#6681 ·
Nicole Barrett76 said:Despite their extensive education, their direct work with people, and their vast experience, psychiatrists can often turn out to be incredibly egotistical individuals driven by a thirst for power; they cling to the notion that their recollection of your session is the only absolute truth, and when you attempt to question why they said or did a specific thing during a previous appointment, the mere act of seeking clarity can inflict profound emotional pain.
I find myself unable to stop ruminating on the words and actions of my ego-driven therapist from our last session, and I am convinced that attempting to seek any explanation for her behavior regarding our recent encounters will only serve to deepen my suffering. Therefore, I believe the most prudent course of action is to sever ties with her without offering any explanation whatsoever.
Furthermore, when one finds oneself expecting a meaningful dialogue with such an egoist—someone whose function is paramount in my life and whose conversation is vital—one might consider secretly recording the interaction and creating a transcription, which could then be password-protected; thus, when I return to them with a question and they claim they never uttered certain words, I could simply present a large-print transcript to them so they may read it easily and immediately, thereby preventing them from hiding behind the excuse of "context."
It sounds Orwellian, does it not, but is it not also utterly terrifying? And precisely because it feels so daunting, I never developed the habit of secretly recording conversations, and now, in light of these circumstances, I feel a deep sense of regret for lacking that precaution.
And yet, psychiatrists still have the audacity to feel victimized, sorrowful, or indignant when they observe a patient cycling through several different doctors over the course of many years.
The truth is, they just don't get it.
Looking at the arguments > makes in his writings, it’s pretty easy to see why they're so lost. > goes even further, calling psychiatry a pseudoscience and arguing that psychiatrists shouldn't even be considered medical doctors.
Personally, I think for severe mental illnesses, you definitely need psychiatry and a psychiatrist. I'd absolutely include > in that category. But running to a psychiatrist for every little thing that crosses your mind? To me, that's nonsense. It's a waste of time for the patients, and it leads to psychiatrists taking on everyone as a patient, which opens the door to corruption, overprescribing meds for things they aren't needed for, and all sorts of other issues.