Betty Palmer8 said:And for some people—those who stand to profit from it—it is just as much so.
It’s not going to lead to anything regardless—but I would honestly love to see a detailed blueprint of what this "vision" actually looks like, complete with specific building designs and all that. If they’ve actually brought in world-class architects like Lovekind, then maybe we'd see some interesting solutions. Still, I just can't get behind it for that area—California has its own unique charm that needs to be preserved, rather than being turned into some miniature version of Dubai or something else entirely. 1.2 miles Honestly—they’ll never reach the heights of a place like Venice.
Perhaps a few of the buildings slated for this project could be relocated to Washington, D.C.—for instance. Actually... maybe the entire project should just be moved to the Thorn district in Washington, D.C.!? 😁
Look, those architects he’s talking about? They aren't building anything remotely close to that level of nonsense. Honestly, it just feels like pure foolishness—a blatant attempt to mask some deep-seated inferiority complex. Take the coast in HR, for instance; the architecture there is worth a hundred times more than anything they're putting up in Dubai. Seriously, props to Bruce or whatever that Arab fellow's name is, but come on. Just give me one beautiful Gothic-Renaissance summer villa in Florida or near Venice, and I won't ask you for another thing until Judgment Day.🙏(If we’re really going to talk about luxury...)
What about this whole project and all that talk about luxury? Honestly, it feels like a total waste of time. You don't achieve true luxury just by throwing ten different hotels onto a map, right? Real luxury isn't about quantity or how many buildings you can cram into one area. It’s about quality—it's about the details. At its core, luxury is defined by rarity. If everyone can have it, is it even luxury anymore?