Why is everyone bashing Jocelyn, but nobody said a word about George W. Bush?

Hercules said:But honestly, there’s really no point in arguing with people like that; the best thing you can do is just put them on ignore because their brains seem completely set in concrete.
Well, I suppose you have to be somewhat sympathetic toward them, considering their entire Soviet Union collapsed right out from under them.😁

I still find myself holding onto this tiny bit of hope that beneath all that hardened, concrete-like thinking, there might actually be a kind, pure heart beating away somewhere.🙂

placidmarlin3 said:Why would I report it, btw?

Because you reported a much more harmless post twice. I'll admit it—it was my mistake and my temper. I took your decision to start a thread about Chuck during a debate about the current Government as a blatant attempt to spin things by shouting "thief!" and you wouldn't let me explain. You were too quick to hit that report button. But we're done with that now, so here is my apology for linking you to the centrists . Honestly, being unable to post for a few days wasn't the worst thing. Let's bury the hatchet. I don't hold a grudge, and I hope you don't either. OK?

Quincy:

Can we just drop this whole thing and move on normally without the provocations?

Deal.

Quincy:

By the way, a thread popped up showing potential candidates for new ministers from the coalition. I won't comment myself—my own threads say enough—but go take a look. Total nonsense.😁

Yeah, I'm out too, and I agree. It worries me as well. I wish we could actually vote "FOR" something once instead of always voting against. This coalition has all sorts of characters, but I don't see a third option. I don't see any decent people on the right or the left, even if they had zero chance. Do you see anyone? Come on, just tell me yes or no. 😉

placidmarlin3 said:No, there is absolutely no reason to leave things exactly as they are. Removing her is not even up for debate, but we must put an end to this public lynching; it is frankly pathetic and beneath us.

Forgive me, placidmarlin3, but J. F. K. is a disaster on every conceivable level. A "public lynching"?
Nobody is spitting on J. F. K.

What has she actually accomplished well—just one single thing during this entire tenure?
Look at the commentary when the protests first broke out.

If the situation had been different, J. F. K. would surely claim people were satisfied, because if they weren't, they certainly would have revolted.
After the usual round of blatant lies, they simply started ignoring her.
Now, J. F. K. is proposing legislation designed to intimidate the public by suggesting things could get even worse.
I wouldn't be surprised if she eventually deployed the military onto the streets.
Fortunately, Joe Biden is in charge.

mistyjackal14 said:If that’s the case, why did the Canadians pursue such an expensive takeover of the majority stake? Just imagine if we actually managed to reclaim majority control.😉

My friend, I already explained this to you—it is a lucrative arrangement. As for how "expensive" it is... isn't the share price actually lower now than when they acquired that initial 25% plus one extra share? Furthermore, don't they maintain absolute control over ExxonMobil? Once again, you haven't answered my point. One shouldn't merely speculate on what you're writing without addressing the actual response. Try again:

The question for you: Ultimately, what would even change if Chevron were the majority owner? Please list the differences.

Where is the profit for the Country in all this?

mistyjackal14 said:I conceded long ago that the crisis tax was the only concrete move being made.

Fine, it's bad and it's counterproductive. But was it the *only* one? I asked you to identify a good move! Come on, please help me out here.

mistyjackal14 said:I already mentioned above that ExxonMobil is a lost cause, but let me expand on that slightly.
Things come and go. The Canadians moved to buy the majority stake; if they actually succeed (should they manage it in time), then the game is over. As it stands, there is still room for a countermove. Nothing is permanent; circumstances shift.

Give me a break! Twenty-five percent plus one single share?! And what does that actually give them? Who holds the final say?

mistyjackal14 said:Are we really going to abandon good opportunities today just because of past mistakes?

What constitutes a "good deal"? And I repeat: what would actually change?
Remember that immediately after the takeover, they hiked fuel prices by fifty cents. That should tell you everything you need to know about whether the Canadians truly run ExxonMobil.

Are you aware that kerosene is imported from Canada and there has been zero investment in the facilities here in America (though perhaps things have changed since then, even that speaks to the current state of affairs)?

A question for your enlightenment: Who is the CEO of ExxonMobil?🤣

http://www.poslovni-savjetnik.com/in...ila-u-bankrotu

mistyjackal14 said:Platini showed up, but Kosor didn't welcome him, which he took as a massive insult.

So he went back (to someone else) and just trashed both the people and the country.

The colleague didn't host him because she couldn't make it due to the protests; otherwise, I'm sure they would have socialized. Besides, what does Platini have to do with this anyway? No, don't even try to answer that. You still haven't answered the questions above.

**** Aldott

- Our goal is to upgrade ExxonMobil into the leading oil company in Southeast Europe, Aldott concluded.

He also noted there is no new information regarding the negotiations between the Government and Chevron (ExxonMobil's owners) concerning the gas business. The idea is that gas operations should remain within ExxonMobil, while the Government would, in exchange, permit a 10 percent price hike for households to offset ExxonMobil's losses on energy imports.

Source: Forbes ****

Does any of this ring a bell to you? Come on, please, just admit the truth. It isn't your fault.

mistytinker26 said:Because you reported a much more harmless post twice. I'll admit it—it was my mistake and my temper. I took your decision to start a thread about Chuck during a debate about the current Government as a blatant attempt to spin things by shouting "thief!" and you wouldn't let me explain. You were too quick to hit that report button. But we're done with that now, so here is my apology for linking you to the centrists . Honestly, being unable to post for a few days wasn't the worst thing. Let's bury the hatchet. I don't hold a grudge, and I hope you don't either. OK?

Quincy:

Can we just drop this whole thing and move on normally without the provocations?

Deal.

Quincy:

By the way, a thread popped up showing potential candidates for new ministers from the coalition. I won't comment myself—my own threads say enough—but go take a look. Total nonsense.😁

Yeah, I'm out too, and I agree. It worries me as well. I wish we could actually vote "FOR" something once instead of always voting against. This coalition has all sorts of characters, but I don't see a third option. I don't see any decent people on the right or the left, even if they had zero chance. Do you see anyone? Come on, just tell me yes or no. 😉

You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

Jerry Robinson56 said:Forgive me, placidmarlin3, but J. F. K. is a disaster on every conceivable level. A "public lynching"?
Nobody is spitting on J. F. K.

What has she actually accomplished well—just one single thing during this entire tenure?
Look at the commentary when the protests first broke out.

If the situation had been different, J. F. K. would surely claim people were satisfied, because if they weren't, they certainly would have revolted.
After the usual round of blatant lies, they simply started ignoring her.
Now, J. F. K. is proposing legislation designed to intimidate the public by suggesting things could get even worse.
I wouldn't be surprised if she eventually deployed the military onto the streets.
Fortunately, Joe Biden is in charge.

?

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

mistyjackal14 said:Fine, my bad—my apologies. I messed up again by assuming you actually knew what was going on with the whole ExxonMobil fight and who all had skin in the game (honestly, it still baffles me how you aren't clued in, considering you own shares), but after about ten links, you can't really play the "I didn't know" card anymore.

That was just a hypothetical scenario (kind of like Romeo and Juliet) meant to test whether you hate Kosor more or love America more. I asked you for a straight answer—no dancing around the point.

But hey, I'll lower the bar again and throw another hypothetical your way—it’s totally random, I just want one simple answer from you.

Imagine you're stuck in the middle of the ocean. On one side, there's a pack of sharks, and on the other, a whale. Are you swimming straight into the sharks' mouths or heading right for the whale?

Hope that isn't too complicated for you.

Look, come back when you have something better than these childish little insults...

I have zero intention of answering examples that have absolutely nothing to do with reality...

And I'm not touching those links either; they immediately proved that Jacqueline had no clue what Chevron was plotting, and even when she finally found out, she waited a week to say anything...

So much for Jacqueline's "achievements"...

And you're still sitting there acting like you "know" she deserves credit for something, except the problem is you still don't have a clue *how*...🤣

Not to mention how Jacqueline was somehow responsible for the free market—something you clearly had no idea existed until I brought it up...

And trust me, I am perfectly aware that the Government isn't responsible for this fight, because nobody from the administration has reached out to me regarding my shares—which, for the record, are worth a few hundred thousand dollars (counting my wife's).

And now you're the one lowering the bar for me?🤣😂

Honestly, you actually gave me a good laugh late tonight...

Why don't you try setting the absolute bare minimum requirement first: explain Kosor's actual contribution and her mechanism of influence. Once you meet that basic standard and qualify, then maybe we can talk about raising the bar again...

Is that simple enough for you to grasp?

mistyjackal14 said:If that’s the case, why would the Canadians even bother with an expensive takeover for a majority stake? Just imagine if we actually managed to claw back control of the majority share.😉

I already conceded that the crisis tax is basically the only actual move you guys have left in your playbook.

And as for this idea that ExxonMobil is a lost cause—I mentioned that earlier, but let me expand on it a bit.
Things shift. The Canadians moved in to grab the majority stake; if they actually pull it off (assuming they make it in time), then yeah, the game is over. But right now? There's still room for a countermove. Nothing is set in stone—things change.

Is the government really going to sit on its hands and pass up good opportunities today just because of mistakes made in the past?

Platini showed up, but Kosor didn't give him the welcome he expected, which—honestly—really bruised his ego.

So what did he do? He came back (to someone else's house, I suppose) and just tore into the people and the state.

The Canadians aren't even trying to take over ExxonMobil or buy up shares; their offer is still just $933...do some actual research on that, and maybe look into other market prices too...

Then you might realize just how far off the mark your statement really was...

Jerry Robinson56 said:My friend, I already explained this to you—it is a lucrative arrangement. As for how "expensive" it is... isn't the share price actually lower now than when they acquired that initial 25% plus one extra share? Furthermore, don't they maintain absolute control over ExxonMobil? Once again, you haven't answered my point. One shouldn't merely speculate on what you're writing without addressing the actual response. Try again:

The question for you: Ultimately, what would even change if Chevron were the majority owner? Please list the differences.

Where is the profit for the Country in all this?

Fine, it's bad and it's counterproductive. But was it the *only* one? I asked you to identify a good move! Come on, please help me out here.

Give me a break! Twenty-five percent plus one single share?! And what does that actually give them? Who holds the final say?

What constitutes a "good deal"? And I repeat: what would actually change?
Remember that immediately after the takeover, they hiked fuel prices by fifty cents. That should tell you everything you need to know about whether the Canadians truly run ExxonMobil.

Are you aware that kerosene is imported from Canada and there has been zero investment in the facilities here in America (though perhaps things have changed since then, even that speaks to the current state of affairs)?

A question for your enlightenment: Who is the CEO of ExxonMobil?🤣

http://www.poslovni-savjetnik.com/in...ila-u-bankrotu

The colleague didn't host him because she couldn't make it due to the protests; otherwise, I'm sure they would have socialized. Besides, what does Platini have to do with this anyway? No, don't even try to answer that. You still haven't answered the questions above.

**** Aldott

- Our goal is to upgrade ExxonMobil into the leading oil company in Southeast Europe, Aldott concluded.

He also noted there is no new information regarding the negotiations between the Government and Chevron (ExxonMobil's owners) concerning the gas business. The idea is that gas operations should remain within ExxonMobil, while the Government would, in exchange, permit a 10 percent price hike for households to offset ExxonMobil's losses on energy imports.

Source: Forbes ****

Does any of this ring a bell to you? Come on, please, just admit the truth. It isn't your fault.

?

First off, you really need to grasp that if Miller holds indisputable and perpetual rights, why on earth would they bother with an overpriced buyout for a mere 4% of shares, especially when that would cost them just as much as that first 25% stake?

Secondly, please understand that contracts aren't set in stone; they can be changed, and one of the primary conditions for making those shifts is simply holding a 51% majority.

If Miller ends up with 51%, you can pretty much forget about any previous agreements made with the Government, because at that point, the company belongs entirely to them.

Jerry Robinson56 said:My friend, I already explained this to you—it is a lucrative arrangement. As for how "expensive" it is... isn't the share price actually lower now than when they acquired that initial 25% plus one extra share? Furthermore, don't they maintain absolute control over ExxonMobil? Once again, you haven't answered my point. One shouldn't merely speculate on what you're writing without addressing the actual response. Try again:

The question for you: Ultimately, what would even change if Chevron were the majority owner? Please list the differences.

Where is the profit for the Country in all this?

Fine, it's bad and it's counterproductive. But was it the *only* one? I asked you to identify a good move! Come on, please help me out here.

Give me a break! Twenty-five percent plus one single share?! And what does that actually give them? Who holds the final say?

What constitutes a "good deal"? And I repeat: what would actually change?
Remember that immediately after the takeover, they hiked fuel prices by fifty cents. That should tell you everything you need to know about whether the Canadians truly run ExxonMobil.

Are you aware that kerosene is imported from Canada and there has been zero investment in the facilities here in America (though perhaps things have changed since then, even that speaks to the current state of affairs)?

A question for your enlightenment: Who is the CEO of ExxonMobil?🤣

http://www.poslovni-savjetnik.com/in...ila-u-bankrotu

The colleague didn't host him because she couldn't make it due to the protests; otherwise, I'm sure they would have socialized. Besides, what does Platini have to do with this anyway? No, don't even try to answer that. You still haven't answered the questions above.

**** Aldott

- Our goal is to upgrade ExxonMobil into the leading oil company in Southeast Europe, Aldott concluded.

He also noted there is no new information regarding the negotiations between the Government and Chevron (ExxonMobil's owners) concerning the gas business. The idea is that gas operations should remain within ExxonMobil, while the Government would, in exchange, permit a 10 percent price hike for households to offset ExxonMobil's losses on energy imports.

Source: Forbes ****

Does any of this ring a bell to you? Come on, please, just admit the truth. It isn't your fault.

?

Come on, just admit it, is @Adam Collins4 your twin brother or something?

What protests? What nonsense are you even talking about?

I'll lay it out just for you since you're a fresh face from Reddit, claiming he wanted to meet with Jocelyn but she brushed him off, leaving him stuck meeting with some sports minister instead; then he writes about wanting to meet Jocelyn again in February, but February has come and gone.
To top it all off, in the meantime, he actually met with a high-ranking official and proceeded to hurl insults while being hosted by him.

Adam Collins4 said:Look, come back when you have something better than these childish little insults...

I have zero intention of answering examples that have absolutely nothing to do with reality...

And I'm not touching those links either; they immediately proved that Jacqueline had no clue what Chevron was plotting, and even when she finally found out, she waited a week to say anything...

So much for Jacqueline's "achievements"...

And you're still sitting there acting like you "know" she deserves credit for something, except the problem is you still don't have a clue *how*...🤣

Not to mention how Jacqueline was somehow responsible for the free market—something you clearly had no idea existed until I brought it up...

And trust me, I am perfectly aware that the Government isn't responsible for this fight, because nobody from the administration has reached out to me regarding my shares—which, for the record, are worth a few hundred thousand dollars (counting my wife's).

