CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Math, baklava, and the self-proclaimed experts

Math, baklava, and the self-proclaimed experts

Started by swiftcobra15 · · 👁 8 views · 68 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants swiftcobra15AJonathan Brooks8Nathan Rodriguez97Rachel BishopHarold James9mistyfox812Hannah EdwardsCasey Perez3granitemason16mistyscout2ruggedfalcon2Jason Johnson4crimsonhound80Justin Watson58Jessica Long2rustymaker5
Harold James9 Harold James9 Active Member
76 messages
joined Mar 2008
#21 ·
guest said:...
Who would wait for another lifetime just to try and grasp the concentrated power of something as small and fragile as a single piece of baklava.

🙂 I get the feeling my thoughts aren't being followed by anyone or anything at all. 😁

So, you're looking for things on this forum that simply can't be found here. We are all so different that we could never actually gather in the real world. Even if someone managed to bring us together, we’d scatter to opposite ends of the country in an instant. Our one common trait is that we are all seekers by nature.

Pandora, a top-tier writer, brightens my day with every post through her effortless way of presenting even the most complex ideas;

planinar, an artist of wit, doesn't tire me out with questions like what the author intended to say ;

obelix, adriatik,nitko i ništa, intellectuals with a healthy desire to share knowledge with others;

geza, a lantern-carrying seeker who neglected teaching and now grumbles about having no followers;

and the rest of us, just nagging and questioning. 😁

You wonder why we are even here? Why don't we just drift apart?

Well, much like planinar, I am just playing a game. I feel most comfortable when I am playing. As for what I expect? I simply hope that one of these "baklavas" (to use a metaphor) will trigger a lightbulb moment that solves my daily life problems.

Believe it or not, it happens. 🙂

🙂 🙂 🙂
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#22 ·
BlueWater said:Well, obviously. But you know how it goes—sometimes people try to pass off cheap knockoffs as high-end gourmet stuff.😉

Yeah, tell me about it... 🙂 I'm actually copying this recipe because it looks a step up from the one I usually make.
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#23 ·
While you guys were busy having this deep, meaningful dialogue 🙂, I was just over here by myself (not in the best way lol) typing up this massive, mile-long lecture 🙂 which you can actually go check out in that new thread I just started.
I mean, if those "higher forms of matrix consciousness" (or whatever you want to call them) are actually working, then it makes sense that I spent my solo time rambling about the exact same stuff you all are discussing right here.
Catch ya later. 🙂
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#24 ·
Take some finely ground philosophers and mix them with coarsely chopped sophists. Make sure you keep them in two separate bowls, adding just enough sugar to each according to your preference. Then, start layering the dough sheet by sheet, ensuring you space them out at least three layers apart to keep the flavor and texture perfectly balanced. Bake it under the direct sun. If the weather isn't cooperating, just use the lowest setting on your oven—you don't want to burn it. It’s actually better to just let it slow-dry.
Once it’s dried out completely, slice it up properly and pour over your glaze... honestly, there’s no secret recipe here!

When it comes to food, you're having a blast right up until you bite into a stray shell. 🙂
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#25 ·
Maybe toss in a few more grapes too, just to make it...🙂
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#26 ·
nobody says anything:
If you added a few grapes in there, it would be perfect...🙂

Man, that little smiley face holding a spoon totally cracked me up—it’s impossible to resist. Here you go, one just for you, plus some grapes. 🙂
Harold James9 Harold James9 Active Member
76 messages
joined Mar 2008
#27 ·
guest said:... That’s exactly why those specific qualities push me toward maximizing utility—for us and everyone else. It's because people like this can't just gather in real life, and even if they did, it wouldn't last long enough to finish the job. This is the only way. Rejecting every single proposal just to play devil's advocate isn't logic; it's just an instinctive reflex to oppose whatever someone else thinks. Why all the resistance?

...

Why the resistance?🙂 I don't see how solving the matrix helps anything. What would we actually gain by cracking the code of the human matrix? If anything, we'd lose everything, and humanity itself would be the biggest loser. We’d discover the limits of consciousness and kill the drive to seek out good, which is essentially what self-actualization is. Philosophy would become obsolete overnight. Engineers would simply build a machine that spits out the answers to everything we should be spending years learning through deep thought—our entire conscious boundary.
I have no interest in discussing the "utility" a government agency might find in mapping the matrices of its citizens. 😱

It would be evil. Look, quest, my only focus is happiness and doing good.

🙂 🙂 🙂

P.S. The escape from the matrix traps is found within the game. 👍
swiftcobra15 swiftcobra15 RegularOP
305 messages
joined Dec 2002
#28 ·
Harold James9 said:.... my only true focus is happiness and doing good.

P.S. There’s always an exit strategy... if you play the game right. 👍

Now, you're talking!

We once gave our species a rather lofty title—"Homo sapiens sapiens." Personally, I think we haven't quite earned such a dignified label yet.

Back in the last century, some thinkers tried to rebrand us as "Homo Faber," which might be more accurate, though I'm not a huge fan of that either.
(parac Miha domina quia Dalmata sum!) 😁

I honestly believe our most permanent and truthful definition is actually:
HOMO LUDENS

🙂 🙂 🙂

Let us rejoice... for all eternity... 😉
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#29 ·
"A thing isn't just a collection of its traits. Like, raisins are part of a cookie, right? We say there are raisins *in* the cookie or it's a raisin cookie. But at the end of the day, those raisins *are* the cookie too. They're part of the whole. And honestly? You’re just as much a part of whatever you make up."

J. Edgar Hoover, Encyclopedia Nullified,
entry for 'absence'
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#30 ·
nobody and nothing said:J. Edgar Hoover, Encyclopedia Nullified,
the entry for 'absence'

🙂 Or take a person, for instance. You list their attributes—arms, legs, head, and so on. Even if you strip all of that away, something still remains. That something is absence.
swiftcobra15 swiftcobra15 RegularOP
305 messages
joined Dec 2002
#31 ·
MISTYFOX812:

The concept of nothingness has always been an absolute certainty to me. Since "nothing" requires no physical structure or substance, its causality becomes a moot point. It simply exists as both its own cause and its own effect.

much like within "General Electric"

A Monad is infinitely smaller than even an atom or the core of a nucleus. It’s barely a trace on the precipice of the void. Think of the Monad as the final sentry guarding the edge of an internal singularity. It is essentially General Electric. It represents the only part of existence where there is almost absolutely nothing left. 🤔

Zvonimir Balog: BRIGHT STAR, New York 97 😉
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#32 ·
Monad is basically just a game for nobody and nothing. 😵
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#33 ·
The philosophy subforum has become an endless loop of the exact same thing.
I mean, seriously, shake things up a bit. Break some stereotypes, inject some fresh energy or life into the discussions—it’s all getting so repetitive... I’m no chef, but even when I’m just browsing recipes here, I can tell when something is stale. Lately, I'll see a recipe for something classic like apple pie and think, "Yeah, not really feeling that today," and just toss the predictable recipe aside.

sig:
Let anyone who hasn't actually tasted a real apple pie keep their mouth shut!
Jonathan Brooks8 Jonathan Brooks8 Active Member
233 messages
joined Feb 2007
#34 ·
Don’t even mention mountain air—I’m trying to stay dry here...
And as for this subforum—well, you get what you pay for with the crowd here.
swiftcobra15 swiftcobra15 RegularOP
305 messages
joined Dec 2002
#35 ·
viviana said:Anyone who hasn't tasted real baklava shouldn't be talking!

Honestly, we should probably ditch the baklava—it's just a sugar bomb—and switch to a cleaner diet. I truly believe eating well leads to clearer thinking.😉

It’s like that old saying: those who sing too loud haven't had their fill of sweets.😁
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#36 ·
Alright, let's get back to the romance! And hey, just a thought—maybe we could throw in some singing during our philosophy seminars.

p.s. quick question: what’s a philosopher supposed to do when a sugar rush leads to a massive toothache?
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#37 ·
Honestly, 😉 we make all these massive life decisions without having nearly enough data to back them up. Then, we just end up standing there, completely blindsided by our own choices, wondering how we managed to screw things up yet again. 😁
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#38 ·
Sorry if I killed the vibe—I just got back from a political rally, and honestly, I didn't mean to hijack the conversation. Please, keep going 😢 😉
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#39 ·
Action 2 said:Sorry, I just got back from a political rally, but honestly, I wasn't trying to kill the conversation. Please, keep going! 😢 😉

Hey, Action 2, 🙂 don't you dare leave! This thread was basically dead anyway; I just gave it a little nudge because I was actually happy to see you chime in. I think everyone else here feels the same way. 🙂 As for killing the vibe, I always thought I was the only Kill Bill around here, so I try to be pretty careful with my weapons—mostly just my sarcastic wit... 🙂

Come on, let's keep this moving...

That data is a complete mystery to me too. It’s like people just vanish into thin air right when a big decision needs to be made. Honestly, I think they're just cowards who are terrified of being held accountable.
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#40 ·
viviana said:Come on, let's just stay on topic here...

That data is just as much of a mystery to me too. I honestly have no clue where they vanish to right when we need to make a critical decision. It feels like they're just cowards, plain and simple. They’re terrified of being held accountable.


😉 thanks🙂

Regarding relevance—I think we're okay if we just accept that we aren't in control of everything. We're never going to have all the facts. Even so, you have to move forward.

We can never truly predict how that one little ingredient we tossed into the batter is going to react later on...

And maybe life is just this chaotic space where we try to force meaning onto things, failing to realize that the only battles that actually matter are the ones we fight within ourselves. 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads