CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › What counts as "trolling" to you?

What counts as "trolling" to you?

Started by mistyrider7 · · 👁 6 views · 39 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants mistyrider7silentpilot6William Martinez36dustyfox162Nicole JamesHarold Adams5Drew Reed85placidwalker53Taylor Campbell4Donna Ruiz2Harold Turner2crimsonhound80frozenangler9John Thompson872
placidwalker53 placidwalker53 Member
25 messages
joined Aug 2003
#21 ·
Just a little observation of mine; I can't help but feel that our searcher is grappling with certain moral dilemmas, perhaps torn between being the paragon of virtue from a perfectly respectable family or simply loosening the reins a bit to indulge in some imperfection every now and then. We all faced those kinds of internal conflicts toward the end of our adolescence, but sooner or later, one inevitably "gets it out of their system" in one way or another (sooner or later)

I'm just rambling, I suppose
Nicole James Nicole James Regular
313 messages
joined Dec 2010
#22 ·
Alright... let's not dive into a deep technical analysis right now, since the thread starter didn't exactly ask for one...

I just wanted to touch upon that old saying—you know, the one about how "wise people learn from the mistakes of others, while everyone else has to learn from their own."
In my view, that old proverb actually misses the mark sometimes—at least in certain scenarios. Experience and theoretical understanding are two entirely different beasts. It’s why psychologists are constantly pushing for more hands-on, experimental learning in schools rather than just rote memorization of facts. Of course, when "learning through experience" carries the risk of permanent fallout—things like addiction, legal trouble, or losing a "serious partner"—it's much wiser to stick to the theory 🙂
Drew Reed85 Drew Reed85 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2006
#23 ·
Nicole James said:Alright... let's not get bogged down in deep academic analysis right now since the OP didn't ask for one...

I just want to touch on that old saying, "Wise people learn from the mistakes of others, while fools learn from their own."
Honestly? I think that proverb misses the mark this time... at least in certain scenarios. There is a massive gulf between hands-on experience and theoretical understanding. It's exactly why psychologists are always banging on about how schools need more field work and experimental learning instead of just forcing kids to memorize endless facts. But look, when "learning through experience" carries the risk of permanent, life-altering consequences—think addiction, a criminal record, or losing a serious partner—then sticking to the theory is definitely the smarter move. 🙂

Sure, people grasp things best when they go through them personally. But I'm talking about the specific stuff you mentioned earlier—things like addiction, risky sexual behavior, or crime.
I’m not suggesting that experiencing drug abuse or heavy intoxication provides anyone with some profound, positive insight into life or the world. All it really offers is a miserable experience that most intelligent people will go out of their way to never repeat.
placidwalker53 placidwalker53 Member
25 messages
joined Aug 2003
#24 ·
Drew Reed85 said:It stands to reason that one can only truly master a subject by having lived through it personally. I am referring to those other issues you brought up earlier—things like addiction, high-risk sexual behaviors, or criminal activity.
I certainly don't believe that experiencing drug abuse or intoxication provides anyone with profound insights into life or the world, aside from the rather unpleasant lessons that most intelligent people would go out of their way to never repeat.

I find myself in complete disagreement with your assessment. One might experience such vivid hallucinations from a single joint that they actually force a person to view certain aspects of reality through an entirely different lens, which means these moments don't necessarily have to beunpleasant or negative experiences.
Drew Reed85 Drew Reed85 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2006
#25 ·
placidwalker53 said:I totally disagree. A good joint can trigger some incredible hallucinations that actually shift your perspective on things, so they don't necessarily have to beunpleasant or negative experiences

I’m going to have to side against you there. Sure, a decent joint might give you a good laugh, but you can find plenty of other ways to get a good laugh without all that.
Taylor Campbell4 Taylor Campbell4 Regular
369 messages
joined Jul 2009
#26 ·
I read a portion of what mistyrider7 wrote, and I find myself agreeing. This whole idea of "living it up" wouldn't even be a thing if our lives were actually okay—if we were in some kind of balance, for instance. I mean, is everyone supposed to sleep around once just to check a box? That’s nonsense. I say this even though I went through my own phase of "living life to the fullest"—doing things my own way—but I’m still here, or at least, I’m trying to live with both lungs full.

If you look at the semantics of the phrase, everything becomes a bit clearer. It’s like saying you "live it out" for a certain period, and then, once that's done, it's as if you stop living entirely. You "live it all out," and then for you, life is over; there's nothing left but—I don't know, what?

Actually, I recently had a thought about a guy telling a girl—or vice versa—that they aren't ready for a serious relationship because they haven't "lived enough" yet. 😁

I see many people pushing this thesis regarding "experience."

However, that argument is mostly meaningless in this context, because the core of this supposed search for "experience" really boils down to searching for a "feeling of being alive."

The only "experience" one truly gains from all these pursuits is learning that life isn't found there.

Or, perhaps one doesn't gain anything—especially not finding the "source of life"—but simply grows weary of the futile attempts and eventually "settles down."

Most of those experiences are complete nonsense. Is getting wasted and being hungover the next morning really a great "life experience"? Doing stupid things a hundred, two hundred, or a thousand times? Or maybe just five times, for the more intelligent—or rather, wiser—people. 😁

I maintain that I am much more stable now than I would have been if I hadn't gone through those things.

My take is this: If I had been more stable, I wouldn't have spent so much time "living it up" in the first place.

@mistyrider7
For most, however, the cultural factor is vital; if the entire culture is sick, it leads to a frantic searching that usually yields poor results, producing only an initial explosion of misguided seeking, followed by a frequent sense of numbness.

Yes, so I think you're quite right. For example, I always look at—not that I dwell on it constantly, mind you—but I think of young people drinking. Everyone says, "Look how reckless they are," or "Look how they act," acting as if things weren't this way before. The cause lies precisely in the environment, or as you put it, the culture or society.

Education is a mess, completely unsuited to the essence of young people; the family unit is struggling; and honestly, our society as a whole has been pretty much a disaster over the years. And so on. Well, you're looking at this from a more philosophical angle, but there's truth in it. After that misguided search, for the vast majority, comes a state of numbness.
vecomes a sort of stagnation.
Everyone seems to be just trying to survive until tomorrow, moving from one vacation to the next, from one paycheck to the next, working jobs they hate (the result of that misguided search), and so on.

I don't know how many people actually work jobs they love. Maybe 20%, if that. But then again, "loving a job" is a very broad concept.

@EGO
"Wise people learn from the experiences of others; everyone else has to learn from their own."

It’s not just about learning from other people's experiences—it’s specifically about learning from their MISTAKES. That’s the real truth, though such people are incredibly rare, mostly because truly wise individuals aren't exactly common. (And even they weren't always this way—not necessarily in the life they lead now)
Of course, we all progress and grow by overcoming obstacles through experience, and life itself is an ongoing lesson—if I don't veer too far into the esoteric side of things.

But surely we possess discernment—a sense to distinguish right from wrong—so we aren't necessarily condemned to stumble through every single possible experience one by one. Besides, one really ought to differentiate the core essence of an experience from its superficial qualities.

I completely disagree with you. You can have such incredible hallucinations or trips from smoking a joint that they actually force you to view certain things differently—they don't necessarily have to be unpleasant or bad experiences.

Well, you make a fair point—you can certainly have good hallucinations or "trips," and I suppose you could call them pleasant illusions, but those things aren't inherently valuable or desirable on their own.
You won't gain any real insight into reality, yourself, or your surroundings (aside from perhaps recognizing some of your own negative traits—though that’s a whole other complicated issue that just occurred to me)—that's my firm stance. Certainly, anyone using marijuana might feel like they're receiving profound revelations, but objectively speaking, they usually aren't; it's mostly just a heightened *feeling* of having gained insight—it's largely just the "high" talking.
Donna Ruiz2 Donna Ruiz2 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2006
#27 ·
You're a regular genius, a true marvel of nature... 🙂 🙂 🙂
Harold Turner2 Harold Turner2 Member
21 messages
joined Jan 2007
#28 ·
Self-discovery isn't a one-size-fits-all process. Some people hit the ground running with a clear vision and the drive to make it happen, while others spend their entire lives just wandering around trying to find themselves.
So where does that leave me? I’d prefer to be part of that first group, but life isn't always that simple. 🙂
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 Regular
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#29 ·
I honestly don't think people get it... the whole point is to have fun and gain life experience, which helps shift your perspective on things that might otherwise seem terrible.
I really wonder what kind of social lives those who claim "living life to the fullest" isn't necessary actually lead—especially since they've never experienced what happened to a certain relative of mine...
The guy graduated with an architecture degree at 23, maintaining a perfect 4.0 GPA. He didn't even have his diploma in hand before landing a job in his field, and he's become quite a big shot in his profession. But there's a catch... he's currently juggling three different banks, rarely goes out, and has almost no friends. Last summer was the first time he ever went on a beach trip with a group of people (before that, it was just him and his parents), and he spends every New Year's Eve at home. I mean, credit where credit is due regarding his professional success and career 👍 but in every other aspect of life, he's a total wreck. He’s a somewhat extreme example, sure, but there are plenty of others who are slightly less intense yet still, well, "unbalanced"—no offense intended to anyone.
Harold Adams5 Harold Adams5 Active Member
102 messages
joined Feb 2008
#30 ·
Donna Ruiz2 said:Oh yeah, you're a total genius, a true marvel of nature... 🙂 🙂 🙂

Or maybe he just lived too much and aged too fast, kind of like mistyrider7😬
You don't get any real insight without searching
or at least having the guts to weigh the good against the bad.
crimsonhound80 crimsonhound80 Active Member
175 messages
joined Mar 2008
#31 ·
You don't exactly have to eat garbage to realize it tastes like crap, right? 🤣 🤣

I mean, look, Jab might share similar tastes with Harold Adams5, but—honestly—if I could somehow bypass some of the rough patches I've been through, maybe I'd actually be a slightly better version of myself than I am now. 😬 😬
frozenangler9 frozenangler9 Active Member
82 messages
joined Jun 2008
#32 ·
mistyrider7 said:There was a thread on this subforum mentioning a partner who wouldn't be ready for a serious commitment because they haven't "lived enough."

I’ve always found that phrase—and the whole idea that you mature by "living life up"—to be kind of... I guess "interestingly stupid."

Personally, I think "living it up" is just one way to grow up, and honestly, it probably just depends on someone's temperament.

It actually reminds me of how my sons learned to walk.

Standard stuff: healthy kids usually "figure out" how to walk solo around their first birthday—no holding hands—which is just the expected milestone in development.

The kid (my offspring) who was always the calm, quiet type didn't start walking until he was a full year old, but when he did, it was steady—no wobbling, no tripping. Meanwhile, the other one—super high-energy, impatient type—was "walking" independently two months earlier, at 10 months. BUT! His walk was super shaky; he’d trip and fall constantly, only to pop right back up and keep going (mostly 😁 sprinting) without making a big deal out of his balance issues.

In the end, they both walked, and they both hit that same level of steady, confident walking around the same time. One just spent two extra months "finding himself," while the other didn't. 😁 😁 😁

I don't see a massive difference here, and I wouldn't pick one style over the other if I had to. The worst thing you could do is try to stunt someone's growth or force them to "walk" in a way that goes against their nature...

BTW, my calm, cautious son is hitting puberty now. It’s not like there aren't outbursts, but it's nowhere near "wild living"... he's still cruising along slow and steady. 👍

On the flip side, I have a feeling this younger, high-octane kid is going to "live it up" until everything's a mess... watch out for your daughters; he's 9 now, but give him maybe four years... yikes. 😬
I don't really see what I could even do to channel all that intense (and often unexpressed) energy...
mistyrider7 mistyrider7 MemberOP
30 messages
joined May 2006
#33 ·
frozenangler9 said:I don't see a major difference, and I wouldn't pick either of those maturation styles. The worst thing would be stifling someone while they're still "learning to walk"—forcing them to act against their own nature...

The Analaogija here is way too simplistic.

Mainly because "living life" isn't just about learning from mistakes—which is what this thread seems to suggest.

It’s more of a specific phenomenon involving a longing for "life", where "life" is fundamentally misunderstood and misplaced during those formative years. It leaves these lingering traces that resurface when most people hit that stage of burnout or total numbness—and honestly, the idea that it's just due to a boring routine? Probably misses the mark.
People like that usually end up daydreaming about the "good old days" of their youth when they felt alive, which just proves they haven't learned a thing—they still think life is back where they failed to find it.
It feels especially pathetic when people in their later years try to desperately recreate that same period of "living."
frozenangler9 frozenangler9 Active Member
82 messages
joined Jun 2008
#34 ·
mistyrider7 said:That analogy is way too simplistic—honestly, maybe even a bit reductive.

And that's because actually living through something is a whole different beast than just learning from mistakes—which is basically what people here are suggesting.

It’s this weird, specific thing—kind of a niche phenomenon—that involves... That whole craving for "life"... I don't know. It’s like this constant, restless itch—this feeling that you're just waiting around for something real to actually start. Maybe it's just burnout, or maybe we're all just chasing some phantom version of happiness that doesn't even exist. I guess people call it "living," but most days it feels more like just surviving the grind. Just an observation.Look, life is basically just one big design flaw—it’s misconfigured from the jump. Everything starts being set in stone during those formative years when you're still figuring things out. That’s when the real damage happens, I guess. It leaves these permanent marks that follow you straight into adulthood, especially once those core patterns start hitting harder.
Populations aren't just getting tired—they're hitting a state of total, genuine stagnation. And honestly? Anyone claiming this is just because life has become too routine is barking up the wrong tree.
Those guys mostly just sit around dreaming about the "good old days" from when they were out living it up—which basically proves they haven't learned a damn thing. They still think life is back then, in all those places where they failed to actually find it. I guess.

I guess walking could be seen as a pretty stellar example—of physical activity, anyway.😉 People want more out of life—but crashing because you tried too hard, too soon? That’s not exactly a "learning experience." It’s not like you didn't know better. It's more about having immature motor skills or just being physically unready for the grind. I guess it's less about ignorance and more about just not being developed enough yet. Maybe.

I don't think you're really hitting the mark here—trying to pit "living life to the fullest" against "just existing" like they have some kind of moral hierarchy... I guess it's a bit of a stretch.
frozenangler9 frozenangler9 Active Member
82 messages
joined Jun 2008
#35 ·
mistyrider7 said:People like that usually just spend their time daydreaming about the "glory days" of their youth when they were actually living life—which just proves they haven't learned a damn thing, since they still think life is somewhere out there where they failed to find it.
It’s especially pathetic when those types try to desperately recreate that same lifestyle once they hit old age.

I think there's plenty of people who dream about their youth, but they're mostly just regretting how they didn't actually live it... even though deep down, that's what they wanted all along. 😉

Then, right as they're hitting old age, it finally clicks—they realize they spent their whole lives living by someone else's playbook (socially forced stuff that didn't fit who they really are) and suddenly, at the last minute, they actually want to start living for themselves.

That's my take, anyway.

The ones who actually lived it back in the day? They don't have these issues. They were always being true to themselves and have nothing to regret. (Trust me, I know. 🙂 )
John Thompson872 John Thompson872 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Nov 2006
#36 ·
It brings up another question, though—how do you actually know if you’ve "lived"? And does that feeling of truly living ever actually stop? There isn't really a set definition for it, is there? For me, I feel like I've definitely lived my life when it comes to the nightlife scene—hitting the bars, drinking too much, chasing after women, and all those other typical guy things. But then again, there are certain experiences I haven't checked off yet. I always had this deep desire to get into extreme sports, but between the cost and just never having the time, it never happened—and now, I sometimes wonder if it might be too late. I guess what I'm getting at is that at some point, everyone either lives life on their own terms or they miss out. And even when you think you've finally done it all, you can never be quite sure when that next itch will strike or when you'll suddenly crave a completely different way to feel alive.
mistyrider7 mistyrider7 MemberOP
30 messages
joined May 2006
#37 ·
frozenangler9 said:I think there's plenty of people out there dreaming about their younger years—mostly just regretting how they didn't really go for it, even though they wanted to deep down. 😉

Then, once you hit that stage where aging starts feeling real, you suddenly realize you've spent your whole life playing by someone else's rules—you know, those social expectations that never actually fit who you are—and you finally get this sudden urge to actually start living for yourself.

There probably are people like that.
But if you actually stop to think about it (😉 ), it doesn't really change anything I said.
frozenangler9 frozenangler9 Active Member
82 messages
joined Jun 2008
#38 ·
Daft Punk said:I feel like society is constantly pushing this idea that I have to "live life to the fullest," but honestly, I'm totally fine without all the adrenaline rushes.😕

Look, the bottom line is you gotta listen to your own gut, regardless of what everyone else expects from you.

Not that I'm out here advocating for anything illegal or crazy—don't want to get that twisted... 😉
mistyrider7 mistyrider7 MemberOP
30 messages
joined May 2006
#39 ·
Taylor Swift said:Look, the whole point is you've gotta listen to your own inner voice—regardless of what society expects from you.

Ugh, yeah—that awful society that’s always trying to dictate how we miserable people should live our lives.

Can't even vent in peace anymore, I guess...😠
frozenangler9 frozenangler9 Active Member
82 messages
joined Jun 2008
#40 ·
Indiana Jones said:Ugh, just that awful crowd constantly trying to dictate how we losers should live our lives.

Can't even blow off some steam in peace...😠

Look, we all know society makes plenty of baseless demands to crush people. 😬

Taking it out on other people (or their stuff 😁) is obviously a no-go, but just "venting" by wasting your own damn energy—which happens a ton when you're young, I guess—why should anyone actually care?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads