CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Math, baklava, and the self-proclaimed experts

Math, baklava, and the self-proclaimed experts

Started by swiftcobra15 · · 👁 6 views · 68 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants swiftcobra15AJonathan Brooks8Nathan Rodriguez97Rachel BishopHarold James9mistyfox812Hannah EdwardsCasey Perez3granitemason16mistyscout2ruggedfalcon2Jason Johnson4crimsonhound80Justin Watson58Jessica Long2rustymaker5
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#41 ·
Hannah Edwards said:When it comes to relevance—I honestly think it’s fine if we just accept that we aren't in control of everything (and let's face it, we'll never have the full picture). We just have to keep moving forward regardless,

Yeah, I find myself wondering all the time how I ever thought the way I did, or why I made choices back then that I wouldn't dream of making today. But at the same time, I know it had to happen that way; I simply wasn't capable of seeing things differently at the time (honestly, life just threw me a curveball 🙂). What if I could have somehow sent a letter from this distant future back to my younger self? I'd tell her, "Don't be crazy, don't even think about it..."

Best,

The one who keeps popping up in your life.
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#42 ·
I sometimes find myself daydreaming about everything working out exactly the way it should. I love the idea of parallel universes existing out there—places where I slip away whenever I’m struggling to make a choice or feeling indecisive 😁

It feels like we have this incredible amount of freedom to do whatever we want. We just have to be ready to own the consequences 😉
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#43 ·
Hannah Edwards said:I honestly feel like we’re incredibly free to do whatever we want. We just have to be ready to deal with the fallout 😉

Exactly—that’s the whole catch! It's all about those consequences. 🙂

p.s. if you're an art lover, there's a thread over here that's pretty much a ghost town... consider this your official invitation to go check it out. 🙂
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#44 ·
Sure, those little setbacks—they really wake us up. Because it’s only when we feel them grinding under our teeth that we get this tiny window to actually... well, figure out what's going on...🤔? Nothing, right 😉

But that’s exactly the point. Since we're essentially flying blind, and since those little bumps in the road are both painful and surprisingly helpful, we have to learn to just accept them. You just have to say, "Eh, it's not my first rodeo," and bite down with a massive grin.😁

P.S. I'm heading over to check out that thread now. Thanks for the heads-up. I am completely fed up with politics; I've had my fill of those kinds of headaches 😁.
Right now, I'm just looking for some fresh cheesecake 👋
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#45 ·
... I couldn't help but laugh at that smiley above... 🙂
I read somewhere today that "looking back is a lie." I think it’s that idea that we’re constantly living our own truths, which eventually evolve into entirely new realizations. When you look back, those old versions of yourself feel fake, but they weren't—because without them, you wouldn't be who you are right now.
Anyway, I don't want to overthink this. This should be a chill conversation, not some heavy philosophical debate that leaves us all feeling exhausted. 🙂

p.s. Besides, what would life even be without our mistakes? They’re basically the fuel that drives us to act and fix things, and honestly, that’s often where the best creativity comes from. A friend of mine always says everything happens for a reason—nothing is just a coincidence. 🙂
Hannah Edwards Hannah Edwards Active Member
111 messages
joined Sep 2006
#46 ·
viviana said:... .. a friend of mine always says everything happens for a reason—nothing is just a coincidence... 🙂


👍

I find myself caught in this loop, swinging between two ideas. On one hand, I get stuck thinking that we don't control anything at all. If there's zero control, then maybe things don't need a grand purpose either. Since nobody is actually at the wheel, whatever happens simply happens. It's just an occurrence, not some cosmic design.
On the other hand, I drift toward the idea that everything does, indeed, have a reason.

I’ll admit, that second thought feels much more comforting when I’m the one making a mistake. But once reality hits and I'm dealing with the fallout? Then I tend to lean back toward that first perspective. 😁
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#47 ·
Hannah Edwards said:I catch myself spiraling between two different ideas: a) the notion that we aren't in control of anything at all, which means things don't necessarily need a deep reason behind them—since nobody's pulling the strings, whatever happens just happens, no grand design required.
b) the opposite idea—that everything happens for a reason.

I’ll admit, I lean toward that second thought when things go my way, but the moment life hits me where it hurts, I find myself retreating into that first mindset.😁

Exactly. We tend to label the things that happen against our will as "fate," while we love to take full credit for all the wins and beautiful moments that actually come our way.🙂

Personally, I lean toward believing everything has a purpose, mainly because I think a failure doesn't have to be a total loss. It’s up to us to take that setback—using it as the catalyst to keep moving—and turn it into something positive that might never have even happened without that initial bump in the road.

Right? 🙂 Got any more of those little Quote : currants...? 🙂
Casey Perez3 Casey Perez3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2005
#48 ·
Check this out:
Instructions on how to trigger that sickening wave of nausea found in Sartre's existentialism.
What you'll need:
- a swivel chair, preferably without armrests
- coffee (instant or brewed, doesn't matter—as long as there's caffeine)
- an empty apartment to run the experiment in
- two days of your life
The process: To make this work, you gotta be alone in your space for at least two days, not eating (well, I guess you can eat a tiny bit just so you don't actually die, but keep it minimal), and only drinking coffee. You shouldn't do anything else during this time, because if you do, you basically become whatever you're doing. On the afternoon of the second day, sit in the chair and start spinning with your eyes closed, keeping your hands up in the air in some kind of comfortable position. Just spin with your feet for a really long time, until you genuinely feel super, super nauseous.
How many of you are crazy enough to try this? (Uh, well... yeah... I actually did follow the instructions myself.)😁
Maybe it's not funny, but at least it’s pointless and not a waste of time.😁
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#49 ·
Casey Perez3, you’re dangerous. 🙂

Honestly, just reading this makes me feel nauseous—like my stomach is spinning in circles while being completely empty. There’s nothing left to swallow here except pure soul!

@ Hannah Edwards, don't be sad. Come over here and let's grab something sweet. 🙂

p.s. And for everyone else, here’s a little wisdom from a philosopher. 🙂 There isn't anything worth eating there anyway.
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#50 ·
Since everyone on this thread decided that currants are somehow the ultimate philosophical mystery, I keep running into them in every philosophy book I pick up. Here’s another one, this time from Wittgenstein's leftovers (1948):

Currants might be the best part of a cake; but a bag of currants isn't any better than the cake itself. And even if someone hands you a whole bag of currants, they still haven't baked you a cake, let alone anything better.

And a cake? That definitely isn't just a bunch of watered-down currants.
granitemason16 granitemason16 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2006
#51 ·
The ancient Greek philosopher Tales once argued that everything in existence was fundamentally made of water. While we obviously know that's not scientifically accurate today, I can't help but suspect the guy might have been on something 🙂 — because, honestly, 🙂 🙂 I mean, how on earth does an idea like that even occur to someone 🙂

I won't bore you all with my own theories on the ideal state, my personal moral code, or my disagreements with Kant's categorical imperative. Instead, I want to pose one simple philosophical question: what is the true substance of bread?

I realize most of you here subscribe to various different schools of thought, so I'm really hoping this thread sparks a constructive discussion. Hopefully, we can learn a bit more about each other's perspectives and, ultimately, discover something new about ourselves along the way 🙂
Jonathan Brooks8 Jonathan Brooks8 Active Member
233 messages
joined Feb 2007
#52 ·
Bread is nothing more than a blend of hunger and patience.😉
mistyscout2 mistyscout2 Active Member
197 messages
joined Feb 2007
#53 ·
I honestly think Glad is the absolute best cook out there. 😁
ruggedfalcon2 ruggedfalcon2 Active Member
64 messages
joined Jun 2005
#54 ·
granitemason16 said:I’m going to pose one simple philosophical question to you all: what is the substance of bread?

I know most of you here follow different schools of thought, so I'm hoping this thread sparks some constructive discussion—one where we might learn a bit about each other, and ultimately... ourselves. 🙂

It consists of four substances, not just one...😉
Jason Johnson4 Jason Johnson4 Active Member
130 messages
joined Dec 2003
#55 ·
ruggedfalcon2 said:it actually takes four different ingredients, not just one 😉

Flour, salt, water, and yeast 🤣
mistyscout2 mistyscout2 Active Member
197 messages
joined Feb 2007
#56 ·
So now we’re getting to the real question: which kind of Flour are we actually talking about here? 😉

Are we looking at corn, wheat, oat, barley, or something else entirely? 😁
Jonathan Brooks8 Jonathan Brooks8 Active Member
233 messages
joined Feb 2007
#57 ·
mistyscout2 said:But the real question is—which flour are we actually talking about? 😉

Corn, wheat, oat, barley, and so on... 😁

I mean, if it’s corn, is it GMO or organic? Is it white or yellow? Is it Mexican or maybe some local brand from the Midwest... Honestly, do you even have any bread at all?
crimsonhound80 crimsonhound80 Active Member
175 messages
joined Mar 2008
#58 ·
Hey there, fellow philosopher 😬 over here
.
You haven't really clarified things—do you mean we're looking at this through a scientific-materialist lens regarding the actual substance of the bread, or is it more of an idealistic 🙄 😬 😬 😬 😬 😬
approach? I guess it depends on how one views the essence of reality itself... maybe?
Justin Watson58 Justin Watson58 Member
25 messages
joined Oct 2006
#59 ·
...who cares what you think
you can throw stones at him all day...
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#60 ·
Druid said:They’re easily the best chef in the business. 😁

Hunger? That’s just the essence of bread.

The absence of hunger? That’s what love feels like. 😉

It sounds like a contradiction, yet they’re perfectly woven together. 😉

And honestly, even without the caviar, it still hits the spot...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads