#201 ·
I’ve got everything filed away perfectly—a whole folder packed with appeals, court rulings, stays, and suspensions
Here’s the breakdown:
The car accident happened on September 26, 2002—I was 100% at fault.
The police filed for a citation, and then on March 18, 2003, the municipal court issued a citation finding me guilty of the accident, ordering me to pay $233, plus $104 costs, along with a six-month license suspension—unless (on probation) I stay clean for a year, plus 4 points on my record.
First legal remedy: filing an objection within 8 days. And I just noticed it says here: if you're only contesting the fine amount or the costs, the appellate court decides that. If I pay, I waive the right to object.
So, I filed an objection. But I wasn't fighting the verdict itself—I admitted I was at fault—I just argued that the punishment was insane—one year of probation and 4 points? I’ve never even had a formal ticket before! Based on those legal procedures, this should have gone straight to the appellate court.
But then, on June 9, 2004, they call me down to the municipal court, where I retold the whole story, and the judge ended up dropping the fine to $183 and reducing it to 2 points—no probation and no license suspension.
Next step: appealing to the appellate court within eight days.
Get this—that ruling came out three and a half months before the statute of limitations expired and right before the summer judicial recess.
I appealed to the appellate court, still not denying the verdict since I *was* guilty, but arguing the fine was way too high, $183
I never received a response, and they never even recorded the points on my file.
Simple as that.
Long live our justice system.
And?
You just filed an objection to a citation—which is exactly what we tell the OP to do.
As far as I know, citations like this are relatively new—since the updated traffic laws kicked in back in late 2002, the police can issue them directly.
I don't get it—why are you lecturing the OP about how to use legal remedies (like filing an objection) when you used every single legal loophole available whenever you had the chance? 😕 You're being totally contradictory.☕
Here’s the breakdown:
The car accident happened on September 26, 2002—I was 100% at fault.
The police filed for a citation, and then on March 18, 2003, the municipal court issued a citation finding me guilty of the accident, ordering me to pay $233, plus $104 costs, along with a six-month license suspension—unless (on probation) I stay clean for a year, plus 4 points on my record.
First legal remedy: filing an objection within 8 days. And I just noticed it says here: if you're only contesting the fine amount or the costs, the appellate court decides that. If I pay, I waive the right to object.
So, I filed an objection. But I wasn't fighting the verdict itself—I admitted I was at fault—I just argued that the punishment was insane—one year of probation and 4 points? I’ve never even had a formal ticket before! Based on those legal procedures, this should have gone straight to the appellate court.
But then, on June 9, 2004, they call me down to the municipal court, where I retold the whole story, and the judge ended up dropping the fine to $183 and reducing it to 2 points—no probation and no license suspension.
Next step: appealing to the appellate court within eight days.
Get this—that ruling came out three and a half months before the statute of limitations expired and right before the summer judicial recess.
I appealed to the appellate court, still not denying the verdict since I *was* guilty, but arguing the fine was way too high, $183
I never received a response, and they never even recorded the points on my file.
Simple as that.
Long live our justice system.
And?
You just filed an objection to a citation—which is exactly what we tell the OP to do.
As far as I know, citations like this are relatively new—since the updated traffic laws kicked in back in late 2002, the police can issue them directly.
I don't get it—why are you lecturing the OP about how to use legal remedies (like filing an objection) when you used every single legal loophole available whenever you had the chance? 😕 You're being totally contradictory.☕