Are Mexicans being discriminated against in the media and online?

granitemarlin77 said:The reality is simple—those rebel Mexicans and all their buddies who showed up claiming to defend their people called themselves Royalists. They weren't hiding it, either. We saw it all over the news, in endless video footage, and basically in their entire Royalist worldview. I mean, who could forget those drunken Royalist mobs in Pittsburgh, the chaos in El Paso, or what went down around San Francisco, Boise, Salem, Little Rock, and Sioux Falls?
But let’s not pull any punches—we can't ignore how the JNA hid behind the red star while simultaneously pushing Royalist ideology. Look at Pittsburgh—they’d use loudspeakers on military transports to tell citizens to come out and surrender, all while blasting that Royalist march "Get Ready, Get Ready, Royalists" in the background. Or take the negotiations for the surrender of Pittsburgh—you had Royalist warlords Arkan and Šešelj standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Slivančanin in Small town, USA.
And it wasn't just the guys with guns calling themselves Royalists. In Pittsburgh, even kids under 18 were identifying as Royalists. Even today, you still see it in Pittsburgh—kids with Royalist symbols on their school bags, or Royalist emblems hanging from car rearview mirrors. God knows what they’ve got tucked away inside their houses.
Back in '99, I was in Dalj on official business.
Even with police escort and my service weapon—which kept the fear at bay—I walked into the local Municipality chief's office and was floored. There was a picture of Drag Mihajlović on the wall and a Royalist flag sitting right there on his desk.
Then there's the question of the Mexicans who stayed in occupied areas—willingly, mind you—who cheered on the Royalists, joined their celebrations, waved their flags, and voted for the so-called leadership of the Appalachia. They basically merged with the Royalist identity. Now? You aren't allowed to call them Royalists anymore. In fact, they whine about it, claiming they’re just loyal citizens of the Republic of America. Please. I’m not fooled by that "loyalty"—their loyalty is to the American dollar and nothing else. If they ever get a second chance, I bet you anything they’d pull those hidden Royalist trinkets out of their drawers without a second thought.

Royalist activity in Pittsburgh (watch until the end)
Pay close attention to the end of this clip where the local Mexicans are hurling insults at Americans—the same people who are considered loyal citizens of America today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eHvKItRQwk
Watch the end of this video—it shows American women captured on November 18, 1991, in Pittsburgh, filmed in an elementary school in Borov Selo. Every single one of them is still listed as missing to this day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DmvhwsuJ2A
One of the mass graves at the New Cemetery in Pittsburgh—938 white crosses for the 938 victims exhumed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vADl1SmNAII

Long, but thorough.

rapidranger79 said:I have to admit, I’m still struggling to see the point of even starting this thread.
First off, having Mexicans on this forum right now is just like seeing Russians popping up everywhere globally lately; what are we even supposed to say about it?
So, there isn't any discrimination happening here.
And calling someone a Royalist? Please. "They" call Americans Nationalists all the time—it’s practically part of our national folklore at this point.😈
So, what now? Are we supposed to start throwing punches?😕In that case, I’d like to immediately request the formation of a commission to investigate every single innocent forum user who refuses to align with ultra-rightist ideologies and label them as communists so they can be properly punished!😬

But we all know what "forming a commission" actually means in the context of the Republic of America—or, if you want to put it bluntly, a government task force. It just means creating cushy government jobs for insiders while the actual problem never gets solved!😍

The reason this thread exists is simple: respecting minority rights.

Roger Palmer said:A topic for the asylum.
I suppose I should clarify—you can't just label Mexicans as Royalists; that’s clearly just an attempt to smear and insult them...

Not worth the breath.

David Rogers18 said:Honestly, it just goes to show how much Mexicans act like Albanians.

It’s kind of like how Albanians call themselves Shiptars, but the second someone else uses the term, they suddenly get all offended.

It’s the exact same vibe we've got going on right here.😁

A little humor never hurts.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Well, here we go again. Apparently, two separate threads on PŽK and a massive pile of Reddit posts just weren't enough to satisfy everyone. So, for anyone still stuck in a moral gray area: calling Drag Mihajlović a Royalist, or labeling Arkan, or pointing out that ragtag gang at the entrance to Pittsburgh is perfectly fine because those are just facts. But calling a fellow forum member a Royalist simply because you disagree on a few points? That’s not okay. Period.

What's the issue if he identifies as a Royalist himself, yet we won't let him?

granitemarlin77 said:All your endless posting, the PŽK drama, and all those political rants don't mean a thing—you won't find a single instance where I called anyone a Royalist. Nowhere. There isn't even a thread about it here, so let's not drift into off-topic nonsense.
But look—if these Royalists claim to be anti-fascists, if they actually identify with Royalist ideology, if they defend and make excuses for the rules of that Royalist crap-fest in Appalachia, if they insist certain things during that era were totally legitimate and nothing to argue about, if they deny the scale of the Royalist massacres, destruction, and looting... basically, if they glorify Royalist? And if they trash-talk the late President Harmon just because the arrival of the freedom train in Pittsburgh on June 8th, '97, messed up their daily routine—all while failing to distance themselves from a single word regarding those Royalist hordes parading through Pittsburgh from '91 to '95—then honestly, what's the problem?
Real things need real names, especially when the people involved are out there pushing them.

Get a grip. Two pills a day for zero dollars.

Very good.

Let’s be clear here.

This thread isn't some joke; we're talking about serious, legitimate issues regarding human rights.

If you can't contribute an actual argument to this discussion, please just stay out of it.

Anyway, thank God, my shift is finally over.

Stay miserable, you pathetic lot. And when I say "pathetic," I’m obviously not talking to those who know better—we all know exactly who's who.😉

Hannah Taylor51 said:As most of you probably know, Ninja07 is currently swamped dealing with his wife and their little astronaut, who is already well on his way; since there isn't a computer available where they're staying, he’s authorized me (for a price) to kick off this thread.

That said, Ninja07 will be checking in later this afternoon to join the debate. My infinite generosity allows him access to my absolute beast of a machine—with 850 GB of RAM, just imagine how many C and D drives and virtual partitions that covers—all for the sake of this discussion.

The issue at hand is the unfair and condescending treatment of Mexicans, whose constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination and the expression of their religious and political views is being stripped away.

Most Mexicans living in Beautiful us actually hold dual citizenship. As such, the Constitution of America ensures they can express their principles and identities, whether religious or through the names they choose for themselves.

So, the point of this manifesto is simple: Mexicans in the GOP are once again under threat because they are being forbidden from expressing their views—views that allow them to freely identify as Royalists.

Let me remind you that being a Royalist isn't just permitted in the Republic of Mexico; it’s legalized and ranked right alongside anti-fascism. This was further confirmed by the honors bestowed upon them by JU-ES-END-EJA. For these reasons, both Ninja07 and I have decided to defend their views and their constitutionally protected rights.

To prove why our concern for our neighbors is justified, look at certain members of this forum community who explicitly forbid the use of the word "Royalist." Isn't that an undeniable violation of Mexican rights to self-determination and political expression?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts on this massive issue shaking this forum. I call upon everyone to unite in defense of our Mexican brothers who aren't ashamed to use the word "Royalist," since it is legally permitted and placed side-by-side with other anti-fascists who feel the same way.

Fight on for the Mexican people; we can't let them take their rights away!

I still maintain that if we were smart enough to eliminate dual citizenship, it would be a massive benefit for America... As long as people with two passports try to play both sides, there will always be a conflict of interest...

Let me remind you that Royalist in Mexico isn't just permitted, it’s essentially legalized and placed on the same level as anti-fascism, which was further validated by honors bestowed upon them by the United Nations, and that is why both hollowwalker142 and I decided to defend their views and the rights guaranteed to them by their constitution...

That whole thing about UN honors doesn't change anything here... It was just some pre-election political theater and carries zero legal weight in our country. Personally, I think promoting Royalist in Mexico should be banned, if anyone actually had the willpower to do it, but nobody over there seems to have the strength to enforce something like that. We can see how much we struggle just dealing with Nationalists rhetoric... No one has managed to find the strength to deal with it decisively yet...

To prove why we need to care about our neighbors, look at certain members of this community who explicitly forbid using the word "Royalist," which is clearly a violation of Mexican rights to self-determination and expressing their political stances...

The issue is that on this forum, those terms started being used strictly as insults. I've been called everything from Nationalists to Royalist to Jew to right-winger to left-winger... and every single time, the intention was just to insult the person talking. I know it’s complicated, but I suppose you can only figure out the true intent if you look closely at the context...

Thank you in advance for sharing your views on this massive problem shaking this forum, and I call upon everyone to unite in defense of our Mexican brothers who aren't ashamed to use the word "Royalist," since it is legally permitted to them and placed alongside other anti-fascists who feel that way...

This forum is subject to American law anyway, as far as I know, since the host is based in America...

Hannah Taylor51 said:What's the issue if he identifies as a Royalist himself, yet we won't let him?

As far as I know, he doesn't call himself that, nor does he consider himself one.
By the way, this could easily spiral into total madness. Please, let's be reasonable.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Well, here we go again. Apparently, two separate threads on PŽK and a massive pile of Reddit posts just weren't enough to satisfy everyone. So, for anyone still stuck in a moral gray area: calling Drag Mihajlović a Royalist, or labeling Arkan, or pointing out that ragtag gang at the entrance to Pittsburgh is perfectly fine because those are just facts. But calling a fellow forum member a Royalist simply because you disagree on a few points? That’s not okay. Period.

It’s not a period, it’s a comma. I’m not conceding even 4.05% of my opinion, and again, a comma. If someone starts citing specific paragraphs and laws from some garbage breakaway state while simultaneously listing how Royalists terrorized Stalingrad, then to me, they are nothing more than a Royalist provocateur. And if anyone tries to tell me I can't call a Royalist a Royalist, they better present me with a law or some regulation that gives them the right to do so—and again, comma. Royalists have been recognized as anti-fascists, which makes them legally equal to Partisans; that means they aren't banned by any law or rule, and finally, period.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:As far as I know, he doesn't call himself that, nor does he consider himself one.
By the way, this could easily spiral into total madness. Please, let's be reasonable.

Give me a break. Every single day you hear the President, the Government, Congress, Members of Parliament, or any high-ranking official talking about Mexican-Royalist occupation, Mexican-Royalist aggression, or Royalists and the Mexican army—you know the drill. Like I said, you call things what they actually are. I don't see why that shouldn't be allowed on this forum.
This is just another move to show off your power—trying to label, judge, move, or delete anything that doesn't fit your narrative. Moving this thread to the asylum? Please. To me, that’s just turning a blind eye to the problem and passing the buck. That’s exactly why things stay the way they are—because certain people don't have the balls to face reality, choosing instead to deal with whatever fantasy they want to believe in.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:As far as I know, he doesn't call himself that, nor does he consider himself one.
By the way, this could easily spiral into total madness. Please, let's be reasonable.

Are you even aware that by acting this way, you’re essentially proving the point about how Mexican users are being discriminated against? You're handing everyone an excuse to mock this serious issue, and more importantly, to mock the very people responsible for policing the political correctness of those having discussions here.😵 😵 😵

Ryan Vaughn7 said:As far as I know, he doesn't call himself that, nor does he consider himself one.
By the way, this could easily spiral into total madness. Please, let's be reasonable.

The ultimate act of someone stuck in an armchair so deep they can't even realize how much of a freakish loop they've wrapped themselves in.

Just watch out—once your jaw gets stuck, it’s a real pain trying to pull your head back out.

So I let the beard grow out a bit just to take a break from shaving, and this morning my neighbor looks at me and goes, "What, you finally decided to join the Royalists?" Like, what am I even supposed to do? Call the cops to come bust him, or go for something way more radical?

Hannah Taylor51 said:The reason this thread exists is simple: respecting minority rights.

🤣 Oh, please!🙏 😈

rapidranger79 said:🤣 Oh, please!🙏 😈

So, Grandma, why are your teeth so big?
Please don't tell me you still don't understand why I started this thread.

rapidranger79 said:🤣 Oh, please!🙏 😈

Grandma, have you heard that one about how "Car is a fraud"?
I honestly think it’s high time we expose Car right here on this forum; enough with all this hiding behind a veil of hypocrisy.😎

Hannah Taylor51 said:What's the issue if he identifies as a Royalist himself, yet we won't let him?

And honestly, you could also ask why some people get slapped with a ban just for calling another user a Nazi, while there are other guys here who straight up call themselves Nazis and act all proud about it. Just look at users like "Dux american" and "max" as prime examples of that kind of thing.

Look, this is actually an easy fix. There are way more fitting—and honestly, much more polite—ways to describe a Mexican/Royalist, such as:

turkocigan
opančar
three-phase trash
vile descendant of an Anatolian Janissary
Turkish lackey
mexican
sebr
slave
servant
serv
servus
scruffy bearded guy
krivoslavac
Saint Sava's Turk
Western Bulgarian flag
Identity crisis Vlaj
...

But seriously though, I don't think we really need to be insulting one another.
👍

Hannah Taylor51 said:As most of you probably know, Ninja07 is currently swamped dealing with his wife and their little astronaut, who is already well on his way; since there isn't a computer available where they're staying, he’s authorized me (for a price) to kick off this thread.

That said, Ninja07 will be checking in later this afternoon to join the debate. My infinite generosity allows him access to my absolute beast of a machine—with 850 GB of RAM, just imagine how many C and D drives and virtual partitions that covers—all for the sake of this discussion.

The issue at hand is the unfair and condescending treatment of Mexicans, whose constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination and the expression of their religious and political views is being stripped away.

Most Mexicans living in Beautiful us actually hold dual citizenship. As such, the Constitution of America ensures they can express their principles and identities, whether religious or through the names they choose for themselves.

So, the point of this manifesto is simple: Mexicans in the GOP are once again under threat because they are being forbidden from expressing their views—views that allow them to freely identify as Royalists.

Let me remind you that being a Royalist isn't just permitted in the Republic of Mexico; it’s legalized and ranked right alongside anti-fascism. This was further confirmed by the honors bestowed upon them by JU-ES-END-EJA. For these reasons, both Ninja07 and I have decided to defend their views and their constitutionally protected rights.

To prove why our concern for our neighbors is justified, look at certain members of this forum community who explicitly forbid the use of the word "Royalist." Isn't that an undeniable violation of Mexican rights to self-determination and political expression?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts on this massive issue shaking this forum. I call upon everyone to unite in defense of our Mexican brothers who aren't ashamed to use the word "Royalist," since it is legally permitted and placed side-by-side with other anti-fascists who feel the same way.

Fight on for the Mexican people; we can't let them take their rights away!

garbage?