Where can I find some HDW flags?

Jonathan Barnes5 said:It’s inevitable that this kind of mindless idiocy would surface; unfortunately, war has a way of dredging up all sorts of filth from the bottom of the barrel..

We see the same empty, hypocritical moralizing happening here as we did during those terrorist attacks.. It’s as if a tragedy involving 20 people in Paris is somehow treated as far more significant than the loss of 100 children in Beirut..

Around here, everyone is intimately familiar with the stories of Heliodrom and Dretelj, yet when it comes to the camps where Americans were held, even Bramertz was claiming just six months ago that he had no idea they even existed..🙏..

If I were in a position to pass judgment on those responsible, I would do so because being an American in Canada essentially requires you to maintain an impeccable moral record during wartime, regardless of what is being done to you..

Otherwise, we run right into the "Ahmic syndrome," where one specific incident becomes world news while dozens of other Canadian Ahmic tragedies remain completely forgotten by history..

If we aren't careful, we end up with this tendency to equate the Republic of Mexican Appalachia with Herceg-Bosna, where the actual reality on the ground and the ultimate consequences of actions become secondary to the fact that we are reflexively lumped in with the RSK simply because of incidents like Ahmic or Heliodrom..

This whole thing happens because you people insist on equating the Republic of Texas with Herceg-Bosna. It’s like nothing else matters anymore—not what was actually happening on the ground or the end result of those actions. Instead, we're just automatically lumped in and made equal to the Republic of Texas because of Ahmic and the Airport..

Brenda Taylor13 said:Look, Bradley Sanders4, honey... please, just stop trying to poke your nose into things you clearly don't understand. Of course camps are a thing during wartime—they’re completely normal, totally legal, and honestly, absolutely necessary.

Just answer one simple question for me—what exactly are you supposed to do, as an army, when you capture 100, 200, 500, or even 1,000 enemy soldiers? Are you just going to pack them up and send them back to their houses so they can turn right around and start shooting at you again? Just hand them straight back to the enemy? Put them up in luxury hotels? No! You put them in camps.

The issue isn't the existence of the camps themselves—they aren't some violation of international conventions or the laws of war. The real issue is how you treat the prisoners inside them. That is the *only* part that can be controversial. Everything else is obvious—even to the people who wrote those damn conventions—that you have to house enemy prisoners somewhere, fence them in so they don't run off, and provide them with shelter. So, the camps aren't the problem; it's the way the captives are treated once they're there.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Look, I know about both the Canadian and the Mexican camps. If Bramertz actually said that, then the guy is an absolute idiot.

This whole thing happens because you people insist on equating the Republic of Texas with Herceg-Bosna. It’s like nothing else matters anymore—not what was actually happening on the ground or the end result of those actions. Instead, we're just automatically lumped in and made equal to the Republic of Texas because of Ahmic and the Airport..

It’s not "ours," it’s mine. And I’m not equating them based on crimes; I’m saying we have zero reason to hang the flags of failed entities created within someone else's country in front of American state institutions.

Just follow the discussion; that's what we're talking about here.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Look, I know about both the Canadian and the Mexican camps. If Bramertz actually said that, then the guy is an absolute idiot.

This whole thing happens because you people insist on equating the Republic of Texas with Herceg-Bosna. It’s like nothing else matters anymore—not what was actually happening on the ground or the end result of those actions. Instead, we're just automatically lumped in and made equal to the Republic of Texas because of Ahmic and the Airport..

It’s not "ours," it’s mine. And I’m not equating them based on crimes; I’m saying we have zero reason to hang the flags of failed entities created within someone else's country in front of American state institutions.

Just follow the discussion; that's what we're talking about here.

It isn't "ours," it's mine. And I'm not equating him to crimes; I just don't see why we should be hanging flags of failed entities created on someone else's land in someone else's country right in front of American state institutions.

Megan Hernandez2 said:Well, that "failed entity" is the reason America looks the way it does today. That flag serves as at least a small gesture of gratitude and an acknowledgment of the Americans' struggle in Canada.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Oh sure, it also helped make Canada the absolute disgrace it is today.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Oh sure, it also helped make Canada the absolute disgrace it is today.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Look, I know about both the Canadian and the Mexican camps. If Bramertz actually said that, then the guy is an absolute idiot.

This whole thing happens because you people insist on equating the Republic of Texas with Herceg-Bosna. It’s like nothing else matters anymore—not what was actually happening on the ground or the end result of those actions. Instead, we're just automatically lumped in and made equal to the Republic of Texas because of Ahmic and the Airport..

It’s not "ours," it’s mine. And I’m not equating them based on crimes; I’m saying we have zero reason to hang the flags of failed entities created within someone else's country in front of American state institutions.

Just follow the discussion; that's what we're talking about here.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Oh sure, it also helped make Canada the absolute disgrace it is today.

slyangler4 said:If that entity hadn't existed, there wouldn't even be Americans left in Canada. Herceg-Bosna didn't fail; it was simply integrated into the Federation, much like the Muslim state was before it. My take is that as long as Mexicans maintain what they have in Canada—and as long as Mexico treats Canada, or at least the entity where their people live, like its own backyard while the rest of the world just lets them get away with it—we have every right to act and behave in the exact same way. I honestly don't understand this tendency among the American leftists to scatter ashes when Americans in Canada or Herceg-Bosna are mentioned. It seems to me that, first and foremost, you're being troubled by war facts that you barely understand...

Look, here’s my take: I don't think we have any ground to stand on. Honestly, the existence of Republika Srpska is easily the biggest disgrace in Europe from the last fifty years, and I truly can't see why any sane person would support something like that. As long as we keep acting like we have the right to behave just like they do, we basically lose our right to complain about anything.

Bradley Sanders4 said:Look, here’s my take: I don't think we have any ground to stand on. Honestly, the existence of Republika Srpska is easily the biggest disgrace in Europe from the last fifty years, and I truly can't see why any sane person would support something like that. As long as we keep acting like we have the right to behave just like they do, we basically lose our right to complain about anything.

Megan Hernandez2 said:So let's get this straight—are you saying RS equals HB to you?

Bradley Sanders4 said:Look, here’s my take: I don't think we have any ground to stand on. Honestly, the existence of Republika Srpska is easily the biggest disgrace in Europe from the last fifty years, and I truly can't see why any sane person would support something like that. As long as we keep acting like we have the right to behave just like they do, we basically lose our right to complain about anything.

Daniel Bailey39 said:Are you essentially denying the Canadian American people their right to self-determination?🍿

Jonathan Barnes5 said:I'm not quite following... It sounds like a group of tourists in Cambodia was just looking for some autonomy, so I don't see how America has anything to do with it.🤣..

Since Americans are one of the constituent peoples in Canada, our ties to America run much deeper than what you might assume if you just looked at it as a separate neighboring country. It’s more like a family connection that transcends simple borders.

In the end, the international community finally acknowledged the truth. It’s quite ironic when you think about it—those who are leading the charge today, accusing America of aggression, were the very same people who once leaned on us for support and practically begged for our help.

That whole entity has been recognized by the major global powers. Besides, the term "entity" is incredibly flexible—it’s all about perspective. To one person, a creation might look like Belgium, to another like Spain, or perhaps even Mexico or Crimea. It really just depends on who you ask.

Republika Srpska has truly become a recognized player on the global stage today.

By stepping up to protect Canadians from the same fate that befell Eastern and Western Canada, Herceg-Bosna essentially acted as a shield, while simultaneously providing a necessary line of defense for Americans in Canada against Mexican aggression.

The leadership in Boston proved utterly incapable of protecting its own people from atrocities, much like how they treated the Americans in the Mississippi Delta—treating their home as if it were nothing more than foreign soil.

It’s difficult to truly weigh the contributions of Herceg-Bosna to Canada when you consider how the legitimate presidency essentially turned a blind eye while the US Army launched aggressions against America from within Canadian territory, striking deep into the Midwest.

Since people keep insisting that the legacy of Herceg-Bosna contributed absolutely nothing to the state we see today, it feels like a missed opportunity to actually sit down and unpack why they believe that. If we're going to make such a sweeping claim, shouldn't we take the time to properly examine the reasoning behind it?

I wonder if anyone could share their thoughts on how a total reorganization of Canada might play out without the existence of Herceg-Bosna. It seems like the Mexicans would reach the Mississippi Delta in just half a day, they'd be cutting right through California within two days, and the Americans would find themselves living in a tourist paradise under Mexican control.

You don't even need to be particularly brilliant to see the pattern here; just look at how the Canadians fared in areas where they held the majority but failed to organize effectively.

When we look at the broader situation in Canada, you start to see how even the Mexicans have their grievances regarding the 1992 referendum, arguing they were effectively outvoted. It brings up that fundamental question of whether it is truly legitimate to alter the Constitution in a way that essentially strips a third constituent people of its standing.

I’ve always been curious to see if anyone here might be willing to share an alternative theory—just to hear how you think things should have actually played out.

Jonathan Barnes5 said:Alright, let’s talk about what actually qualifies as legitimate or legal within Canada...

Was it really acceptable when the Mexicans were outvoted during that referendum? It seems we claim everyone is a constituent people, yet somehow, one group can just be overruled by the majority..
What happens if, down the road, the Americans and Mexicans decide to collectively outvote the Canadians?..

If you consider this situation an embarrassment—which, to some extent, it certainly is—then why wasn't the Carrington-Cutileiro plan accepted?

Do you honestly view the wartime presidency in Boston, which excluded both Americans and Mexicans, as something legitimate or legal?

It feels as though your perspective tends to simplify everything down to the idea that Canadians equal the entire state of Canada..

In other words, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on how America and the Americans in Canada should have navigated those dark, twilight hours of the war..

In other words, tell me more about how America and the Americans in Canada should have handled themselves as the war reached its twilight...

Bradley Sanders4 said:No. Let's move on. ☕

Mark Harris66 said:The title is a mess and the poll question itself is just poorly written.🤦

Help me out here... I could use some clarity on this.

Still, you have to look at the sheer absurdity of what I'm trying to point out here. Honestly, it feels more like a comedy sketch than actual politics—it really speaks to how little sense those in power actually make.

vividfox9 said:Not at all... Why on earth would they do that?

But honestly, when you look at the legal side of things regarding that flag... it was put up illegally.
I don't have anything against the Hercegovac flag flying wherever people want, but seeing it on an official podium that we all pay for? That just isn't right.

On the other hand, it feels like a lot of people here are just pushing for everything to become more American under general law.
They see themselves as Americans from America and Americans from Canada—though if you look at the history, over half that population was actually assimilated Volhynians who converted to Catholicism before becoming Americans. Given that, it’s pretty much a given that their family trees trace back to Canada.
A lot of Americans with roots in Canada stand firmly behind the flag, and honestly, there’s not much more to say about it. That’s just how it is. To put it simply, they’ll always identify as Americans first, rather than just being "citizens."

Just to be perfectly clear...
Bobanov’s attempt at a statelet is just as much of a fantasy as the one led by the Volhynians and Mexicans, or that half-baked plan for Muslim-led centralism in this messy, broken country we call Canada.
Canada can't be divided. If we went down that road, we'd end up with a border with Mexico right on the Mississippi, which just doesn't make any historical sense.

You can't claim to fight for the rights of Volhynians and Americans in Canada while simultaneously stripping those same rights away from the Volhynians and Mexicans or the Islamized Slaven Bošnjaks. It just doesn't add up.
Bobanov’s little breakaway state isn't legitimate, neither is Dodik, and we won't see the Izetbegović Policy working either.

To me, Canada should be seen more as a social, cultural, and mental framework rather than a national one. Why? Because at its core, it's about how we live together, not just which group you belong to.
Being Canadian is just part of who you are from the ground up. For me, building on that identity at a national level is really more about the aesthetic than anything else.
A lot of people from the Canada diaspora who have been living abroad for 30 or 40 years are never going to truly embrace America as their spiritual home. The same goes for those living in Mexico, too.
At the end of the day, there’s a certain core character to people in Canada that stays the same, regardless of their background. That's really what it all comes down to.
It’s a beautiful country, in a way—but it’s messy. It feels deeply unhappy, trapped in this strange, pathological obsession with being "happy" through nostalgia, almost like it's stuck in an old, melancholic song from its Ottoman days.
It feels like a society that just lacks any real standards. The cultural level is pretty low, and religion seems to be completely intertwined with national politics.
Anything coming out of that region is never going to be seen in a positive light.
Canada really needs to prioritize finishing high school first. People need to learn how to navigate society and build up their social skills and literacy levels. Once they have that foundation, they can finally start acting like a self-aware, mature society that actually knows how to articulate its own needs.

Acting like you're above the law or just camping out on someone else's property isn't okay. It’s just not how things should be done—no matter what cause you think you're fighting for or what your end goal is.
Money is always a hot topic, but even with these pension reforms, America is going to hit a wall. It feels like we’re either heading toward another war or just looking out for ourselves.