Enchantress said:Sedmica says:
Jung claims joga isn't really suited for us Americans. Our unconscious works differently. He suggests we reach some semblance of balance by age 35... after that, joga often becomes a refuge for neurotics trying to fix their problems the wrong way.
Jung basically hopes we all find some stability by 35. After that, it gets harder. He’s speaking from experience, really. It means finding a center, a direction, before that threshold hits.
And what isn't a refuge for neurotics? Who isn't neurotic? Show me one person who isn't—socially or individually conditioned by their unconscious. It's just human nature to hold onto the good stuff and suppress the pain when we can't process it. Everyone does it, especially in those first five years. Then comes more socialization, more conditioning, more repression. It's standard psych mechanics. A "normal" psyche is a neurotic one. That's not inherently bad. The issue only arises when we notice our actions or behaviors—internal or external—just aren't clicking.
Jung actually addressed the pros and cons of Eastern spiritual practices by observing universal symbols and introducing the "middle way" into Western psychology. You can only find the answer yourself. If you practice meditative techniques, you'll start seeing those universal symbols, from the Navaj to the culture of Mohenjatdar. Once you see that universality within ourselves, the question of whether Eastern techniques are "beneficial" stops being relevant. Instead, the focus shifts to how to integrate them into an American lifestyle to improve our quality of life.
Best, 🙂
p.s. Jung was a bit wary of joga and tried to fit it into his own theory, which differs slightly from actual joga. But hey, you're entitled to your own interpretation and way of living. 🙂 Jung is a massive influence on me, but I don't follow him blindly. I don't take anything from his theories for granted. Everything, really, has to be understood through personal experience.