And now you're the one lowering the bar for me?🤣😂

Honestly, you actually gave me a good laugh late tonight...

Why don't you try setting the absolute bare minimum requirement first: explain Kosor's actual contribution and her mechanism of influence. Once you meet that basic standard and qualify, then maybe we can talk about raising the bar again...

Is that simple enough for you to grasp?

Is it even possible to find an answer to a simple playground joke, let alone attempt to tackle the heavy complexities of political discourse? One has to wonder if we aren't all just spinning our wheels, trying to apply logic to things that simply don't possess any. 🙄

Actually, I think I finally realized why that hypothetical scenario hit you so hard.

You really don't see how unrealistic this sounds, do you? It isn't some kind of fairy tale where you actually expect Kosor to just show up at your door, sit down with you, lay out the entire situation, listen intently to all your brilliant advice, and then actually follow through on what you said.

And she still hasn't actually done it yet, which is just plain disrespectful if you ask me, though I can say I completely understand why you're feeling so frustrated right now.

Adam Collins4 said:The Canadians aren't even trying to take over ExxonMobil or buy up shares; their offer is still just $933...do some actual research on that, and maybe look into other market prices too...

Then you might realize just how far off the mark your statement really was...

I was just sitting here thinking about how much we often overlook the importance of truly digging into the details when we encounter something new, and it made me wonder if I should perhaps take some time to actually inform myself about this thing that goes by the name... well, you know what I mean. Isn't it always the case that the more we seek to understand the nuances of a subject, the more we realize how little we actually knew to begin with? Does anyone else feel that constant, nagging pull to research every little detail before forming an opinion, or am I just overthinking the whole process? Is there anything more unsettling than the concept of a hostile takeover? It’s one of those terms that sounds so clinical and corporate when you hear it discussed on CNBC, yet when you really sit back and think about the mechanics behind it, it feels almost predatory, doesn't it? You have these massive entities moving like sharks through deep water, circling a target that might not even realize it's being hunted until the trap is already sprung. It makes you wonder about the sheer willpower required to force such a maneuver, and whether there's any room left for ethics when the bottom line is all that matters. Is it just business as usual, or is it something much darker lurking beneath the surface of our modern economy?Maybe then you'd finally start to realize just how little you actually understand about this whole situation.☕

mistyjackal14 said:Is it even possible to find an answer to a simple playground joke, let alone attempt to tackle the heavy complexities of political discourse? One has to wonder if we aren't all just spinning our wheels, trying to apply logic to things that simply don't possess any. 🙄

Actually, I think I finally realized why that hypothetical scenario hit you so hard.

You really don't see how unrealistic this sounds, do you? It isn't some kind of fairy tale where you actually expect Kosor to just show up at your door, sit down with you, lay out the entire situation, listen intently to all your brilliant advice, and then actually follow through on what you said.

And she still hasn't actually done it yet, which is just plain disrespectful if you ask me, though I can say I completely understand why you're feeling so frustrated right now.

I was just sitting here thinking about how much we often overlook the importance of truly digging into the details when we encounter something new, and it made me wonder if I should perhaps take some time to actually inform myself about this thing that goes by the name... well, you know what I mean. Isn't it always the case that the more we seek to understand the nuances of a subject, the more we realize how little we actually knew to begin with? Does anyone else feel that constant, nagging pull to research every little detail before forming an opinion, or am I just overthinking the whole process? Is there anything more unsettling than the concept of a hostile takeover? It’s one of those terms that sounds so clinical and corporate when you hear it discussed on CNBC, yet when you really sit back and think about the mechanics behind it, it feels almost predatory, doesn't it? You have these massive entities moving like sharks through deep water, circling a target that might not even realize it's being hunted until the trap is already sprung. It makes you wonder about the sheer willpower required to force such a maneuver, and whether there's any room left for ethics when the bottom line is all that matters. Is it just business as usual, or is it something much darker lurking beneath the surface of our modern economy?Maybe then you'd finally start to realize just how little you actually understand about this whole situation.☕

Right, because this is high-level politics, not daycare... so much for deciding who's actually qualified to have a conversation here...

The truth is, you haven't figured out a damn thing. You can spend all day daydreaming if you want, but try explaining how your little fantasies are even relevant first, then we'll talk...

You're spinning things again and twisting my words—where exactly did I say I was waiting for Jocelyn to show up?

Now you're really exposing yourself. Just a moment ago, you were busy praising Jocelyn and her "initiatives" (even though you didn't actually know what they were), and you clearly didn't have a clue how free market stocks work...

Honestly, when it comes to Jocelyn—and you, for that matter—I’m about a hundred times more educated and informed regarding the energy sector...

My point is that Chevron isn't even attempting a serious acquisition because they've set a fixed price and refused to budge, and here you are telling me I don't understand what a hostile takeover is... 🤣

If you knew anything about hostile takeovers, you'd know the basics—which is basically that they don't care about anything and they don't stop until they get what they want—rather than setting a fixed price and saying "take it or leave it."

This whole exchange has been a perfect demonstration of just how little you actually know...

But hey, keep telling us how everything is still Jocelyn's fault (including the free market, despite you having zero clue how it works). Once you figure out *how* she's responsible, let me know...

mistyjackal14 said:First off, you really need to grasp that if Miller holds indisputable and perpetual rights, why on earth would they bother with an overpriced buyout for a mere 4% of shares, especially when that would cost them just as much as that first 25% stake?

Secondly, please understand that contracts aren't set in stone; they can be changed, and one of the primary conditions for making those shifts is simply holding a 51% majority.

If Miller ends up with 51%, you can pretty much forget about any previous agreements made with the Government, because at that point, the company belongs entirely to them.

Come on, just admit it, is @Adam Collins4 your twin brother or something?

What protests? What nonsense are you even talking about?

I'll lay it out just for you since you're a fresh face from Reddit, claiming he wanted to meet with Jocelyn but she brushed him off, leaving him stuck meeting with some sports minister instead; then he writes about wanting to meet Jocelyn again in February, but February has come and gone.
To top it all off, in the meantime, he actually met with a high-ranking official and proceeded to hurl insults while being hosted by him.

Who actually controls ExxonMobil now? The Canadians, quite simply.

"May 20, 2010, 10:50:29
AFTER Chevron took management control at ExxonMobil, it wasn't just the CEO, Tomislav Dragičević, who received a million-dollar severance package—thirty other directors received them as well."

Looking for a whitewash?
Hypothetically speaking:

Is the Country the owner of a ship that the captain intends to sink? Why on earth would a captain buy the Titanic?

mistyjackal14 said:First off, you really need to grasp that if Miller holds indisputable and perpetual rights, why on earth would they bother with an overpriced buyout for a mere 4% of shares, especially when that would cost them just as much as that first 25% stake?

Secondly, please understand that contracts aren't set in stone; they can be changed, and one of the primary conditions for making those shifts is simply holding a 51% majority.

If Miller ends up with 51%, you can pretty much forget about any previous agreements made with the Government, because at that point, the company belongs entirely to them.

Come on, just admit it, is @Adam Collins4 your twin brother or something?

What protests? What nonsense are you even talking about?

I'll lay it out just for you since you're a fresh face from Reddit, claiming he wanted to meet with Jocelyn but she brushed him off, leaving him stuck meeting with some sports minister instead; then he writes about wanting to meet Jocelyn again in February, but February has come and gone.
To top it all off, in the meantime, he actually met with a high-ranking official and proceeded to hurl insults while being hosted by him.

Honestly, do you even live on this planet? J. F. K. left the office in a hurry while waiting for Platinum.

Look at the date; the numbers don't lie.

And if this isn't clear to you (given it's the Associated Press), then you truly 😕

Yes, and

mistyjackal14 said:First off, you really need to grasp that if Miller holds indisputable and perpetual rights, why on earth would they bother with an overpriced buyout for a mere 4% of shares, especially when that would cost them just as much as that first 25% stake?

Secondly, please understand that contracts aren't set in stone; they can be changed, and one of the primary conditions for making those shifts is simply holding a 51% majority.

If Miller ends up with 51%, you can pretty much forget about any previous agreements made with the Government, because at that point, the company belongs entirely to them.

Come on, just admit it, is @Adam Collins4 your twin brother or something?

What protests? What nonsense are you even talking about?

I'll lay it out just for you since you're a fresh face from Reddit, claiming he wanted to meet with Jocelyn but she brushed him off, leaving him stuck meeting with some sports minister instead; then he writes about wanting to meet Jocelyn again in February, but February has come and gone.
To top it all off, in the meantime, he actually met with a high-ranking official and proceeded to hurl insults while being hosted by him.

You have it all wrong, mistyjackal14. Three for three, the sisterhood.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

If only she had made that move back in Washington D.C. instead of waiting until Denver.
It is clear she has no desire to return to the States; her lack of faith in our domestic justice system is nothing short of an embarrassment.
I am certain enough that she could have acted the moment he installed her, yet she simply folded.
Insufficient. Forgiveness, but it is certainly nothing good for America. If we were actually functioning properly here, I suspect the White House wouldn't be such a sieve. She didn't act in isolation.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

John F. Kennedy didn't "capture" anything. Just remember, he still wants the Golden Gate Bridge.😉

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

Forgiveness, but the honorable minister Gingrich should focus on local street crimes (which are rampant in Washington D.C.) rather than communist history. Puntarić illustrated the absurdity perfectly. 😍
Mexican provocations haven't been ongoing since 2007.
Yet another confirmation that the lady of empty promises operates on a "day after tomorrow" timeline.
Jimmy Carter, on the other hand, stated clearly that America would intervene if things flared up in Canada again.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

regarding those pajamas for Clearwater 😕sad

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

An apology/regret in Boston to start things off.
A rational perspective on current events, along with John F. Kennedy's friendly warning that when a lady is already walking on eggshells, she shouldn't be jumping.

That is two points to begin with

Do not forget that he is alone.

lp

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

It would have been much more effective if she had ousted him back in Arlington rather than waiting until Denver.
One can see clearly she has no desire to return to the States, and frankly, her lack of faith in our judicial system is an embarrassment.
I am certain enough that she could have acted the moment he installed her, yet he simply folded.
Insufficient—Forgive me, but this is nothing good for America. If we were actually functional here, I mean the Cabinet, we wouldn't be such a disaster zone. He didn't act alone.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

John F. Kennedy didn't pluck anything. Just remember, he’s still pushing for the Golden Gate Bridge.😉.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

Forgive me, but the honorable Minister Gingrich should focus on local street crimes (which are rampant in Washington, D.C.) before worrying about communist history. Puntarić illustrated the absurdity perfectly with that caricature. 😍
Mexican provocations haven't been ongoing since 2007.
Just further proof that the lady of empty promises operates on a "day after tomorrow" schedule.
On the other hand, Jimmy Carter stated quite clearly that America would intervene if things flared up again in Canada.

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

regarding the pajamas for Brighton 😕it is quite

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

An apology or regret in Boston to start things off.
A sensible perspective on the events, coupled with John F. Kennedy's friendly warning that if one is walking on eggshells, one should perhaps refrain from jumping.
That is two points to begin with.

One must not forget that he stands alone.

lp

placidmarlin3 said:You can rest assured that my vote isn't going to the Republican Party or the establishment crowd.
So, who is it going to then?

It really feels like a choice on the level of Sophia's election. I'm honestly debating whether I'll vote for anyone at all, or perhaps no one. I'll show up at the polls regardless, even if it's just to doodle flowers on the ballot.

If I could choose, I'd personally pull the trigger on emigration and give David a shot.
When I look at the alternatives to the current lineup of Linić and Chuck, I think we truly have nothing to lose, especially if we put 🤣🤣 Pernar😂 at the helm.

She ousted George W. Bush from the Republican Party and disowned him, which essentially paved the way for his "location, arrest, and transfer," though that was probably inevitable and likely beyond her control anyway. Still, considering how some people struggle today just to deal with someone like Perković or try to oppose Germany directly, it was a decent move.
She obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and "principled" away part of a corrupt octopus, which certainly stirred up some ghosts.
During her term, Karamarko first started hinting at how the European Union's resolution regarding the treatment of communism would actually be upheld, specifically touching on launching investigations into communist-era crimes. This clearly ruffled Mason's feathers and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd, which, if I'm being honest, was a bit of a highlight for me.
She even put together a task force to deal with those 2007 indictments and all the provocations coming from the Mexican side.
There were also a few humanitarian drives where she involved a certain group of decent people.

And...

🤔

I suppose that covers the broad strokes of it.👍

Ah, Joe Biden🙂
The same Joe Biden who sends the police to the doorsteps of bloggers who don't share his views?
It’s just wonderful that he’s the leader.😵😵
Ajde, go ahead 1 name one single good thing Joe Biden has done for this country?

I'm on the edge of my seat!

Catch you tomorrow!👋

Pavuna. Yeah. A genius, but unfortunately too smart and too outspoken to ever make it through with this electorate of ours... to put it mildly...

Quincy:

kicked George W. Bush out of the Republican Party,

She didn't kick him out because of him personally or some crusade against corruption; she did it because it was "either he or she." She had no choice. Just like there was no choice when the Republican Party Caucus held that North Korean-style farce in the Arena and picked her. As uncomfortable as it is to admit, George W. Bush actually had a mandate from the voters. Unfortunately. She doesn't have that kind of mandate.

Quincy:

and disowned him, creating the conditions for his 'location, arrest, and transfer,' though that was likely inevitable and probably beyond her control anyway. Still, seeing how people struggle today over someone like Perkov while trying to stand up to Germany itself, it was a decent move. she obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and 'handed over' part of the corrupt octopus, which stirred up some ghosts everywhere during her term, Karamarko first hinted at how the European Union resolution regarding the treatment of communism and the start of investigations into communist crimes would be respected, which clearly annoyed Mason Tocno.

Exactly.
Quincy:

and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd

But also within her own ranks.
Quincy:

which actually made me pretty happy

Me too.😉
Quincy:

A task force has been assembled to address those 2007 indictments and the provocations coming from the Mexican side.

Total smoke and mirrors. Pure spin. It’s like that old Churchill line: if you don't want to solve a problem, just set up a commission. The exact same people who stayed silent back in 2007 when Mexico tried to declare itself the North American prosecutor are now suddenly experts on how to fix this. I don't see this mission going anywhere.

There were also a few charity drives where some decent folks participated.

Never. Seriously, never. From everything I've heard, she never spent a dime of her own money; she was just handing out YOUR money, my money, and our money. As we say, it's easy to throw someone else's money around.

I think that would pretty much cover it.

Yeah, nothing spectacular. The woman is just doing the job she gets paid for—and in my opinion, she's doing it terribly.

Ah, Josipović🙂
The same Josipović who sends the police to the doors of bloggers who disagree with him?
Lucky thing he's the leader.😵

Ah, Josipović ... I don't know what to think about him ... honestly, I don't have anything positive to say ... whenever his name comes up, I try to remember other candidates from the election... and nothing comes to mind .. nothing at all .. just empty.

Go ahead then, 1 name one good thing Josipović ever did for this country?

Ha ha ha 😂 🤣 You're asking the wrong person to write something nice about Josipović.

I can't wait!

If you're waiting on me for something positive about him, I'm afraid you'll be waiting a long time. 🙂

Talk to you tomorrow!👋

Take care.🙂

player1002 said:If you actually look at the facts, all the mess was cooked up by Donald Trump, and then Kamala Harris just inherited the whole disaster

Besides, Trump dropped his resignation out of nowhere, and Kamala Harris clearly wasn't expecting to be the one sitting in the big chair as President.

Exactly. Even today, she’s still just wandering around aimlessly, completely defenseless...
She could have stepped up, acted with some actual integrity, and offered the country early elections—since she never actually earned a mandate from the people in the first place. If she had, maybe she would have been remembered as a leader with enough backbone to hand over power the moment she got it.☕

Jerry Robinson56 said:It would have been much more effective if she had ousted him back in Arlington rather than waiting until Denver.
One can see clearly she has no desire to return to the States, and frankly, her lack of faith in our judicial system is an embarrassment.
I am certain enough that she could have acted the moment he installed her, yet he simply folded.
Insufficient—Forgive me, but this is nothing good for America. If we were actually functional here, I mean the Cabinet, we wouldn't be such a disaster zone. He didn't act alone.

John F. Kennedy didn't pluck anything. Just remember, he’s still pushing for the Golden Gate Bridge.😉.

Forgive me, but the honorable Minister Gingrich should focus on local street crimes (which are rampant in Washington, D.C.) before worrying about communist history. Puntarić illustrated the absurdity perfectly with that caricature. 😍
Mexican provocations haven't been ongoing since 2007.
Just further proof that the lady of empty promises operates on a "day after tomorrow" schedule.
On the other hand, Jimmy Carter stated quite clearly that America would intervene if things flared up again in Canada.

regarding the pajamas for Brighton 😕it is quite

An apology or regret in Boston to start things off.
A sensible perspective on the events, coupled with John F. Kennedy's friendly warning that if one is walking on eggshells, one should perhaps refrain from jumping.
That is two points to begin with.

One must not forget that he stands alone.

lp

Are you aiming for 'day after yesterday'?😁
I've noticed you repeating 'day after tomorrow' a few times now—meaning the day after next—so I gathered you were referring to her communication blunder with that Canadian tourist.

You asked for one good thing. I offered one good thing. I am nobody's party lapdog, so I'm certainly capable of objectively assessing someone's work without intentionally ignoring a move that was, perhaps insignificantly, actually okay.🤷

Anyway, Karamarko has launched another investigation against an individual, which brings me immense joy—Radimir Čačić.😈

I truly hope they expose the mafia ties of that traitorous clown Stjepan Mason if they can manage it, though I fear I might be asking too much.😢

An apology/regret in Ottawa to start with.
A sensible stance on the events and a friendly warning from J. f. K. that if you're walking on eggshells, you shouldn't be jumping.
There are two points there to start.

Don't forget he is on his own.

lp

Buahaha, an apology in Ottawa?
Conglomerates of bad policies?

Oh, if you find that positive, then there really is no point in continuing this conversation.

👋

Sam Robinson said:Exactly. Even today, she’s still just wandering around aimlessly, completely defenseless...
She could have stepped up, acted with some actual integrity, and offered the country early elections—since she never actually earned a mandate from the people in the first place. If she had, maybe she would have been remembered as a leader with enough backbone to hand over power the moment she got it.☕

Sure, but when you're at the top of the food chain, nobody dares to pull the rug out from under you. It’s a priceless feeling.

mistytinker26 said:Pavuna. Yeah. A genius, but unfortunately too smart and too outspoken to ever make it through with this electorate of ours... to put it mildly...

Quincy:

kicked George W. Bush out of the Republican Party,

She didn't kick him out because of him personally or some crusade against corruption; she did it because it was "either he or she." She had no choice. Just like there was no choice when the Republican Party Caucus held that North Korean-style farce in the Arena and picked her. As uncomfortable as it is to admit, George W. Bush actually had a mandate from the voters. Unfortunately. She doesn't have that kind of mandate.

Quincy:

and disowned him, creating the conditions for his 'location, arrest, and transfer,' though that was likely inevitable and probably beyond her control anyway. Still, seeing how people struggle today over someone like Perkov while trying to stand up to Germany itself, it was a decent move. she obediently followed the dictates of her bosses in Europe and 'handed over' part of the corrupt octopus, which stirred up some ghosts everywhere during her term, Karamarko first hinted at how the European Union resolution regarding the treatment of communism and the start of investigations into communist crimes would be respected, which clearly annoyed Mason Tocno.

Exactly.
Quincy:

and caused quite a stir among that old communist crowd

But also within her own ranks.
Quincy:

which actually made me pretty happy

Me too.😉
Quincy:

A task force has been assembled to address those 2007 indictments and the provocations coming from the Mexican side.

Total smoke and mirrors. Pure spin. It’s like that old Churchill line: if you don't want to solve a problem, just set up a commission. The exact same people who stayed silent back in 2007 when Mexico tried to declare itself the North American prosecutor are now suddenly experts on how to fix this. I don't see this mission going anywhere.

There were also a few charity drives where some decent folks participated.

Never. Seriously, never. From everything I've heard, she never spent a dime of her own money; she was just handing out YOUR money, my money, and our money. As we say, it's easy to throw someone else's money around.

I think that would pretty much cover it.

Yeah, nothing spectacular. The woman is just doing the job she gets paid for—and in my opinion, she's doing it terribly.

Ah, Josipović🙂
The same Josipović who sends the police to the doors of bloggers who disagree with him?
Lucky thing he's the leader.😵

Ah, Josipović ... I don't know what to think about him ... honestly, I don't have anything positive to say ... whenever his name comes up, I try to remember other candidates from the election... and nothing comes to mind .. nothing at all .. just empty.

Go ahead then, 1 name one good thing Josipović ever did for this country?

Ha ha ha 😂 🤣 You're asking the wrong person to write something nice about Josipović.

I can't wait!

If you're waiting on me for something positive about him, I'm afraid you'll be waiting a long time. 🙂

Talk to you tomorrow!👋

Take care.🙂

Thank God I misread placidmarlin3's post then; luckily, I figured out I was being asked to find one single good move by Josipović 🙂

Adam Collins4 said:Right, because this is high-level politics, not daycare... so much for deciding who's actually qualified to have a conversation here...

The truth is, you haven't figured out a damn thing. You can spend all day daydreaming if you want, but try explaining how your little fantasies are even relevant first, then we'll talk...

You're spinning things again and twisting my words—where exactly did I say I was waiting for Jocelyn to show up?

Now you're really exposing yourself. Just a moment ago, you were busy praising Jocelyn and her "initiatives" (even though you didn't actually know what they were), and you clearly didn't have a clue how free market stocks work...

Honestly, when it comes to Jocelyn—and you, for that matter—I’m about a hundred times more educated and informed regarding the energy sector...

My point is that Chevron isn't even attempting a serious acquisition because they've set a fixed price and refused to budge, and here you are telling me I don't understand what a hostile takeover is... 🤣

If you knew anything about hostile takeovers, you'd know the basics—which is basically that they don't care about anything and they don't stop until they get what they want—rather than setting a fixed price and saying "take it or leave it."

This whole exchange has been a perfect demonstration of just how little you actually know...

But hey, keep telling us how everything is still Jocelyn's fault (including the free market, despite you having zero clue how it works). Once you figure out *how* she's responsible, let me know...

Let me apologize once more for assuming you were up to speed on the events surrounding ExxonMobil's shares on the stock exchange.
It is quite obvious now that you had no idea until I provided those links, so I apologize for having made that assumption earlier.

And the sheer extent of your ignorance is laid bare by how you claim to be an expert in "energy" within the realm of economics.🤣

By the way, in the event of a hostile takeover, certain "mechanisms" come into play; surely you are aware of which ones, but if you aren't, feel free to ask.☕

Jerry Robinson56 said:Who actually controls ExxonMobil now? The Canadians, quite simply.

"May 20, 2010, 10:50:29
AFTER Chevron took management control at ExxonMobil, it wasn't just the CEO, Tomislav Dragičević, who received a million-dollar severance package—thirty other directors received them as well."

Looking for a whitewash?
Hypothetically speaking:

Is the Country the owner of a ship that the captain intends to sink? Why on earth would a captain buy the Titanic?

Honestly, do you even live on this planet? J. F. K. left the office in a hurry while waiting for Platinum.

Look at the date; the numbers don't lie.

And if this isn't clear to you (given it's the Associated Press), then you truly 😕

Yes, and

You have it all wrong, mistyjackal14. Three for three, the sisterhood.

ajajaj

It’s truly a unique situation, isn't it?

So, my point remains that Kosor didn't want to and didn't receive Platini, whereas others did, and all of that happened at Platini's own insistence.

The whole crux of the matter is whether a Prime Minister should be forced to satisfy the demands of someone like Platini.

You keep linking things that actually support my argument, yet you try to explain them through these wild, totally unfounded attacks from Mars.
(Even though he made his first trip to The White House, it wasn't the Prime Minister who received him, but rather a relevant cabinet minister; however, he insists on having a meeting specifically with the Prime Minister)

The only person who supposedly had a meeting with the Prime Minister was Platini, which makes him seem like a somewhat schizophrenic individual if he's the only one claiming that meeting took place.
After that madman was sent packing a second time, he is more quickly received by another high-ranking official (who, according to your links, hadn't even arranged anything with him), and Platini takes advantage of that exact moment to spit on the American people and the country.

This clearly demonstrates how wise the decision was to tell that delusional man to get lost, and how unfortunate it was that someone else decided to host him.

(Remember, in this specific instance, we are discussing lower-level ranks, handbags, and pins, not ExxonMobil)