CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Political Scene › Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4

Eric Adams - Mayor of New York City, Part 4

Started by Robin Jones2 · · 👁 74 views · 1.3K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Robin Jones2Adam Diaz67vividraven79Sam Wright21darkhawk30Jeffrey LongdriftingtinkerKevin Harris93Scott Peterson172Jose Campbell2Rachel Barrett8Gregory Hall66Alex Roberts4electricdriver33hollowmason64dustymarlin10swiftmaker12Amanda Hughes37Richard Wilson4Charles Carter4bluelynx8Scott Perez57steelfox98Melissa Bailey5 …
neonpuma30 neonpuma30 Member
43 messages
joined Aug 2020
#741 ·
I honestly thought people would speak up, but I'm totally baffled that nobody’s raising hell about saving our green spaces from all this aggressive concrete jungle madness.

It feels like we're just stuck with Bloomberg’s old playbook, letting them ruin perfectly good neighborhoods by cramming in new concrete slabs where they absolutely don't belong.👎

Seriously though, does anyone actually think our current infrastructure can handle this? No wonder the sewers always smell and finding a parking spot in this city is a total nightmare.👎
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#742 ·
neonpuma30 said:I honestly thought people would speak up, but I'm totally baffled that nobody’s raising hell about saving our green spaces from all this aggressive concrete jungle madness.

It feels like we're just stuck with Bloomberg’s old playbook, letting them ruin perfectly good neighborhoods by cramming in new concrete slabs where they absolutely don't belong.👎

Seriously though, does anyone actually think our current infrastructure can handle this? No wonder the sewers always smell and finding a parking spot in this city is a total nightmare.👎

https://www.chicago.info/aktualno/zg-...-nista/398916/

All of this is just what the Whistleblower is putting out there.
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#743 ·
Absolutely. It just remains a mystery why, after all this legacy talk, we aren't already seeing the follow-through on the specific path we selected to drive real change.
brightpuma brightpuma Active Member
128 messages
joined Jun 2024
#744 ·
Sam Wright21 said:Absolutely. It just remains a mystery why, after all this legacy talk, we aren't already seeing the follow-through on the specific path we selected to drive real change.

And what was the alternative? Privatizing everything? Now that would be something people actually cheered for. 😬

Man, how do you come up with this kind of nonsense? 🙄
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#745 ·
brightpuma said:And what was the alternative? Privatizing everything? Now that would be something people actually cheered for. 😬

Man, how do you come up with this kind of nonsense? 🙄

Really?

Care to elaborate?

The owners want to sell off their holdings, plain and simple, and Eric Adams knew that the moment he started playing nice with the local council.

Look, eminent domain is always an option on the table, but it isn't strictly necessary here.

Just wait until you see the cheap, low-quality housing developments popping up all over the city, much like they did during the old era of urban decay.

Eric Adams made his promises to the council...
neonpuma30 neonpuma30 Member
43 messages
joined Aug 2020
#746 ·
brightpuma said:And what was the alternative? Privatizing everything? Now that would be something people actually cheered for. 😬

Man, how do you come up with this kind of nonsense? 🙄

Wait, hold up—don't you realize a property owner can't just drop a 100-story skyscraper in the middle of the city whenever they feel like it?😲

Zoning laws and stuff like that exist for a reason.🍿
Gregory Hall66 Gregory Hall66 Active Member
70 messages
joined May 2024
#747 ·
driftingtinker said:https://www.chicago.info/aktualno/zg-...-nista/398916/

All of this is just what the Whistleblower is putting out there.

But for how much longer? Will we still be dealing with this in the year 2493? Does this "snitch complex" ever truly reach its conclusion? I find myself unable to even begin to grasp the depth of it. They are essentially third-tier players with the looming prospect of becoming fourth-tier.

Is there no end to these endless excuses? This entire crew of Smurfs working alongside Disney is utterly incompetent and intellectually... well, shall we say, limited.

Is it really such an insurmountable struggle to simply accept—or perhaps, to acknowledge—the truth?
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#748 ·
Well, what can you really do? It seems to be hardwired into the human psyche to cling to hope, even when it feels misplaced. We’ll inevitably find ourselves back out on the streets, protesting once again.
Gregory Hall66 Gregory Hall66 Active Member
70 messages
joined May 2024
#749 ·
Sam Wright21 said:Well, what can you really do? It seems to be hardwired into the human psyche to cling to hope, even when it feels misplaced. We’ll inevitably find ourselves back out on the streets, protesting once again.

Post the link again
Gary Booth6 Gary Booth6 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2022
#750 ·
Look, Adams is actually a solid guy, he really is, it’s just that he doesn't have anyone in his corner who actually knows how to get things done... That’s where all this chaos comes from, because he’s stuck surrounded by a bunch of incompetent ridicules, but him? He’s good, honestly even great.
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#751 ·
neonpuma30 said:Wait, hold up—don't you realize a property owner can't just drop a 100-story skyscraper in the middle of the city whenever they feel like it?😲

Zoning laws and stuff like that exist for a reason.🍿

Look at the zoning regulations for up Šimunski. We're talking low-rise buildings here. How can you even suggest otherwise? These zoning codes are the law of the land; you basically can't fight against them if you want to stay legal.
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#752 ·
Gregory Hall66 said:Post the link again


I can't. It was deleted.

We’ll just have to take to the streets and protest against this old-school machine politics.
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#753 ·
Gary Booth6 said:Look, Adams is actually a solid guy, he really is, it’s just that he doesn't have anyone in his corner who actually knows how to get things done... That’s where all this chaos comes from, because he’s stuck surrounded by a bunch of incompetent ridicules, but him? He’s good, honestly even great.

I am absolutely thrilled about how things are playing out.
Gregory Hall66 Gregory Hall66 Active Member
70 messages
joined May 2024
#754 ·
Gary Booth6 said:Look, Adams is actually a solid guy, he really is, it’s just that he doesn't have anyone in his corner who actually knows how to get things done... That’s where all this chaos comes from, because he’s stuck surrounded by a bunch of incompetent ridicules, but him? He’s good, honestly even great.

No offense intended.

I find myself wondering if Disney is even permitted to have thoughts at all.
Not just today, mind you, but for the last decade or so. Perhaps longer.
Gary Booth6 Gary Booth6 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2022
#755 ·
Gregory Hall66 said:No offense intended.

I find myself wondering if Disney is even permitted to have thoughts at all.
Not just today, mind you, but for the last decade or so. Perhaps longer.

Yeah, total puppet candidate right there.
hollowmason64 hollowmason64 Regular
411 messages
joined Jan 2016
#756 ·
Melissa Bailey5 said:They never actually did the job classification thing, which is mandatory under labor law, and I mean, the unions have been flagging this from the start, basically agreeing there’s way too much administrative bloat. The new management just completely dropped the ball on it—even though it probably would've been pretty easy and quick to sort out—so I suppose we should all just wait for the inevitable lawsuits to start rolling in.
And honestly, you can just take all those other fancy corporate buzzwords they used in the announcement and shove them.

Even under the old system, they were already overstaffed. I mean, if you look at what The New York Times reported, you had two or three people assigned to a single position.
So, if they want to file lawsuits, let them.

Sam Wright21 said:It seems the point is being missed entirely, despite my best efforts to explain it through every philosophical epic from the Upanishads to the Iliad. The new administration doesn't need to reinvent the wheel; they simply need to present a concrete plan at City Hall. Beyond that, the developer handles the heavy lifting. But instead, the current leadership prefers to stick to the old ways of the previous mayors. I have to ask: given all those pre-election promises, is this really just a minor hiccup? I’ve always considered you a level-headed person, so tell me, what do you make of this persistent habit of letting the city stagnate?

Is it that again? 🙂
No, that's not how it works. An investor can take their plan directly to Congress themselves. Just because Vogue didn't give them the green light doesn't stop an investor from moving forward with the proposal to Congress. Why haven't they pushed ahead with it already?
Sam Wright21 Sam Wright21 Regular
402 messages
joined Jul 2016
#757 ·
hollowmason64 said:Even under the old system, they were already overstaffed. I mean, if you look at what The New York Times reported, you had two or three people assigned to a single position.
So, if they want to file lawsuits, let them.

Is it that again? 🙂
No, that's not how it works. An investor can take their plan directly to Congress themselves. Just because Vogue didn't give them the green light doesn't stop an investor from moving forward with the proposal to Congress. Why haven't they pushed ahead with it already?

Do you even remember how things work? Without the blessing of the party machine, nothing of this sort ever passes. He needs to run this by his boss, Eric Adams. Do you honestly think Nobel and Carney are fools? They cut their teeth working under Bloomberg.

That said, I am curious to find out who is actually pulling the strings behind Retkovac and the local administration...
Linda Lee4 Linda Lee4 Active Member
53 messages
joined Jun 2024
#758 ·
The reality is that trash isn't even being picked up in large parts of the city, and in my neighborhood, the bin has been sitting out front for two weeks straight, still overflowing. My neighbors are starting to lose their cool over the lack of service, especially since the bills arrive right on schedule without fail.

Right now, it looks like they’re just grasping at straws to keep from sinking entirely.

It is painfully obvious that the system has completely broken down, leading to these desperate, half-baked moves—like deciding they won't pick up trash in Queens for two weeks, then suddenly deciding they won't hit Brooklyn for two weeks, essentially waiting until people start revolting before they actually show up.

If they don't find a fix for this BASIC ISSUE immediately, the mayor won't even make it to a second term. People couldn't care less about "cost optimization" or "rationalization" when there's trash rotting in front of their houses in 95-degree heat for two weeks.
Melissa Bailey5 Melissa Bailey5 Active Member
68 messages
joined May 2024
#759 ·
I guess you want me to kiss you or something, which is kind of a wild thing to ask a stranger on the internet, maybe? I don't know, I'm just sitting here minding my own business, so I'll pass. kaže:
They were already overstaffed based on the old system anyway. Or maybe it’s just that whole hiring mess mentioned by the whistleblower—where you end up with two or three people crammed into a single position. I guess that's just how it goes.
So, I guess they’re just gonna start throwing lawsuits around now.

Honestly, you’re just talking just to hear yourself speak, I guess.

January 7, 2022, ProPublica:
If they don't figure out how to reorganize the job roles first, I guess those layoffs at the conglomerate are probably going to be a total nightmare to pull off.

The unions are basically saying there won't be any layoffs without a full restructuring of the system first.

The unions are basically saying there’s zero legitimate basis for even talking about layoffs within the conglomerate or its subsidiaries right now. I mean, you can't just start cutting people without a formal job classification system in place—that’s the document that actually defines whether anyone is redundant across the whole conglomerate or its individual branches. But, well, that hasn't even been done yet. So, naturally, the unions are demanding they actually sit down and finish the systematization and a real reorganization plan, along with some actual development goals and enough data to justify any decisions about letting people go.

The unions are pretty much on the same page about all the excess within the conglomerate, and honestly, they aren't exactly running away from the conversation either, I guess.

The unions are basically saying that if you’re looking for those higher pay bumps, you should probably stop wasting your time with roles covered by the collective agreement and instead aim for the positions that pay above a 4.2 coefficient. I guess they think that's where the real money is hiding, maybe.

And about this, you once wrote something like "it's not like we can't spare a janitor" while defending those layoffs:


So, looking at the roster, you've got like 30 cleaners, maybe 30 warehouse guys, some 19 janitors or handymen, about 20 security guards, five porters, and seven drivers or delivery folks. There’s also some phone operators, makeup artists, an archivist, a cook, and a cashier on there too, I guess.

The Democratic Party had a sit-down with our union folks and the guys from the AFL-CIO, I guess.

We sat down with the heads of the city conglomerate to hash out all the shady business surrounding how they’ve been handling layoffs, and honestly, we spent most of the time questioning if the whole process was even legal to begin with. I guess we eventually reached some kind of mutual understanding that... The whole thing is pretty much illegal, I guess, since they totally botched the order of operations—they should've run a full staff audit first just to see if there’s even an actual surplus of workers to begin with, and honestly, this entire mess is probably just going to end up drowning the courts in lawsuits later on..

So, here's the deal:
The MTA is basically running on empty right now—no spare parts, no toilet paper, not even soap for the crews. It’s a total mess. I heard one guy saying every single office just has its own little stash of rolls tucked away in a drawer because the central supply is non-existent. I guess that's just how things work there now.

John Doe, the guy heading up the union at the MTA, basically says you can’t even begin to list all the ways things are falling apart without being right. I mean, he’s saying if you claim something is missing, you’re probably telling the truth. Apparently, they haven't seen basic stuff like soap or toilet paper for months—maybe longer, actually. But honestly, that’s almost the least of it. He was saying there aren't even spare parts for the buses or trains, no replacement glass, no signage, and they don't even have cleaners to wash the vehicles... I guess our transit has never been this filthy, and on top of that, they're short on electricians and drivers too. It feels like everything is just gone, from the actual people to the parts and even the basic hygiene supplies. Everything is just... missing.

Doe pointed out that the vehicles have never looked this filthy, and he just muttered, "no surprise there," I guess.I guess we used to have entire crews of like six or eight cleaners just rushing in to scrub down the vehicles, but now at the MTA depot, it’s just one lone cleaner trying to handle the whole damn thing by herself.“Our cleaning crew is basically just women over 60 at this point, constantly hitting retirement or taking sick leave, and the outside contractors just can't keep up with the workload like they used to,” he tells us, adding, “I mean, expecting a 62-year-old woman to handle a whole subway car by herself? It’s just not happening.”

He notices things are going downhill enough to mention that there’s apparently only one cleaner left handling the entire MTA New York depot in Brooklyn, and honestly, he isn't the only one telling us that.
Melissa Bailey5 Melissa Bailey5 Active Member
68 messages
joined May 2024
#760 ·
Nicholas Davis4 said:I’m honestly struggling to follow what’s happening here. I’m firmly against state-mandated child support—your child is your responsibility, and unprotected sex isn't a business model—but I can't wrap my head around why this is sitting in court, let alone why it would be treated as some permanent, lifelong right.
Can someone catch me up?
It seems illogical that a decision made by any mayor—regardless of who they are—would be set in stone forever, immune to change.
I'm crossing my fingers that the courts reject this. It feels completely unnecessary and discriminatory; it’s an insult to all the responsible people out there working hard and taking care of their families rather than treating parenthood like a political calculation.

Topic:

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads