments carry.
But since bragging about your IQ is seen as being a total narcis,
I guess we'll just keep struggling to understand each other.😬

Honestly, I don't know and I don't care. I'd assume I'm above average for the general population, average among academics, and below average among geniuses... 🙂
Austin Carter6 Austin Carter6 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jan 2008
#75 ·
So, first off, I really don't think having a high IQ has anything to do with being a narcis... I mean, sure, it might show up in people who realize they're way above average... but honestly, carrying around an extremely high intelligence can be so incredibly hard, especially if someone is emotionally unstable... I guess a high IQ actually leads to this feeling of just not fitting in with "average" people and a mismatch of intellectual abilities... and maybe that’s exactly what causes mental health struggles in most cases? Narcissistic people definitely have an edge in those situations, but I think most people aren't narcissistic enough for that, so they just start pulling away from everyone else... High-IQ narcissists can be pretty nasty and cold, and their minds tend to be focused on destructive stuff, whereas emotional people with high IQs are usually humanists—they're the peacemakers working for the good of humanity... those folks are truly great, both in heart and mind...

crimsonhound80 said:Look, there's no need to apologize, but honestly, your argument mostly applies to artists —think painters, musicians, poets—who might be geniuses in their craft but end up completely unhinged due to excessive drinking, partying 😁 or an old-school addiction to opium followed by more modern narcotics. And let's be real, a person doesn't actually have to be highly intelligent just to be a good painter.

Forget all this talk about having seven or eight different types of intelligence; there’s really only one kind that’s actually been scientifically validated.

I am just shocked by that statement... wow... it seems like you clearly aren't familiar with art, and honestly, it wouldn't hurt to know at least a few of the biggest names throughout history who left a mark with their genius... obviously, not knowing how to paint doesn't mean someone isn't smart, but I feel like all intelligent people have some area where they really know how to express that intelligence👍
Thomas Martinez67 Thomas Martinez67 Active Member
51 messages
joined Apr 2010
#76 ·
says:
To start off, I don't really see how you can equate high intelligence with a high IQ score, since those standardized tests only ever scratch the surface of what a person is actually capable of.

For instance, the psychologist Howard Gardner identified seven distinct types of intelligence:

1. Verbal-linguistic intelligence
2. Musical intelligence
3. Logical-mathematical intelligence
4. Visual-spatial intelligence
5. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence
6. Intrapersonal intelligence
7. Interpersonal intelligence

A narcis might be linked to intrapersonal intelligence—which involves one's own self-perception—as well as interpersonal intelligence, which governs how we interact with the people around us.

Personally, I feel like I can spot a narcis quite easily, even without knowing their specific IQ, though I often suspect they possess quite high scores.

So, if I were to try and link narcissism to a high IQ (rather than "high intelligence," which is a much broader concept that I suspect excludes narcissism entirely), perhaps it’s a combination of intrapersonal intelligence acting as the "face" and interpersonal intelligence acting as the "mirror." It's as if a certain level of narcissism provides the grip that allows them to hold that mirror steady.

8 - The intelligence of nonsense
9 - The intelligence of waste

There was a time when people thought all of this fell under one umbrella called "excretory intelligence," but later on, dr. Kelly realized that we are actually looking at two fundamentally different types of intelligence.
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells RegularOP
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#77 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:Well, if it isn't actually life-threatening, then I guess it doesn't sound all that terrible to me.

Is narcissism even really a bad thing?
And if it is—well, what exactly is it that makes it so problematic?

Look, having a little bit of narcissism is totally fine... but once it becomes pathological? That’s when things go south fast—like, medically speaking, you're screwed.😁
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells RegularOP
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#78 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:🙄 🙄
'I have a high IQ, and I don't have any flaws; I'm just incredibly smart and perfect, but I'm not narcissistic.'

So, I guess we have a textbook example here of someone who—supposedly—is highly intelligent, yet instead of avoiding narcissism, they've fallen right into its center.
It almost seems like there might be some truth to the idea that highly intelligent people tend to lean toward being a narcis.

See? I told you—I’m not entirely wrong about this!🙂
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells RegularOP
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#79 ·
Thomas Martinez67 said:
says:
To start off, I don't really see how you can equate high intelligence with a high IQ score, since those standardized tests only ever scratch the surface of what a person is actually capable of.

For instance, the psychologist Howard Gardner identified seven distinct types of intelligence:

1. Verbal-linguistic intelligence
2. Musical intelligence
3. Logical-mathematical intelligence
4. Visual-spatial intelligence
5. Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence
6. Intrapersonal intelligence
7. Interpersonal intelligence

A narcis might be linked to intrapersonal intelligence—which involves one's own self-perception—as well as interpersonal intelligence, which governs how we interact with the people around us.

Personally, I feel like I can spot a narcis quite easily, even without knowing their specific IQ, though I often suspect they possess quite high scores.

So, if I were to try and link narcissism to a high IQ (rather than "high intelligence," which is a much broader concept that I suspect excludes narcissism entirely), perhaps it’s a combination of intrapersonal intelligence acting as the "face" and interpersonal intelligence acting as the "mirror." It's as if a certain level of narcissism provides the grip that allows them to hold that mirror steady.

8 - The intelligence of nonsense
9 - The intelligence of waste

There was a time when people thought all of this fell under one umbrella called "excretory intelligence," but later on, dr. Kelly realized that we are actually looking at two fundamentally different types of intelligence.

So... what exactly was the poet trying to get at here???😁
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells RegularOP
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#80 ·
mistymoose57 said:I suspect they’re veering toward depression just because their eyes are finally open... Not that anyone ever sang about how great it is to be clueless.

Man, whoever sang that song about being rich and carefree... hey, he can sing whatever he wants!😁 Anyway, total tangent!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads