#41 ·
Could you provide a more detailed explanation as to why we should be avoiding them altogether?
Started by Walter Garcia6 · · 👁 10 views · 182 replies
Chloe Richardson76 said:Could you provide a more detailed explanation as to why we should be avoiding them altogether?
Walter Perez2 said:So, I was thinking... does anyone here actually have experience with those sketchy ads for car loans? You know the ones, where they offer you cash for your ride but let you keep driving it? Apparently, they make you sign some kind of sales contract where you technically sell them the car, then they give you power of attorney so you can still use it. But get this—they only pay you like a third of what the car is actually worth. Then, once you pay everything back (which usually ends up being more than you originally owed), the car is supposedly yours again. I don't know, sounds a bit fishy to me. Is that just straight-up loan shark stuff, or is there actually some legal way they pull that off?
Kimberly Nguyen said:After everything that’s been dragged through the mud and reported all over the news lately... I honestly cannot wrap my head around the people who still have the nerve to ask if those predatory loans—you know, the sketchy ones you see plastered on telephone poles or tucked away in some random Craigslist ad—are actually "okay."
Look, maybe I’m just being dense here, but I am truly struggling to grasp the logic.
vividbear12 said:Most of those ads aren't even about old-school loan sharks; they just use more subtle marketing tactics. It’s mostly credit card debt stuff like Vojtek mentioned, or those people acting as "facilitators" who are actually just selling life insurance policies. Some big banks use those policies as collateral instead of traditional guarantors. I guess it's all perfectly legal—insurance companies sell through brokers for a commission, and the bank approves your loan based on that policy. You just end up paying for both the loan and the insurance in the end.