CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › The Cloverfield Paradox (2018)

The Cloverfield Paradox (2018)

Started by Rebecca Scott95 · · 👁 9 views · 59 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rebecca Scott95Grace EdwardsAaron Ward6Lawrence Booth2Rachel Turner2Jessica Morris6Edward Price6bluepuma9Joshua Smith5Gerald Jackson48northerncrane4Jack Murphy5Donna Fowler3Raymond Hillsilvertiger11Amy Johnson2velvethawk8Justin Rogers5Douglas Evans35feralpilot0rustydriverRobert James2Zachary GomezGregory Brown94 …
Gerald Jackson48 Gerald Jackson48 Active Member
125 messages
joined Jun 2018
#41 ·
Robert James2 said:I haven't seen it yet, but if it's anything like 10 Cloverfield lane, then it isn't actually garbage—it’s just not great either.

The movie mostly works for me, though I wasn't a huge fan of how they handled the ending, but I don't want to get too repetitive about my thoughts on the original premise.

To me, it's way more interesting than Cloverfield.

It’s definitely weaker than Lane, which I actually liked because it had a clear structure.

This one just throws everything at the wall and nothing really sticks.
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#42 ·
Gerald Jackson48 said:It’s definitely weaker than Lane, which I actually liked because it had a clear structure.

This one just throws everything at the wall and nothing really sticks.

image
Gerald Jackson48 Gerald Jackson48 Active Member
125 messages
joined Jun 2018
#43 ·
😁 Maybe they’re both good and bad, but hey, at least they’re consistent. Unlike, say...

image
Zachary Gomez Zachary Gomez Member
33 messages
joined Sep 2014
#44 ·
It was pretty pointless, bordering on parody... I ended up turning it off before the end.
Gregory Brown94 Gregory Brown94 Active Member
74 messages
joined Nov 2021
#45 ·
Whatever you guys say, I actually liked this one. It feels like those predictable sci-fi blockbusters from the mid-2000s. It was a fun watch for me. What were you all expecting from this? 2001? Interstellar?
rustydriver rustydriver Member
12 messages
joined Aug 2017
#46 ·
I was honestly hoping for a movie that would actually build on the original, maybe expand the lore or at least try to maintain some semblance of the quality we saw in the first one. And even though that wasn't exactly setting the bar through the roof, it still felt like a masterpiece compared to this absolute joke.
Morgan Peterson Morgan Peterson Member
44 messages
joined Jan 2023
#47 ·
I actually enjoyed it.
It certainly had its merits, and honestly, even if it doesn't tie directly back into the Cloverfield lore, I don't mind the lack of connective tissue. In the original Cloverfield, they were essentially searching for answers by candlelight, so why should this be any different? As a standalone thriller, it wasn't anything groundbreaking, but it worked.
The narrative here actually possesses a sense of progression—a clear beginning, middle, and end. It isn't trying to reinvent the wheel, yet it avoids that tired "been there, done that" feeling; it’s far from boring and manages to throw a few surprises your way. It reminded me most strongly of Event Horizon and Sunshine.
The cast is excellent, even if most of them were relatively unknown to me.
My one grievance—Spoiler:
If I had one complaint, it’s that it could have wrapped up just a few seconds earlier; that jittery, jumping CGI monster was a bit much.

7/10

I'm looking forward to seeing what the future holds—perhaps some Nazis in Cloverfield space? 😁
Nancy Howard4 Nancy Howard4 Active Member
75 messages
joined Sep 2022
#48 ·
Morgan Peterson said:I actually enjoyed it.
It certainly had its merits, and honestly, even if it doesn't tie directly back into the Cloverfield lore, I don't mind the lack of connective tissue. In the original Cloverfield, they were essentially searching for answers by candlelight, so why should this be any different? As a standalone thriller, it wasn't anything groundbreaking, but it worked.
The narrative here actually possesses a sense of progression—a clear beginning, middle, and end. It isn't trying to reinvent the wheel, yet it avoids that tired "been there, done that" feeling; it’s far from boring and manages to throw a few surprises your way. It reminded me most strongly of Event Horizon and Sunshine.
The cast is excellent, even if most of them were relatively unknown to me.
My one grievance—Spoiler:
If I had one complaint, it’s that it could have wrapped up just a few seconds earlier; that jittery, jumping CGI monster was a bit much.

7/10

I'm looking forward to seeing what the future holds—perhaps some Nazis in Cloverfield space? 😁

Zhang Ziyi: Memoirs of a Geisha

Daniel Brühl: The Bourne Ultimatum, The Little Things, Captain America

Elizabeth Debicki: The Great Gatsby, Everest, The man from UNCIT

And the rest are mostly TV actors or voices in video games and cartoons😁
Nancy Howard4 Nancy Howard4 Active Member
75 messages
joined Sep 2022
#49 ·
Honestly, I thought the movie was pretty alright—nothing to write home about, really—but it’s definitely worth a watch. It feels like they didn't dump a massive budget into this one or even try to make the visuals look as mind-blowing as Interstellar
I couldn't stop thinking about whether that monster at the end is actually edible, just some huge chunk of meat, while billions of people down below are literally starving 😁
Edward Price6 Edward Price6 Active Member
97 messages
joined Feb 2017
#50 ·
Nancy Howard4 said:Zhang Ziyi: Memoirs of a Geisha

Daniel Brühl: The Bourne Ultimatum, The Little Things, Captain America

Elizabeth Debicki: The Great Gatsby, Everest, The man from UNCIT

And the rest are mostly TV actors or voices in video games and cartoons😁

Wait, didn't I see Chris O'Dowd in the trailer? He isn't exactly unknown. Especially for fans of British TV. Plus he was in Molly's Game and a few other Hollywood films.
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#51 ·
Edward Price6 said:Wait, didn't I see Chris O'Dowd in the trailer? He isn't exactly unknown. Especially for fans of British TV. Plus he was in Molly's Game and a few other Hollywood films.

Honestly, I see the guy more often sitting on the couch with Graham Norton than I actually see him in movies...
velvetbear372 velvetbear372 Active Member
56 messages
joined Aug 2018
#52 ·
This has nothing to do with my vision for the Cloverfield franchise.

The movie is trash.
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#53 ·
briskhound2 said:Honestly, I see the guy more often sitting on the couch with Graham Norton than I actually see him in movies...

Now you've reminded me where I know him from 🤣
Jessica Morris6 Jessica Morris6 Active Member
195 messages
joined Nov 2022
#54 ·
briskhound2 said:Honestly, I see the guy more often sitting on the couch with Graham Norton than I actually see him in movies...

Check him out in the series Get Shorty. He's absolutely brilliant there... It’s almost like he’s carrying the entire show on his back.
Amy Long64 Amy Long64 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Apr 2016
#55 ·
The movie feels like an episode of The Twilight Zone. On its own, it’s decent—just don't go in expecting a masterpiece. The plot stays engaging and moves quickly. Watching it as part of the Cloverfield space, J. J. Abrams is doing what he does best, which fans of Lost will recognize immediately 🙂. There are three parallel dimensions, a total mindfuck, and we might even get a fourth installment out of WWII. It provides a solid foundation for tying everything in the Cloverfield universe together 😁 🙂.
stormymoose10 stormymoose10 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jun 2023
#56 ·
For those who appreciate the one and only original Cloverfield. Just 4 minutes of all the scenes where the monster actually shows up.

Enjoy 🙂

Cloverfield - Kaiju scenes -


As for this new movie... I haven't sat down to watch it yet, but honestly, just looking at the trailer and the clips floating around YouTube, it looks like total garbage.

To me, Cloverfield (2008) remains the only realistic monster movie out there. That’s how these things—whether they're about monsters or aliens—should actually feel. They shouldn't be played out like Godzilla or King Kong. I think that’s exactly why the original film blew up and became such a hit; it actually had that sense of grounded dread that everyone else is missing. And the worst part? It’s not even that hard to pull off. I’d take a movie like that over something like Transformers or Pacific Rim any day. Those movies feel more like animated cartoons to me; sure, the CGI is great, but from a design and storytelling perspective, the creatures just don't feel believable.
James Perez3 James Perez3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2012
#57 ·
I was skimming through the movie earlier and just stumbled right into some monster scene or something. Is there actually any point in watching the whole thing?
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#58 ·
Nah.
I mean, okay, but only if you've got the flu and you're absolutely stuck in bed.
wearyangler55 wearyangler55 Member
14 messages
joined Feb 2018
#59 ·
Yeah. Look at this!
Ashley Bailey6 Ashley Bailey6 Active Member
208 messages
joined Jun 2013
#60 ·
The movie isn't nearly as bad as the reviews suggest.
It has its moments.

Even the sequel didn't have much to do with the first one; they just took a direction and ran with it, even if it was the wrong one.
I'd love to see a real Cloverfield 2, but sequels aren't necessarily bad when viewed as standalone films.

stormymoose10 said:For those who appreciate the one and only original Cloverfield. Just 4 minutes of all the scenes where the monster actually shows up.

Enjoy 🙂

Cloverfield - Kaiju scenes -


As for this new movie... I haven't sat down to watch it yet, but honestly, just looking at the trailer and the clips floating around YouTube, it looks like total garbage.

To me, Cloverfield (2008) remains the only realistic monster movie out there. That’s how these things—whether they're about monsters or aliens—should actually feel. They shouldn't be played out like Godzilla or King Kong. I think that’s exactly why the original film blew up and became such a hit; it actually had that sense of grounded dread that everyone else is missing. And the worst part? It’s not even that hard to pull off. I’d take a movie like that over something like Transformers or Pacific Rim any day. Those movies feel more like animated cartoons to me; sure, the CGI is great, but from a design and storytelling perspective, the creatures just don't feel believable.

I agree with this.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads